Quantification of Differential Metabolites in Dried Blood Spots Using Second-Tier Testing for SCADD/IBDD Disorders Based on Large-Scale Newborn Screening in a Chinese Population

Introduction

Acylcarnitine profiling of dried blood spots (DBSs) by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a valuable measurement tool for high-throughput newborn screening (NBS), which is important for diagnosing deficiencies, including those in fatty acid β-oxidation (FAO) and branched-chain amino acid metabolism (1). Unfortunately, this method is utilized without the differentiation of acylcarnitine into isomers, isobaric compounds, and contaminants based on non-derivatization MS/MS. Despite the development of several high-performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS methods for separating isomers in serum and urine, such approaches remain time-consuming, involve different derivatization steps, or focus on specific acylcarnitines. However, a new ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC–MS/MS) method that assesses special analytes as markers for short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (SCADD), isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (IBDD), and other disorders has been developed (1, 2).

Previous studies have shown that analyte testing for butyl carnitine (C4) in DBSs is able to confirm SCADD (MIM 606885) and IBDD (3) (MIM 611283), and this assay is also used to test for ethylmalonic encephalopathy (EE) (4, 5) (MIM 201470), glutaric acidemia type II (GA2) (6, 7) (MIM 213680), and formiminoglutamic aciduria (FIGLU, MIM 229100). Nevertheless, increasing concentrations of methylsuccinic acid (MSA) concentration serves as a special biochemical marker for EE (8), and elevations in OX-2-acetoacetic acid, isovalanyl glycine-2,2-hydroxyisobutyric acid-2, and adipic acid to extremely high levels are observed in GA2 (9). In some cases of FIGLU, formiminoglutamate is observed in biological fluids after histidine loading (10). Therefore, a novel second-tier screening method involving the use of UPLC-MS/MS can detect the secondary targets ethylmalonic acid (EMA) and isobutyryl-glycine (IBG), which are part of the differential diagnosis or profile review of screening for primary targets (11, 12). According to Adhikari et al., second-tier biochemical testing excludes nearly 50% of initial positive MS/MS tests (13).

Short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency is an autosomal recessive inborn-error metabolic disease of mitochondrial FAO (3, 14–16). The pathogenic gene is traditionally considered to be ACADS, and the biochemical signatures of defects in short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SCAD) result in the accumulation of plasma C4 and urine EMA (17, 18). Extremely rare autosomal recessive metabolic disorder IBDD has a heterogeneous phenotype that generally exhibits a mild clinical course (19–21). The first case of an inborn defect in the IBD gene was detected in 1998, and an increased level of urinary IBG has been reported (20). Many individuals with confirmed IBDD either show mild manifestations or are asymptomatic, which is comparable to classic organic academia (22). The natural history of SCADD and IBDD was elucidated in recent years via NBS and clinical follow-up of individuals with abnormal screening results (13). Although SCADD and IBDD typically involve benign biochemical phenotypes, additional factors, including environmental effects, associated genes, and the accumulation of toxic metabolites, may participate in the progression of their disorders (23). Therefore, to avoid misdiagnosis, novel second-tier testing programs have been reluctant to halt evaluations of neonates with elevated C4 concentrations.

The present study assessed the correlation of the initial DBS C4 value and the second-tier DBS EMA and IBG value in a large cohort of individuals identified as potential cases of SCADD/IBDD through NBS. We investigated whether the combined consideration of multiple test results improves the specificity of NBS for the differentiation of SCADD/IBDD from other disorders in an effort to reduce the burden of follow-up testing and unnecessary anxiety for families.

Although previous publications have described the familial impacts of NBS results, but these studies did not focus specifically on SCADD and IBDD within the context of benign clinical findings. Thus, to contribute to current data on these conditions, we evaluated the clinical biochemical outcomes of infants who were identified by the NBS program as having SCADD or IBDD from 2015 to 2020 and compared them to the health status of an age-matched control group. We also performed phone interviews to collect statements from parents on their experiences with the NBS and the clinical diagnosis of their children with SCADD/IBDD (24).

