Impact Factor 2.335
2017 JCR, Clarivate Analytics 2018

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Pediatr., 16 May 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00144

Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Learning From Longer Follow Up to Adulthood

  • 1Laboratory of Immunology, Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • 2Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • 3Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Background: Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) is a rare condition, representing approximately 10% of SLE cases. The aim of this study was to identify variables to improve the diagnostic awareness and management of pSLE patients.

Methods: This retrospective study included 25 patients diagnosed with pSLE and followed at the University of Pisa. We collected data about clinical profile at disease onset and during a long-term follow-up, including disease activity, organ damage development, and treatments received.

Results: The mean patient age at disease onset was 14.6 ± 1.6 years, and the mean follow-up period was 14.17 ± 8.04 years. The most common initial manifestations were arthritis, malar rash, and cytopenias. The median time to diagnosis since the first symptoms was 6 months, and was significantly longer in patients with hematological onset (54 months). During follow-up, the number of patients with renal involvement showed a significant increase, from 36% at diagnosis to 72.2% after 10 years of disease evolution. Patients who developed chronic organ damage maintained a higher time-averaged disease activity during follow-up and received a significantly higher dose of corticosteroids.

Conclusion: Patients with immune cytopenia represent a group deserving strict clinical follow-up for the risk of evolution to SLE. Intense surveillance of renal function, early treatment and steroid-sparing strategies should be strongly considered in the management of pSLE patients.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with multisystemic involvement and a chronic-relapsing course.

According to the definition proposed by Silva et al, pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) identifies a subset of patients with disease onset of SLE prior to the 18th birthday (1), as this threshold reflects differences in clinical expression, disease activity and gender distribution.

The mean age at the onset of SLE symptoms is typically between 20 and 40 years, and therefore pSLE is a rare condition, representing approximately 10% of SLE cases. Pediatric-onset disease is also characterized by a less pronounced female/male ratio compared to the adult-onset disease (aSLE) (25).

Concerning the clinical phenotype, most studies have reported substantial differences between pSLE and adult-onset disease, showing a higher frequency of renal, hematological and neuropsychiatric involvement in pediatric patients, while chronic cutaneous lupus is more commonly diagnosed in patients with aSLE. The most relevant feature is the high rate of renal involvement, described in more than 65% of pSLE patients, while adult-onset disease is associated with a 33–55% rate of renal disease (610). Patients with pSLE also have higher disease activity compared to aSLE patients and frequently develop more organ damage, showing worse outcomes (11, 12).

However, while there are many studies concerning aSLE, studies on pSLE are often limited because of the small number of patients or the short duration of follow-up (1316) in which the evaluation is complicated by the need for transition to adult care.

In the present study, we report the analysis of the clinical phenotype, disease activity and cumulative organ damage at disease onset and during long-term follow-up in a cohort of patients diagnosed with pSLE.

The aim of the present study is to identify variables that may improve the diagnostic sensibility and management of pSLE patients, by the analysis of the most common patterns observed at disease onset, the manifestations occurring during the clinical course, the factors associated with the development of organ damage and the effects of treatment received.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection

The present study includes patients diagnosed with pSLE from 1980 to 2016 and followed in the Pediatrics, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology units of Santa Chiara Hospital at the University of Pisa.

Only patients who fulfilled 1997 ACR diagnostic criteria (17) were included in the present study. Patients with incomplete clinical documentation of the disease onset were excluded.

Retrospective Data Collection

For each patient, we investigated initial disease manifestations, time to diagnosis (from first symptom to diagnosis) and the clinical expression of pSLE at the moment of diagnosis and during follow-up. Data on the follow-up were collected at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after diagnosis and included the assessment of disease activity and organ damage and the treatment received.

Definition and Analysis of Organ Involvement

Acute cutaneous SLE was defined by the presence of malar rash, photosensitivity or both.

Articular involvement was defined by the presence of synovitis affecting two or more joints.

Hematologic involvement was defined by the presence of either 1 of the following: hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100.000mm3), leukopenia or lymphopenia (leucocyte count < 4,000/mm3 or lymphocyte count < 1,500/mm3).

Renal involvement was defined by the presence of proteinuria >0.5 g in 24 h, hematuria or histologically documented renal damage. Renal biopsies were classified according to the International Society of Nephrology and the Renal Pathology Society classification (18).

Neuropsychiatric manifestations were classified according to American College of Rheumatology nomenclature of 1999 (19).

Data about specific organ involvement at diagnosis and after 10 years of follow-up were compared, in order to show the evolution of the clinical phenotype.

Treatment Received

The analysis focused on the use of immunosuppressive drugs and the mean annual dose of prednisone administered to each patient. Moreover, we investigated the infection occurrence and its correlation with the use of immunosuppressive drugs and, particularly, corticosteroids, dividing patients in two groups according to the presence/absence of infectious events and comparing the mean annual dose of prednisone between the two groups.

Assessment of Disease Activity

Data on the disease activity at diagnosis and during follow-up were retrospectively calculated by using the revised version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2K) (20). The validity of the retrospective assessment of disease activity was demonstrated in 1996 by Arce-Salinas et al and confirmed in 1999 by Arce-Salinas et al. (21) and FitzGerald et al. (22).

Assessment of Organ Damage

Organ damage was evaluated and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index was retrospectively calculated (23). We also investigated the role of the overall disease activity and of the use of corticosteroids in the development of organ damage: the population of patients with at least 10 years of follow-up was divided according to the presence of organ damage (“damage group” and “non-damage group”), and time-averaged SLEDAI scores and mean annual dose of prednisone were compared between the two groups of patients.

Statistical Analysis

The data on the categorical variables are reported as the percentage and absolute value. The data on the continuous variables with normal distribution (skewness between +1 and −1) are presented as the mean value and standard deviation. In case of asymmetric distribution, the data are presented as median value. An exact Fisher test was used to compare data about categorical variables from two groups. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test or a T-Student test was used to compare the data about continuous from two groups of patients; a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Demographic Data

We analyzed the clinical reports of 32 patients with diagnosis of pSLE; seven of them were excluded for the absence of clinical documentation of the disease onset. The study included the remaining 25 patients (24 females and 1 male), diagnosed between 1980 and 2016 (4 from 1980 to 1995; 6 from 1996 to 2005; 15 from 2006 to 2016). The mean age at disease onset was 14.6 ± 1.6 years; 24 patients were of caucasian ethnicity and 1 patient was of hispanic ethnicity.

Data on the disease onset and clinical profile at diagnosis were available for the overall population. Follow-up data were available for 24 patients (one patient was excluded as very recently diagnosed), with a mean follow-up period of 14.17 ± 8.04 years. Follow-up data at 10 years from diagnosis were available for 18 patients, while for 13 patients the follow-up period was longer than 10 years.

Clinical Manifestation at Disease Onset

In the present cohort, arthritis was the most common initial manifestation, being observed in 12 out of 25 patients (48%), and malar rash was detected in 10 patients (40%). Hematological involvement was observed in 7 patients at disease onset (28%), and among these patients, autoimmune cytopenia was the only first sign of pSLE for 4 patients (3 thrombocytopenia patients and 1 hemolytic anemia patient).

Renal involvement was observed in 5 patients (20%). Other manifestations observed include Raynaud's phenomenon (2 patients), xerostomia and xerophthalmia (1 patient), pleuro-pericarditis (1 patient), gastro-enteritis (1 patient), and deep venous thrombosis (1 patient).

Time to Diagnosis

The median time to diagnosis was 6 months.

The 4 patients with only cytopenia at disease onset had a significantly longer median time to diagnosis (54 months) compared to patients with other clinical manifestations of pSLE (p = 0.02), and serum ANA and anti-dsDNA positivity appeared later than hematological involvement. The median time between the onset of cytopenia and the development of other symptoms in this subgroup of patients was 27 months.

Patients who initially presented with non-SLE specific signs (Raynaud's phenomenon, xerostomia and xerophthalmia, and gastroenteritis) had a mean time to diagnosis of 21.5 months (p = 0.03).

Clinical Profile at Diagnosis

At diagnosis, the most common manifestations observed were arthritis (16 patients, 64% of our cohort), hematological involvement (15 patients, 60%), and acute cutaneous lupus (16 patients, 64%): malar rash and photosensitivity were identified, respectively, in 13 patients (52%), and 10 patients (40%).

Among hematological manifestations, leukopenia was observed in 10 patients (40%), thrombocytopenia was observed in 7 patients (28%), and hemolytic anemia was observed in 6 patients (24%).

Renal involvement was detected in 9 patients (36%), while mucosal ulcerations were detected in 12%, and alopecia was detected in 16% of patients.

Moreover, serositis was observed in 2 patients: one patient developed pericarditis, and the other patient developed pleuro-pericarditis.

In the present cohort, we did not identify any cases of neuropsychiatric involvement or manifestations of chronic cutaneous lupus, such as discoid rash, at diagnosis.

Clinical Profile During Follow-Up

During follow-up, we registered a significant decrease in the percentage of patients with cutaneous and articular involvement, and in the present cohort we did not observe any cases of erosive arthritis.

We also documented a statistically significant increase of renal involvement form diagnosis to 10-year follow-up (from 36 to 72%). Renal biopsy was performed in 11 patients (44% of our cohort): histological evaluation showed 1 case of class II glomerulonephritis, 2 cases of class III glomerulonephritis and 8 cases of class IV glomerulonephritis. Patients who received biopsy had a mean age at disease onset of 13.9 ± 1.8 years, while patients who did not receive biopsy had a mean age at disease onset of 15.2 ± 1.2 years (p = 0.02). In the subgroup of patients with histologically documented lupus nephritis, 3 out of 11 patients (26.7%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD), and one of these patients required dialysis.

Neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE), including episodes of lupus headache, seizures and two cases of cranial neuropathy (one case involving the optical nerve, and the other case involving the oculomotor nerve) due to central nervous system vasculitis, was less frequently observed. After 1 year of follow-up, one patient received a diagnosis of “multi-infarct encephalopathy” based on an evaluation with brain magnetic resonance.

Table 1 summarizes the clinical manifestations at diagnosis and during the follow-up for the present cohort at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years from the diagnosis of pSLE, and Figure 1 highlights the comparison between clinical profile at diagnosis and after 10 years of follow-up.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Evolution of clinical profile during follow-up.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Differences in clinical profile at diagnosis and after 10 years of follow-up. Clinical data collected at diagnosis and after 10 years of follow-up are compared, highlighting the statistically significant reduction of articular and cutaneous involvement and the growth in the percentage of patients with renal involvement.

Therapy and Infection Occurrence

Twenty-three patients (92%) received corticosteroids and 20 patients (80%) received antimalarial drugs during the clinical course. The median annual dose of corticosteroids was 1.825 g/year of prednisone

Twenty patients (80%) received immunosuppressive drugs during follow-up. The most commonly administered drugs included azathioprine (48%), mycophenolate (40%), cyclophosphamide (36%), methotrexate (24%), cyclosporine (16%), and rituximab (16%).

During follow-up, 5 patients (20.8%) experienced clinically relevant infections, and 2 of these patients had multiple infections. Overall, we observed 3 cases of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, 2 cases of Herpes-Zoster Virus reactivation, 1 primary severe infection by Epstein-Barr virus and 1 infection by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis.

The median annual dose of steroids for this subgroup of patients was 4.015 g/year, which was significantly higher compared to that for patients who did not develop infections (p = 0.03).

Disease Activity

Data about median disease activity at diagnosis and during follow-up are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Disease activity at diagnosis and during follow-up.

Organ Damage Development

During the entire observation period, 15 patients (62.5%) developed non-reversible organ damage. Nine out of 24 patients (37.5%) developed renal damage, including nephrotic syndrome or ESRD, and 7 patients (29%) showed vascular involvement, with deep venous thrombosis or ischemic arterial lesions. The nervous system was involved in 4 patients (16.7%), with ischemic stroke, cranial neuropathies and cerebral vasculitis. Cutaneous damage, consistently observed as chronic non-scarring alopecia, was detected in 3 patients (15%), with muscular (myositis), cardiac (acute myocardial infarction), and pulmonary (restrictive syndrome and pulmonary heart) damages respectively identified in each patient.

We observed a progressive increase in the percentage of patients with organ damage and in the mean SLICC score of the population with damage. Table 3 summarizes the data on organ damage development and the mean SLICC score.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Analysis of organ damage during follow-up.

Relationship Between Time-Averaged Disease Activity and Organ Damage Development

The median time-averaged disease activity of the patients of the “damage group” was 8 points, while time-averaged disease activity of patients of the “non-damage group” was 4 points (p = 0.04).

Relationship Between the Mean Dose of Corticosteroids Received and Organ Damage

Patients in the “damage group” required a median annual dose of steroids 3.5 g/year, significantly higher compared to those in the “non-damage group,” that was 1.14 g/year (p = 0.01).

Discussion

The follow-up of pSLE patients has been scarcely investigated, as the delicate process of transition to adult rheumatology clinics makes it difficult to perform long-term studies.

In our hospital, the coexistence of the Pediatrics, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology units facilitated the follow up of the present patients for several years after clinical transition. The aim of the present study was to analyze the evolution of pSLE to identify key issues for an early intervention that could modify and improve long-term prognosis.

Analysis of disease onset in the overall population showed a clear predominance of articular and cutaneous manifestations as first signs of pSLE, and these two phenotypes were associated with an early diagnosis of lupus. Specifically, photosensitive malar rash is universally recognized as highly suggestive for lupus, and its presence consistently accelerates the formulation of diagnosis.

Articular involvement in pSLE is extremely common, but the clinical manifestation of arthritis do not evoke a specific pattern in SLE; therefore, when arthritis is the first sign of pSLE, making a correct diagnosis may pose some difficulties. However, we suggest that, even at pediatric age, SLE must be included in the potential diagnosis in cases of unexplained arthritis, particularly when associated with abnormal hematologic values.

Renal involvement at presentation was also associated with a short time to pSLE diagnosis, partially depending on an early recourse to renal biopsy.

Hematological manifestations were common at disease onset, but when immune-mediated cytopenia was the only initial sign of pSLE, the diagnostic time was significantly longer. These manifestations, particularly autoimmune thrombocytopenia in adolescents, may eventually manifest as SLE many years after clinical onset. Therefore, patients with immune-mediated cytopenia deserve a strict clinical follow-up, with periodical determination of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, and anti-phospholipid antibodies.

Compared with data from previous studies on adult-onset disease, the present pSLE cohort had a greater percentage of patients with malar rash, photosensitivity and renal involvement, while no differences were observed relative to the incidence of articular and hematological manifestations (2426). In the present cohort, while articular, hematologic, cutaneous and renal involvements were frequent at diagnosis, no patients showed neuropsychiatric signs or symptoms. This finding is in disagreement with the current literature, which reports significant central nervous system involvement in patients with pSLE. However, the retrospective method of the present study makes it difficult to ascribe a neurological manifestation to pSLE, and it is likely that we underestimated the actual prevalence of neurological involvement in the present cohort.

As observed in the present cohort, non-lupus specific onset is more common in pSLE than in adult-onset disease: these patients commonly show a long time to diagnosis, particularly dependent on a progressive disease evolution. Previous studies have reported other various non-specific patterns of pSLE onset, including recurring abdominal pain, acute abdomen, coronary arteritis, chorea, cough, and parotitis (2731). These data confirm the assumption that pSLE is a heterogeneous condition; therefore, according to Bader-Meunier et al. we suggest that in pediatric age, especially in adolescents, the diagnosis of SLE should be firmly considered in the presence of “not explained organ involvement and laboratory findings suggestive for systemic inflammation” (27).

Analysis of the follow-up of the present cohort revealed a significant increase in the percentage of patients with renal involvement: many studies confirm a higher incidence of renal damage in pSLE compared to aSLE (32), indicating that a strict follow-up of renal function in patients with pSLE is necessary. Moreover, is important to highlight that almost 20% of patients with histologically documented renal damage develop ESRD (11, 33). Therefore, evaluation of the mean age at disease onset of patients who received biopsy suggests that a younger age at disease onset could be related to a greater severity of renal involvement.

Evaluation of disease activity confirmed that pSLE is a condition characterized by high activity at diagnosis, with a higher mean SLEDAI score when compared with adult-onset disease. These findings are consistent with those of many previous studies, which report even higher scores (12, 34).

During follow up, as expected, we observed a considerable growth in the percentage of patients with organ damage and in the mean SLICC score. The observed damage was mainly renal, vascular and neurological, while muscular damage was detected in only one patient, and none of the patients showed skeletal damage.

The relationship between disease activity and organ damage showed that, independent from the mean SLEDAI score at disease onset, patients with chronically active disease were at significantly higher risk of developing organ damage; studies by Brunner and Sato showed similar conclusions, confirming that cumulative disease activity is a predictor for organ damage (35, 36). To our knowledge, the present study is the longest follow-up study investigating the relationship between disease activity and organ damage in pediatric-onset disease. The findings underline the necessity for early intervention in patients with pSLE to promptly reduce disease activity and prevent cumulative non-reversible organ damage.

In addition to the damage induced by the pathology, damage caused by the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs must be considered. The clinical severity of organ involvement in pSLE and the high disease activity often lead to the use of immunosuppressive drugs, reported to be higher than in adult-onset disease (11). Interestingly, we identified a correlation between the administration of corticosteroids and the development of organ damage, indicating that corticosteroids are the most relevant contributors to organ damage among the immunosuppressive agents, confirming the data from several studies performed in adult and pediatric populations (3739). Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to investigate the role of other immunosuppressive drugs in the development of organ damage, in order to optimize the treatment strategy for pSLE patients.

Early organ involvement, high disease activity and the considerable need for corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs make pSLE a challenge for clinicians, who should be trained on managing the complexity of a systemic disease with specific age-related differences and complications.

Despite limitations by the small number of patients and the retrospective method of analysis, the present study represents an effort to increase the current knowledge of the clinical picture, disease activity and organ damage development at disease onset and during follow-up of pSLE patients, and offers a great contribution for the early disease diagnosis and the prevention of severe complications. The new era of “treat to target” will enable the use of steroid-sparing strategies, opening a window of opportunity for improving outcomes in pediatric aged patients.

Conclusion

The analysis of disease onset underlines that patients with autoimmune cytopenias represent a population deserving a closer surveillance for the possibility of evolving to lupus.

During follow-up we observed a marked increase in the percentage of patients with renal damage, and therefore an intense surveillance of renal function must be performed for pSLE patients, particularly those with early disease onset.

Our study evidenced a positive correlation between the development of organ damage and both time-averaged disease activity and use of corticosteroids, suggesting that early intervention to reduce disease activity could be useful in the prevention of chronic-non-reversible complications, and that steroid-sparing strategies should be accurately considered.

Data Availability

Data about clinical profile of the single patients are available in the additional file (Appendix 1). The other data are available on request contacting the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

All authors participated in the collection and interpretation of clinical data. GC wrote the paper. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Annalisa Legitimo for the help during the revision of this paper.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2018.00144/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Silva CA, Avcin T, Brunner HI. Taxonomy for systemic lupus erythematosus with onset before adulthood. Arthritis Care Research. (2012) 64:1787–93. doi: 10.1002/acr.21757

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Cervera R, Abarca-Costalago M, Abramovicz D, Allegri F, Annunziata P, Aydintug AO, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in Europe at the change of the millennium: lessons from the “Euro-Lupus Project.” Auto Rev. (2006) 5:180–6. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.06.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Borchers AT, Naguwa SM, Shoenfeld Y, Gershwin ME. The geoepidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Auto Rev. (2010) 9:A277–87. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Jimenez S, Cervera R, Font J, Ingelmo M. The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2003) 25:3–12. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:25:1:3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcon GS, Scofield L, Reinlib L, Cooper GS. Understanding the epidemiology and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2010) 39:257–68. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Malattia C, Martini A. Paediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. (2013) 27:351–62. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.07.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sousa S, Goncalves MJ, Ines LS, Eugenio G, Jesus D, Fernandes S, et al. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus: comparative data of childhood, adult and late-onset disease in a national register. Rheumatol Int. (2016) 36:955–60. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3450-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Uziel Y, Gorodnitski N, Mukamel M, Padeh S, Brik R, Barash J, et al. Outcome of a national Israeli cohort of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus (2007) 16:142–6. doi: 10.1177/0961203306075385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Brunner HI, Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MD, Silverman ED. Difference in disease features between childhood-onset and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. (2008) 58:556–62. doi: 10.1002/art.23204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Janwityanujit S, Totemchokchyakarn K, Verasertniyom O, Vanichapuntu M, Vatanasuk M. Age-related differences on clinical and immunological manifestations of SLE. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol (1995) 13:145–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

11. Hersh AO, Von Scheven E, Yazdany J, Panopalis P, Trupin L, Julian L, et al. Differences in long-term disease activity and treatment of adult patients with childhood- and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. (2009) 61:13–20. doi: 10.1002/art.24091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tucker LB, Uribe AG, Fernandez M, Vilá LM, McGwin G, Apte M, et al. Adolescent onset of lupus results in more aggressive disease and worse outcomes: results of a nested matched case-control study within LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA LVII). Lupus. (2008) 17:314–22. doi: 10.1177/0961203307087875

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rood MJ, Ten Cate R, Van Suijlekom-Smit LW, den Ouden EJ, Ouwerkerk FE, Breedveld FC, et al. Childhood-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: clinical presentation and prognosis in 31 patients. Scand J Rheumatol. (1999) 28:222–6. doi: 10.1080/03009749950155580

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Pusongchai T, Jungthirapanich J, Khositseth S. Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus in Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thail. (2010) 93(Suppl 7):S283–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Dung NT, Loan HT, Nielsen S, Zak M, Petersen FK. Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus onset patterns in Vietnamese children: a descriptive study of 45 children. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. (2012) 10:38. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-10-38

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tan JH, Hoh SF, Win MT, Chan YH, Das L, Arkachaisri T. Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in Singapore: clinical phenotypes, disease activity, damage, and autoantibody profiles. Lupus (2015) 24:998–1005. doi: 10.1177/0961203315584413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Yu C, Gershwin ME, Chang C. Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: a critical review. Journal of autoimmunity. (2014) 48–9:10–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD. The ISN/RPS 2003 classification of lupus nephritis: an assessment at 3 years. Kidney Int. (2007) 71:491–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum. (1999) 42:599–608. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:4<599::AID-ANR2>3.0.CO;2-F

CrossRef Full Text

20. Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. (2002) 29:288–91.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Arce-Salinas A, Cardiel MH, Guzman J, Alcocer-Varela J. Validity of retrospective disease activity assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. (1996) 23:846–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. FitzGerald JD, Grossman JM. Validity and reliability of retrospective assessment of disease activity and flare in observational cohorts of lupus patients. Lupus (1999) 8:638–44. doi: 10.1191/096120399680411443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lam GK, Petri M. Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2005) 23(5 Suppl 39): S120–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Sebastiani GD, Prevete I, Piga M, Iuliano A, Bettio S, Bortoluzzi A, et al. Early lupus project - A multicentre Italian study on systemic lupus erythematosus of recent onset. Lupus (2015) 24:1276–82. doi: 10.1177/0961203315585817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Alonso MD, Martinez-Vazquez F, De Teran TD, Miranda-Filloy JA, Dierssen T, Blanco R, et al. Late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in Northwestern Spain: differences with early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and literature review. Lupus (2012) 21:1135–48. doi: 10.1177/0961203312450087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, Sebastiani GD, Gil A, Lavilla P, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and immunologic patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Eur Work Party Syst Lupus Erythemat Med. (1993) 72:113–24. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199303000-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bader-Meunier B, Armengaud JB, Haddad E, Salomon R, Deschênes G, Koné-Paut I, et al. Initial presentation of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a French multicenter study. J Pediatr. (2005) 146:648–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.12.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lepore L, Facchini S, Codrich D, Pelizzo G, Messineo A, Ventura A. Acute abdomen: the presenting sign of systemic lupus erythematosus in childhood. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2002) 35:570–2. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200210000-00021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Iqbal S, Sher MR, Good RA, Cawkwell GD. Diversity in presenting manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus in children. J Pediatr. (1999) 135:500–5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70174-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Taddio A, Rossetto E, Rose CD, Brescia AM, Bracaglia C, Cortis E, et al. Prognostic impact of atypical presentation in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a multicenter study. J Pediatr. (2010) 156:972–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Agarwal A, Medical Student SB, Lim-Stavros S, Votava-Smith JK, Ramanathan A. Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus presenting with coronary arteritis: A case series and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2015) 45:42–7. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.02.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Levy DM, Kamphuis S. Systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. (2012) 59:345–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. McCurdy DK, Lehman TJ, Bernstein B, Hanson V, King KK, Nadorra R, et al. Lupus nephritis: prognostic factors in children. Pediatrics (1992) 89:240–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Hiraki LT, Benseler SM, Tyrrell PN, Hebert D, Harvey E, Silverman ED. Clinical and laboratory characteristics and long-term outcome of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr. (2008) 152:550–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Brunner HI, Silverman ED, To T, Bombardier C, Feldman BM. Risk factors for damage in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: cumulative disease activity and medication use predict disease damage. Arthritis Rheum. (2002) 46:436–44. doi: 10.1002/art.10072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Sato JO, Corrente JE, Saad-Magalhaes C. Chronic active disease pattern predicts early damage in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus (2015) 24:1421–8. doi: 10.1177/0961203315599449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Koutsonikoli A, Trachana M, Heidich AB, Galanopoulou V, Pratsidou-Gertsi P, Garyphallos A. Dissecting the damage in Northern Greek patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatol Int. (2015) 35:1225–32. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3209-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Petri M, Purvey S, Fang H, Magder LS. Predictors of organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: the Hopkins Lupus Cohort. Arthritis Rheum. (2012) 64:4021–8. doi: 10.1002/art.34672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zonana-Nacach A, Barr SG, Magder LS, Petri M. Damage in systemic lupus erythematosus and its association with corticosteroids. Arthritis Rheum. (2000) 43:1801–8. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200008)43:8<1801::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-O

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: systemic lupus erythematosus, children, disease activity, organ damage, corticosteroids, thrombocytopenia, lupus nephritis, long-term follow-up

Citation: Costagliola G, Mosca M, Migliorini P and Consolini R (2018) Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Learning From Longer Follow Up to Adulthood. Front. Pediatr. 6:144. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00144

Received: 21 March 2018; Accepted: 01 May 2018;
Published: 16 May 2018.

Edited by:

Claudio Pignata, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Reviewed by:

Aleš Janda, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Germany
Fatma Dedeoglu, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, United States

Copyright © 2018 Costagliola, Mosca, Migliorini and Consolini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Giorgio Costagliola, giorgio.costagliola@hotmail.com