SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Sec. Children and Health
Volume 8 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.549549
Interventions for Addressing Anemia Among Children and Adolescents: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
- 1Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
- 2Division of Evidence Synthesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India
- 3Division of Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
- 4Manipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
- 5Medical Biometrics & Informatics (Biostatistics), Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
- 6Department of Community Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India
Context: Anemia is a public health problem that can lead to growth, cognitive, and motor impairments.
Objective: To collate evidence on interventions for addressing childhood and adolescent anemia.
Methods: In this overview of systematic reviews, we included Cochrane as well as non-Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) irrespective of language and publication status. Two sets of review authors independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data from relevant SRs. We present data in a tabular format and summarize results based on outcome reported, age of participants, and type of interventions. We also adopt a “measurement for change” approach to assess the utility of measurement for development of interventions in childhood and adolescent anemia.
Results: Our search yielded 2,601 records of which 31 SRs were found eligible for inclusion. Results were favorable for fortification and supplementation with clear reduction in the risk of anemia and increase in hemoglobin levels across all age groups. Other interventions reported by the SRs were inconclusive and suggest further research.
Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that fortification or supplementation with iron and micronutrients leads to better reduction in the risk of anemia and improvements in hemoglobin levels among children and adolescents. Results of this overview can help decision makers in informing selection of interventions to address childhood and adolescent anemia.
Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42016053687.
Anemia is a condition in which there is either a decrease in the number of red blood corpuscles (RBCs) or a decrease in the total amount of hemoglobin (Hb) (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) defines childhood anemia as Hb concentration below 11 grams per deciliter in children between 6 and 59 months, below 11.5 grams per deciliter in children between 5 and 11 years, and below 12 grams per deciliter in children between 12 and 14 years of age (2).
The highest burden of anemia is in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Estimates show that almost 90,000 deaths have occurred due to iron deficiency anemia across all age groups (3). India, with ~89 million children with anemia is the highest contributor of childhood anemia (4, 5). Iron deficiency anemia is the most common cause of anemia on a global level. Other causes of childhood anemia include nutritional deficiencies, such as deficiency of folic acid, iron, or vitamin B12; chronic conditions, such as inflammatory disorders; and parasitic infestations (2). Disorders associated with synthesis of hemoglobin, formation of RBCs, or survival of RBCs are the other, less common causes of anemia in children (2). Malaria, HIV, tuberculosis, and helminthic infestations have been reported to lead to substantial burden of anemia, especially in developing countries (2, 6, 7). The severity of anemia is higher in children under 8 years old as compared with children over 8 years (8). Regardless of the etiology of anemia, impaired physical growth, motor development, and cognitive development have been observed in anemic children (7, 9–12).
WHO and the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) recommend multipronged public health preventive strategies, such as supplementation of nutrients, fortification of food with nutrients, educational interventions, and prevention and control of parasitic and protozoal infestations (13).
Our comprehensive search strategy reveals many systematic reviews (SRs) that assess the efficacy of different public health interventions for addressing childhood anemia. However, no synthesis of these reviews has been reported in an overview. Hence, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) task force on childhood and adolescent anemia commissioned this overview in order to collate evidence on the efficacy of various interventions in addressing childhood and adolescent anemia in order to inform programs and a future research agenda. This review could serve as a baseline for clinicians, stakeholders, and decision makers to intervene in childhood and adolescent anemia.
A letter of intent was invited from Indian scientists with experience in evidence synthesis. A review team of experienced researchers was constituted to work on the overview of SRs. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO prospective register of systematic reviews (Registration number: CRD42016053687) after consultation with national experts (14).
Irrespective of language and publication status, we included SRs, evaluating the effect of
1. Any one intervention, or
2. Combination of interventions, such as iron of ferrous sulfate (FS) or zinc (Zn) or multi micro nutrients (MMN) or vitamin supplementation, or
3. Iron or FS or Zn or MMN or vitamin fortification, or
4. Anti-helminthic treatment
5. Treatment or prevention of malaria, or
6. Treatment of H. pylori, or
7. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions.
We included SRs designed for addressing anemia in children between 6 months and 19 years of age. We included studies regardless of gender, study setting, and severity of anemia. We excluded non-SRs, SRs targeting populations other than children and adolescents, those done on overtly diseased children or adolescents, those providing data on overlapping age groups, and SRs that did not assess the outcomes of interest of this overview. We assessed outcomes, namely anemia, Hb levels, and adverse events.
Search Methods for Identification of Reviews
We searched the electronic sources listed below between February 8, 2018, and February 10, 2018, and further updated searches between January 5, 2019, and February 7, 2019: Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE via PubMed, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Campbell Collaboration Online Library of Systematic Reviews (www.campbellcollaboration.org/library.html), Database of Promoting Health Effectiveness Reviews (https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/webdatabases4/Intro.aspx?ID=9), and 3ie Database of Systematic Reviews. The review team, in consultation with an information specialist (RV), decided potential key words to be used for this evidence summary. We developed the search strategy for CENTRAL as in Supplementary File 1. In addition, we hand-searched the bibliographies of all eligible reviews, pertinent clinical guidelines, and textbooks to find relevant reviews. We also communicated and requested specialists in this field to provide related unpublished work.
Selection of Reviews
We undertook screening of SRs using Covidence SR software (15). Two overview authors (PM and RH) independently screened all SRs (retrieved in the search process) on the basis of title and abstract. Two overview authors (RH and NK) then independently screened the full texts of identified reviews for inclusion. A third reviewer (BU) resolved disagreement among primary reviewers through discussion. We prepared a PRISMA flow diagram to map the inclusion and exclusion of SRs (16).
We developed and pilot-tested our data extraction form for its suitability and usability. Three review authors (AS, PM, and NK) independently extracted data regarding characteristics of the included participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and methodological quality of the included reviews. We contacted reviewers to seek missing information if any.
Methodological Quality of Included Reviews Summarized in the Overview
We followed standard procedures given by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (19). We obtained data from included SRs and presented them in a tabular and graphical format. In case of duplicate publications, we considered them as a single report. We summarized results based on outcome reported, age of participants, and type of interventions as risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). As an overview, we mainly focused on summarizing and thematically categorizing the intervention and its effectiveness and not taking a more interpretative approach during synthesis.
Our search yielded 2,601 records. After removal of duplicates, 2,204 records remained, and they were screened for title and abstract. At this stage, we excluded 2,043 articles, and a total of 161 full-text articles were screened for eligibility. We excluded 130 articles and included 31 SRs that met our inclusion criteria (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for SR and meta-analysis: the PRISMA flow diagram for inclusion and exclusion of studies.
Description of Included Reviews
We included 31 SRs in this overview, the salient features of which are depicted in Table 1.
We included nine Cochrane reviews (20, 21, 28, 31, 38, 41, 46, 49, 50) and 22 non-Cochrane SRs (22–27, 29, 30, 32–37, 39, 40, 42–45, 47, 48). Except for Cembranel et al. (23), all other reviews are in the English language. Updating the version of existing SRs was reported only by Cochrane reviews. The review by Neuberger et al. (21) is the updated version of previous publications (51, 52). Taylor-Robinson et al. (46) is updated from a previous five Cochrane reviews (53–55). One Cochrane review by De-Regil et al. (38) has been reprinted in a Cochrane review journal (56), and hence, to avoid duplication, we considered both reviews as a single report (38). Abdullah et al. (27), Best et al. (39), McDonagh et al. (42), and Dangour et al. (49) did not undertake meta-analysis.
Included reviews differed in the age groups of participants: 11 reviews included participants <5 years of age (23, 25–27, 30, 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41). Low et al. (20), Das et al. (34), and Huang et al. (48) included participants of age groups beyond the inclusion range in our overview, but they reported separate data for children as a subgroup analysis and, hence, were included. Aaron et al. (32) included a trial on pregnant women that was not included in the meta-analysis of anemia. Another review (35) considered included women but did not identify studies on women and, hence, was included in this overview. Except for Low et al. (24), all included reviews included participants of both genders. All SRs except McDonagh et al. (42) included studies from LMICs and developing countries. Sun et al. (45) included specifically the Chinese population. One SR included studies each on children from malaria endemic areas (21), areas endemic for intestinal helminths (46), and areas endemic for anemia (50).
Reviews covered an array of interventions for prevention, control, and/or treatment of anemia in children and adolescents. We found 11 reviews on iron supplementation (20–29, 44). Six reviews were on fortification (28, 30, 33, 35, 39, 57); five reviews on supplementation with fortification (41–45); two reviews on deworming (46, 47); and one review each on H. pylori treatment (48), WASH intervention (49), and antimalarial intervention (50).
Effects of Interventions
A total of 18 SRs addressed the effect of different interventions on anemia in children and adolescents (20–25, 28, 30–36, 40, 41, 45, 50) (Table 2 and Figure 2). We did not find any review that assessed the effect of treatment of deworming, H. pylori infection, or WASH intervention on anemia status.
In infants, iron fortification decreased the risk of anemia by 58% (RR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.24–0.72; six studies; 1,234 participants; moderate QoE) (34) and MMN fortification by 41% (RR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.50–0.70; three studies; 1809 participants; low QoE) (34).
In children under 2 years of age, home fortification, when used as a preventive measure, showed maximum reduction in the risk of anemia by 46% (RR = 0·54, 95%CI = 0.46–0.64; 4,331 participants 6M−2Y) (40). However, when used as a treatment measure, it led to an insignificant increase in the risk of anemia by 4% (RR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.76–1.41; 1,263 participants 6M−2Y) (40). In the same age group, iron supplementation significantly reduced the risk of anemia by 39% (RR = 0·61, 95%CI = 0.50–0.74; I2 = 86%; 17 studies; 4,825 participants 4–23M) (25), followed by home fortification with MMP (compared to placebo/no intervention) by 31% (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.60–0·78; I2 = 19%; six studies; 1,447 participants 4–23M; moderate QoE) (38).
Milk fortification significantly reduced the odds of anemia in healthy children between 6 and 47 months old by 64% (OR = 0.36, 95%CI = 0.14–0.91) (30). Fortification of food with iron and MMN (RR = 0.43, 95%CI = 0.26–0.71; I2 = 80.5%; seven studies, 1,927 participants 6M−5Y) (36) and intermittent iron supplementation (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.23–0.80; four studies; 658 apparently healthy children <5 years) (28) reduced the risk of anemia significantly by 57%, followed by fortification of milk and cereals with iron by 50% (RR = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.33–0.75; I2 = 71.2%; 11 studies; 3,100 participants 6M−5Y) (36), and point-of-use fortification of milk with MMP by 36% (RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.44–0.93; I2 = 73%; six studies; 1,706 participants 2–5Y) (31). Single-iron fortification of milk (RR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.45–1.28; I2 = 0%; four studies; 1,173 participants 6M−5Y) (36), daily doses of FS (RR = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.49–1.09; I2 > 75%; participants aged <5Y) (23), and weekly doses of FS (RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.27–1.54; I2 > 75%; participants <5Y) (23) showed insignificant reductions in the risk of anemia by 36, 27, and 24%, respectively.
In preschool and school-age children, MMN fortification showed a maximum reduction in the risk of anemia by 55% (RR = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.22–0.89; five studies; 1,246 participants) (34), followed by iron fortification by 40% (RR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.43–0.84; 10 studies; 2,013 participants) (34), point-of-use fortification of food with micro nutrient powders (MNP) by 34% (RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.49–0.88; I2 = 73%;10 studies; 2,448 participants; moderate QoE) (31), and point-of-use fortification of food with iron, vitamin A, and Zn by 28% (RR0·72, 95%CI = 0.65–0.80; I2 = 0%; seven studies; 1,705 participants with malaria) (31). In children with malaria, point-of-use fortification of food with MNP insignificantly reduced the risk of anemia by 43% (RR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.29–1.14; I2 = 83%; four studies; 934 participants with malaria) (31).
In apparently healthy children under 12 years of age, maximum reduction in the risk of anemia is seen with intermittent iron and MMN supplementation by 84% (RR = 0.16, 95%CI = 0.06–0.44; one study; 107 participants <12 years) (28), followed by intermittent iron supplementation (iron alone) by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.31–0.74; six studies; 1,074 participants <12 years). Daily iron/folic acid (FA)/MMN supplementation showed better results as compared with intermittent iron/FA/MMN supplementation (28).
Daily oral iron supplements with or without other vitamins (FA or vitamin C) reduced the risk of anemia in children between 12 and 18 years by 68% (RR = 0.32, 95%CI = 0.11–0.93; I2 = 97%; four studies; 2,169 participants) (20), and in children between 3.3 and 15 years reduced the risk of anemia by 50% (RR = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.39–0.64; I2 = 85%; seven studies; 1,763 participants) (24). Administration of non-dairy, MMN-fortified beverages in children between 5 and 18 years in LMICs effectively reduced the risk of anemia by 37% (RR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.54–0.73; I2 = 17%; six studies; 2,995 participants) (32). In malaria-endemic areas, additional supplementation of iron along with antimalarial treatment reduced the risk of anemia by 56% (RR = 0.44, 95%CI = 0.28–0.70; I2 = 40%; two studies; 295 participants <18Y), followed by iron and FA supplementation by 51% (RR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.25–0.99; I2 = 49%; three studies; 633 participants <18Y), and iron supplementation by 37% (RR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.49–0.82; I2 = 97%; 15 studies; 3,784 participants <18Y) (21).
Twenty-five reviews addressed the effect of different interventions on Hb levels in children and adolescents (20–26, 28–31, 33–38, 40, 41, 43, 44, 46–48, 50) (Table 3 and Figure 3). We did not find any review that assessed the effect of WASH intervention on Hb status.
In infants, MMN fortification showed maximum improvement in Hb (SMD = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.48–1.63; seven studies; 1,508 participants; moderate QoE) (34), followed by iron fortification (SMD = 0·81, 95%CI = 0.31–1.31; 12 studies; 1,834 infants; moderate QoE) (34).
In children under 2 years old, daily iron supplementation showed significant improvements in Hb (MD = 7.22 g/L, 95%CI = 4.87–9.57; I2 = 94%; 26 studies; 5,479 participants 4M−2Y) (25), followed by MMN fortification (MD = 5.87 g/L, 95%CI = 3.25–8.49, six studies, 1,447 participants 6M−2Y) (38), and home fortification (5.06 g/L; 95%CI = 2.29–7.83, 22 studies, 2,449 participants 6M−2Y) (40). Home fortification did not show a significant impact on Hb levels as compared with iron drops (−0.91 g/L; 95%CI = −11.96–10.14; 1,263 participants 6M−2Y) (40) or iron supplements (MD = −2.36 g/L; 95%CI = −10.30–5.598, I2 = 78%, two studies, 278 participants 6M−2Y) (38).
In children under 5 years old, maximum improvement in Hb levels was seen with MMN fortification (MD = 0.87 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.57–1.16; I2 = 82%; eight studies; 1,803 participants 6M−5Y) (36), followed by daily iron supplementation (MD = 6.97 g/L, 95%CI = 4.21–9.72; I2 = 82%; nine studies; 1,690 participants 2–5Y; high QoE) (26), intermittent iron supplementation (MD = 6.45 g/L, 95%CI = 2.36–10.55; nine studies, 1,254 apparently healthy participants <5Y) (28), iron fortification of milk and cereals (MD = 0.62 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.34–0.89; I2 = 86.2%; 13 studies, 2,274 participants 6M−5Y) (36), and daily FS supplementation (MD = 0.56 mg/dL, 95%CI = 0.31–0.81; 14 studies; participants <5Y) (23). Insignificant changes were observed with fortified milk (MD = 5.89 g/L, 95%CI = −0.24–12.02) (30), point-of-use fortification of food with MNP (MD = 2.02 g/L, 95%CI = −0.87 to 4.92) (31), single iron fortification (MD = 0.20 g/dL, 95%CI = −0.05 to 0.45) (36), and weekly FS supplementation (MD = 0.28 mg/dL; 95%CI = −0.22 to 0.78) (23).
The maximum effect on Hb in preschool and school-age children was seen with iron fortification (SMD = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.24–0.67; 16 studies; 3,832 participants; moderate QoE) (34) and MMN fortification (SMD = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.12–0.79; seven studies; 1,543 participants; moderate QoE) (34) followed by point-of-use fortification with MMN (MD = 3.37 g/L, 95%CI = 0.94–5.80; 11 studies; 2,746 participants; low QoE) (31). In apparently healthy children under 12 years of age, intermittent supplementation with iron alone or in combination with other nutrients effectively increased Hb concentrations, and this positive response did not differ between frequency or duration of supplementation or age of children (28).
In children under 15 years of age, daily iron supplementation (MD = 8.38 g/L, 95%CI = 6.21–10.56; I2 = 97%; 28 studies; 6,545 participants 3.3–15Y) (24) and iron with micronutrient supplementation (WMD = 0.69 g/L, 95%CI = 0.48–0.91; 18 studies; participants <15Y) showed better improvements in Hb than iron with micronutrient fortification (WMD = 0.61 g/L, 95%CI = 0.40–0.81; 15 studies; participants <15Y) (43). A school-based deworming program resulted in a decreased prevalence of anemia (WMD = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.01–2.25; I2 = 0%; eight studies; 1,005,239 participants) (47).
In children under 18 years of age, point-of-use fortification of food with MMP showed maximum though insignificant improvements in Hb levels (MD = 7.86 g/L, 95%CI = −0.76–16.49; three studies; 524 participants ≥5Y) (31). Daily oral iron supplementation with or without other vitamins (MD = 6.99 g/L, 95%CI = 3.85–10.13; I2 = 95%; 10 studies; 3,220 participants 12–18Y) (20) and MMN-fortified beverages (2.76 g/L, 95%CI = 1.19–4.33; eight studies; 3,855 apparently healthy participants 5–18Y) showed significant improvements (32). Also, there was a substantially higher increase in Hb concentration from iron interventions (WMD = 1.49, 95%CI = 0.46–2.51; 16 studies; 2,542 participants 6M−18Y) (29) than oral iron supplementation (WMD = 0.79 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.65–0.94; 82 studies) and iron fortification (WMD = 0.25 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.02–0.52; nine studies; participants <18Y) (44). Fortification of food with vitamin A substantially increased Hb concentrations in children under 18 years of age (SMD = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.07 = 0.89; two studies; 1,538 participants <18Y), with iron (SMD = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.36–0.97; 20 studies; 4,176 participants <18Y from UMHICs), and with MMN (SMD = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.21–0.78; eight studies; 1,769 participants <18Y from LMICs) (34).
In children under 18 years of age residing in malaria-endemic areas, iron with antimalarial treatment (MD = 0.91 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.47–1.35; one study; 151 participants <18Y) and iron with FA supplementation (MD = 0.90 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.51–1.29; one study; 124 participants <18Y) showed better results as compared with iron-only supplementation (MD = 0.75 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.48–1.01; I2 = 93%; 16 studies; 5,261 participants <18Y) (21). There is low-quality evidence that community deworming has little or no effect (MD = 0.02 g/dL, 95%CI = −0.05 to 0.09; I2 = 0%; two studies; 464 participants <16Y) and that, in programs that treat only infected children, a single dose of deworming may improve Hb (MD = 0.37 g/dL, 95%CI = 0.10–0.64; two trials; 108 participants <16Y; low QoE) (46). Additional H. pylori eradication therapy along with iron administration provided better improvements in iron deficiency anemia than iron administration alone (WMD = 11.77 g/L, 95%CI = 2.40–21.15; I2 = 90%; four studies; participants <18Y) (48).
A total of six reviews addressed the adverse effects of different interventions for preventing, treating, and controlling anemia (21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 31) (Table 4). We did not find any review that assessed the adverse effects of antimalarial intervention, deworming, H. pylori treatment, or WASH interventions.
Table 4. Findings for adverse events of different interventions for addressing childhood anemias in included systematic reviews.
In children between 4 months and 2 years, there is an uncertain effect of risk of adverse events with iron supplements as compared with controls with a 10% increase in the risk of any adverse event (RR = 1.10, 95%CI = 0.98–1.25; I2 = 0%; three studies, 912 participants), 38% increase in the risk of vomiting (RR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.10–1.73; I2 = 1%; three studies, 1,020 participants), and 3% increase in the risk of diarrhea (RR = 1.03, 95%CI = 0.86–1.23; I2 = 0%; six studies; 1,697 participants) (25).
In apparently healthy children under 12 years of age, intermittent supplementation of iron alone or with other nutrients showed a 3.87-times risk of any adverse events (RR = 3.87, 95%CI = 0.19–76.92; one study; 53 participants) (28). However, the risk of any adverse events was 40% less (RR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.19–1.87; I2 = 87%; four studies; 895 participants), and the risk of diarrhea was 1.17 times higher (RR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.60–2.28; I2 = 0%; one study; 122 participants) with intermittent iron supplements with or without other micronutrients as compared with daily iron supplements with or without other micronutrients (28). There is an insignificant effect of food fortification on adverse effects (RR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.16–7.42; one study; 90 participants; moderate QoE) and diarrhea (low QoE) in preschool and school-age children (31). The risk of gastrointestinal upset was 1.3 times higher (RR = 1.30, 95%CI = 0.89–1.91; I2 = 0%; four studies; 576 participants), constipation was 3.44 times higher (RR = 3.44, 95%CI = 0.66–19.68; I2 = 6%; two studies, 202 participants), and vomiting was 14% lower (RR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.13–5.67; I2 = 0%; two studies; 202 participants) with iron supplements in school-aged children between 3.3 and 15 years (24).
In children under 18 years old residing in malaria endemic areas, there is a significantly higher risk of diarrheal episodes per patient-month by 15% with iron supplements (RR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.06–1.26; eight studies; 23,912 participants) and by 29% with Zn supplements (RR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.15–1.44; I2 = 30%; three studies, 6,346 participants) (21).
We evaluated 31 SRs that assessed the effects of different interventions for addressing anemia in children and adolescents. The highest number of SRs addressed food fortification and iron supplementation. None of the reviews were from India or included participants from India. Overall, the quality of the evidence reported by the SRs varied between moderate to low (Supplementary File 2).
In infants, iron fortification showed better results as compared with MMN fortification (30, 34). In children between 4 months and 2 years of age; home fortification, when used as a preventive measure, showed significant reduction in the risk of anemia followed by iron supplementation (25, 38, 40). However, when used as a treatment measure, home fortification insignificantly increased the risk of anemia (40). This difference in the effect of home fortification when used as a preventive measure and as a treatment measure might be because the prevention trials were conducted on unselected populations, and the participants in the control group did not receive any treatment. On the contrary, the therapeutic trials were conducted on anemic subjects, and the participants in the control received medicinal iron drops (40).
In children under 5 years old and in school-age children, fortification of food with iron and MMN showed better improvement in Hb (moderate QoE) (34, 36). In apparently healthy children under 12 years old, intermittent supplementation of iron alone or in combination with other nutrients significantly increased Hb concentrations, and this positive response did not differ with frequency or duration of supplementation or age of children (28). The risk of anemia is higher with intermittent iron/FA/MMN supplementation as compared with daily iron/FA/MMN supplementation (28). A school-based deworming program resulted in a decrease in the prevalence of anemia in children (47). Programs that combined interventions, such as deworming with iron and nutrition supplementation, led to better effects as compared with single interventions (47). Daily oral iron supplementation with or without other vitamins (20, 24) and MMN-fortified beverages (32) showed maximum reduction in the risk of anemia in children between 3.5 and 18 years. In malaria endemic areas, iron supplementation with antimalarial treatment reduced the risk of anemia (21). There is low-quality evidence that community deworming has little or no effect (46).
In summary, results were favorable for iron with MMN fortification until school age and iron with MMN supplementation in older children with a clear reduction in the risk of anemia and increase in Hb among the intervention groups of individual SRs. However, other interventions reported by SRs were inconclusive and all SRs suggested further research on the same.
The chances of developing anemia were less in children who received daily supplements as compared with those who received intermittent supplements. However, studies suggest that, in places and settings in which daily supplementation is not practical, intermittent supplementation can be used as a public health intervention to address childhood anemia. We did not find any review that assessed the effect of treatment of deworming, H. pylori infection, or WASH intervention on anemia status.
Limitations of the review: This overview examined the available evidence with respect to interventions addressing childhood and adolescent anemia without any restrictions on the type of interventions or language of publication. We did not restrict the search to Cochrane reviews, and inclusion of non-Cochrane reviews makes it more comprehensive. However, wide physiological variations during different stages of childhood could make the uniform application of interventions difficult. We acknowledge that not all SRs included in this overview were up to date. We found limited reviews on deworming, antimalarial interventions, H. pylori intervention, and WASH intervention, and hence, there is a need for primary studies in these areas. Some SRs did not consider socio-economic or nutritional status at baseline or did not report this clearly, which could have had an influence on some findings. In some reviews, there were too few data to reach a firm conclusion.
Strengths of the review: We estimate the potential bias in this overview as low. We followed the Cochrane handbook for methodology (19). The search was as comprehensive as possible. Screening of studies, data extraction, and assessing the methodological quality of reviews were done in duplicate. The authors of this review are from diverse disciplines (e.g., public health, biostatistics, nutrition, physiology, and maternal and child health), and this internal diversity may be an asset of this overview.
After an extensive literature search, we did not come across any overview of SRs that has addressed this area. This overview can help healthcare providers, consumers, public health specialists, and decision makers by providing a “bird's-eye view” of the efficacy of different public health interventions across reviews and age groups.
Implications of All the Available Evidence
This overview identified interventions that had favorable effect sizes (which public health experts might contemplate using) as well as interventions that were mostly ineffective (which public health experts might want to restrict). More research is needed to assess the effect of deworming, antimalarial intervention, H. pylori treatment, and WASH intervention on anemia. Also, better recording of adverse events in primary studies is needed.
Results were favorable for iron and MMN fortification and supplementation with a clear reduction in the risk of anemia and increase in Hb levels across all age groups. Other interventions reported by the SRs were inconclusive and suggest further research. MMN improves outcomes better than single micronutrients. Also, better recording of adverse effects of different intervention is needed.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
AS envisioned the idea of the review. RV developed and ran the search strategies. AS and PM developed the protocol. PM and RH screened title and abstract. RH and NK screened full texts. BU resolved disagreement among primary reviewers (for screening) through discussion. AS, PM, and MK extracted data. AS and PM assessed the methodological quality of included SRs. NN, AG, and SQ provided technical advice. MK and PM drafted the manuscript with input from AS, BU, NN, AG, and SQ. All authors have contributed significantly to this overview, read the manuscript, and participated in writing and revision.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Dr. Penny Holding, Grand Challenge Canada.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2020.549549/full#supplementary-material
1. King TC. Elsevier's Integrated Pathology. (2007). p. 263–89. Available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323043281500176 (accessed December 05, 2019).
2. WHO. The Global Prevalence of Anaemia in 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization (2015). Available online at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/177094/1/9789241564960-eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed December 05, 2019).
3. WHO. Global Health Estimates 2014 Summary Tables: Deaths by Cause, Age and Sex, by WHO Region, 2000−2012. Geneva: World Health Organization (2014). Available online at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html (accessed December 05, 2019).
4. Bharati S, Pal M, Chakrabarty S, Bharati P. Socioeconomic determinants of iron-deficiency anemia among children aged 6 to 59 months in India. Asia Pac J Public Health. (2015) 27:NP1432–43. doi: 10.1177/1010539513491417
6. Kassebaum NJ, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi M, Wulf SK, Johns N, Lozano R, et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood. (2014) 123, 615–24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508325
9. Carter RC, Jacobson JL, Burden MJ, Armony-Sivan R, Dodge NC, Angelilli ML, et al. Iron deficiency anemia and cognitive function in infancy. Pediatrics. (2010) 126:e427–34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2097
10. Khedr E, Hamed SA, Elbeih E, El-Shereef H, Ahmad Y, Ahmed S. Iron states and cognitive abilities in young adults: neuropsychological and neurophysiological assessment. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2008) 258:489–96. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0822-y
12. Lukusa Kazadi A, Ngiyulu RM, Gini-Ehungu JL, Mbuyi-Muamba JM, Aloni MN. Factors associated with growth retardation in children suffering from sickle cell anemia: first report from central Africa. Anemia. (2017) 2017:7916348. doi: 10.1155/2017/7916348
13. Baltussen R, Knai C, Sharan M. Iron fortification and iron supplementation are cost-effective interventions to reduce iron deficiency in four subregions of the world. J Nutr. (2004) 134:2678–84. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2678
14. Prasanna Mithra, Anju Sinha, Nithin Kumar, Ramesh Holla, Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, et al. Interventions for the control and prevention of anaemia among children and adolescents: an overview of systematic reviews. PROSPERO. (2016) CRD42016053687.
15. Covidence Systematic Review Software. Melbourne, VIC: Veritas Health Innovation. Available online at: www.covidence.org (accessed December 5, 2019).
16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. (2009) 339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
17. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. (2009) 62:1013–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
18. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. (2017) 358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008
19. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Vol. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011). Available online at: http://handbook.cochrane.org (accessed January 02, 2019).
20. Low MSY, Speedy J, Styles CE, De-Regil LM, Pasricha S-R. Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2016) 4:CD009747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009747.pub2
22. Mayo-Wilson E, Imdad A, Junior J, Dean S, Bhutta ZA. Preventive zinc supplementation for children, and the effect of additional iron: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. (2014) 4:e004647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004647
23. Cembranel F, Dallazen C, González-Chica DA. [Effectiveness of ferrous sulfate supplementation in the prevention of anemia in children: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis]. Cad Saude Publica. (2013) 29:1731–51. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2013001300014
24. Low M, Farrell A, Biggs B-A, Pasricha S-R. Effects of daily iron supplementation in primary-school-aged children: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ. (2013) 185:E791–802. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130628
25. Pasricha S-R, Hayes E, Kalumba K, Biggs B-A. Effect of daily iron supplementation on health in children aged 4-23 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Glob Health. (2013) 1:e77–86. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70046-9
26. Thompson J, Biggs B-A, Pasricha S-R. Effects of daily iron supplementation in 2- to 5-year-old children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. (2013) 131:739–53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2256
27. Abdullah K, Kendzerska T, Shah P, Uleryk E, Parkin PC. Efficacy of oral iron therapy in improving the developmental outcome of pre-school children with non-anaemic iron deficiency: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. (2013) 16:1497–506. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003709
28. De-Regil LM, Jefferds MED, Sylvetsky AC, Dowswell T. Intermittent iron supplementation for improving nutrition and development in children under 12 years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2011) 2011:CD009085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009085.pub2
29. Ramakrishnan U, Aburto N, McCabe G, Martorell R. Multimicronutrient interventions but not vitamin a or iron interventions alone improve child growth: results of 3 meta-analyses. J Nutr. (2004) 134:2592–602. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2592
30. Matsuyama M, Harb T, David M, Davies PS, Hill RJ. Effect of fortified milk on growth and nutritional status in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. (2017) 20:1214–25. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003189
31. De-Regil LM, Jefferds MED, Peña-Rosas JP. Point-of-use fortification of foods with micronutrient powders containing iron in children of preschool and school-age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 11:CD009666. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009666.pub2
32. Aaron GJ, Dror DK, Yang Z. Multiple-micronutrient fortified non-dairy beverage interventions reduce the risk of anemia and iron deficiency in school-aged children in low-middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis (i-iv). Nutrients. (2015) 7:3847–68. doi: 10.3390/nu7053847
36. Eichler K, Wieser S, Rüthemann I, Brügger U. Effects of micronutrient fortified milk and cereal food for infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. (2012) 12:506. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-506
37. Gera T, Sachdev HS, Boy E. Effect of iron-fortified foods on hematologic and biological outcomes: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. (2012) 96:309–24. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031500
38. De-Regil LM, Suchdev PS, Vist GE, Walleser S, Peña-Rosas JP. Home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders for health and nutrition in children under two years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2011) 6:CD008959. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008959.pub2
39. Best C, Neufingerl N, Del Rosso JM, Transler C, van den Briel T, Osendarp S. Can multi-micronutrient food fortification improve the micronutrient status, growth, health, and cognition of schoolchildren? A systematic review. Nutr Rev. (2011) 69:186–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00378.x
41. Kristjansson E, Francis DK, Liberato S, Benkhalti Jandu M, Welch V, Batal M, et al. Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) 2015:CD009924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009924.pub2
42. McDonagh MS, Blazina I, Dana T, Cantor A, Bougatsos C. Screening and routine supplementation for iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review. Pediatrics. (2015) 135:723–33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3979
43. Gera T, Sachdev HPS, Nestel P. Effect of combining multiple micronutrients with iron supplementation on Hb response in children: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Public Health Nutr. (2009) 12:756–73. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003145
44. Gera T, Sachdev HPS, Nestel P, Sachdev SS. Effect of iron supplementation on haemoglobin response in children: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2007) 44:468–86. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000243440.85452.38
45. Sun J, Zhang L, Cui J, Li S, Lu H, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of dietary intervention treatment on children with iron deficiency anemia in China: a meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. (2018) 17:108. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0749-x
46. Taylor-Robinson DC, Maayan N, Soares-Weiser K, Donegan S, Garner P. Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2015) 7. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub6
49. Dangour AD, Watson L, Cumming O, Boisson S, Che Y, Velleman Y, et al. Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2013) 8:CD009382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009382.pub2
51. Ojukwu JU, Okebe JU, Yahav D, Paul M. Oral iron supplementation for preventing or treating anaemia among children in malaria-endemic areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2009) 3:CD006589. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006589.pub2
53. Dickson RC, Awasthi S, Demellweek C, Williamson PR. Anthelmintic drugs for treating worms in children: effects on growth and cognitive performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2007) 2:CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub2
54. Taylor-Robinson DC, Maayan N, Soares-Weiser K, Donegan S, Garner P. Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin and school performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2012) 7:CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub4
55. Taylor-Robinson DC, Jones AP, Garner P. Deworming drugs for treating soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on growth and school performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2007) 4:CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub3
56. De-Regil LM, Suchdev PS, Vist GE, Walleser S, Peña-Rosas JP. Home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders for health and nutrition in children under two years of age (review). Evid Based Child Health Cochrane Rev J. (2013) 8:112–201. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1895
Keywords: childhood anemia, adolescent anemia, supplementation, fortification, overview of review
Citation: Mithra P, Khatib MN, Sinha AP, Kumar N, Holla R, Unnikrishnan B, Vijayamma R, Nair NS, Gaidhane A and Quazi Zahiruddin S (2021) Interventions for Addressing Anemia Among Children and Adolescents: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Front. Pediatr. 8:549549. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.549549
Received: 06 April 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020;
Published: 16 February 2021.
Edited by:Eduardo Daniel Rosas-Blum, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United States
Reviewed by:Lutfi Abdulfattah Jaber, Independent Researcher, Taibe, Israel
Denease Francis, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, United States
Ranjan Bista, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, United States
Copyright © 2021 Mithra, Khatib, Sinha, Kumar, Holla, Unnikrishnan, Vijayamma, Nair, Gaidhane and Quazi Zahiruddin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anju Pradhan Sinha, firstname.lastname@example.org
†These authors have contributed equally to this work