Materials and Methods

Among 469,730 neonates (249,032 males and 220,698 females) recruited at the Newborn Screening Center of Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital between November 2015 and March 2020 and analyzed by MS/MS throughout the study period, increased C4 levels and relative ratios that exceeded the cutoff values were found in 1,029 neonates (0.219%, 1,029/469,730). These results were considered to be initial positive screening results for SCADD, IBDD, and other metabolic disorders. From March 2019 to March 2020, 237 neonatal samples positive for C4-associated metabolic defects based on elevated C4 and related ratios were collected by using a second-tier test by UPLC-MS/MS test. Moreover, urinary GC/MS was performed as a common detection method that would be used with recall of positive individuals. Mutation analysis, which involved sequencing was performed for diagnosis, and “site validation” of variants relevant to the screened disorders was performed. A genetic family tree was constructed using data from parental peripheral blood leukocytes obtained via Sanger sequencing. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI-3100 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the DNA sequencing pipeline developed for screening purposes, which included the ACADS and ADAD8 genes as alternative targets, was employed for the clinical diagnosis of individuals identified as positive by MS/MS screening. The DNA panel used in our center contained 76 genes divided into two groups, and these 76 genes were curated based on evidence for their association with metabolic conditions in the Xuzhou area (Supplementary Table 1). Evaluations by the quality assurance program of the China National Center for Clinical Laboratories consistently yielded 100% satisfactory results between 2015 and 2020. The Research Ethics Board of the Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital approved this study.

For this study, we developed an additional biochemical informatic analysis to assess whether such analyses aid in case resolution without the need for follow-up metabolic testing. Variant bioinformatics analysis was implemented as previously described, and the identified variants were searched in databases (23). The pathogenicity of missense variants was evaluated using the PolyPhen-2 tool, and evolutionary conservation was assessed via ClustalX (http://www.clustal.org/clustal2). Swiss Model Workspace was used for homology modeling to analyze changes in three-dimensional (3D) structures.

Second-Tier Biochemical Assay

Samples from three DBSs (d = 3.2 mm) (the DBSs were stored at 4°C) were punched into a 96-well plate, and 100 μl of a liquid containing internal standards was added to yield a methanol, water and formic acid at a ratio of 50:49:0.42. Briefly, the mixture was rotated at 600 rpm and 35°C for 30 min and rested for 5 min to stop the reaction and methanol was removed under heated nitrogen flow at 55°C. The resulting residue was reconstituted in 50 μl of water. The samples were separated using a Kinetex 2.6 μm XB-C18 100A column (Phenomenex, USA) with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, USA) coupled to a Xevo XE tandem mass spectrometer (Waters, USA). Supplementary Table 2 shows the parameter settings for the second-tier analyte testing. UPLC-MS/MS was operated in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) negative mode to follow precursor-to-product species transitions for EMA (130.98–86.96 m/z) and IBG (143.95–73.8 m/z) as well as the corresponding internal standards by negative ion electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS/MS and a mass-to-charge ratio (Supplementary Table 3) (25). The total run time was 8.5 min per sample. The peak and results for the EMA/IBG internal standard are shown in Figure 4F.

Statistical Analysis

According to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (EP28-A3c: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory, Approved Guideline, 3rd edition), the D/R ratio was ≤1/3, and the two values were not outliers. Cases that lacked quantitative data (fewer than 5,000 cases) were assessed for a normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test. Significant data (p-value <0.05) did not adhere to a normal distribution, as demonstrated by K-S testing, and the percentile of the non-parametric test percentile was used to establish the cutoff. Throughout the entire study period, cases with elevated C4 concentrations at the initial NBS were recruited for second-tier detection by UPLC-MS/MS. A total of 2,308 samples from healthy individuals as the negative group were chosen to calculate the cutoff value using the percentile distribution of metabolites.

Results

C4 Acylcarnitine Determination by MS/MS for Initial NBS

The major biochemical characteristics identified throughout the study period are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1, and these including the corresponding C4, C4/C2, and C4/C3 levels obtained by MS/MS. Figures 1A,B show the scatter plots for the C4 vs. C4/C2 ratios and differences among SCADD, IBDD, and no-gene mutation cases. In the initial NBS approach, the cutoff value for C4 was 0.04–0.42 μmol/L. The mean plasma concentrations of C4 in individuals with SCADD and individuals with IBDD were 1.42 and 1.39 μmol/L, respectively. Further statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between individuals with SCADD or IBDD and the no-mutation group (p < 0.001). The C4/C2 and C4/C3 ratios were also above the cutoff values in individuals with confirmed SCADD or IBDD, and compared with the no-gene-mutation group, the mean C4/C2 or C4/C3 ratios of the confirmed cases obtained from the initial NBS by MS/MS were nearly double the cutoffs. However, no significant difference was found between the SCADD and IBDD groups.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Levels of abnormal parameters for the two associated different disorders with C4 by MS/MS and urinary GC/MS.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Metabolite levels in individuals with molecularly confirmed ACADS and ACAD8 variants. (A) Levels of C4 identified by newborn screening. (B) C4/C2 ratios obtained from newborn screening. (C–E) Box plots of biochemical tests using MS/MS for SCADD compared to IBDD. (C) C4-acylcarnitine concentrations identified by newborn-screening blood spots (DBSs C4). (D) C4/C2 ratios in DBSs. (E) C4/C3 ratios in DBSs. (^*p < 0.05; ^**p < 0.01; ^***p < 0.001).

Biochemical and Molecular Genetic Descriptions of Individuals With SCADD or IBDD

We developed a local NBS flow for the diagnosis of inherited metabolic diseases in Xuzhou, China, and recall of positive individuals is recommended for further detection by urinary GC/MS and DNA sequencing. Among 17 cases (4 females and 13 males) that were analyzed in Xuzhou, China, many involved pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in associated genes (Table 2); a small number were variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). In total, positive urinary GC/MS results were found for eight infants with SCADD and fur with IBDD identified with two P/LP variant or one P/LP and one VUS variant in a pathogenic gene. Other cases were suspicious for SCADD/IBBD and were followed up in our center for a long time after birth.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Molecular characteristics for the SCADD and IBDD individuals identified with two pathogenic variants.

DNA sequence analysis of 76 genes for NBS revealed a larger number of variants in confirmed SCADD/IBDD cases, and two associated genes (ACADS and ACAD8) were identified. The molecular spectrum comprised nine different variants in ACADS: five have previously been reported, and the other four are novel. The most common variant was c.1031A>G (p. E344G), which is located in exon 9 of ACADS; this variant was found in 9/18 alleles (50%). Despite the limited number of cases, in silico and protein modeling analyses suggested that novel ACADS gene mutations may affect protein function (Figure 2). By combining analysis with biochemical data, all the individuals carrying novel variants were tested for increasing C4 concentration by MS/MS and urinary GC/MS and novel variants confirmed in Xuzhou, China, were considered disease-associated mutation types. In addition, 15 ACAD8 gene variants were detected in eight infants (Table 2). All variants with the exception of c.567+8C> T and c.1092+1G> A, are located in exons. Nine previously unreported variants are absent in disease databases, and exhibit extremely low frequencies in the global population, as illustrated in Figure 3. Similarly, the alignment of ACAD8 sequences revealed that the amino acids at positions 58, 71, 96, 115, 138, 242, 354, and 392 are highly conserved (Figure 4F). Protein modeling showed that all of the novel variants with the exception of that at position 242 are located in the α-helixes, and alterations in properties may be attributed to abnormal folding. Nonetheless, replacement of a hydrophobic proline with a basic arginine at position 242 of IBD may also result in a lack of cis peptide bonding. According to ACMG/AMP guidelines, the above variants are considered VUSs (PM2+PP3) based on sequence variation interpretation (26).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Bioinformatic analyses of ACADS-encoded proteins: three-dimensional structural modeling of mutant SCAD proteins. The green color represents the wild-type protein. (A) Four novel ACADS gene variants. (B) Frequency of different ACADS gene variants. (C) Swiss modeling and surface charge structure of novel SCAD variants.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Bioinformatic analyses of ACAD8-encoded proteins: three-dimensional structural modeling of mutant IBD proteins. (A) Structure of the IBD protein with mutation sites marked. (B) Analysis of amino acid conservation in variant sites among several different species. (C) Swiss modeling of novel IBD protein variants. Arg-58 (Gln colored in cyan), Glu-71 (Asp in pink), Gly-96 (Ser in light blue), Gly-115 (Asp in brown), Ile-125 (Thr in pale cyan), and Asn-138 (Met in red) are located in the N-terminal domain; Pro-242 (Arg in magenta) is located in the middle domain; Ala-354 (Thr in purple) and Arg-392 (Ser in wheat) are located in the C-terminal domain.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Metabolite levels identified by the second-tier test and urinary GC/MS. (A) Statistical analyses of outliers and normal distribution results for EMA. (B) Second-tier test for EMA in DBSs. (C) Second-tier test for IBG in DBSs. (D) EMA concentrations in individuals with SCADD/IBDD determined by the second-tier test and urinary GC/MS. (E) IBG concentrations in individuals with SCADD/IBDD determined using the second-tier test and urinary GC/MS. (F) Chromatographic separation of several acylcarnitines. Calibration curve, points constructed from 11 standardized acylcarnitines. The following acylcarnitine species were extracted from the calibration curve point chromatogram: 2OHGA, 2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria; 3OHGA, 3-hydroxyglutaric aciduria; GA, glutaric acidemia; IBG, isobutyryl-glycine; and IVG, isovaleric acidemia. ^***p < 0.001, ^###p < 0.001.

Not unexpectedly, no significant differences in C4, C4/C2, and C4/C3 values were found between SCADD/IBDD cases and the suspected cases based on biochemical data (Figures 1C–E). However, in the confirmed SCADD group, the mean C4 concentration obtained from initially measured data was 1.50 μmol/L, which was not significantly different from that of the confirmed IBDD group (C4 = 1.54 μmol/L). Correspondingly, C4/C2 and C4/C3 ratios in the confirmed SCADD group were 0.095 and 1.12, respectively, similar to the mean values of 0.12 and 1.22 found for the confirmed IBDD group (Table 1). The initial MS/MS screening used to evaluate the clinically differential detection of SCADD/IBDD was indeterminate; a second-tier test may be performed for differential screening of the latter.

Generalizability of a Second-Tier Approach: Cutoffs for SCADD and IBDD

Notably, two presumptive outliers of EMA (4.32 and 4.53 μmol/L) are depicted in Figure 4A. However, the D/R ratio was ≤1/3, and the two values were not outliers. Previous studies have shown no significant difference in metabolite levels based on sex. As indicated in Supplementary Table 4, despite the slightly more extreme values, the 99.0th percentile (2.12 μmol/L) was far lower than the cutoff value previously reported by the Mayo Clinic Laboratory. Nevertheless, the 99.7th percentile (2.89 μmol/L) was chosen as the cutoff for second-tier screening, which resulted in percentages of 0.67% for the suspected positive rate (Table 3). Sixteen cases exceeded the EMA cutoff of 2.89 mmol/L, including all primary and secondary targets (n = 4). Because of the lack of further analysis, the IBG concentration in all of the negative individuals was zero.

TABLE 3

Table 3. The positive rates of different percentile cut-offs with EMA by second-tier test.

Second-Tier Testing by UPLC-MS/MS Separation of C4 Acylcarnitine in Confirmed Individuals

The second-tier test for EMA and IBG was performed using additional punched specimens from initial DBSs, and these two analytes were assessed in addition to the initial MS/MS analytes. As shown in Table 4, UPLC-MS/MS to detect EMA and IBG levels in DBSs validated methodologically based on the recovery rate and intraday/interday precision. A second-tier test was designed with three replications, and quality controls with high, median, and low levels were used to assess the experimental stability, recovery rates, and intraday/interday precision were calculated with narrower confidence intervals. Thus, the results of the UPLC-MS/MS analysis for detecting the level of IVG in DBSs were credible. The second-tier test identified 16 samples as likely SCADD and 3 as likely IBDD from March 2019 to March 2020 (Table 5). Because an uncertain category in NBS would be reported as requiring clinical follow-up by MS/MS and second-tier testing, the second-tier test would eliminate 91.98% (218/237) of the initial positive results. At this stage, molecular genetic analyses had not been confirmed.

TABLE 4

Table 4. The method verification of precision for UPLC-MS/MS to detect the level of isovalerylglycine in dry filter paper.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Results of second-tier test compared to initial screening by MS/MS and urinary GC/MS (2019.03–2020.03).

Assessment of the clinical worth of using the second-tier test results was evaluated for the ACADS and ACAD8 genotypes. Ethylmalonate is used as the diagnostic metabolite for SCADD because it can be markedly elevated and specific. Figure 4D illustrates box plots of EMA levels between the second-tier test and urinary detection;focuses on IBG, Figure 4E shows the different concentrations in cases with elevated C4. Overall, using a second-tier test for EMA and IBG allowed better separation between individuals with SCADD and individuals with IBDD. Indeed, the incorporation of EMA or IBG testing as a marker for SCADD and IBDD would have eliminated 91.98% (218/237) of unnecessary referrals with 100% sensitivity. Given thatcases of elevated IBG were identified in the limited screening population, this second-tier test for IBDD may not be justified. However, IBG analysis is likely to distinguish IBDD from other C4-associated disorders because this assay is characterized by specific metabolites, and their elevation suggests a different diagnosis. An additional feature of the second-tier test was the observation that this analysis minimized turnaround time without resampling and involved short preparation and chromatography times compared with those needed for urinary GC/MS (Figure 4).

We have also followed confirmed individuals with SCAD/IBD deficiency, all diagnosed through NBS by MS/MS. Several individuals were without testing in our center and we might follow up by phone (Supplementary Table 5). One patient with SCADD (no. 2) had speech delay at 3 years of age. Majority of patients with SCADD or IBDD have had normal growth and development. After a mean period of follow-up of 2.7 years (range 8 months−4 years and 2 months), we have not observed any complications that may be related to the disorder.

