Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 29 August 2022
Sec. Pediatric Endocrinology
Volume 10 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.993460

#childhoodobesity – A brief literature review of the role of social media in body image shaping and eating patterns among children and adolescents

  • 1Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
  • 2Institute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
  • 3Institute of Pedagogy, University of Bielsko-Biala, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Obesity and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Children’s food preferences are closely related to their parents’ food preferences and knowledge of food is linked to what their parents share with them. Parents, however, are not the only people who model such behavior. Paradoxically, the ubiquitous technological development can also pose a huge threat. In developed countries, 94% of teenagers use social media platforms such as: Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, or TikTok, and this also applies to children. It can therefore be argued that parents’ nutritional preferences and behavior are related to the same behaviors of children and there is an extensive literature on this subject. It is therefore important to check how other factors – new technology (and social media in particular) – can influence changes in this area. A literature search was conducted in the following databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, EBSCO in December 2021. After applying all the filters and verification of relevance in terms of the research on the topic of interest to us, 4 articles related to research on body image and social media and 4 articles related to research on food choices and social media among children and adolescents were obtained. The conducted analysis showed that various studies so far indicate that social media can have a very strong influence on the development of eating patterns and body image in children and adolescents, which in turn may be one of the risk factors for developing obesity when promoted behaviors are not associated with a healthy lifestyle. It is also worth pointing out that social media can be used as a resource in the prevention and treatment of obesity. A closer look at this topic seems to be particularly important due to the fact that, among adults, social media is not only a very important source of information about lifestyle, but also a source of social support when people attempting to lose weight. Therefore, by increasing preventive activity in social media and using modern solutions related to social media (including the use of hashtag signs), we can have a greater impact on the health awareness of children and adolescents around the world.

Introduction

Childhood is the most important period in which eating habits are formed, which undoubtedly influences later health condition (1). The result of the transmission of incorrect eating patterns is obesity, other metabolic diseases and eating disorders (24). As is commonly known, these disorders are more and more often diagnosed in children and adolescents, and the recent situation related to COVID (e.g., due to the frequent change of lifestyle to a less healthy one) was conducive to the development of excessive body weight in this age group (e.g., (511).

The first educator in the field of eating behavior is the family (12). Research shows that children’s food preferences are closely related to their parents’ food preferences. Also, children’s knowledge of food is linked to what their parents share with them (13). It is well known that children learn to eat through their own experience as well as through the observation of others (14). It can therefore be argued that parents’ nutritional preferences and behavior are related to the same behaviors of children and there is an extensive literature on this subject (1517). As the knowledge about eating behaviors is quite extensive, so it is important to check how new technology (and social media in particular) can influence changes in this area.

Parents, however, are not the only people who model such behavior (18). Paradoxically, the ubiquitous technological development, which is supposed to be a convenience, can also pose a huge threat (19). In developed countries, 94% of teenagers use social media platforms such as: Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, or TikTok (20), and this also applies to children (21). Many studies around the world indicate that children and adolescents use social media for up to several hours a day, an example of such research is an Iranian study in which almost 80% of children and adolescents use social media 3-4 h or more a day (19). Using these media, we often come across information on the subject of obesity, which can very quickly spread around the world, including by using a hashtag (#) for them appropriately (22). For example, when analyzing the titular #childhoodobesity, on the one hand, we come across (good quality) educational materials that raise people’s awareness of the prevention and treatment of obesity. On the other hand, there are also numerous posts that can be strongly stigmatizing. The latter very often relate to two areas of functioning – body image and eating patterns (19). As shown by the research carried out so far, eating patterns and body image can play a very important role in developing obesity (e.g., (10, 23, 24), and one of the theoretical models explaining this is the Homeostatic Theory of Obesity (25). This model has also been empirically verified in studies conducted in a group of Polish children and adolescents (26). However, it is worth continuing research in this area to check how important social media in childhood are in shaping body image and eating patterns, especially given that (in general) children’s and adolescents’ use of social media has a significant impact on their body mass index (19).

Most children and adolescents publish their photos on the above-mentioned portals, so-called “selfies” (27). Considering the sociocultural model (28), teenagers internalize the ideals of appearance that are conveyed by the media and make comparisons with them (29, 30). According to the National Eating Disorders Association (31), body image is how an individual believes what they look like in the mirror, how they feel about their body, and how they feel in control about the body. This image can be positive or negative (31). The negative ones are an early indicator of an eating disorder. Regarding the shaping of one’s body image and exposure in social media, it is worth mentioning that social media promotes an unnaturally slim figure as desirable, often building a negative body image, and children and adolescents seem to be the most vulnerable group (31). This pattern often promotes stigma and strengthens the tendency of obese children to lose weight by means of maladaptive measures (e.g., very restrictive diets, use of laxatives, vomiting), which often lead to further weight gain in the long term (19, 3234). Thus, as research shows, social media and peer groups functioning in it can, on the one hand, be an important source of knowledge and support in preventing obesity and promoting healthy growth (19, 35, 36). On the other hand, they can be a source of great discomfort, spreading myths about obesity and its treatment (19, 33). That is why it is so important to look carefully at how the content available on social media can influence the shaping of the body image and eating patterns of children and adolescents.

There is a strong international interest in research into eating behavior, the transmission of eating patterns through the family environment, and body image formation, but few studies in this context have analyzed the impact of social media (1517). Importantly, not only selfies but also sharing pictures of meals with friends is also a popular phenomenon on social media (37). The reaction to such a photo is reacted on social media can also perpetuate and modify various eating and lifestyle behaviors. Therefore, this review of research aims to: (I) summarize the current research on the role of social media in the group of children and adolescents in (Ia) body image shaping, (Ib) shaping eating patterns, (II) indicating the essence of the problem and the direction of obesity preventive measures to public health institutions and other entities with a significant influence on the promotion of healthy eating behavior, mental health, and the proper use of social media, and (III) indicating further studies directions among obese children and adolescents in the context described above.

Materials and methods

A literature search was conducted in the following databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, EBSCO from December 2021 to January 2022. The following keyword alone combinations were used: body image, body image and social media, food choices and social media, food choices, food choices and Facebook/TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat, body image and Facebook/TikTok/Instagram/

Snapchat. Filters in search engines were also used, such as: “Free full text,” ten-year articles, English and Polish, and the target research group “children and adolescents.”

After applying all the filters, 26 results related to the subject of body image in social media and 8 results related to food choices in social media were obtained. Then, all the results were verified in terms of the relevance of the research on the topic of interest to us. As a result, 4 articles related to research on body image and social media among children and adolescents and 4 articles related to research on food choices and social media among children and adolescents were obtained. A block diagram of this process is shown in Figure 1. The “Supplementary Material” section provides more details about these studies (i.e., group description, variables and measures, results and detailed statistics for the measured variables; (Appendix Table 1)).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow chart of article selection process.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristic of the analyzed studies.

Results

Body image and social media

Self-body perceptions, especially among girls in recent decades, have become a cause of global adolescent self-esteem (38). The basis of adolescent self-presentation is increasingly based on photos and videos on social media (39, 40). Social media can create appearance standards that are difficult to achieve (39), especially by adolescents and children. This situation can lead to lower self-esteem and emotional disturbances (41).

Previous research, for example, conducted in Norway on a group of 1998 respondents aged 10-14 (boys and girls), looked at which social media platforms they use, how often they post something on their account per month and how often they post photos of themselves and how often they comment on other people’s statuses and photos (41). Results indicate, among other things, that other-oriented social media use lowered self-reported appearance among respondents aged 10-12 and 12-14, while self-oriented use had no effect on this (41).

Another Dutch study, involved 440 teenagers of both genders aged 12 to 19 (29). The study was aimed at, inter alia, indicating whether the use of social media is a significant predictor of body dissatisfaction. The results showed that teens who reported more use of social media also reported higher levels of body dissatisfaction (29).

Interesting research in this area was also carried out in Singapore, where 100 female teenagers aged 13 to 18 were recruited from various local communities, such as the Chinese, Malayas, and Indians (42). Total smartphones use time, social media use, cognitive internalization, anxiety about social appearance, respect for the body, and position of weight control were assessed. The results suggest that only excessive use of social media, according to the authors, more than 3 h a day results in lower body evaluation results. Interestingly, the authors also explored the issue of engaging in online and offline appearance comparisons. They found that while social media escalates unhealthy cognitive patterns, it also does so outside of the time spent in these media, harming teenagers’ own body assessment, including a girl study (42).

A very different report is indicated by researchers from Denmark, who focused on the effects of social networking on body image among 604 adolescents (male and female) aged 11 to 18 (43). The study was related to the frequency of use of social media and information about the appearance that teenagers obtained from their peers and its impact on their body image. The results show that the more teens used social networking sites, the more often they received feedback about their appearance. Interestingly, the feedback received did not predict body dissatisfaction (43). This finding contradicts most studies about the association of social media with negative body image.

Eating patterns and social media

Visual representations of food and beverage products in traditional communications and digital marketing primarily involve products high in fat, sugar and salt (44). YouTube is also very popular with children aged 5 to 15 (45), and the information contained in the content viewed influences their eating behavior (44). Research shows that exposure to food-related information contained in social media content, known as influencers, directly, immediately influences the choice and consumption of promoted foods by 9–11-year-old children (46, 47).

An equally interesting study on the marketing impact of a product promoted via the YouTube platform conducted in qualitative terms is a British study on a group of children (boys and girls) aged 10-11 years (48). The children watched a marketing video promoting the sweet product and were informed that the purpose of the study was to gather their views on YouTubers advertising food and drinks. The results of this study indicated that youtubers are a source of entertainment, information, social acceptance, and experiences for children, moreover, the products promoted by youtubers were desired by children (48).

The same authors also analyzed the channels of Youtubers popular among children to determine the scope and nature of the recommendations of food products and drinks (44). They also examined the proportion of “healthy” and “unhealthy” referrals. As it turned out, each of the commands had at least one food or drink tip, more often they were unhealthy than healthy. As many as 92.6% of the analyzed videos contained food and drink tips, which corresponds to 29.9 tips per hour (44).

A study by American researchers on a sample of 884 male and female adolescents aged 13-17 indicated that food ads posted on Instagram were very attractive to the respondents compared to traditional food ads (49). Interestingly, the Instagram symbol itself caused much more interest in the promoted product (49).

Discussion

Various studies cited so far indicate that social media can have a very strong influence on the development of eating patterns and body image in children and adolescents, which in turn may be one of the risk factors for developing obesity when promoted behaviors are not associated with a healthy lifestyle.

Originally, the sociocultural model proposed by Thompson et al. (28) focused on traditional media, e.g., television, magazines, and the traditional “face-to-face” perception of the other person. Today, teenagers derive their ideal-looking messages from social media. According to the above-mentioned sociocultural model of comparison, the internalization of ideal appearance communicated through social media results in body dissatisfaction (50). This is supported by the analysis of the research presented in this article. In most studies on the impact of social media on body image, the target respondents are teenagers and adults and their results show a negative relationship between social media and body dissatisfaction (e.g., 43, 5052). Therefore, attention should be paid to the importance of the problem of social media in the context of incorrect body image. If the problem is large among adult users of social media platforms, the group of children and adolescents may be even more at risk (53). Unfortunately, there are few studies that can approximate to the magnitude of this problem among children, and thus allow for the design of prevention activities aimed at child caregivers that would help monitor online behavior and allow for the protection of children from negative self-perception.

Social media also contributes to the promotion of food products to users (54). Influencers, youtubers show specific food products, recommend their purchase, and they are not always healthy (55). These are sponsored advertisements paid for by large food concerns. Research to date provides sufficient evidence of the effectiveness of influencer marketing on consumption primarily among adolescents (56). What is important for such marketing activities is that about 98% of people from the “Z” generation, i.e., people born after 1995, have a smartphone, and moreover, half of teenagers spend 10 or more hours a day using the telephone (57). It is therefore a powerful tool to influence choices, including food preferences. The Norwegian Consumer Council in 2019 showed that about 20% of all influencer-related marketing activities were for food and drinks (58). So far, research on this subject is not sufficient, and as far as we are aware, such research has not been conducted on a Polish sample. The exposure of children and adolescents to the influence of people for whom the most important thing is to sell a not necessarily healthy product is underestimated. Influencers often choose the way they present themselves on the Internet (59), using products and brands for self-presentation rather than actual consumption (60). The cognitive development of younger children (12 years of age and younger) is still developing, and thus a critical understanding of the commercial world will not be the same as the critical thinking skills of adults (61), therefore the popularity of influencers and content that they post on their profiles is particularly attractive to young audiences. Given this information, it is important to ensure the protection and control of young people in the digital space, and it should also be crucial for preventive health. To effectively protect children and adolescents, an intervention in the use of social media must be developed, and to implement it, a better understanding of how the use of social networking sites affects body image and food choices should be developed. Taking these actions is also important due to such phenomena as “echo chamber” (this can be defined as personalizing the content used on the Internet and matching it to the profile of a specific user, which means that we only receive information on social media that has been determined by appropriate algorithms as consistent with our interests and views; (62) and “mukbang” (this can be defined as an online audiovisual broadcast through a video-streaming platforms such as TikTok or YouTube in which a host consumes different amounts and types of food and interacts with the audience using a multimodal communication; (63), which may have a significant impact on shaping the awareness, body image and eating patterns of children and adolescents.

Summarizing the current knowledge, in future studies related to childhood obesity we should focus on: (I) analysis of the impact on eating patterns and body image of content from TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat, (II) taking into account the interaction of parents with social media in shaping un(healthy) eating patterns and (positive and negative) body image in their children and adolescents, (III) taking into account the assessment of children’s mental health (e.g., depression, eating disorders), (IV) taking into account children under the age of 10, (V) research among Polish children and adolescents including the division into genders, (VI) doing more experimental research in this topic.

Finally, it is also worth pointing out that social media can be used as a resource in the prevention and treatment of obesity. A closer look at this topic seems to be particularly important due to the fact that, among adults, social media is not only a very important source of information about lifestyle, but also a source of social support when people attempting to lose weight (e.g., 64, 65). Interestingly, this research shows that this online support is even greater than that they receive from their family and friends in the non-virtual world (64). Therefore, it would be interesting to check whether we recognize a similar effect in children and adolescents. Moreover, as is commonly known, many materials available on social media are not prepared on the basis of reliable and credible sources of information (e.g., 22, 66, 67). However, by increasing preventive activity in social media and using modern solutions related to social media (including the use of hashtag signs), we can have a greater impact on the health awareness of children and adolescents around the world, including fighting myths about obesity and patients who have been subject to stigmatization. Moreover, it seems clear that the topic of social media and their relationship with body image and eating patterns should be obligatorily addressed by psychologists and nutritionists during obesity therapy, thanks to which we can correct patients’ attitudes in this regard and increase knowledge and raise awareness among their caregivers.

Author contributions

AM, KC-B, and JM conceived the study and performed literature search. All authors were involved in writing the manuscript and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.

Funding

This publication was financed by the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Birch L, Savage JS, Ventura A. Influences on the development of children’s eating behaviours: from infancy to adolescence. Can J Diet Pract Res. (2007) 68:s1–56.

Google Scholar

2. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. (2021). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed July 13, 2022)

Google Scholar

3. Simmonds M, Burch J, Llewellyn A, Griffiths C, Yang H, Owen C, et al. The use of measures of obesity in childhood for predicting obesity and the development of obesity-related diseases in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. (2015) 19:1–336. doi: 10.3310/hta19430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Llewellyn A, Simmonds M, Owen CG, Woolacott N. Childhood obesity as a predictor of morbidity in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2016) 17:56–67. doi: 10.1111/obr.12316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Dattani S, Ritchie H, Roser M. Mental Health. Eating Disorders. (2021). Available online at:https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health (accessed July 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

6. Ritchie H, Roser M. Obesity. (2017). Available online at: https://ourworldindata.org/obesity (accessed July 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

7. Scapaticci S, Neri CR, Marseglia GL, Staiano A, Chiarelli F, Verduci E. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lifestyle behaviors in children and adolescents: an international overview. Ital J Pediatr. (2022) 48:22. doi: 10.1186/s13052-022-01211-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. Incidence and outcomes of eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Psychiatry. (2021) 220:1–3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. World Health Organization. World Obesity Day 2022 – Accelerating Action to Stop Obesity. (2022). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news/item/04-03-2022-world-obesity-day-2022-accelerating-action-to-stop-obesity#:~:text=More%20than%201%20billion%20people,This%20number%20is%20still%20increasing (accessed July 13, 2022)

Google Scholar

10. Valenzise M, D’Amico F, Cucinotta U, Lugarà C, Zirilli G, Zema A, et al. The lockdown effects on a pediatric obese population in the COVID-19 era. Ital J Pediatr. (2021) 47:209. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01142-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zipfel S, Schmidt U, Giel KE. The hidden burden of eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. (2022) 9:9–11. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00435-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Savage JS, Fisher JO, Birch LL. Parental influence on eating behavior: conception to adolescence. J Law Med Ethics. (2007) 35:22–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00111.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Patrick H, Nicklas TA. A review of family and social determinants of children’s eating patterns and diet quality. J Am Coll Nutr. (2005) 24:83–92. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2005.10719448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Hayman LL. The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC): progress and prospects for primary prevention. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. (2003) 18:4–5. doi: 10.1111/j.0889-7204.2003.01781.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Trevino SD, Kelly NR, Budd EL, Giuliani NR. Parent gender affects the influence of parent emotional eating and feeding practices on child emotional eating. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:654237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Scaglioni S, De Cosmi V, Ciappolino V, Parazzini F, Brambilla P, Agostoni C. Factors influencing children’s eating behaviours. Nutrients. (2018) 10:706. doi: 10.3390/nu10060706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Yee AZ, Lwin MO, Ho SS. The influence of parental practices on child promotive and preventive food consumption behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2017) 14:47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0501-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kearney MS, Levine PB. Role models, mentors, and media influences. Fut Child. (2020) 30:83–106.

Google Scholar

19. Khajeheian D, Colabi AM, Ahmad Kharman Shah NB, Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi CWJ, Jenatabadi HS. Effect of social media on child obesity: application of structural equation modeling with the taguchi method. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:1343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Dilon C. Tiktok influences on teenagers and young adults students: the common usages of the application Tiktok. ASRJETS. (2020) 68:132–42.

Google Scholar

21. Norc Center for Public Affairs Research. Instagram and Snapchat are Most Popular Social Networks for Teens; Black Teens are Most Active on Social Media, Messaging Apps. (2017). Available online at: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2141928/instagram-and-snapchat-are-most-popular-social-networks-for-teens-black-teens-are-most-active-on-social-media/2897226/ on 13 Jul 2022 (accessed July 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

22. Li C, Ademiluyi A, Ge Y, Park A. Using social media to understand web-based social factors concerning obesity: systematic review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. (2022) 8:e25552. doi: 10.2196/25552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Leppänen MH, Lehtimäki AV, Roos E, Viljakainen H. Body mass index, physical activity, and body image in adolescents. Children. (2022) 9:202. doi: 10.3390/children9020202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zandian M, Bergh C, Ioakimidis I, Esfandiari M, Shield J, Lightman S, et al. Control of body weight by eating behavior in children. Front Pediatr. (2015) 3:89. doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Marks DF. Homeostatic theory of obesity. Health Psychol Open. (2015) 2:2055102915590692. doi: 10.1177/2055102915590692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Czepczor-Bernat K, Brytek-Matera A, Matusik P. The homeostatic theory of obesity: an empirical verification of the circle of discontent with an assessment of its relationship to restrained and uncontrolled eating among children and adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:6028. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. McLean SA, Jarman HK, Rodgers RF. How do “selfies” impact adolescents’ well-being and body confidence? A narrative review. Psychol Res Behav Manag. (2019) 12:513–21. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S177834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S. Exacting Beauty: Theory Assessment and Treatment of Body Image Disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (1999). doi: 10.1037/10312-000

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. de Vries DA, Vossen HGM, van der Kolk-van der Boom P. Social media and body dissatisfaction: investigating the attenuating role of positive parent-adolescent relationships. J Youth Adolesc. (2019) 48:527–36. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0956-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Rodgers RF, Wertheim EH, Paxton SJ, Tylka TL, Harriger JA. #Bopo: enhancing body image through body positive social media- evidence to date and research directions. Body Image. (2022) 41:367–74. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.03.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. National Eating Disorders Association. What is Body Image?. (2016). Available online at: https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/body-image-0 (accessed July 13, 2022)

Google Scholar

32. Contreras RE, Schriever SC, Pfluger PT. Physiological and epigenetic features of yoyo dieting and weight control. Front Genet. (2019) 10:1015. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Clark O, Lee MM, Jingree ML, O’Dwyer E, Yue Y, Marrero A, et al. Weight stigma and social media: evidence and public health solutions. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:739056. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.739056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Di Germanio C, Di Francesco A, Bernier M, de Cabo R. Yo-Yo dieting is better than none. Obesity. (2018) 26:1673. doi: 10.1002/oby.22335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gruver RS, Bishop-Gilyard CT, Lieberman A, Gerdes M, Virudachalam S, Suh AW, et al. A social media peer group intervention for mothers to prevent obesity and promote healthy growth from infancy: development and pilot trial. JMIR Res Protoc. (2016) 5:e159. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Swindle TM, Ward WL, Whiteside-Mansell L. Facebook: the use of social media to engage parents in a preschool obesity prevention curriculum. J Nutr Educ Behav. (2018) 50:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.05.344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zhu J, Jiang L, Dou W, Liang L. Post, eat, change: the effects of posting food photos on consumers’ dining experiences and brand evaluation. J Interac Mark. (2019) 46:101–12. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2018.10.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Harter S. The Construction of the Self. In Developmental and Sociocultural Foundations. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Publications Inc (2012).

Google Scholar

39. Chua THH, Chang L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Comput Hum Behav. (2016) 55:190–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Mascheroni G, Vincent J, Jimenez E. Girls are addicted to likes so they postsemi-naked selfies”: Peer mediation, normativity and the construction of identity online. Cyberpsychol J Psychos Res Cyberspace. (2015) 9:5. doi: 10.5817/CP2015-1-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Steinsbekk S, Wichstrøm L, Stenseng F, Nesi J, Hygen BW, Skalická V. (2021). The impact of social media use on appearance self-esteem from childhood to adolescence – A 3-wave community study. Comput Hum Behav. (2021) 114:106528. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106528

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Yang H, Wang JJ, Tng GYQ, Yang S. Effects of social media and smartphone use on body esteem in female adolescents: testing a cognitive and affective model. Children. (2020) 7:148. doi: 10.3390/children7090148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. de Vries DA, Peter J, de Graaf H, Nikken P. Adolescents’ social network site use, peer appearance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: testing a mediation model. J Youth Adolesc. (2016) 45:211–24. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0266-4de

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Coates AE, Hardman CA, Halford JCG, Christiansen P, Boyland EJ. Food and beverage cues featured in youtube videos of social media influencers popular with children: an exploratory study. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. OFCOM. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. London: Ofcom (2018).

Google Scholar

46. Coates AE, Hardman CA, Halford JCG, Christiansen P, Boyland EJ. Social media influencer marketing and children’s food intake: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. (2019) 143:e20182554. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Coates AE, Hardman CA, Halford JCG, Christiansen P, Boyland EJ. The effect of influencer marketing of food and a “protective” advertising disclosure on children’s food intake. Pediatr Obes. (2019) 14:e12540. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Coates AE, Hardman CA, Halford JCG, Christiansen P, Boyland EJ. “It’s just addictive people that make addictive videos”: children’s understanding of and attitudes towards influencer marketing of food and beverages by youtube video bloggers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:449. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Bragg M, Lutfeali S, Greene T, Osterman J, Dalton M. How food marketing on instagram shapes adolescents’ food preferences: online randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e28689. doi: 10.2196/28689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Tiggemann M, Miller J. The internet and adolescent girls’ weight satisfaction and drive for thinness. Sex Roles. (2010) 63:79–90. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9789-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Rousseau A, Eggermont S, Frison E. The reciprocal and indirect relationships between passive Facebook use, comparison on Facebook, and adolescents’ body dissatisfaction. Comput Hum Behav. (2017) 73:336–44. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kleemans M, Daalmans S, Carbaat I, Anschütz D. Picture perfect: the direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychol. (2018) 21:93–110. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Núñez-Gómez P, Larrañaga KP, Rangel C, Ortega-Mohedano F. Critical analysis of the risks in the use of the internet and social networks in childhood and adolescence. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:683384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Simeone M, Scarpato D. Sustainable consumption: how does social media affect food choices? J Clean Prod. (2020) 277:124036. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124036

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Packer J, Russell SJ, Siovolgyi G, McLaren K, Stansfield C, Viner RM, et al. The impact on dietary outcomes of celebrities and influencers in marketing unhealthy foods to children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. (2022) 14:434. doi: 10.3390/nu14030434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Lou C, Kim HK. Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2567. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Shout Out UK [SOUK]. Generation Z And Their Phones: Separating The Myths From The Facts. (2020). Available online at: https://www.shoutoutuk.org/2020/09/22/generation-z-andtheir-phones-separating-the-myths-from-the-facts/ (accessed august 18, 2022).

Google Scholar

58. Norwegian Consumer Council. Young and Exposed to Unhealthy Food Marketing: Digital Food Marketing Using Influencers. (2019). Available online at: https://fil.forbrukerradet.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/young-and-exposed-to-unhealthy-marketing-digitalfood-marketing-using-influencers-report-february-2019.pdf (accessed July 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

59. Blinka L, Smahel D. Fourteen is fourteen and a girl is a girl: validating the identity of adolescent bloggers. Cyberpsychol Behav. (2009) 12:735–9. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Commun. (2007) 13:210–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Story M, French S. Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2004) 1:3. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-1-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Cinelli M, De Francisci Morales G, Galeazzi A, Quattrociocchi W, Starnini M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2021) 118:e2023301118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023301118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kim Y. Eating as a transgression: Multisensorial performativity in the carnal videos of mukbang (eating shows). Int J Cult Stud. (2021) 24:107–22. doi: 10.1177/1367877920903435

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Hwang KO, Ottenbacher AJ, Green AP, Cannon-Diehl MR, Richardson O, Bernstam EV, et al. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. Int J Med Inform. (2010) 79:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.10.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Erdem H, Sisik A. The reliability of bariatric surgery videos in youtube platform. Obes Surg. (2018) 28:712–6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Mejova Y. Information sources and needs in the obesity and diabetes Twitter discourse. Proceedings of the In DH’18: 2018 International Digital Health Conference, April 23–26. New York, NY: ACM (2018). p. 21–9.

Google Scholar

67. Jane M, Hagger M, Foster J, Ho S, Kane R, Pal S. Effects of a weight management program delivered by social media on weight and metabolic syndrome risk factors in overweight and obese adults: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0178326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Marsh HW. Self Description Questionnaire-I (SDQI): APA Psyctests. Campbelltown, NSW: University of Western Sydney (1990).

Google Scholar

69. Harter S. Manual For The Self-Perception Profile For Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver (1988).

Google Scholar

70. Wichstrøm L. Harters self-perception profile for adolescents – reliability, validity, and evaluation of the question format. J Pers Assess. (1995) 65(1):100–16. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Probst M, Vandereycken W, Van Coppenolle H, Vanderlinden J. The body attitude test for patients with an eating disorder: psychometric characteristics of a new questionnaire. Eat Disord. (1995) 3(2):133–44. doi: 10.1080/10640269508249156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Frison E, Eggermont S. Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Soc Sci Comput Rev. (2016) 34:153–71. doi: 10.1177/0894439314567449

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Buhrmester D, Furman W. The Network of Relationships Inventory: Relationship Qualities Version. Richardson, TX: University of Texas at Dallas (2008). doi: 10.13072/midss.387

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Rosen L, Whaling K, Carrier L, Cheever N, Rokkum J. The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: an empirical investigation. Comput Hum Behav. (2013) 29:2501–11. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Thompson JK, van den Berg P, Roehrig M, Guarda AS, Heinberg LJ. The sociocultural attitudes towards appearance scale-3 (SATAQ-3): development and validation. Int J Eat Disord. (2004) 35(3):293–304. doi: 10.1002/eat.10257

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Schaefer LM, Thompson JK. The development and validation of the physical appearance comparison scale-revised (PACS-R). Eat Behav. (2014) 15(2):209–17. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Hart TA, Flora DB, Palyo SA, Fresco DM, Holle C, Heimberg RG. Development and examination of the social appearance anxiety scale. Assessment. (2008) 15(1):48–59. doi: 10.1177/1073191107306673

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess. (2001) 76(1):90–106. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Stotland S, Zuroff DCA. new measure of weight locus of control: the dieting beliefs scale. J Pers Assess. (1990) 54(1–2):191–203. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9673986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Cash TF. The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire Users’ Manual. (1994). Available online at: http://www.body-images.com/assessments/mbsrq.html (accessed July 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Keywords: childhood obesity, social media, body image, eating patterns, children, adolescents

Citation: Modrzejewska A, Czepczor-Bernat K, Modrzejewska J, Roszkowska A, Zembura M and Matusik P (2022) #childhoodobesity – A brief literature review of the role of social media in body image shaping and eating patterns among children and adolescents. Front. Pediatr. 10:993460. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.993460

Received: 13 July 2022; Accepted: 09 August 2022;
Published: 29 August 2022.

Edited by:

Malgorzata Gabriela Wasniewska, University of Messina, Italy

Reviewed by:

Malgorzata Wojcik, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Poland
Valeria Calcaterra, University of Pavia, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Modrzejewska, Czepczor-Bernat, Modrzejewska, Roszkowska, Zembura and Matusik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Adriana Modrzejewska, adriana.modrzejewska@sum.edu.pl

Download