Case Report: Intact Survival of a Marginally Viable Male Infant Born Weighing 268 Grams at 24 Weeks Gestation

Introduction

Detailed case reports of infants with a birth weight of <300 g are extremely limited because of their exceedingly low survival rate (1–9). In particular clinical outcomes are extremely unfavorable for male infants in this category (1, 3, 10, 11). As of February 2019, only 23 infants weighing <300 g at birth were registered in the University of Iowa's Tiniest Babies Registry, of whom only four were male (12). However, a report of the successful discharge of an infant born in 1938 with a birth weight of 283 g indicates that some of such infants are viable with appropriate treatment (12). The ongoing worldwide improvement in the survival rate of infants with extremely low birth weight can be attributed to physicians' accumulation of experience and evidence over the years. Continuing accumulation of case reports is essential to improve clinical outcomes for some of such infants.

Neonatal medicine has already achieved great success in caring for infants weighing 400 g or more at birth (1, 3). However, physicians may hesitate to treat infants born weighing less than this, particularly those below 300 g, because of the unfavorable prognosis and lack of evidence-based practice. For male infants in particular, a high mortality rate and incidence of severe complications are still unresolved issues (10, 11). However, there have been several recent reports of survival of infants weighing <300 g at birth (1, 8, 9). There is currently an active discussion regarding the appropriate ethical and social approach to treat infants with extremely low birth weight.

We report the case of a preterm small for gestational age male infant who was born at 24 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 268 g and was discharged from our hospital without requiring home oxygen therapy or tube feeding. He did not experience severe intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, hearing disability, or any other serious complications. This case illustrates the importance of both minimal handling and family involvement.

The concept of minimal handling has been familiar to pediatricians since 1980 (13–18). Today, this has become a standard of care, especially in preterm infants, as it promotes cardiopulmonary stability and is associated with good long-term outcomes. However, it is unclear to what degree minimal handling standards can be maintained with marginally viable premature infants, as handling may be necessary for evaluation and treatment. In addition, evidence regarding the application of minimal handling in these infants is limited, as there are few reports on survivors in this population, and those that exist have generally involved infants weighing more than 300 g at birth. Thus, our report provides information on the application of minimal handling standards for marginally viable premature infants.

Family involvement is the standard of care for premature infants admitted to the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) and can be regarded as the essential supporting foundation of NICU treatment. It strengthens bonds among family members, reduces stress for both the babies and their families, and promotes infant stability and development (19–21). Despite these benefits, hospital staff often hesitate to involve the family in the care of marginally viable premature infants because of the risk of infection and the infants' instability, and there are few reports regarding the effects of family involvement in these infants. We consider family involvement especially important in these cases because the stress placed on the families is extraordinary. We hope our report of successfully involving the family in the treatment of a vulnerable premature infant will encourage hospital staff to increase family involvement in these cases.

Case Description

A male infant was born to a 30-years-old mother with no significant medical history (gravida 0, para 0, abortus 0) who became pregnant via natural insemination. At 23 weeks of gestation, the mother was referred to our hospital because of severe fetal growth restriction caused by utero-placental insufficiency and was treated with antenatal steroids. Fetal maturity was ascertained by calculating from the mother's last menstrual period and was confirmed by prenatal ultrasound. Prenatal counseling was conducted for the parents, and they requested to give birth by cesarean section. At 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation, the infant was delivered by emergency cesarean section because of interrupted blood flow in the umbilical cord; there was no umbilical cord coiling or amniotic fluid staining. The weight of the placenta was 60 g. Placental pathology revealed infarction. No findings of chorioamnionitis were observed. Immediately after birth, he was wrapped using a plastic bag on a prewarmed radiant warmer. The ambient temperature of the operating room was set to 27°C (22). He was intubated in the operation room with a 2-mm endotracheal tube and transferred to the NICU in an incubator. The admission temperature at the axilla was 35.8°C. The humidity in the incubator was set at 90% on day 0 in order to reduce insensible water loss, and it was lowered by 5% daily to 60% (23). His Apgar score was 2 at 1 min after birth, 6 at 5 min, and 6 at 10 min. Apart from his size, his physical examination and laboratory test results were unremarkable. Postnatal maturation assessment was adequate for a preterm infant born at 24 weeks of gestation. Genetic disorders were ruled out as a cause of intrauterine growth restriction based on the findings of physical examination and ultrasonography and the results of blood examination including blood gas, complete blood count, and biochemistry. Hence, genetic testing was not performed. His birth weight was 268 g (−3.92 SD). In order to prioritize stabilization, his head circumference and length were not measured at birth; when they were measured for the first time on postnatal day 16 (postmenstrual age 26 weeks, 2 days), his head circumference was 18.5 cm (−3.03 SD) and his length was 24.0 cm (−3.7 SD). On arrival to the NICU, he was placed on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation because of low pulmonary compliance, and a surfactant was administered on days 0 and 2. Sedation was not performed. Anhydrous caffeine was started from day 0. Prophylactic antibiotics (ampicillin, gentamicin, and fosfluconazole) were administered after birth and continued until day 6. Because the umbilical artery was narrow, an umbilical artery catheter could not be inserted. The infant's blood pressure was measured after birth via a 24G peripheral arterial catheter to avoid the risk of damage that a cuff would pose to his immature skin and was the approximate value expected for his gestational age; thus, no inotropes were administered. After the catheter occluded on day 8, we assessed his blood pressure mainly by physical examination. The target ranges of osmotic agents were set with reference to previous studies, and his albumin level was kept above 2.5 g/dL to maintain osmotic pressure (24–27). Echocardiography was performed to diagnose patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) on day 1. We administered 0.1 mg/kg per dose of indomethacin, because echocardiography represented an increased shunt volume of PDA (28, 29). PDA closed after indomethacin administration on day 1. He required 45 days of mechanical ventilation, including 40 days of high-frequency oscillation (Figure 1). He was extubated on day 45 (30 weeks and 3 days of postmenstrual day) when we confirmed that the prongs of our continuous positive airway pressure machine fit his nose. His body weight when measured after extubation was 518 g on day 51 (31 weeks and 2 days of postmenstrual day). From day 42, he received a systemic steroid (dexamethasone) for 10 days, as advised by Doyle et al. (30). After successful extubation, he required nasal continuous positive airway pressure for 7 days and a high-flow nasal cannula for 116 days. Target SpO₂ was set at 85–95% before 34 weeks of postmenstrual age and above 95% afterward.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. The clinical course of respiratory management. The left vertical axis indicates the daily maximum ventilator setting for mean airway pressure and the right vertical axis indicates the daily maximum ventilator setting for FiO₂. The horizontal axis indicates the postnatal day of life. The solid line indicates mean airway pressure, and the dotted line indicates FiO₂. HFO, high-frequency oscillation; SIMV, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation.

Parenteral nutrition was started on day 0 via an 18G umbilical venous catheter. After this catheter became occluded on day 12, a 27G peripherally inserted central venous catheter was used, but it also became occluded on day 19. From then on, parenteral nutrition was continued via a peripheral venous catheter. On day 1, oral administration of the mother's breast milk using a cotton swab was performed by the parents, and trophic feeding via nasogastric tube was started. A maximum of 3 mL/kg of 5-fold-diluted amidotrizoic acid was rectally administered for 1 week starting on day 1, resulting in successful defecation. After 3 days of trophic feeds, enteral feeding was stopped because the infant's abdomen was gradually becoming distended. His daily abdominal X-ray indicated significantly expanding intestinal gas, and we diagnosed him with meconium-related ileus. Intragastric administration of 3 mL/kg 5-fold-diluted amidotrizoic acid succeeded in triggering mass excretion of feces, as described in previous studies (31–35). Subsequently, abdominal distention improved, and enteral feeding was resumed. Fortified breast milk was used from day 20 when the infant's breast milk consumption reached 100 mL/kg per day. We maintained him on a breast milk diet for most of his hospital stay, adding medium-chain triglyceride oil from day 94 to 133 for calorie enrichment. The calorie goal was set at 120–140 kcal/kg/day. Oral feeding was initiated on day 98, and the gastric tube was removed on day 137. During the treatment, blood glucose was managed within the reference range with glucose administration and enteral feeding only, except for insulin administration at day 1 and from day 5 to 6. Fluid intake was determined from vital signs and physical findings, fluid balance, and blood test results. Fluid intake was relatively restricted in expectation of reducing risk of morbidities and complications (36). Transepidermal water loss was estimated based on the sodium levels, fluid intake, urine output, and previous reports (37). Total fluid volume administered on day 0 was 65 mL/kg; for most of the period after the patient stabilized, it was maintained between 130 and 160 mL/kg per day. Minimal handling was conducted in all aspects of the patient's management. As described above, anthropometric measurements were kept to a minimum, and our patient's weight was estimated from fluids and nutritional balance and was adjusted on the day it was measured. After his first weighing on day 0, he was not weighed again until day 30 to confirm the anticipated growth. His body weight, length, and head circumference were measured every 2 weeks after that. Until day 42, we kept him in a prone position without postural change, aiming to prevent both gastroesophageal reflux and unplanned extubation. During that period, we undertook careful skin management, making sure to give him proper support to prevent bedsores. Although minimizing postural change may increase the risk of skin and pulmonary infection, there were only two events after the day of birth when we had to administer antibiotics: from day 38 to 45 for suspected aspiration pneumonia and from day 66 to 76 for cellulitis due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus at the site of the removed peripheral catheter. Blood sampling was also minimized to reduce the frequency of painful procedures and the risk of iatrogenic anemia. For a month after birth, heel sticks were performed as little as once per day to analyze blood gas, electrolytes, metabolic factors (glucose, lactate), and biochemical factors (albumin, phosphate, C-reactive protein). We performed a comprehensive blood examination (complete blood count and biochemical tests) only once every week or two (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Table 1. The average number of daily heel sticks and endotracheal suctions for NICU patients during the first 2 weeks of life.