Discussion

Acylcarnitine profile analysis is performed for biochemical detection of disorders of mitochondrial FAO and organic acid metabolism (27). At the start of NBS using MS/MS, clinical screening of SCADD or IBDD was primarily based on the biochemical quantification of C4, but the overlap in C4 levels between healthy and affected neonates renders C4 a poor discriminator. Butyl carnitine is also associated with several other related metabolic disorders, as mentioned above including EE, GA2, and FIGLU, which exhibit low testing specificity and sensitivity (28, 29). The use of acylcarnitine ratios, such as C4/C2, improves sensitivity, but routine screening methods do not provide further distinguishment, and the differential rate for C4-associated disorders remains poor (24). This poor differentiation necessitates further diagnostic detection, which may result in an unbalanced cost-benefit ratio for NBS and might impose an unnecessary emotional burden on the families of unaffected neonates (24). Based on the current understanding, the initial screening results in this retrospective study suggest that most recalled cases screened by MS/MS do not need resampling after a second-tier test, which emphasizes the importance of optimizing analyses with second-tier tests to determine which individuals are truly at risk for SCADD or IBDD clinical disorders.

Of interest, diagnostic testing with molecular genetic analysis revealed the occurrence of SCADD in nine neonates and IBDD in seven, but only three neonates with IBDD were distinguished by second-tier screening before DNA sequencing. However, the stability of the second-tier analytes EMA and IBG were within narrower confidence intervals. As shown in Table 4, the average recovery of the 2 s-tier testing parameters was nearly 100%, with inter- and intraday-UPLC-MS/MS methodologies of 4.67 and 6.30%, respectively. The endogenous matrix and common metabolites did not interfere with the analysis. Although C4 concentration testing was performed in the primary screening panel by MS/MS, metabolic disorders associated with elevated C4, such as SCADD and IBDD, are difficult to distinguish by initial NBS screening. Indeed, the positive predictive values (PPVs) of the primary screening targets using C4, C4/C2, and C4/C3 as markers were 3.38% (8/237) for SCADD and 1.69% (4/237) for IBDD. Overall, second-tier screening using UPLC-MS/MS is an efficient approach for improving the specificity of NBS, and all neonates with SCADD and half of those with IBDD were directly identified by the second-tier test using DBSs. In general, reflexive analysis of the same screening samples with more specific markers eliminates the need to contact parents to bring in their newborn for another sample collection, and the second-tier testing results typically override the initial NBS results. We retrospectively measured EMA and IBG in 2,394 DBS samples that included positive samples with elevated C4 identified by initial NBS, and the second-tier positive samples exceeded the EMA and IBG cutoffs of 2.89 and 0 μmol/L, respectively (Supplementary Table 4). Our results indicate that the incorporation of second-tier testing for SCADD/IBDD differential screening would have eliminated 91.89% of unnecessary referrals. Sixteen individuals were labeled as likely to have SCADD and three as likely to have IBDD. Moreover, second-tier testing is unlikely to prolong the turnaround time because the assay is performed with initial DBS samples without the need for sample recollection. Second-tier testing that measured markers other than C4 improved the differential screening rate of SCADD and IBDD with 100% specificity.

Combining analyses of data from the initial MS/MS screening, second-tier biochemical testing, and ACADS/ACAD8 genotyping from DNA sequencing allowed for fine-tuning of the second-tier test to suggest that several of the initial positive MS/MS screenings that were clinically recalled cases could be excluded. The implementation of such testing prior to referral would reduce the number of individuals who require follow-up and would eliminate 91.89% of the false-positive results that are screened for C4-assiocated disorders in NBS. This discussion of performance improvement includes cases initially considered based on the MS/MS results as showing elevations in C4 and were distinguished as SCADD or IBDD by UPLC-MS/MS. Nevertheless, the present study focused on the important question of the differential detection of C4-elevated cases. Some infants with SCADD or IBDD, two rare metabolic disorders, may have no clinical symptoms; other conditions, such as IBDD, are differentially identified via specific metabolites, such as IBG. Given the uncertainty of SCADD/IBDD, a reasonable clinical course would be to clinically follow only those infants as carrying identified with two rare variants in ACADS/ACAD8. The use of a second-tier test by the NBS laboratory would avoid unnecessary referrals of disorder carriers or unaffected cases. Another ability of the second-tier test is the focus on true-positive individuals who need immediate identification to achieve improved outcomes. Clinicians should be aware that the use of second-tier testing before referral may eliminate most cases from the referral burden of a screening center.

In the present study, eight individuals from a Chinese population were diagnosed with SCADD, and the estimated incidence of SCADD was 1:58,716 at a single NBS center. The incidence of SCADD detected by MS/MS varies greatly by region, for example, 1:70,000 in Germany, 1:45,466 in southern Italy, 1:50,000 in Denmark, and 1:292,451 in California. In our study, the treatable metabolic disease IBDD showed a rare incidence of approximately 1:78,288 in a Chinese population in Xuzhou, China. Of note, the initial C4 concentration and the C4/C2 and C4/C3 ratios in our samples did not differ significantly from the reference range in the healthy, SCADD and IBDD groups (Figure 1). Therefore, our study shows that differential screening methods are necessary for clinical measurement.

Our study was performed with a large-scale Chinese population, though DNA sequencing was only performed only for individuals suspected of having SCADD/IBDD. Urinary GC/MS should be expanded in NBS following initial positive MS/MS results. Regardless, there are challenges with urinary GC/MS testing has challenges with regard to cost and turn-around time, and it is not a panacea. Certainly, many individuals in the population of our clinic carry a single non-pathogenic variant, particularly a benign variant. If available for these cases, a second-tier test would likely increase ability to distinguish individuals with clinical SCADD/IBDD from carriers because the latter do not need follow-up and do not exhibit biochemical abnormalities.

Previous reports of SCADD have described affected patients with multiple signs, including hypoglycemia, developmental delay, lactic acidosis, hypotonia, seizures, and cardiomyopathy, who exhibit variable responses to treatment and different outcomes (30–32). Of particular note, the most frequent autosomal recessive variant of the ACADS gene in our center was c.1031A>G (p. E344G) in exon 9. An abnormally folded SCAD protein, as discussed in more detail above, may aggregate in cells, resulting in cellular toxicity. Abnormal accumulation of organic acids may be due to loss of SCAD enzymatic activity, which increases the risk of acute metabolic acidosis and physiological stress. The confirmed ACADS variants were all missense and included four unreported types. Based on different bioinformatics analyses, the c.233G>A (p.G78E) and c.1148G>A (p.R383H) variant proteins display a similar unstable structure with surface charge changes (Figure 2). The novel variants c.781T>A (p.F261I) and c.1153G>A (p.A385T) were classified genetically as being related to a steric hindrance effect and lacking the catalytic properties of the wild-type enzyme (33).

Fewer than a dozen cases of IBDD are described in the literature, and the majority of these patients are well, though some need carnitine supplementation. Molecular screening identified all seven neonates with compound heterozygous ACAD8 variants, and homozygous c.567+8C>T or c.1092+1G>A variants in introns were detected in two infants (34, 35). Based on the present clinical data, IBDD is a rare metabolic disease in our region. These six novel mutations in a Chinese population suggest that other mutations are shared across different ethnic groups. However, a significant weakness of our study is that the cohort was drawn from the screening spectrum, which has the limitation of focusing only on neonates in Xuzhou, China. Mutational analysis may aid in the prediction of SCAD and IBD activity but cannot forecast the severity of clinical presentations, which is highly unpredictable. Therefore, asymptomatic individuals remain at risk for future episodes.

Conclusion

Our study successfully evaluated the integration of EMA and IBG analyses into routine newborn C4 screening and distinguished SCADD/IBDD from other C4-associated disorders (36). Due to technical advances and increasing knowledge of metabolites in disorders, a second-tier test may be a reasonable approach for differential detection to reduce the recall rates of MS/MS. The use of second-tier screening significantly improved the differential rate of C4-associated metabolic disorders, with 100% sensitivity (13). Moreover, the improved specificity eliminated 96.41% of false positives and incidental findings. The results also demonstrated that sequencing of a targeted cohort generates data that can substantially improve NBS by fine-tuning the second-tier test. Fortunately, a second-tier test would also assist in the follow-up of positive cases, particularly as it may be performed within a rapid time frame and without sample recollection. This robust method determined EMA/IBG with a high differential rate and may also be applied to monitor patients under treatment (24).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University reviewed and approved the protocol (Committee's reference numbers: [2019] No. 8 and [2021] No. 07). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

WZ and MG: conception and design of study. WZ and HL: acquisition of data. WZ, HL, and HC: analysis and/or interpretation of data. WZ: drafting the manuscript. WZ and ZJ: revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Jiangsu Province Maternal and Child Health Project (Grant number: F201912) and Xuzhou Science and Technology Program (Grant number: KC19028).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the patients for their participation in this study. We extend special thanks to personnel from the Affiliated Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Zhejiang Biosan Biochemical Technologies Co., Ltd., including Yezhen Shi and Baojun Jin, who provided technical assistance. Ultimately, the editors and reviewers also contributed considerably to the publication of this article.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.757424/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

C4, butyl carnitine; EMA, ethylmalonate; IBG, isobutyryl-glycine; DBSs, dried blood spots; NBS, newborn screening; SCADD, short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency; IBDD, isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency; EE, ethylmalonic encephalopathy; GA2, glutaric acidemia type II; FIGLU, formiminoglutamic aciduria; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry; UPLC-MS/MS, Ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; GC/MS, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

References

1. Lin Y, Zheng Q, Zheng T, Zheng Z, Lina W, Fu Q. Expanded newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders and genetic characteristics in a southern Chinese population. Clin Chim Acta. (2019) 494:106–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.1622

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gucciardi A, Pirillo P, Di Gangi IM, Naturale M, Giordano G. A rapid UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous separation of 48 acylcarnitines in dried blood spots and plasma useful as a second-tier test for expanded newborn screening. Anal Bioanal Chem. (2012) 404:741–51. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6194-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Nochi Z, Olsen RKJ, Gregersen N. Short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: from gene to cell pathology and possible disease mechanisms. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2017) 40:641–55. doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0047-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Govindaraj P, Parayil Sankaran B, Nagappa M, Arvinda HR, Deepha S, Jessiena Ponmalar J, et al. Child neurology: ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Neurology. (2020) 94:e1336–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Boyer M, Sowa M, Di Meo I, Eftekharian S, Steenari MR, Tiranti V, et al. Response to medical and a novel dietary treatment in newborn screen identified patients with ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Mol Genet Metab. (2018) 124:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Saral NY, Aksungar FB, Aktuglu-Zeybek C, Coskun J, Demirelce O, Serteser M. Glutaric acidemia type II patient with thalassemia minor and novel electron transfer flavoprotein-A gene mutations: a case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. (2018) 6:786–90. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.786

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wajner M. Neurological manifestations of organic acidurias. Nat Rev Neurol. (2019) 15:253–71. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0161-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Grings M, Wajner M, Leipnitz G. Mitochondrial dysfunction and redox homeostasis impairment as pathomechanisms of brain damage in ethylmalonic encephalopathy: insights from animal and human studies. Cell Mol Neurobiol. (2020). 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10571-020-00976-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ou M, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Zhang Y, et al. A novel electron transfer flavoprotein dehydrogenase (ETFDH) gene mutation identified in a newborn with glutaric acidemia type II: a case report of a Chinese family. BMC Med Genet. (2020) 21:98. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-00995-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ahrens-Nicklas RC, Ganetzky RD, Rush PW, Conway RL, Ficicioglu C. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with formiminoglutamic aciduria detected through newborn screening. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2019) 42:140–6. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

11. Hobert JA, Liu A, Pasquali M. Acylglycine Analysis by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Curr Protoc Hum Genet. (2016) 25.1–17.25.12. doi: 10.1002/cphg.19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Minkler PE, Stoll MSK, Ingalls ST, Kerner J, Hoppel CL. Quantitative acylcarnitine determination by UHPLC-MS/MS — going beyond tandem MS acylcarnitine “profiles”. Mol Genet Metab. (2015) 116:231–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Adhikari AN, Currier RJ, Tang H, Turgeon CT, Nussbaum RL, Srinivasan R, et al. Genomic analysis of historical cases with positive newborn screens for short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency shows that a validated second-tier biochemical test can replace future sequencing. Int J Neonatal Screen. (2020). 6:41. doi: 10.3390/ijns6020041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Merritt JL II, Norris M, Kanungo S. Fatty acid oxidation disorders. Ann Transl Med. (2018) 6:473. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.10.57

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Merritt JL II, MacLeod E, Jurecka A, Hainline B. Clinical manifestations and management of fatty acid oxidation disorders. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. (2020) 21:479–93. doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09568-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. van Maldegem BT, Duran M, Wanders RJ, Waterham HR, Wijburg FA. Flavin adenine dinucleotide status and the effects of high-dose riboflavin treatment in short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Pediatr Res. (2010) 67:304–8. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181cbd57b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Korman SH, Andresen BS, Zeharia A, Gutman A, Boneh A, Pitt JJ. 2-ethylhydracrylic aciduria in short/branched-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: application to diagnosis and implications for the R-pathway of isoleucine oxidation. Clin Chem. (2005) 51:610–7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.043265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Van Calcar SC, Baker MW, Williams P, Jones SA, Xiong B, Thao MC, et al. Prevalence and mutation analysis of short/branched chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (SBCADD) detected on newborn screening in Wisconsin. Mol Genet Metab. (2013) 110:111–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Koeberl DD, Young SP, Gregersen NS, Vockley J, Smith WE, Benjamin DK Jr, et al. Rare disorders of metabolism with elevated butyryl- and isobutyryl-carnitine detected by tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening. Pediatr Res. (2003) 54:219–23. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000074972.36356.89

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Roe CR, Cederbaum SD, Roe DS, Mardach R, Galindo A, Sweetman L. Isolated isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: an unrecognized defect in human valine metabolism. Mol Genet Metab. (1998) 65:264–71. doi: 10.1006/mgme.1998.2758

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Knerr I, Weinhold N, Vockley J, Gibson KM. Advances and challenges in the treatment of branched-chain amino/keto acid metabolic defects. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2012) 35:29–40. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9269-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lin Y, Peng W, Jiang M, Lin C, Lin W, Zheng Z, et al. Clinical, biochemical and genetic analysis of Chinese patients with isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Clin Chim Acta. (2018) 487:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.09.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Tonin R, Caciotti A, Funghini S, Pasquini E, Mooney SD, Cai B, et al. Clinical relevance of short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SCAD) deficiency: exploring the role of new variants including the first SCAD-disease-causing allele carrying a synonymous mutation. BBA Clin. (2016) 5:114–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sadat R, Hall PL, Wittenauer AL, Vengoechea ED, Park K, Hagar AF, et al. Increased parental anxiety and a benign clinical course: infants identified with short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency and isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency through newborn screening in Georgia. Mol Genet Metab. (2020) 129:20–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Martens J, Berden G, Bentlage H, Coene KLM, Engelke UF, Wishart D, et al. Unraveling the unknown areas of the human metabolome: the role of infrared ion spectroscopy. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2018) 41:367–77. doi: 10.1007/s10545-018-0161-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. (2015) 17:405–24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wajner M, Amaral AU. Mitochondrial dysfunction in fatty acid oxidation disorders: insights from human and animal studies. Biosci Rep. (2015) 36:e00281. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Nguyen TV, Andresen BS, Corydon TJ, Ghisla S, Abd-El Razik N, Mohsen AW, et al. Identification of isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase and its deficiency in humans. Mol Genet Metab. (2002) 77:68–79. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7192(02)00152-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Matern D, Tortorelli S, Oglesbee D, Gavrilov D, Disease PRJJoIM. Reduction of the false-positive rate in newborn screening by implementation of MS/MS-based second-tier tests: The Mayo Clinic experience (2004–2007). J Inherit Metabolic Dis. (2007). 30:585–92. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0691-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kiliç M, Senel S, Karaer K, Ceylaner S. Microcephaly and developmental delay caused by short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Turk J Pediatr. (2017) 59:708–10. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2017.06.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Chiplunkar S, Bindu PS, Nagappa M, Panikulam BB, Arvinda HR, Govindaraj P, et al. Novel magnetic resonance imaging findings in a patient with short chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Metab Brain Dis. (2017) 32:967–70. doi: 10.1007/s11011-017-0005-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Bulut FD, Kör D, Seker-Yilmaz B, Gül-Mert G, Kilavuz S, Önenli-Mungan N. Turkish case of ethylmalonic encephalopathy misdiagnosed as short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Metab Brain Dis. (2018) 33:977–9. doi: 10.1007/s11011-017-0152-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lin Y, Gao H, Lin C, Chen Y, Zhou S, Lin W, et al. Biochemical, clinical, and genetic characteristics of short/branched chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in chinese patients by newborn screening. Front Genet. (2019) 10:802. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Adhikari AN, Gallagher RC, Wang Y, Currier RJ, Amatuni G, Bassaganyas L, et al. The role of exome sequencing in newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism. Nat Med. (2020) 26:1392–7. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0966-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Scolamiero E, Cozzolino C, Albano L, Ansalone A, Caterino M, Corbo G, et al. Targeted metabolomics in the expanded newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism. Mol Biosyst. (2015) 11:1525–35. doi: 10.1039/C4MB00729H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. McCalley S, Pirman D, Clasquin M, Johnson K, Jin S, Vockley J. Metabolic analysis reveals evidence for branched chain amino acid catabolism crosstalk and the potential for improved treatment of organic acidurias. Mol Genet Metab. (2019) 128:57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.05.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar