- 1Medical School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
- 2Oncology Medical Center, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
Lung cancer remains one of the malignancies with the highest incidence and mortality rates worldwide, and its treatment continues to pose significant challenges. Metabolic reprogramming, as one of the hallmarks of cancer, supports the abnormal growth, proliferation, invasion, and drug resistance of cancer cells by altering glucose, lipid, and amino acid metabolic pathways, providing both energy and biosynthetic precursors. It has thus become a critical focus in lung cancer research. Circular RNAs (CircRNAs), owing to their unique closed-loop structure and high stability, play important roles in regulating tumor metabolism and progression. This review systematically summarizes the molecular mechanisms through which CircRNAs drive metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer, including the regulation of key metabolic enzymes, influence on metabolism-related signaling pathways, remodeling of the tumor microenvironment, and mediation of epigenetic modifications. Furthermore, CircRNAs demonstrate great potential in clinical applications for lung cancer, not only as biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation but also as promising therapeutic targets. Leveraging their stability and low immunogenicity, the development of CircRNA-based vaccines and targeted delivery systems has opened new avenues for lung cancer immunotherapy. However, challenges remain in the synthesis of CircRNAs, understanding their in vivo metabolism, and achieving multi-target synergistic interventions, which warrant further investigation. This review provides a theoretical foundation for in-depth exploration of the metabolic regulatory network in lung cancer and the development of precise therapeutic strategies, while also highlighting the broad prospects of CircRNAs in translational medicine. We conducted a literature search across databases including PubMed up to 2025, focusing on keywords related to circRNA, lung cancer, and metabolic reprogramming. Ultimately, 161 relevant references were included in this narrative review.
1 Introduction
According to global cancer epidemiological reports, lung cancer ranks among the most common malignant tumors worldwide, with an incidence rate of 12.36% and a mortality rate as high as 17.59%, consistently representing the leading cause of cancer-related disease burden and constituting a major global health challenge (1–3). Although treatment strategies for lung cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and other modalities, the prognosis remains unsatisfactory, with a five-year survival rate of only approximately 20% (4, 5). Current therapeutic approaches face multiple challenges, such as strict limitations on surgical indications, significant side effects associated with chemotherapy, and the tendency of drug treatments to induce resistance. These factors severely constrain treatment efficacy and survival duration in lung cancer patients. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the mechanisms underlying lung cancer development and progression and to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Metabolic reprogramming, by modulating cellular energy metabolism, maintaining redox homeostasis, and regulating intracellular signal transduction, promotes rapid cancer cell growth and proliferation, making it one of the hallmarks of cancer (6, 7). Compared to normal cells, lung cancer cells—including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell lung cancer—exhibit significant alterations in metabolic patterns, characterized by enhanced glycolysis, upregulated amino acid metabolism, and dysregulated lipid metabolism (8). Notably, the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in lung cancer demonstrates high heterogeneity: in certain subtypes, such as adenocarcinoma harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS). OXPHOS activity is not suppressed but instead compensatorily enhanced through increased mitochondrial biogenesis or upregulation of electron transport chain complexes, thereby sustaining tumor stemness and metastatic potential. In other subtypes, however, OXPHOS function is impaired due to microenvironmental hypoxia or suppression by oncogenic signals. This dynamic reprogramming further drives lung cancer progression by meeting the demands for biosynthetic precursors, energy, and redox capacity required for rapid proliferation, invasion, and metastasis (9).
Building upon the aberrant pathways associated with metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer, targeted therapies addressing these dysregulations have become a major research focus. Benefiting from their unique closed-loop structure, CircRNAs are resistant to degradation by Ribonuclease R (RNase R), enabling their stable presence in various tissues (10) and demonstrating relative stability in extracellular environments (11). In recent years, the role of CircRNAs in cancer research has gained increasing prominence. Studies have shown that CircRNAs play important roles in regulating tumor gene expression, including modulating tumor cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis (12, 13). Furthermore, CircRNAs participate in regulating metabolic reprogramming in various cancer cells by altering energy acquisition and utilization mechanisms, thereby influencing the progression of malignant tumors (14–17). For instance, in lung adenocarcinoma, CircRNA_103809 functions as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) by sponging miR-377-3p, thereby relieving its transcriptional repression of hexokinase and lactate dehydrogenase, ultimately driving the glycolytic process (18). Simultaneously, CircRNA_104135 forms a complex with the RNA-binding protein Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) to directly enhance the stability of glutaminase mRNA, consequently activating glutaminolytic metabolism (14). Research in lung squamous cell carcinoma indicates that CircRNA_0007534 upregulates pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase via miR-6855-3p-dependent epigenetic regulation, leading to impaired mitochondrial OXPHOS and a reinforced glycolytic phenotype. Additionally, CircCD36, through its sponge effect on miR-195-5p, significantly elevates the expression level of the lipid transporter CD36, promoting exogenous fatty acid uptake to meet tumor lipid metabolic demands (19). Further analysis in small cell lung cancer reveals that CircRNA_0072088 targets and inhibits miR-338-3p, thereby alleviating its negative regulation of enolase, which accelerates glycolytic flux and sustains rapid tumor proliferation (20). These studies unveil the intricate relationship between CircRNAs and lung cancer metabolic reprogramming. However, the specific mechanisms of CircRNAs in lung cancer metabolic reprogramming have not been fully elucidated, and their potential applications in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation warrant further exploration.
This review aims to systematically explore the roles, mechanisms, and potential clinical applications of Circular RNAs (CircRNAs) in metabolic reprogramming and lung cancer progression. By analyzing the functions and mechanisms of CircRNAs in regulating key metabolic enzymes, modulating metabolism-related signaling pathways, remodeling the tumor microenvironment, and mediating epigenetic modifications, we delve into their potential for clinical applications in lung cancer. This study will provide a novel theoretical foundation and research perspectives for precision medicine in lung cancer, with the goal of developing more effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
In this review, we summarized recent literature retrieved from databases such as PubMed up to 2025. The search strategy combined keywords related to circular RNAs (e.g., “circRNA”, “circular RNA”), lung cancer subtypes (e.g., “NSCLC”, “lung adenocarcinoma”, “SCLC”), and key metabolic processes. Specifically, we used search terms such as “metabolic reprogramming”, “glucose metabolism”, “lipid metabolism”, and “Amino acid metabolism” to capture the diverse metabolic roles of circRNAs. We prioritized the inclusion of high-impact original research and authoritative reviews published within the past five years, with a specific focus on English-language literature that elucidates the mechanisms, functions, and clinical prospects of circRNAs in the metabolic reprogramming of lung cancer. Ultimately, 161 relevant references were included in this narrative review.
2 Overview of circular RNA
CircRNAs are a special class of non-coding RNA molecules. Unlike traditional linear RNAs, CircRNAs are formed through back-splicing, resulting in a closed circular structure that lacks a 5′-cap and a 3′-polyadenylated tail (21). This unique structure confers high stability to CircRNAs, making them resistant to degradation by exonucleases and allowing them to persist in cells for extended periods (22).
Functionally, CircRNAs play key regulatory roles in various pathophysiological processes and exhibit diverse biological significance. Numerous studies have shown that (23, 24)CircRNAs not only act as miRNA sponges—dynamically participating in cholesterol synthesis, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis, thereby serving as critical regulatory nodes—but also play important roles in the following diseases: In cancer, specific CircRNAs drive progression through dual mechanisms. For example, CircHIPK3 sponges oncogenic miR-124 to relieve phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) silencing, promoting hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation (25), while CircPVT1 promotes estrogen receptor-positive breast tumorigenesis and drug resistance by targeting estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS), facilitating cancer progression via ceRNA and protein scaffolding mechanisms (26); In neurodegenerative diseases, aberrantly expressed CircRNAs regulate Tau phosphorylation (e.g., in Alzheimer’s disease) or influence α-synuclein aggregation (e.g., in Parkinson’s disease), thereby disrupting neuronal survival and synaptic function (27, 28). In metabolic disorders, CircRNAs participate in maintaining glucose homeostasis by regulating insulin secretion-related genes (e.g., INSR) or glucose transporter expression (e.g., GLUT4) (29); In the cardiovascular system, CircRNAs modulate the TGF-β/Smad signaling axis to influence myocardial fibrosis and vascular remodeling processes (30). These multidimensional regulatory mechanisms highlight the broad and significant biological roles of CircRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets within complex disease networks. miRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression through post-transcriptional mechanisms. Their core function relies on sequence-specific binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target mRNAs, leading to translational repression or mRNA degradation, thereby achieving gene silencing (31). During tumorigenesis and cancer progression, miRNAs exhibit a “molecular double-edged sword” characteristic: tumor-suppressive miRNAs (e.g., the let-7 family) effectively inhibit tumor cell proliferation and metastasis by silencing oncogenic networks such as K-RAS and c-Myc (32, 33), while oncomiRs (e.g., miR-21) drive malignancy progression in cancers such as breast and liver cancer by repressing tumor suppressors including PTEN and TPM1 (34–36). Mechanistic studies further reveal that miR-124 significantly inhibits the invasive ability of liver cancer cells by negatively regulating the epigenetic modifier EZH2, and miR-34a induces G1 phase arrest and activates p53-dependent apoptosis by directly binding to the 3′-UTRs of cell cycle regulators such as MYC and CDC25A (37–39). These findings systematically illustrate the central role of miRNAs in constructing multi-layer regulatory networks involved in tumor initiation, differentiation, and remodeling of the metastatic microenvironment (40). Notably, miRNA expression profiles are closely associated with molecular subtypes of tumors, treatment sensitivity, and prognosis evaluation, providing a theoretical basis for the development of liquid biopsy biomarkers and RNA interference-based therapies (41). The canonical function of circRNAs is acting as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs). By specifically binding to microRNAs (miRNAs) and inhibiting their regulatory effects on target genes, circRNAs indirectly modulate gene expression (42). Additionally, circRNAs can directly interact with circRNA-binding proteins (cRBPs) to regulate gene functions (43). Recent studies have demonstrated that certain circRNAs containing internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) or N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications can serve as templates for translation, thereby encoding functional proteins or peptides. Furthermore, some circRNAs participate directly in transcriptional regulation (43). For instance, the nuclear-localized circFGFR1 inhibits the transcription of its host gene by forming an RNA-DNA triplex structure (R-loop) within the promoter region (44). (as shown in Figure 1).
Figure 1. Overview of CircRNA. This figure summarizes the biogenesis, functions, and role in lung cancer of CircRNAs. They form stable closed loops through back-splicing of pre-mRNA. CircRNAs function as ceRNAs to sequester miRNAs and regulate gene expression; they also bind RNA-binding proteins to modulate gene function; some serve as templates for protein/peptide translation; a subset can directly participate in transcriptional regulation. Through these mechanisms, circRNAs broadly regulate processes such as proliferation, metabolism, and metastasis in lung cancer. Image was created with Figdraw.
With the continuous advancement of high-throughput sequencing technologies and bioinformatic analytical methods, an increasing number of CircRNAs have been identified and characterized (45). These CircRNAs exhibit unique biological functions in the development and progression of diseases. In the context of cancer, Long et al. (46)revealed that circ_0007379 acts as a scaffold to facilitate the processing of pri-miR-320a and pre-miR-320a in a KSRP-dependent manner, leading to enhanced maturation of miR−320a, which subsequently suppresses the expression of the transcription factor RUNX1, thereby inhibiting colorectal cancer progression. Fang et al. (47)demonstrated that EIF4E-mediated biogenesis of circPHF14 promotes the growth and metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Additionally, Chen et al. (48) found that circZNF707 facilitates lung cancer progression by sponging miR-668-3p, resulting in the upregulation of PFKM.
3 Metabolic reprogramming and lung cancer progression
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates (49). It is primarily classified into two types: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC is the most prevalent subtype, accounting for 85–90% of all lung cancer cases. NSCLC consists of several histological subtypes, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), and large cell lung cancer (LCLC) (50).
Tumor metabolic reprogramming refers to the adaptation of metabolic processes by cancer cells to meet the high energy demands of rapid proliferation. Research in this field dates back to the 1920s, when German biochemist Otto Warburg first described the tendency of tumor cells to generate energy via glycolysis even under oxygen-replete conditions—a phenomenon termed the “Warburg effect” (51–53). However, subsequent studies have revealed that (54–56) the Warburg effect and OXPHOS can be simultaneously upregulated in certain tumor cells. While relying on glycolysis for rapid energy supply, these cells retain and enhance the OXPHOS pathway. Consequently, OXPHOS generates substantial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to fuel energy-intensive processes such as tumor invasion and metastasis.
Metabolic plasticity enables tumor cells to tailor their bioenergetics to specific stages of progression. In the invasive phase, cells rely heavily on fatty acid oxidation (FAO). Upregulated transporters increase fatty acid uptake for β-oxidation and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle entry, generating ATP via mitochondrial respiration to power migration. Furthermore, FAO intermediates contribute to membrane remodeling, optimizing adhesion and detachment dynamics (57). In contrast, during metastatic colonization—particularly in the oxygen-rich environment of the lung—tumor cells shift toward glutamine metabolism. Through high transporter expression, glutamine is converted to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) that fuels the TCA cycle. This process supports both energy generation and macromolecule biosynthesis, while the byproduct ammonia helps maintain intracellular pH homeostasis in the new environment (58).
In summary, tumor metabolic reprogramming is characterized by significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity and context dependency. Tumor cells do not rely on a static metabolic profile; instead, they adaptively tailor their metabolic networks to meet distinct microenvironmental conditions and functional requirements. This plasticity involves the co-activation of glycolysis and OXPHOS, as well as the selective engagement of fatty acid oxidation or glutamine metabolism at specific stages, providing the energy and substrates necessary for survival and spread. Thus, metabolic reprogramming serves as a fundamental hallmark that underpins lung cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance (59, 60).(as shown in Figure 2).
Figure 2. Metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer. This figure describes the hallmarks of metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer cells. Key features include enhanced aerobic glycolysis for rapid energy production (the Warburg effect) even under oxygen-sufficient conditions, alongside altered lipid and amino acid metabolism to meet biosynthetic demands. These interconnected metabolic alterations collectively drive malignant progression and reshape the tumor microenvironment. Image was created with Figdraw.
3.1 Glucose metabolism and lung cancer
Glucose metabolism is a fundamental physiological process essential for sustaining life, comprising both catabolism and anabolism. In catabolism, glycolysis converts glucose into pyruvate within the cytoplasm. Under anaerobic conditions, pyruvate is reduced to lactate, whereas under aerobic conditions, it enters the mitochondria and converts to acetyl-CoA to fuel the TCA cycle—the common pathway for complete substrate oxidation and substantial ATP generation (61). Regarding anabolism, glycogenesis polymerizes glucose to store energy via enzymatic reactions (62), while glycogenolysis functions in reverse to rapidly release glucose for blood glucose homeostasis (63). Additionally, gluconeogenesis synthesizes glucose from non-carbohydrate precursors to ensure energy supply during specific physiological states (64). These interconnected pathways are precisely regulated through mechanisms such as allosteric modulation, covalent modification, and hormonal control of key enzymes. This coordination adapts glucose metabolism to the organism’s varying energy and metabolic demands, ensuring normal physiological function.
Reprogramming of glucose metabolism is a hallmark of lung cancer. Lung cancer cells exhibit the “Warburg effect”, prioritizing glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen (65). Enhanced glycolytic flux enables rapid glucose uptake and its conversion to lactate, accompanied by limited ATP production (66). Beyond fueling rapid tumor proliferation, this process supplies abundant metabolic intermediates for biosynthesis. For instance, the pentose phosphate pathway derives ribose for nucleic acid synthesis, while glycolytic intermediates serve as precursors for amino acid and fatty acid synthesis (67). In the context of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Wang et al. (68) demonstrated via immunohistochemistry that protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type H (PTPRH) upregulates glycolysis-related proteins (GLUT1, HK2, PKM2, and LDHA), thereby promoting tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), a common subtype of NSCLC, has been shown to be influenced by potassium channel activity. Lin et al. (69)reported that the acid-sensitive potassium channel 1 (KCNK3) suppresses cancer cell proliferation and glucose metabolism by activating the AMPK-TXNIP pathway in LUAD cells. Furthermore, Wang et al. (70) revealed that knocking down SLC2A1 expression in LUAD cells significantly impairs glucose transport, consumption, and lactate secretion, highlighting its pivotal role in glycolysis. Collectively, these findings suggest that targeting shared regulatory nodes linking glucose metabolism to lung cancer pathology—particularly in NSCLC and LUAD—may offer a promising strategy for modulating glucose metabolism and improving therapeutic outcomes.
3.2 Lipid metabolism and lung cancer
Lipid metabolism encompasses the digestion, absorption, synthesis, and breakdown of lipids—including fats, phospholipids, sphingolipids, and cholesteryl esters—in living organisms (71). Triglycerides are primarily synthesized in the liver via the monoacylglycerol and diacylglycerol pathways using products derived from glucose metabolism. Fatty acid synthesis occurs in the cytoplasm, starting from acetyl-CoA as the substrate (72). In catabolic pathways, triglyceride mobilization is catalyzed by hormone-sensitive lipase, while fatty acids are oxidized through β-oxidation and other pathways to generate energy. Unsaturated fatty acids undergo specific oxidative processes, and under certain conditions, the liver produces ketone bodies to supply extrahepatic tissues (73). These pathways work in concert to maintain lipid homeostasis, and dysregulation at any step may lead to various health disorders.
In addition to glucose reprogramming, lung cancer cells undergo profound changes in lipid metabolism to support membrane biogenesis, signaling, and energy storage (74). This is achieved by upregulating fatty acid uptake transporters and activating de novo synthesis pathways (75). Furthermore, tumor cells flexibly adjust lipid enzyme activity and metabolic flux to facilitate growth and dissemination. For instance, Xu et al. (76)demonstrated that miR-365-3p suppresses CPT1A expression by targeting its 3′-untranslated region in lung cancer cells, leading to increased lipid droplet accumulation, reduced ATP production, and decreased fatty acid oxidation, ultimately regulating cell proliferation and migration. Similarly, Wang et al. (77)identified CCAAT enhancer-binding protein δ (C/EBPδ) as a key lipid regulator. By recruiting nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (NCOA3), C/EBPδ transcriptionally activates Slug (a classic EMT transcription factor), which induces the expression of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) receptor-1 (Lox1) and enhances oxLDL uptake to promote metastasis. Additionally, using multi-omics approaches and lung epithelial-specific Cpt1a-knockout mouse models, Ma et al. (78)confirmed that CPT1A, the rate-limiting enzyme of FAO, collaborates with L-carnitine derived from tumor-associated macrophages to drive ferroptosis resistance and CD8+T cell inactivation in lung cancer. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms linking lipid metabolism to lung cancer may provide a theoretical basis for developing innovative therapeutic strategies targeting key lipid metabolic regulators.
3.3 Amino acid metabolism and lung cancer
Amino acid metabolism is a critical physiological process encompassing both anabolism and catabolism. In terms of anabolism, non-essential amino acids are synthesized endogenously via pathways such as transamination and reductive amination, whereas essential amino acids must be acquired through dietary intake. During catabolism, amino acids initially undergo deamination to yield ammonia and corresponding α-keto acids. Ammonia is primarily converted into urea in the liver via the urea cycle (ornithine cycle) and excreted to maintain nitrogen balance. Meanwhile, the resulting α-keto acids serve as substrates for gluconeogenesis, ketogenesis, or OXPHOS supplying energy and biosynthetic raw materials (79). Collectively, this precisely regulated system is essential for sustaining vital life activities, regulating physiological functions and systemic homeostasis.
Amino acid metabolism also plays a pivotal role in lung cancer progression, with tumor cells exhibiting an increased demand for specific amino acids. Using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), Sun et al. (80)analyzed 23 amino acids in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from lung cancer patients. Their results, validated through partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), Shapiro-Wilk tests, and Bonferroni correction, revealed significantly elevated serine levels in the lung cancer group. Serine serves not only as a nitrogen source for multiple biosynthetic pathways but also enters the TCA cycle to support energy production (81). Lung cancer cells enhance serine uptake by upregulating serine transporter expression. Concurrently, key enzymes involved in serine metabolism undergo adaptive changes, enabling efficient utilization of serine in support of tumor metabolic reprogramming (82).
Furthermore, glutamine plays a central role in the metabolic reprogramming of lung cancer cells. As the most abundant free amino acid in cells, glutamine serves not only as a critical substrate for protein and nucleotide synthesis but also as a key regulator of intracellular redox homeostasis (83, 84). Huang et al. (85)demonstrated that glutamine blockade using 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (JHU083) significantly potentiates the efficacy of an EGFR peptide vaccine (EVax) in controlling EGFR-driven lung cancer. This blockade enhances immunoprevention by promoting the infiltration of anti-tumor CD8+T cells and Th1 cells while reducing immunosuppressive cell populations. Additionally, Liu et al. (86)revealed that cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF)-specific long non-coding RNA LINC01614, packaged in CAF-derived exosomes, directly interacts with ANXA2 and p65 to promote NF-κB activation. This leads to upregulation of the glutamine transporters SLC38A2 and SLC7A5, enhances glutamine uptake in cancer cells, and ultimately contributes to an unfavorable prognosis in LUAD.
In summary, amino acid metabolism plays a crucial role in lung cancer progression. Further elucidation of the regulatory mechanisms linking additional amino metabolic pathways to lung cancer may open up novel and effective therapeutic avenues for precision treatment of this malignancy.
4 CircRNA and metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer
In recent years, CircRNAs, as rising stars in the non-coding RNA family, have been demonstrated to play indispensable regulatory roles in the progression of numerous diseases—from autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases to osteoarticular disorders (87)—and particularly in cancer (88). Through summarizing and analyzing current literature on the mechanisms of CircRNAs in metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer, we aim to elucidate their diverse modes of action and impacts on lung cancer progression, thereby exploring the enigmatic functions of CircRNAs in the metabolic landscape of lung cancer. Differentially expressed CircRNAs in NSCLC and other lung cancer cells mediate biological effects ranging from modulating the expression levels of key intracellular enzymes and metabolically relevant signaling pathways to remodeling the metabolic tumor microenvironment. This extensive regulatory network, spanning both intracellular and extracellular processes, compellingly directs our attention to these molecular messengers in this microscopic world (89, 90).(as shown in Figure 3).
Figure 3. CircRNA in lung cancer metabolic reprogramming. This figure illustrates the multi-layered regulatory network through which CircRNAs drive metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer. CircRNAs coordinately alter the metabolic state of cancer cells by regulating key metabolic enzymes, modulating related signaling pathways, remodeling the tumor microenvironment, and mediating epigenetic modifications, thereby promoting tumor proliferation and adaptation. Image was created with Figdraw.
4.1 CircRNA regulates the expression of key enzymes in metabolism
In lung cancer cells, circRNAs such as CircZNF707 and CircHIPK3 play a crucial role in regulating the expression of key metabolic enzymes. Mostly by altering the expression levels and activity of metabolic enzymes such as PFKM and HK2, they can meet the energy and material demands for rapid proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of lung cancer cells (91). But how exactly do circRNAs exert their regulatory functions in lung cancer cells? Further studies have revealed that circRNAs can participate in the regulation of key metabolic enzyme expression through multiple mechanisms. On one hand, circRNAs can act as molecular sponges to adsorb microRNAs (miRNAs), thereby alleviating the inhibitory effect of miRNAs on the mRNA of key metabolic enzymes and promoting their expression. For example, CircZNF707 competitively binds to miR-668-3p, upregulates PFKM expression, promotes glycolysis, and enhances the proliferation, migration, and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells (48); Researchers such as Gu et al. found that CircHIPK3, by adsorbing miR-381-3p, relieves the negative regulation of HK2 by miR-381-3p, upregulates HK2 expression, modulates glycolytic metabolism, and promotes lung cancer cell proliferation and migration (92); Similarly, CircSHKBP1 upregulates PKM2 expression by sponging miR-1294, mediating glycolysis and promoting the growth and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer cells (93); Likewise, CircEHD2 adsorbs miR-3186-3p, upregulates HK2 expression, and facilitates glycolysis and the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells (94); Moreover, Circ_UBE2C captures miR-107, alleviating its inhibition of HK2 and upregulating HK2 expression, thereby promoting glycolysis and lung cancer cell proliferation (95); It is noteworthy that some circRNAs exhibit more complex regulatory hierarchies. For instance, CircSLC25A16 can activate LDHA and promote its transcription through the miR-488-3p/HIF1α/LDHA signaling axis, enhancing glycolysis while significantly promoting the spread of non-small cell lung cancer (96); Meanwhile, Circ0000518 upregulates SLC1A5 expression by modulating the miR-330-3p/SLC1A5 axis, regulating glutamine metabolism and promoting the progression of non-small cell lung cancer (97). On the other hand, as a special class of non-coding RNAs, circRNAs can interact with specific proteins to regulate the expression of key metabolic enzymes. For example, CircP4HB binds to PKM2 and subsequently upregulates its expression by enhancing tetramer formation, promoting tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma (98); Researchers such as Li et al. found that CircACC1 binds to the β and γ subunits of AMPK, stabilizing AMPK and enhancing its activity, promoting fatty acid β-oxidation and glucose metabolism while inhibiting lipid synthesis, thereby regulating metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer cells (99). Additionally, circRNAs can directly influence transcription and translation processes to regulate the expression of key metabolic enzymes. For instance, CircRARS positively regulates LDHA activity and expression at the transcriptional level, promoting glycolysis and the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells (100). In summary, in lung cancer tissues, these circRNAs directly or indirectly regulate the expression of key metabolic enzymes through various molecular mechanisms, promoting metabolism such as glycolysis, which serves as the primary nutrient source for the proliferation and spread of lung cancer cells.(as shown in Figure 3 and Table 1).
4.2 CircRNA affects metabolic signaling pathways
In addition to influencing the metabolic processes of lung cancer cells by regulating the expression of key metabolic enzymes, circRNAs can also mediate metabolism-related signaling pathways such as PI3K, MAPK, and Wnt/β-catenin to modulate various metabolic processes in lung cancer cells, thereby regulating metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer. The PI3K pathway plays a crucial role in the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, metastasis, and immune regulation of lung cancer cells, making it one of the key signaling pathways involved in the development and targeted therapy of lung cancer (101). Researchers have found that CircVAPA can activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway by regulating the miR-377-3p/IGF1R axis and the miR-494-3p/IGF1R axis, thereby modulating small cell lung cancer (102). For instance, Circ_0000376 inhibits the activity of the PI3K/PKB signaling pathway by downregulating the levels of phosphorylated PI3K and PKB, thereby suppressing the progression of non-small cell lung cancer (103). Circ-PLCD1, on the other hand, can adsorb miR-375 and miR-1179 and increase PTEN expression, thereby inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and acting as a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer (104). Additionally, miR-760 overexpression attenuates the regulatory effects of Circ_0008594 on the functions of H23 and H460 cells as well as the PI3K/AKT pathway. Therefore, Circ_0008594 promotes the development of non-small cell lung cancer by regulating the miR-760-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway (105).
The MAPK signaling pathway connects extracellular signals to cellular functions such as development, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis. Abnormalities in the MAPK pathway can lead to cancer development (106). Circ0001313, Circ-ZKSCAN1, and others can mediate the MAPK signaling pathway to regulate the proliferation and development of lung cancer. For example, Circ0001313 competitively binds with miR-452, upregulates HMGB3 levels, and attenuates the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting the proliferation and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells (107). Meanwhile, some scholars have found that Circ-ZKSCAN1, by adsorbing miR-330-5p, upregulates FAM83A expression, thereby inhibiting the MAPK signaling transduction pathway and further promoting the progression of non-small cell lung cancer (108).
Aberrations in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway are not only a critical factor in the development and progression of lung cancer but also regulate cancer stem cell properties, invasion, and metastasis (109). Certain circRNAs can also mediate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and other metabolism-related pathways to regulate lung cancer progression. For instance, CircFBXW7 can be translated into a short peptide, circFBXW7-185aa, which, after epigenetic modification, interacts with β-catenin, leading to its ubiquitination and degradation. This process mediates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and modulates the progression of lung adenocarcinoma (110). Furthermore, circRNAs such as CircERI3 and CircACC1 can participate in regulating other signaling pathways, including mitochondrial metabolism and glucose metabolism, thereby providing necessary nutrients and energy support for the growth and migration of lung cancer cells. Specifically, CircERI3 interacts with DDB1, modulates its ubiquitination process, and enhances its stability, thereby promoting peroxisome proliferation, influencing mitochondrial function and metabolism, and ultimately driving lung cancer proliferation (111). Circ_0047921 mediates the miR-1287-5p/LARP1 signaling pathway, enhances glucose metabolism, and significantly promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells (112). Additionally, researchers such as Li et al. found that CircACC1 directly binds to AMPK subunits, stabilizing and enhancing AMPK activity, which coordinates fatty acid β-oxidation and glucose metabolism while promoting lung cancer proliferation (99). It is noteworthy that some circRNAs can mediate multiple metabolic pathways simultaneously, rather than just one. For example, Circ-ZKSCAN1 not only promotes non-small cell lung cancer proliferation by adsorbing miR-330-5p and mediating the MAPK signaling pathway but also facilitates lung adenocarcinoma proliferation by regulating the miR-185-5p/TAGLN2 axis (108, 113).(as shown in Figure 3 and Table 2).
4.3 CircRNA reshapes the tumor microenvironment
The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises cellular components such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells, as well as non-cellular components including the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cytokines (114). During the development and progression of lung cancer, significant changes occur in the TME of lung cancer tissues, including alterations in cellular components, remodeling of the ECM, changes in cytokines, and metabolic reprogramming, which collectively provide the driving force for the proliferation and migration of lung cancer cells (115). CircRNAs contribute substantially to the remodeling of the TME, thereby creating favorable conditions for the growth, invasion, and metastasis of lung cancer cells (116). For instance, CircNOX4 upregulates fibroblast activation protein (FAP) via the miR-329-5p/FAP axis, increasing the expression of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). This enhances the glycolytic capacity and lactate secretion of CAFs, providing energy and synthetic precursors for tumor cells, thereby promoting angiogenesis, inflammatory responses, and metastasis, ultimately influencing the growth and metastasis of NSCLC (117). Extracellular vesicle-carried CircMYBL1 can modulate CD44 expression in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs), promoting adhesion between cancer cells and endothelial cells and facilitating pulmonary metastasis of adenoid cystic carcinoma (118). Moreover, circRNAs can modulate the functions of key immune cells, such as T cells and macrophages, either directly or through exosome-mediated mechanisms, thereby fostering an immunosuppressive TME in lung cancer. On one hand, circRNAs suppress T cell activity and infiltration. For instance, Wei et al. (119) demonstrated that circFNDC3B binds to transcription factor II-I (TFII-I) to downregulate the chemokines CXCL10 and CXCL11, consequently restricting CD8+T cell infiltration in NSCLC tissues. Similarly, circUSP7 induces CD8+T cell dysfunction via the miR-934/SHP2 axis, leading to resistance against anti-PD-1 therapy (120). On the other hand, circRNAs are pivotal in regulating macrophage polarization. Studies have shown that circATP9A and exosomal circPLEKHM1 (under hypoxic conditions) can facilitate macrophage polarization toward the pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype via extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery, thereby driving lung cancer progression and metastasis (121, 122). CircRNAs can also facilitate the invasion and metastasis of lung cancer cells by breaking through ECM constraints via regulation of ECM remodeling. For example, under hypoxic conditions, Circ_0007386 enhances its circularization through YAP1-EIF4A3 interaction, subsequently affecting ECM remodeling via the miR-383-5p/CIRBP axis (123). Meanwhile, CircRNAs play a significant role in modulating cytokines. CircNOX4, through the miR-329-5p/FAP axis, upregulates FAP and promotes the secretion of cytokines such as IL-6 and CCL2, thereby fostering a pro-metastatic inflammatory microenvironment and further promoting the growth and metastasis of NSCLC (117). Additionally, some CircRNAs can alter the tumor metabolic microenvironment of lung cancer by regulating metabolism. For instance, Circ_0008928 promotes glycolytic metabolism through the miR-488/HK2 axis, remodeling the glucose metabolic microenvironment and facilitating the growth and migration of NSCLC cells (124). Furthermore, researchers such as Xue et al. found that Circ-LDLRAD3 promotes glutamine transport and metabolism by regulating the miR-137/SLC1A5 axis, reshaping the amino acid metabolic microenvironment in lung cancer. This not only provides nitrogen sources and energy for lung cancer cells but also participates in amino acid synthesis, supporting the biosynthetic and energy metabolism required for lung cancer cell proliferation, thereby promoting lung cancer progression (125). In summary, CircRNAs remodel the tumor microenvironment through diverse pathways, involving both cellular and non-cellular components, creating favorable conditions for the proliferation and metastasis of lung cancer cells.(as shown in Figure 3 and Table 3).
4.4 CircRNA regulates epigenetic modification
Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA-mediated gene regulation, represent a reversible and heritable mode of influencing gene expression (126). In the metabolic reprogramming of lung cancer, the regulation of epigenetic modifications by circRNAs is of great significance, as they exert regulatory roles at multiple levels such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and RNA modifications. Lung cancer tissues exhibit significantly abnormal histone acetylation, with promoter hypermethylation commonly observed in early stages leading to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, while promoter hypomethylation or loss of methylation is more frequent in advanced stages (127). Some circRNAs can regulate metabolism through epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling, thereby promoting the proliferation and invasion of lung cancer cells (127). For instance, CircTFF1 upregulates DNMT3A via the miR-29c-3p/DNMT3A axis, promoting BCL6B promoter methylation and suppressing its transcription. As BCL6B is a transcriptional repressor, its downregulation alleviates the transcriptional repression of various metabolism-related genes, thereby remodeling the metabolic network of lung cancer cells and providing energy and nutrients for their proliferation, migration, and invasion (128). In NSCLC, upregulation of Circ_0077837 reduces PTEN expression and increases PTEN gene methylation, thereby inhibiting apoptosis in lung cancer cells (129). CircRNAs can also regulate lung cancer metabolism through RNA modifications. For example, CircERI3 undergoes increased nuclear export via 5-methyladenosine modification, enhancing DDB1 stability and promoting PGC-1α transcription, thereby altering mitochondrial energy metabolism and facilitating lung cancer development (111). Similarly, CircNOTCH1 regulates the NOTCH1 pathway by modulating m6A methylation, indirectly influencing glycolysis and promoting NSCLC cell growth (130). Additionally, CircVMP1 mediates the miR-524-5p/METTL3 axis by regulating m6A modification, promoting the progression of NSCLC (131). Beyond DNA methylation and RNA modifications, circRNAs in lung cancer tissues also regulate histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. For example, CircNDUFB2 inhibits NSCLC progression by enhancing the ubiquitination and degradation of IGF2BP (132). Meanwhile, CircEPB41L2 can bind to the RRM1 domain of PTBP1 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIP12, promoting polyubiquitination and degradation of PTBP1, thereby inhibiting glucose uptake and lactate production, and subsequently suppressing NSCLC progression and metastasis (133). Conversely, CircDCUN1D4 forms a CircDCUN1D4/HuR/TXNIP RNA-protein ternary complex, stabilizing TXNIP expression, which inhibits glucose uptake and glycolysis, as well as the metastasis of lung cancer cells (134). The regulation of epigenetic modifications by circRNAs in lung cancer tissues constitutes a complex and precise network involving DNA methylation, histone modifications, and other mechanisms. This network not only influences the metabolism of lung cancer cells but also remodels the tumor microenvironment, promoting their proliferation and invasion.(as shown in Figure 3).
5 Clinical application prospects of circRNA
The evolutionarily conserved circRNA family exhibits stable expression differences across various tissues, thereby mediating countless biological functions. Not only can they express proteins like lncRNAs, but their superior circular structure also provides stable properties for in vivo delivery and low immunogenicity (135). To date, the clinical translation of circRNAs primarily includes disease diagnosis, prognosis assessment (136), vaccine development (137, 138), and targeted drug discovery, among other aspects. Owing to their stable expression patterns, we can now detect circRNA types in blood, saliva, and tissues to inform critical clinical decisions such as early disease diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. This has been studied in various diseases, including ophthalmic diseases (139), lung cancer (140), breast cancer (141), colorectal cancer (142), stroke (143), heart failure (144), multiple sclerosis (145), and major depressive disorder (146).
Compared to mRNA vaccines, circRNA vaccines not only offer advantages such as high efficacy, low immunogenicity, high stability, ease of production, and durability but also enable stable protein expression in vivo, triggering a more robust adaptive immune response and higher antibody production. Researchers such as Laura et al. (138)explored the adjuvant activity of circRNA vaccines administered in mice, using CART delivery systems to enhance translational activity. They successfully induced T-cell responses in mice, paving new pathways for clinical cancer immunotherapy. Although the development of such RNA vaccines is still in its early stages and has not yet entered clinical trials, they hold broad therapeutic potential for further translation in areas such as viral infections, cancer treatment, metabolic diseases, and autoimmune disorders (137).
CircRNAs hold promise for applications such as protein replacement therapy, vaccine development, cancer immunotherapy, and gene editing. Their in vivo delivery systems mainly include lipid nanoparticles, exosomes, virus-like particles, and viral vectors (147). For example, exosomes are natural intercellular communication vehicles—small, biocompatible, and innate—making them highly suitable as delivery carriers (148). However, intravenous administration has an extremely short duration, and chemical/biological modifications can extend their half-life (148). Due to the challenges of loading circRNAs into exosomes owing to their unique circular structure, researchers such as Yu et al. (149) constructed the coding DNA of the target circRNA DYM into a lentiviral vector. This vector was used to transfect T cells, enabling accurate and efficient circularization and facilitating large-scale production. Although circRNAs hold immense potential for clinical translation, they still face challenges in synthesis, purification, and delivery systems. Their metabolic processes, efficacy, and distribution in vivo require further exploration (147).
6 Conclusion and outlook
In this review, we summarize the biological roles mediated by differentially expressed circRNAs in lung cancer cells. A growing body of research has highlighted the role of non-coding RNAs in remodeling the tumor microenvironment (150). Among them, circRNAs promote the progression of malignant phenotypes in lung cancer by regulating glycolysis. Recent studies have shown that circRNAs facilitate glycolysis through their sponge effect on miRNAs, thereby promoting the progression of malignant phenotypes in lung cancer (151). Furthermore, circRNAs also regulate the expression of related enzymes. For instance, CircSLC25A16 upregulates LDHA and promotes glycolysis by modulating key glycolytic enzymes, thereby facilitating the initiation and progression of lung cancer (151). The implementation of this mechanism demonstrates that non-coding RNAs have the potential to regulate the mRNA and protein expression of metabolic enzymes or indirectly interact with key factors that modulate the synthesis of metabolic enzymes (150).
CircRNAs can collaborate with other molecules to remodel the tumor microenvironment. For example, circRNAs adsorb miRNAs to regulate the expression of miRNA target genes, thereby participating in the modulation of malignant behaviors and immune escape in various tumor cells, including lung cancer (152). Specifically, circRNAs can influence the regulatory effects of miRNAs on their target genes by binding to miRNAs, making them potential biomarkers (153). To realize this potential, a clear translational pathway emerges, guiding future efforts from validation to application: advancing the clinical validation and standardized detection of key circRNA biomarkers will rely on large-scale prospective studies (136) and the establishment of robust, reproducible liquid biopsy protocols (154); overcoming in vivo delivery hurdles necessitates the development of novel targeted systems, such as engineered nanocarriers, to provide precise therapeutic tools (147); integrating circRNA profiles with multi-omics data to construct prognostic models will chart a new course for precision diagnosis and therapy in lung cancer (155); ultimately, through innovative clinical trials, strategies combining interventions targeting circRNA-mediated metabolic axes with existing treatments hold promise for breaking through therapeutic plateaus and offering new hope to patients (156). Existing research indicates that while circRNAs hold great potential in inhibiting the activity of key metabolic enzymes in metabolic pathways, it is necessary to simultaneously target multiple metabolic pathways or combine interventions in oncogenic signaling pathways to enhance therapeutic efficacy and avoid drug resistance (157). Moreover, studies on circRNAs in lung cancer provide new insights and potential biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis assessment, and treatment of lung cancer (153). Additionally, circRNAs show promise in cancer therapy, including but not limited to the use of RNA interference (RNAi) and CRISPR-Cas9 systems to target specific circRNAs, thereby inhibiting cancer cell proliferation and invasion (158). These advancements offer hope for optimizing clinical prediction and cancer treatment. However, current research on the regulation of cancer metabolic reprogramming by circRNAs also faces many challenges. In recent years, few studies have explored their clinical application as diagnostic cancer biomarkers, and the complexity of experimental methods and difficulties in detection remain limitations that need to be addressed in future research (159).
In summary, our review provides a theoretical foundation for in-depth analysis of the metabolic regulatory network in lung cancer and the development of precision treatment strategies. Research on circRNAs contributes to a better understanding of altered energy metabolism in cancer cells. With advances in biological research, circRNAs are expected to be applied in clinical settings for regulating immunometabolism (158) and multi-target synergistic interventions, thereby contributing to cancer therapy.
Author contributions
SC: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. ML: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Data curation. SL: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Data curation. YS: Writing – review & editing, Funding Acquisition, Supervision. LW: Writing – review & editing, Funding Acquisition, Supervision.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study received funding from the Open Fund Project of the State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Traditional Chinese Medicine Powder and Innovative Drugs (Coconstructed by Province and Ministry) (23PTKF1006). The funder had the following involvement in the study: Writing – review & editing, Funding Acquisition, Supervision.
Conflict of interest
The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1737600/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, and Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
3. Li C, Lei S, Ding L, Xu Y, Wu X, Wang H, et al. Global burden and trends of lung cancer incidence and mortality. Chin Med J (Engl). (2023) 136:1583–90. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002529
4. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer J Clin. (2022) 72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708
5. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA: A Cancer J Clin. (2016) 66:115–32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338
6. Callao V and Montoya E. Toxohormone-like factor from microorganisms with impaired respiration. Science. (1961) 134:2041–2. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3495.2041
7. Kalyanaraman B. Teaching the basics of cancer metabolism: Developing antitumor strategies by exploiting the differences between normal and cancer cell metabolism. Redox Biol. (2017) 12:833–42. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.018
8. Li X, Liu M, Liu H, and Chen J. Tumor metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer progression. Oncol Lett. (2022) 24:287. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13407
9. Pavlova NN and Thompson CB. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. (2016) 23:27–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006
10. Lin W, Ye H, You K, and Chen L. Up-regulation of circ_LARP4 suppresses cell proliferation and migration in ovarian cancer by regulating miR-513b-5p/LARP4 axis. Cancer Cell Int. (2020) 20:5. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-1071-z
11. Li Y, Zheng Q, Bao C, Li S, Guo W, Zhao J, et al. Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Cell Res. (2015) 25:981–4. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.82
12. Huang X, Li Z, Zhang Q, Wang W, Li B, Wang L, et al. Circular RNA AKT3 upregulates PIK3R1 to enhance cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer via miR-198 suppression. Mol Cancer. (2019) 18:71. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0969-3
13. Cao J, Zhang X, Xu P, et al. Circular RNA circLMO7 acts as a microRNA-30a-3p sponge to promote gastric cancer progression via the WNT2/β-catenin pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2021) 40:6. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01791-9
14. Zhou J, Zhang S, Chen Z, He Z, Xu Y, and Li Z. CircRNA-ENO1 promoted glycolysis and tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma through upregulating its host gene ENO1. Cell Death Dis. (2019) 10:885. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2127-7
15. Yang F, Hu A, Guo Y, Wang J, Li D, Wang X, et al. p113 isoform encoded by CUX1 circular RNA drives tumor progression via facilitating ZRF1/BRD4 transactivation. Mol Cancer. (2021) 20:123. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01421-8
16. Cao L, Wang M, Dong Y, Xu B, Chen J, Ding Y, et al. Circular RNA circRNF20 promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis and Warburg effect through miR-487a/HIF-1α/HK2. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:145. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2336-0
17. Zhang Y, Zhao L, Yang S, Cen Y, Zhu T, Wang L, et al. CircCDKN2B-AS1 interacts with IMP3 to stabilize hexokinase 2 mRNA and facilitate cervical squamous cell carcinoma aerobic glycolysis progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2020) 39:281. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01793-7
18. Xiong S, Li D, Wang D, Huang L, Liang G, Wu Z, et al. Circular RNA MYLK promotes glycolysis and proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells by sponging miR-195-5p and increasing glucose transporter member 3 expression. Cancer Manag Res. (2020) 12:5469–78. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S257386
19. Wu W, Xi W, Li H, Yang M, and Yao X. Circular RNA circ−ACACA regulates proliferation, migration and glycolysis in non−small−cell lung carcinoma via miR−1183 and PI3K/PKB pathway. Int J Mol Med. (2020) 45:1814–24. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4549
20. Xu Y, Jiang T, Wu C, and Zhang Y. CircAKT3 inhibits glycolysis balance in lung cancer cells by regulating miR-516b-5p/STAT3 to inhibit cisplatin sensitivity. Biotechnol Lett. (2020) 42:1123–35. doi: 10.1007/s10529-020-02846-9
21. Xu F, Xiao Q, Du WW, Wang S, and Yang BB. CircRNA: functions, applications and prospects. Biomolecules. (2024) 14:1503. doi: 10.3390/biom14121503
22. Pu Z, Xu M, Yuan X, Xie H, and Zhao J. Circular RNA circCUL3 Accelerates the Warburg Effect Progression of Gastric Cancer through Regulating the STAT3/HK2 Axis. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. (2020) 22:310–8. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.08.023
23. Chen W, Xu J, Wu Y, Liang B, Yan M, Sun C, et al. The potential role and mechanism of circRNA/miRNA axis in cholesterol synthesis. Int J Biol Sci. (2023) 19:2879–96. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.84994
24. Dori M and Bicciato S. Integration of bioinformatic predictions and experimental data to identify circRNA-miRNA associations. Genes (Basel). (2019) 10:642. doi: 10.3390/genes10090642
25. Chen G, Shi Y, Liu M, and Sun J. circHIPK3 regulates cell proliferation and migration by sponging miR-124 and regulating AQP3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. (2018) 9:175. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0204-3
26. Yi J, Wang L, Hu GS, Zhang YY, Du J, Ding JC, et al. CircPVT1 promotes ER-positive breast tumorigenesis and drug resistance by targeting ESR1 and MAVS. EMBO J. (2023) 42:e112408. doi: 10.15252/embj.2022112408
27. Dube U, Del-Aguila JL, Li Z, Budde JP, Jiang S, Hsu S, et al. An atlas of cortical circular RNA expression in Alzheimer disease brains demonstrates clinical and pathological associations. Nat Neurosci. (2019) 22:1903–12. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0501-5
28. Bougea A and Stefanis L. microRNA and circRNA in Parkinson’s Disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Adv Clin Chem. (2023) 115:83–133. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2023.03.002
29. Stoll L, Sobel J, Rodriguez-Trejo A, Guay C, Lee K, Venø MT, et al. Circular RNAs as novel regulators of β-cell functions in normal and disease conditions. Mol Metab. (2018) 9:69–83. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.01.010
30. Werfel S, Nothjunge S, Schwarzmayr T, Strom TM, Meitinger T, and Engelhardt S. Characterization of circular RNAs in human, mouse and rat hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. (2016) 98:103–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.07.007
31. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. (2004) 116:281–97. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5
32. Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, Cheng A, et al. RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell. (2005) 120:635–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.014
33. Lee YS and Dutta A. The tumor suppressor microRNA let-7 represses the HMGA2 oncogene. Genes Dev. (2007) 21:1025–30. doi: 10.1101/gad.1540407
34. Asangani IA, Rasheed SA, Nikolova DA, Leupold JH, Colburn NH, Post S, et al. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. (2008) 27:2128–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210856
35. Zhu S, Wu H, Wu F, Nie D, Sheng S, and Mo YY. MicroRNA-21 targets tumor suppressor genes in invasion and metastasis. Cell Res. (2008) 18:350–9. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.24
36. Meng F, Henson R, Wehbe-Janek H, Ghoshal K, Jacob ST, and Patel T. MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Gastroenterology. (2007) 133:647–58. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.022
37. Lu Y, Yue X, Cui Y, Zhang J, and Wang K. MicroRNA-124 suppresses growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting STAT3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2013) 441:873–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.157
38. He L, He X, Lim LP, de Stanchina E, Xuan Z, Liang Y, et al. A microRNA component of the p53 tumour suppressor network. Nature. (2007) 447:1130–4. doi: 10.1038/nature05939
39. Chang TC, Wentzel EA, Kent OA, Ramachandran K, Mullendore M, Lee KH, et al. Transactivation of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and promotes apoptosis. Mol Cell. (2007) 26:745–52. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.010
40. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. (2005) 435:834–8. doi: 10.1038/nature03702
41. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008) 105:10513–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804549105
42. Yang X, Wang J, Li H, Sun Y, and Tong X. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0026123 suppresses ovarian cancer cell metastasis and proliferation through the miR−124−3p/EZH2 signaling pathway. Int J Mol Med. (2021) 47:668–76. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4804
43. Misir S, Wu N, and Yang BB. Specific expression and functions of circular RNAs. Cell Death Differ. (2022) 29:481–91. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00948-7
44. Xu X, Zhang J, Tian Y, Gao Y, Dong X, Chen W, et al. CircRNA inhibits DNA damage repair by interacting with host gene. Mol Cancer. (2020) 19:128. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01246-x
45. Li S, Teng S, Xu J, Su G, Zhang Y, Zhao J, et al. Microarray is an efficient tool for circRNA profiling. Brief Bioinform. (2019) 20:1420–33. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby006
46. Long F, Li L, Xie C, Ma M, Wu Z, Lu Z, et al. Intergenic circRNA circ_0007379 inhibits colorectal cancer progression by modulating miR-320a biogenesis in a KSRP-dependent manner. Int J Biol Sci. (2023) 19:3781–803. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.85063
47. Fang Z, Wu Z, Yu C, Xie Q, Zeng L, and Chen R. EIF4E-mediated biogenesis of circPHF14 promotes the growth and metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Mol Cancer. (2025) 24:56. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02262-5
48. Chen W, Fang S, Wu X, Fang T, Chen Z, Su W, et al. circZNF707 promoted glycolysis and tumor progression through miR-668-3p-PFKM axis in NSCLC. Eur J Med Res. (2025) 30:141. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02359-z
49. Wéber A, Morgan E, Vignat J, Laversanne M, Pizzato M, Rumgay H, et al. Lung cancer mortality in the wake of the changing smoking epidemic: a descriptive study of the global burden in 2020 and 2040. BMJ Open. (2023) 13:e065303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065303
50. Abdelaziz HM, Gaber M, Abd-Elwakil MM, Mabrouk MT, Elgohary MM, Kamel NM, et al. Inhalable particulate drug delivery systems for lung cancer therapy: Nanoparticles, microparticles, nanocomposites and nanoaggregates. J Control Release. (2018) 269:374–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.036
51. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, and Dang CV. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. (2011) 11:325–37. doi: 10.1038/nrc3038
52. Icard P, Shulman S, Farhat D, Steyaert JM, Alifano M, and Lincet H. How the Warburg effect supports aggressiveness and drug resistance of cancer cells? Drug Resist Updat. (2018) 38:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2018.03.001
53. Vaupel P and Multhoff G. Revisiting the Warburg effect: historical dogma versus current understanding. J Physiol. (2021) 599:1745–57. doi: 10.1113/JP278810
54. Mitaishvili E, Feinsod H, David Z, Shpigel J, Fernandez C, Sauane M, et al. The molecular mechanisms behind advanced breast cancer metabolism: warburg effect, OXPHOS, and calcium. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). (2024) 29:99. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2903099
55. Pouysségur J, Marchiq I, Parks SK, Durivault J, Ždralević M, and Vucetic M. Warburg effect” controls tumor growth, bacterial, viral infections and immunity - Genetic deconstruction and therapeutic perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol. (2022) 86:334–46. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.07.004
56. Alberghina L. The warburg effect explained: integration of enhanced glycolysis with heterogeneous mitochondria to promote cancer cell proliferation. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:15787. doi: 10.3390/ijms242115787
57. Zhao H, Yan G, Zheng L, Zhou Y, Sheng H, Wu L, et al. STIM1 is a metabolic checkpoint regulating the invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. (2020) 10:6483–99. doi: 10.7150/thno.44025
58. Bergers G and Fendt SM. The metabolism of cancer cells during metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. (2021) 21:162–80. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00320-2
59. Augert A, Mathsyaraja H, Ibrahim AH, Freie B, Geuenich MJ, Cheng PF, et al. MAX functions as a tumor suppressor and rewires metabolism in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell. (2020) 38:97–114.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.04.016
60. Liu X, Li Z, Wang Z, Liu F, Zhang L, Ke J, et al. Chromatin remodeling induced by ARID1A loss in lung cancer promotes glycolysis and confers JQ1 vulnerability. Cancer Res. (2022) 82:791–804. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0763
61. Chandel NS. Glycolysis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2021) 13:a040535. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040535
62. Wang L, Li J, and Di LJ. Glycogen synthesis and beyond, a comprehensive review of GSK3 as a key regulator of metabolic pathways and a therapeutic target for treating metabolic diseases. Med Res Rev. (2022) 42:946–82. doi: 10.1002/med.21867
63. Paredes-Flores MA, Rahimi N, and Mohiuddin SS. Biochemistry, glycogenolysis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing (2025). Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554417/.
64. Shah A and Wondisford FE. Gluconeogenesis flux in metabolic disease. Annu Rev Nutr. (2023) 43:153–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-061121-091507
65. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. (1956) 123:309–14. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309
66. Xu JQ, Fu YL, Zhang J, Zhang KY, Ma J, Tang JY, et al. Targeting glycolysis in non-small cell lung cancer: Promises and challenges. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:1037341. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1037341
67. Lieu EL, Nguyen T, Rhyne S, and Kim J. Amino acids in cancer. Exp Mol Med. (2020) 52:15–30. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0375-3
68. Wang S, Cheng Z, Cui Y, Xu S, Luan Q, Jing S, et al. PTPRH promotes the progression of non-small cell lung cancer via glycolysis mediated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. J Transl Med. (2023) 21:819. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04703-5
69. Lin G, Lin L, Lin H, Chen W, Chen L, Chen X, et al. KCNK3 inhibits proliferation and glucose metabolism of lung adenocarcinoma via activation of AMPK-TXNIP pathway. Cell Death Discov. (2022) 8:360. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-01152-9
70. Wang Y, Shi S, Ding Y, Wang Z, Liu S, Yang J, et al. Metabolic reprogramming induced by inhibition of SLC2A1 suppresses tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. (2017) 10:10759–69.
71. Bian X, Liu R, Meng Y, Xing D, Xu D, and Lu Z. Lipid metabolism and cancer. J Exp Med. (2021) 218:e20201606. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201606
72. Alves-Bezerra M and Cohen DE. Triglyceride metabolism in the liver. Compr Physiol. (2017) 8:1–8. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170012
73. Zechner R, Zimmermann R, Eichmann TO, Kohlwein SD, Haemmerle G, Lass A, et al. FAT SIGNALS--lipases and lipolysis in lipid metabolism and signaling. Cell Metab. (2012) 15:279–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.018
74. Sangineto M, Villani R, Cavallone F, Romano A, Loizzi D, and Serviddio G. Lipid metabolism in development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). (2020) 12:1419. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061419
75. Mylonis I, Simos G, and Paraskeva E. Hypoxia-inducible factors and the regulation of lipid metabolism. Cells. (2019) 8:214. doi: 10.3390/cells8030214
76. Xu D, Liu B, and Wang L. MiR-365-3p inhibits lung cancer proliferation and migration via CPT1A-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:7076. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91665-x
77. Wang D, Cheng X, Li Y, Guo M, Zhao W, Qiu J, et al. C/EBPδ-Slug-Lox1 axis promotes metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma via oxLDL uptake. Oncogene. (2020) 39:833–48. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-1015-z
78. Ma L, Chen C, Zhao C, Li T, Ma L, Jiang J, et al. Targeting carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1A (CPT1A) induces ferroptosis and synergizes with immunotherapy in lung cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:64. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01772-w
79. Chandel NS. Amino acid metabolism. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2021) 13:a040584. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040584
80. Sun X, Xu M, Ding L, Yang G, Kong J, Zhu Y, et al. The amino acid and carnitine concentration changes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from lung cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. (2022) 20:380. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02850-5
81. Guo D, Bell EH, and Chakravarti A. Lipid metabolism emerges as a promising target for Malignant glioma therapy. CNS Oncol. (2013) 2:289–99. doi: 10.2217/cns.13.20
82. DeNicola GM, Chen PH, Mullarky E, Sudderth JA, Hu Z, Wu D, et al. NRF2 regulates serine biosynthesis in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Genet. (2015) 47:1475–81. doi: 10.1038/ng.3421
84. Cluntun AA, Lukey MJ, Cerione RA, and Locasale JW. Glutamine metabolism in cancer: understanding the heterogeneity. Trends Cancer. (2017) 3:169–80. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.01.005
85. Huang M, Xiong D, Pan J, Zhang Q, Sei S, Shoemaker RH, et al. Targeting glutamine metabolism to enhance immunoprevention of EGFR-driven lung cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). (2022) 9:e2105885. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105885
86. Liu T, Han C, Fang P, Ma Z, Wang X, Chen H, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-specific lncRNA LINC01614 enhances glutamine uptake in lung adenocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. (2022) 15:141. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01359-4
87. Wei Q, He J, Wu C, Makota P, Gao F, Lin H, et al. Identification of a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network to explore the effects of circRNAs on pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2023) 41:1068–76. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kgm1rn
88. Dong Z, Deng L, Peng Q, Pan J, and Wang Y. CircRNA expression profiles and function prediction in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cell Physiol. (2020) 235:2609–18. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29165
89. Huang Z, Ma W, Xiao J, Dai X, and Ling W. CircRNA_0092516 regulates chondrocyte proliferation and apoptosis in osteoarthritis through the miR-337-3p/PTEN axis. J Biochem. (2021) 169:467–75. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvaa119
90. Zhang Y, Luo J, Yang W, and Ye WC. CircRNAs in colorectal cancer: potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Cell Death Dis. (2023) 14:353. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05881-2
91. Zhou Y, Zhan Y, Jiang W, Liu H, and Wei S. Long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs in the metabolic reprogramming of lung cancer: functions, mechanisms, and clinical potential. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022) 2022:4802338. doi: 10.1155/2022/4802338
92. Gu F, Zhang J, Yan L, and Li D. CircHIPK3/miR-381-3p axis modulates proliferation, migration, and glycolysis of lung cancer cells by regulating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Open Life Sci. (2020) 15:683–95. doi: 10.1515/biol-2020-0070
93. Chen W, Tang D, Lin J, Huang X, Lin S, Shen G, et al. Exosomal circSHKBP1 participates in non-small cell lung cancer progression through PKM2-mediated glycolysis. Mol Ther Oncolytics. (2022) 24:470–85. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2022.01.012
94. Zhang F, Zhang T, Zhao Z, Ji Y, Peng Y, and Zhao L. Circular RNA Eps15-homology domain containing protein 2 motivates proliferation, glycolysis but refrains autophagy in non-small cell lung cancer via crosstalk with microRNA-3186-3p and forkhead box K1. Bioengineered. (2022) 13:6464–75. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2031385
95. Nie J, Liu C, Pu D, Cha M, and Zhang Y. Circ_UBE2C promotes proliferation and glycolysis of lung cancer cells by regulating miR-107/HK2 axis. J Army Med University. (2024) 46:1729–39. doi: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202311127
96. Shangguan H, Feng H, Lv D, Wang J, Tian T, and Wang X. Circular RNA circSLC25A16 contributes to the glycolysis of non-small-cell lung cancer through epigenetic modification. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:437. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2635-5
97. Lv H, Shi Z, Sui A, Zhang Y, Peng L, Wang M, et al. hsa_circ_0000518 Facilitates Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Progression via Moderating miR-330-3p and Positively Regulating SLC1A5. J Immunol Res. (2022) 2022:4996980. doi: 10.1155/2022/4996980
98. Li H, Guo H, Huang Q, Wang S, Li X, and Qiu M. Circular RNA P4HB promotes glycolysis and tumor progression by binding with PKM2 in lung adenocarcinoma. Respir Res. (2023) 24:252. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02563-7
99. Li Q, Wang Y, Wu S, Zhou Z, Ding X, Shi R, et al. CircACC1 regulates assembly and activation of AMPK complex under metabolic stress. Cell Metab. (2019) 30:157–173.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.009
100. Li H, Huang Q, Guo H, Chen X, Li X, and Qiu M. Circular RNA, circular RARS, promotes aerobic glycolysis of non-small-cell lung cancer by binding with LDHA. Thorac Cancer. (2023) 14:389–98. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14758
101. Zhang B, Leung PC, Cho WCS, Wong CK, and Wang D. Targeting PI3K signaling in Lung Cancer: advances, challenges and therapeutic opportunities. J Transl Med. (2025) 23:184. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06144-8
102. Hua J, Wang X, Ma L, Li J, Cao G, Zhang S, et al. CircVAPA promotes small cell lung cancer progression by modulating the miR-377-3p and miR-494-3p/IGF1R/AKT axis. Mol Cancer. (2022) 21:123. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01595-9
103. Yuan H, Wu H, Cheng J, and Xiong J. Circ_0000376 downregulation inhibits the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by mediating the miR-488-3p/BRD4 axis and the PI3K/PKB signaling pathway. Histol Histopathol. (2021) 36:1309–24. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-390
104. Si J, Jin J, Sai J, Liu X, Luo X, Fu Z, et al. Circular RNA circ-PLCD1 functions as a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer by inactivation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Hum Cell. (2022) 35:924–35. doi: 10.1007/s13577-022-00691-8
105. Wang Q, Yan C, Zhang P, Li G, Zhu R, Wang H, et al. Microarray identifies a key carcinogenic circular RNA 0008594 that is related to non-small-cell lung cancer development and lymph node metastasis and promotes NSCLC progression by regulating the miR-760-mediated PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:757541. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.757541
106. Dhillon AS, Hagan S, Rath O, and Kolch W. MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene. (2007) 26:3279–90. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210421
107. Zhang S, Liu J, Yuan T, Liu H, Wan C, and Le Y. Circular RNA 0001313 Knockdown Suppresses Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation and Invasion via the microRNA-452/HMGB3/ERK/MAPK Axis. Int J Gen Med. (2020) 13:1495–507. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S272996
108. Wang Y, Xu R, Zhang D, Lu T, Yu W, Wo Y, et al. Circ-ZKSCAN1 regulates FAM83A expression and inactivates MAPK signaling by targeting miR-330-5p to promote non-small cell lung cancer progression. Transl Lung Cancer Res. (2019) 8:862–75. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.04
109. Zhong Y, He JW, Huang CX, Lai HZ, Li XK, Zheng C, et al. The NcRNA/Wnt axis in lung cancer: oncogenic mechanisms, remarkable indicators and therapeutic targets. J Transl Med. (2025) 23:326. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06326-4
110. Li K, Peng ZY, Wang R, Li X, Du N, Liu DP, et al. Enhancement of TKI sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma through m6A-dependent translational repression of Wnt signaling by circ-FBXW7. Mol Cancer. (2023) 22:103. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01811-0
111. Wu J, Zhao Q, Chen S, Xu H, Zhang R, Cai D, et al. NSUN4-mediated m5C modification of circERI3 promotes lung cancer development by altering mitochondrial energy metabolism. Cancer Lett. (2024) 605:217266. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217266
112. Xiao Y, Gu S, Yao W, Qin L, and Luo J. Circ_0047921 acts as the sponge of miR-1287-5p to stimulate lung cancer progression by regulating proliferation, migration, invasion, and glycolysis of lung cancer cells. World J Surg Oncol. (2022) 20:108. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02466-1
113. Yu N, Gong H, Chen W, and Peng W. CircRNA ZKSCAN1 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by miR-185-5p/TAGLN2 axis. Thorac Cancer. (2023) 14:1467–76. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14889
114. Xiao Y and Yu D. Tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. (2021) 221:107753. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107753
115. Glaviano A, Lau HS, Carter LM, Lee EHC, Lam HY, Okina E, et al. Harnessing the tumor microenvironment: targeted cancer therapies through modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Hematol Oncol. (2025) 18:6. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01634-6
116. Wang C, Tan S, Li J, Liu WR, Peng Y, and Li W. CircRNAs in lung cancer - Biogenesis, function and clinical implication. Cancer Lett. (2020) 492:106–15. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.08.013
117. Zhao Y, Jia Y, Wang J, Chen X, Han J, Zhen S, et al. circNOX4 activates an inflammatory fibroblast niche to promote tumor growth and metastasis in NSCLC via FAP/IL-6 axis. Mol Cancer. (2024) 23:47. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01957-5
118. Fu M, Gao Q, Xiao M, Li RF, Sun XY, Li SL, et al. Extracellular vesicles containing circMYBL1 induce CD44 in adenoid cystic carcinoma cells and pulmonary endothelial cells to promote lung metastasis. Cancer Res. (2024) 84:2484–500. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3508
119. Wei X, Xiang X, Wang H, Wang Z, Xing S, Peng W, et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic circular RNA circFNDC3B attenuates CD8+ T cells infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer. Commun Biol. (2025) 8:711. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08108-6
120. Chen SW, Zhu SQ, Pei X, Qiu BQ, Xiong D, Long X, et al. Cancer cell-derived exosomal circUSP7 induces CD8+ T cell dysfunction and anti-PD1 resistance by regulating the miR-934/SHP2 axis in NSCLC. Mol Cancer. (2021) 20:144. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01448-x
121. Yao Y, Chen C, Wang J, Xuan H, Chen X, Li Z, et al. Circular RNA circATP9A promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by interacting with HuR and by promoting extracellular vesicles-mediated macrophage M2 polarization. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2023) 42:330. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02916-6
122. Wang D, Wang S, Jin M, Zuo Y, Wang J, Niu Y, et al. Hypoxic exosomal circPLEKHM1-mediated crosstalk between tumor cells and macrophages drives lung cancer metastasis. Adv Sci (Weinh). (2024) 11:e2309857. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309857
123. Li L, Liu D, Chen T, Wei C, Qiao Y, Liu W, et al. Hypoxia-enhanced YAP1-EIF4A3 interaction drives circ_0007386 circularization by competing with CRIM1 pre-mRNA linear splicing and promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2024) 43:200. doi: 10.1186/s13046-024-03116-6
124. Shi Q, Ji T, Ma Z, Tan Q, and Liang J. Serum Exosomes-Based Biomarker circ_0008928 Regulates Cisplatin Sensitivity, Tumor Progression, and Glycolysis Metabolism by miR-488/HK2 Axis in Cisplatin-Resistant Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. (2023) 38:558–71. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2020.4490
125. Xue M, Hong W, Jiang J, Zhao F, and Gao X. Circular RNA circ-LDLRAD3 serves as an oncogene to promote non-small cell lung cancer progression by upregulating SLC1A5 through sponging miR-137. RNA Biol. (2020) 17:1811–22. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1789819
126. Gibson F, Hanly A, Grbic N, Grunberg N, Wu M, Collard M, et al. Epigenetic dysregulation in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2022) 63:447–71. doi: 10.1007/s12016-022-08956-8
127. Lou W and Li Y. Research trend of lung cancer epigenetics research: Bibliometric and visual analysis of top-100 cited documents. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e35686. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35686
128. Zhao L, Xie H, Li P, Chen H, He J, Wang L, et al. CircTFF1 Promotes Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Lung Cancer Cells by Facilitating Methylation of BCL6B Promoter via miR-29c-3p/DNMT3A Axis. Mol Biotechnol. (2023) 65:942–52. doi: 10.1007/s12033-022-00594-x
129. Li D, Lv H, Gao H, Wang Z, Wang D, Tian K, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0077837 is upregulated in non-small cell lung cancer to downregulate phosphatase and tensin homolog through methylation. Bioengineered. (2022) 13:6711–8. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2025707
130. Shen Y, Li C, Zhou L, and Huang JA. G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor promotes cell growth of non-small cell lung cancer cells via YAP1/QKI/circNOTCH1/m6A methylated NOTCH1 signalling. J Cell Mol Med. (2021) 25:284–96. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15997
131. Xie H, Yao J, Wang Y, and Ni B. Exosome-transmitted circVMP1 facilitates the progression and cisplatin resistance of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting miR-524-5p-METTL3/SOX2 axis. Drug Deliv. (2022) 29:1257–71. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2057617
132. Li B, Zhu L, Lu C, Wang C, Wang H, Jin H, et al. circNDUFB2 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression via destabilizing IGF2BPs and activating anti-tumor immunity. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:295. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20527-z
133. Wang Y, Wang Y, Wu C, Ji Y, Hou P, Wu X, et al. circEPB41L2 blocks the progression and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by promoting TRIP12-triggered PTBP1 ubiquitylation. Cell Death Discov. (2024) 10:72. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-01836-4
134. Liang Y, Wang H, Chen B, Mao Q, Xia W, Zhang T, et al. circDCUN1D4 suppresses tumor metastasis and glycolysis in lung adenocarcinoma by stabilizing TXNIP expression. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. (2021) 23:355–68. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.11.012
135. Yi Q, Feng J, Lan W, Shi H, Sun W, and Sun W. CircRNA and lncRNA-encoded peptide in diseases, an update review. Mol Cancer. (2024) 23:214. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02131-7
136. Kristensen LS, Jakobsen T, Hager H, and Kjems J. The emerging roles of circRNAs in cancer and oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2022) 19:188–206. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00585-y
137. Niu D, Wu Y, and Lian J. Circular RNA vaccine in disease prevention and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:341. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01561-x
138. Amaya L, Grigoryan L, Li Z, Lee A, Wender PA, Pulendran B, et al. Circular RNA vaccine induces potent T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2023) 120:e2302191120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302191120
139. Zhang W, He Y, and Zhang Y. CircRNA in ocular neovascular diseases: Fundamental mechanism and clinical potential. Pharmacol Res. (2023) 197:106946. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106946
140. Li H, Wu F, Han Y, Guo Z, Chen T, and Ma Z. CircRNA regulates lung cancer metastasis. Gene. (2025) 935:149060. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.149060
141. Yang B, Wang YW, and Zhang K. Interactions between circRNA and protein in breast cancer. Gene. (2024) 895:148019. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.148019
142. Qiu M, Chen Y, and Zeng C. Biological functions of circRNA in regulating the hallmarks of gastrointestinal cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. (2024) 64:49. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5637
143. Yifan D, Jiaheng Z, Yili X, Junxia D, and Chao T. CircRNA: A new target for ischemic stroke. Gene. (2025) 933:148941. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148941
144. Wang Y, Chen Q, Zhang J, Deng Y, Liu C, Wang S, et al. CircRNA interference pathway: A new target for intervention in different stages of heart failure. Curr Top Med Chem. (2024) 24:1451–63. doi: 10.2174/0115680266300535240514104107
145. Cipriano GL, Schepici G, Mazzon E, and Anchesi I. Multiple Sclerosis: Roles of miRNA, lcnRNA, and circRNA and Their Implications in Cellular Pathways. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:2255. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042255
146. Yu X, Fan Z, Yang T, Li H, Shi Y, Ye L, et al. Plasma circRNA HIPK2 as a putative biomarker for the diagnosis and prediction of therapeutic effects in major depressive disorder. Clin Chim Acta. (2024) 552:117694. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117694
147. Dong J, Zeng Z, Huang Y, Chen C, Cheng Z, and Zhu Q. Challenges and opportunities for circRNA identification and delivery. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. (2023) 58:19–35. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2023.2185764
148. Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhang X, Huang H, Tang S, Chai Y, et al. Recent advances in exosome-mediated nucleic acid delivery for cancer therapy. J nanobiotechnol. (2022) 20:279. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01472-z
149. Yu X, Bai Y, Han B, Ju M, Tang T, Shen L, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of circDYM alleviates CUS-induced depressive-like behaviours. J Extracell Vesicles. (2022) 11:e12185. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12185
150. Zhang Y, Mao Q, Xia Q, Cheng J, Huang Z, Li Y, et al. Noncoding RNAs link metabolic reprogramming to immune microenvironment in cancers. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:169. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01179-y
151. Wang Y, Zou W, Wu X, Li Y, Ren Z, and Chen J. Research progress of non-coding RNA targeting glucose metabolism reprogramming in lung cancer. J Modern Oncol. (2023) 31:2727–32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2023.14.031
152. Wang D, Guo Z, Kang Y, and Xu R. Effects of circular RNA CDR1-AS on proliferation,apoptosis and immune factor expression of lung cancer cells by targeting miR-1277. Chin J Immunol. (2024) 40:939–44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2024.05.007
153. Li Y and Guan J. Circular RNA and its association with lung cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Pulmonary Med. (2024) 29:1758–61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2024.11.024
154. Lian X, Cao D, Hu X, Mo W, Yao X, Mo J, et al. Circular RNAs hsa_circ_101555 and hsa_circ_008068 as diagnostic biomarkers for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Int J Gen Med. (2022) 15:5579–89. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S367999
155. Tashakori N, Mikhailova MV, Mohammedali ZA, Mahdi MS, Ali Al-Nuaimi AM, Radi UK, et al. Circular RNAs as a novel molecular mechanism in diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic target, and inhibiting chemoresistance in breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract. (2024) 263:155569. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155569
156. Mu H, Yang X, Li Y, Zhou B, Liu L, Zhang M, et al. Three-year follow-up study reveals improved survival rate in NSCLC patients underwent guideline-concordant diagnosis and treatment. Front Oncol. (2024) 14:1382197. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1382197
157. Tian T and Yang M. Advances of metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer. J Nanjing Med University. (2024) 44:410–6. doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNSN230975
158. Yu T, Wang Y, Fan Y, Fang N, Wang T, Xu T, et al. CircRNAs in cancer metabolism: a review. J Hematol Oncol. (2019) 12:90. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0776-8
Keywords: circRNA, lung cancer, mechanism, metabolic reprogramming, role
Citation: Chen S, Li M, Li S, Sun Y and Wang L (2026) Metabolic reprogramming and lung cancer focused on roles, mechanism, and clinical prospects of circRNAs: a narrative review. Front. Oncol. 16:1737600. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1737600
Received: 02 November 2025; Accepted: 02 January 2026; Revised: 22 December 2025;
Published: 23 January 2026.
Edited by:
Tasleem Arif, University of Miami, United StatesCopyright © 2026 Chen, Li, Li, Sun and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yinhui Sun, czMzNDY4MDg4QDE2My5jb20=; Lihuai Wang, MzEwNjAwQGhudWNtLmVkdS5jbg==
Simin Chen1