In addition to minimal handling, we encouraged parental involvement from the day of birth. Shortly after the infant was born, the family began to talk to him and hold him. The parents frequently visited our NICU to engage in physical contact with him, including breastfeeding, which was performed from day 1 (Supplementary Video 1).

Magnetic resonance imaging of the head at 45 weeks of postmenstrual age revealed no detectable abnormalities. An automated auditory brainstem response test was bilaterally passed. However, the infant developed bilateral retinopathy of prematurity (stages 2–3), requiring laser treatment. He was discharged from the hospital on day 176 (postmenstrual age, 49 weeks and 1 day) without any requirement for home oxygen therapy or tube feeding. His body weight at discharge was 3,238 g (−3.41 SD), his head circumference was 35.5 cm (−1.31 SD), and his length was 46.8 cm (−4.55 SD) (Figure 2) (45). The patient's mother said that she could only say how happy she was that he had grown so much.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Patient's growth charts. Our infant's anthropometric measurements are plotted against Japanese neonatal anthropometric charts of male infants delivered by a para 0 mother according to gestational age at birth. Dots indicate the patient's measurements at the given postmenstrual age. The vertical axes indicate (A) body weight, (B) body length, and (C) head circumference. The horizontal axis indicates gestational age for the Japanese neonatal anthropometric charts and postmenstrual age for our patient. The Japanese neonatal anthropometric charts feature five solid lines indicating the distribution of data; in order from top to bottom, they represent the mean +2.0 SD, +1.5 SD, ±0 SD, −1.5 SD, and −2.0 SD.

Discussion

Although neonatal medicine has advanced enough to produce favorable clinical outcomes for most premature infants, physicians still hesitate to treat those weighing <300 g at birth, especially male infants, because of lack of experience and evidence (1–12). Case reports of male infants weighing <300 g at birth are especially rare owing to a survival rate far lower than that of the female infants of similar weight. The present case report recounts the detailed clinical course of a small for gestational age male infant weighing 268 g at 24 weeks gestation; as of February 2019, he was the tiniest male infant in the world to be discharged from the hospital without any serious complications other than severe retinopathy of prematurity that required laser therapy (12, 46).

Antenatal steroid treatment contributed greatly to the absence of serious complications in the present case (47). The absence of preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes, which causes chorioamnionitis and oligohydramnios, was also beneficial for the survival of the infant (48, 49). Although the body weight at birth of the present case was extremely low, the successful clinical course was also related to the fact that the child was born at 24 weeks of gestation due to intrauterine growth restriction instead at 22 or 23 weeks of gestation (50). The primary cause for the severe retinopathy of prematurity was likely to be short gestational age and extremely low birth weight (38, 39). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia might also increase its risk (40). Further research is needed to improve the outcomes for marginally viable infants.

Table 1 shows that the number of heel sticks and endotracheal suctions during the first 2 weeks of life in our case is similar to that reported in previous cases (41–44, 51–53). During this period, our patient underwent three heel sticks (range 1–5), and 4.7 endotracheal suctions (range 1–9) per day on average; on some days, he received as few as 1 of each. Surprisingly, these numbers were similar to those reported in previous cases involving infants with a birth weight of more than 300 g. If handling can be safely minimized, this can improve patient stability and promote development (13–18). However, the necessary degree of handling should be determined by the physician, as minimal handling also means less information on the patient's situation. Fortunately, our hospital has previous experience with infants with a birth weight of <300 g (8), which helped us minimize handling in the present case.

Regarding family involvement during the acute phase of treatment, concerns about infection and instability may lead some physicians to refrain from encouraging families to proactively seek contact with their infants. However, we believe that encouraging families to hold their infants and talk to them contributes to infant stability and improves long-term development (19–21). The present case demonstrates that family involvement beginning soon after birth can be achieved safely and can positively affect the family's emotional well-being and the infant's clinical outcomes.

A limitation of this report is that the number of infants weighing <300 g at birth who could survive is unclear. The University of Iowa's worldwide database of surviving infants with birth weights <400 g includes cases reported in media outlets and medical journals, as well as reports submitted directly by physicians, but it is possible that some of those cases may not be included (12). However, the database mentioned above is currently the largest database of surviving marginally viable premature infants worldwide. Given the low survival rates reported in the literature, it is likely that the actual number of survivors in this population is extremely low (1–11).

Our experience, in this case, demonstrates that minimal handling can be safe and effective in treating infants with birth weight <300 g and that family interaction beginning soon after birth can positively affect clinical outcomes and family relationships with no adverse effects. We conclude that improved clinical outcomes and strong family relationships can be achieved for marginally viable premature infants through meticulous consideration of minimal handling and family involvement together with the application of up-to-date research and advanced medical devices. This report describes a very rare case that could be a source of invaluable information for the development of neonatal medicine. Further research developments are needed.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants' parents for the publication of this case report and any identifiable data or images.

Author Contributions

TA was an attending physician of the patient, performed the literature review, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DW, ST, and MT assisted in the patient's treatment. MH and TT supervised the patient's treatment, provided scientific contributions, and critically revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by MEXT KAKENHI, grant numbers JP 19K12734 and 15K09725 (TA).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge all the staff in the Division of Neonatology at Keio University Hospital, especially Dr. Kaori Hara, Dr. Takane Kin, Dr. Masayoshi Shinjoh, and Dr. Norihiro Nagai, for their assistance in the patient's treatment; Satoru Ikenoue and Miho Kawaida for their advice regarding the manuscript; and Dr. Taisuke Nogayama for his assistance in describing the growth charts. We also thank the infant and his parents for their contributions.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2020.628362/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Inoue H, Ochiai M, Yasuoka K, Tanaka K, Kurata H, Fujiyoshi J, et al. Early mortality and morbidity in infants with birth weight of 500 grams or less in Japan. J Pediatr. (2017) 190:112–7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lau C, Ambalavanan N, Chakraborty H, Wingate MS, Carlo WA. Extremely low birth weight and infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. (2013) 131:855–60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2471

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Brumbaugh JE, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Sridhar A, Carlo WA, Hintz SR, et al. Outcomes of extremely preterm infants with birth weight <400 g. JAMA Pediatr. (2019) 173:434–45. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Nishida H, Sakuma I. Limit of viability in Japan: ethical consideration. J Perinat Med. (2009) 37:457–60. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Muraskas J, Hasson A, Besinger RE. A girl with a birth weight of 280 g, now 14 years old. N Engl J Med. (2004) 351:836–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200408193510826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Muraskas JK, Carlson NJ, Halsey C, Frederiksen MC, Sabbagha RE. Survival of a 280-g infant. N Engl J Med. (1991) 324:1598–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105303242213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Muraskas JK, Rau BJ, Castillo PR, Gianopoulos J, Boyd LA. Long-term follow-up of 2 newborns with a combined birth weight of 540 grams. Pediatrics. (2012) 129:e174–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hokuto I, Ikeda K, Tokieda K, Mori K, Sueoka K. An ultra-premature baby of 290 g birth weight needed more than 500 mg/kg of calcium and phosphorus daily. Eur J Pediatr. (2001) 160:450–1. doi: 10.1007/s004310100761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kohelet D, Arbel E, Shochat R, Tavori I. Survival of a 300-g infant ventilated by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. (2002) 30:1152–5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200205000-00033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Garfinkle J, Yoon EW, Alvaro R, Nwaesei C, Claveau M, Lee SK, et al. Trends in sex-specific differences in outcomes in extreme preterms: progress or natural barriers? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2020) 105:158–63. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316399

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kent AL, Wright IM, Abdel-Latif ME, New South W, Australian Capital Territory Neonatal Intensive Care Units Audit G. Mortality and adverse neurologic outcomes are greater in preterm male infants. Pediatrics. (2012) 129:124–31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. The University of Iowa. The Tiniest Babies™. (2019). Available online at: https://webapps1.healthcare.uiowa.edu/TiniestBabies/index.aspx (accessed February 20, 2019).

Google Scholar

13. Speidel BD. Adverse effects of routine procedures on preterm infants. Lancet. (1978) 1:864–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90204-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Murdoch DR, Darlow BA. Handling during neonatal intensive care. Arch Dis Child. (1984) 59:957–61. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.10.957

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Danford DA, Miske S, Headley J, Nelson RM. Effects of routine care procedures on transcutaneous oxygen in neonates: a quantitative approach. Arch Dis Child. (1983) 58:20–3. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.1.20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Long JG, Philip AG, Lucey JF. Excessive handling as a cause of hypoxemia. Pediatrics. (1980) 65:203–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.65.2.203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Dahl M, Kamper J. Physical outcome and school performance of very-low-birthweight infants treated with minimal handling and early nasal CPAP. Acta Paediatr. (2006) 95:1099–103. doi: 10.1080/08035250600609781

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Latini G, De Felice C, Presta G, Rosati E, Vacca P. Minimal handling and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. (2003) 162:227–9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1131-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lv B, Gao XR, Sun J, Li TT, Liu ZY, Zhu LH, et al. Family-centered care improves clinical outcomes of very-low-birth-weight infants: a quasi-experimental study. Front Pediatr. (2019) 7:138. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Raiskila S, Axelin A, Toome L, Caballero S, Tandberg BS, Montirosso R, et al. Parents' presence and parent-infant closeness in 11 neonatal intensive care units in six European countries vary between and within the countries. Acta Paediatr. (2017) 106:878–88. doi: 10.1111/apa.13798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Pineda R, Bender J, Hall B, Shabosky L, Annecca A, Smith J. Parent participation in the neonatal intensive care unit: predictors and relationships to neurobehavior and developmental outcomes. Early Hum Dev. (2018) 117:32–8. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. McCall EM, Alderdice F, Halliday HL, Vohra S, Johnston L. Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 2:CD004210. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004210.pub5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Glass L, Valdez A. Preterm infant incubator humidity levels: a systematic review. Adv Neonatal Care. (2020). doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000791. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yang CY, Li BY, Xu P, Yang YJ, Yang QZ. Correlation of serum albumin with the clinical features and prognosis of preterm neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. (2016) 43:149–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

25. Torer B, Hanta D, Yapakci E, Gokmen Z, Parlakgumus A, Gulcan H, et al. Association of serum albumin level and mortality in premature infants. J Clin Lab Anal. (2016) 30:867–72. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Arsenault D, Brenn M, Kim S, Gura K, Compher C, Simpser E, et al. A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines: hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in the neonate receiving parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (2012) 36:81–95. doi: 10.1177/0148607111418980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Späth C, Sjöström ES, Ahlsson F, Ågren J, Domellöf M. Sodium supply influences plasma sodium concentration and the risks of hyper- and hyponatremia in extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Res. (2017) 81:455–60. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.264

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Carmo KB, Evans N, Paradisis M. Duration of indomethacin treatment of the preterm patent ductus arteriosus as directed by echocardiography. J Pediatr. (2009) 155:819–22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Singh Y, Fraisse A, Erdeve O, Atasay B. Echocardiographic diagnosis and hemodynamic evaluation of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low gestational age newborn (ELGAN) infants. Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:573627. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.573627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Doyle LW, Davis PG, Morley CJ, McPhee A, Carlin JB. Low-dose dexamethasone facilitates extubation among chronically ventilator-dependent infants: a multicenter, international, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. (2006) 117:75–83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kubota A, Imura K, Yagi M, Kawahara H, Mushiake S, Nakayama M, et al. Functional ileus in neonates: Hirschsprung's disease-allied disorders vs. meconium-related ileus. Eur J Pediatr Surg. (1999) 9:392–5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1072290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Kubota A, Shiraishi J, Kawahara H, Okuyama H, Yoneda A, Nakai H, et al. Meconium-related ileus in extremely low-birthweight neonates: etiological considerations from histology and radiology. Pediatr Int. (2011) 53:887–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2011.03381.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Michikata K, Kodama Y, Kaneko M, Sameshima H, Ikenoue T, Machigashira S, et al. Oral diatrizoate acid for meconium-related ileus in extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Int. (2018) 60:714–8. doi: 10.1111/ped.13606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Haiden N, Norooz F, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Horak AS, Jilma B, Berger A, et al. The effect of an osmotic contrast agent on complete meconium evacuation in preterm infants. Pediatrics. (2012) 130:e1600–6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Deshmukh M, Balasubramanian H, Patole S. Meconium evacuation for facilitating feed tolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. (2016) 110:55–65. doi: 10.1159/000444075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Bell EF, Acarregui MJ. Restricted vs. liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2014) CD000503. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000503.pub3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Wada M, Kusuda S, Takahashi N, Nishida H. Fluid and electrolyte balance in extremely preterm infants <24 weeks of gestation in the 1st week of life. Pediatr Int. (2008) 50:331–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02577.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Todd DA, Wright A, Smith J, NICUS Group. Severe retinopathy of prematurity in infants <30 weeks' gestation in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory from 1992 to 2002. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2007) 92:F251–4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.096479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Darlow BA, Hutchinson JL, Henderson-Smart DJ, Donoghue DA, Simpson JM, Evans NJ, et al. Prenatal risk factors for severe retinopathy of prematurity among very preterm infants of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. Pediatrics. (2005) 115:990–6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Seiberth V, Linderkamp O. Risk factors in retinopathy of prematurity. A multivariate statistical analysis. Ophthalmologica. (2000) 214:131–5. doi: 10.1159/000027482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Simons SH, van Dijk M, Anand KS, Roofthooft D, van Lingen RA, Tibboel D. Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2003) 157:1058–64. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Ducrocq S, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. (2008) 300:60–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Cignacco E, Hamers J, van Lingen RA, Stoffel L, Buchi S, Muller R, et al. Neonatal procedural pain exposure and pain management in ventilated preterm infants during the first 14 days of life. Swiss Med Wkly. (2009) 139:226–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Jeong IS, Park SM, Lee JM, Choi YJ, Lee J. The frequency of painful procedures in neonatal intensive care units in South Korea. Int J Nurs Pract. (2014) 20:398–407. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Itabashi K, Miura F, Uehara R, Nakamura Y. New Japanese neonatal anthropometric charts for gestational age at birth. Pediatr Int. (2014) 56:702–8. doi: 10.1111/ped.12331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. BBC News. “Tiniest baby boy” ever sent home leaves Tokyo hospital. (2019) Available online at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-47382058?ocid=socialflow_twitter (accessed December 15, 2020).

47. Ehret D, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT, Bernstein IM, Buzas JS, Soll RF, et al. Association of antenatal steroid exposure with survival among infants receiving postnatal life support at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. JAMA Netw Open. (2018) 1:e183235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, Antsaklis A, Loutradis D, Daskalakis G. The impact of residual oligohydramnios following preterm premature rupture of membranes on adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 222:628–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Soraisham AS, Singhal N, McMillan DD, Sauve RS, Lee SK, Canadian Neonatal Network. A multicenter study on the clinical outcome of chorioamnionitis in preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2009) 200:372.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Anderson JG, Baer RJ, Partridge JC, Kuppermann M, Franck LS, Rand L, et al. Survival and major morbidity of extremely preterm infants: a population-based study. Pediatrics. (2016) 138:e20154434. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Guedj R, Danan C, Daoud P, Zupan V, Renolleau S, Zana E, et al. Does neonatal pain management in intensive care units differ between night and day? An observational study. BMJ Open. (2014) 4:e004086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Britto CD, Rao Pn S, Nesargi S, Nair S, Rao S, Thilagavathy T, et al. PAIN–perception and assessment of painful procedures in the NICU. J Trop Pediatr. (2014) 60:422–7. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmu039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Roofthooft DW, Simons SH, Anand KJ, Tibboel D, van Dijk M. Eight years later, are we still hurting newborn infants? Neonatology. (2014) 105:218–26. doi: 10.1159/000357207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar