Pilot study shows skin-to-skin care with parents improves heart rate variability in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

Introduction

Skin-to-skin care for newborns was originally implemented in low resource countries as Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC), with preterm newborns on their mother's chest 24 h/day. KMC has been shown to be effective for thermal control, breastfeeding, and bonding in newborns (1). For infants with a birthweight <2,000 g born in low- or middle-income countries, initiating KMC within the first week of postnatal life resulted in 51% reduction in mortality (1). KMC has also been found to decrease health care related sepsis and to improve infant growth (1).

In contrast, skin-to-skin care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in high-resource countries is usually performed as short-term placement on mother's or father's chest to enhance breastfeeding, attachment, and parental self-esteem. Studies have shown that it is safe for both intubated and non-intubated preterm infants (1–3). However, a survey found that 59% of NICU nurse managers thought intubated infants should not receive skin-to-skin care for reasons including lack of criteria for infant selection, fear of extubation, stress to the infant, time involved for the nurse, temperature control, and bedside nursing fears of being blamed if something went wrong (4). Demonstration of potential benefit of skin-to-skin care for the infant could promote expansion of this practice. One potential benefit could be enhancement of the maturation of the autonomic nervous system.

The autonomic nervous system, comprised of sympathetic and parasympathetic innervations, is incomplete at birth. In premature infants (<37 weeks' gestation), sympathetic tone is dominant. Increased parasympathetic tone promotes growth and energy conservation (5), maintenance of appropriate muscle tone in the alimentary canal and decreased heart rate, thus allowing cardiac muscle rest and building up reserves for times of stress (6). Heart rate variability (HRV) is the temporal variation between sequences of consecutive heart beats, measured by the normal to normal (NN) interval, which is the period between adjacent QRS complexes (7). The standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval (SDNN) is a metric of HRV that represents the overall heart rate variability, while the root mean squared of successive differences of normal-to-normal intervals (RMSSD) evaluates variation in adjacent N-N intervals to give an estimate of changes in short-term HRV (7). Heart rate variability measures the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic mediators of heart rate (5). Variability increases with gestational age and with skin-to-skin care (8–10). There are few published studies reporting HRV in preterm infants receiving respiratory support, although one study of HRV in 11 preterm infants showed a statistically significant change in six of eight HRV measures (10). Thus, HRV measurements may be useful in capturing clinically relevant dynamic changes in autonomic regulation in response to skin-to-skin care (9–11).

Additionally, there are few studies of skin-to-skin care with fathers; however, this care has been shown to contribute to the father's development of positive feelings of attachment and bonding (12). Results of a crossover trial comparing physiologic measures in preterm infants before, during, and after skin-to-skin care showed no significant difference in body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, or neonatal stress score between care by the infant's mother or father, although oxygen saturations were higher during skin-to-skin with mothers (13).

The objective of this pilot study was to examine heart rate variability in preterm infants receiving respiratory support during skin-to-skin care with mothers and fathers. We hypothesized that skin-to-skin care would be associated with a more mature pattern of parasympathetic activity as measured by various domains of heart rate variability. An exploratory aim was to investigate differences in infant heart rate variability between skin-to-skin care performed by mother or father.

Materials and methods

This prospective pilot study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, and written parental consent was obtained for all participants. Infants were eligible for the study if they were born at ≤30 weeks’ gestational age, were less than 6 weeks postnatal age, were without Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on cranial ultrasound (14), and were receiving some degree of respiratory support at the time of the first session. This could include mechanical ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, high or low flow nasal cannula support. Infants were excluded if they had a known genetic disorder or chromosomal anomaly, major congenital anomaly, were undergoing active sepsis evaluation or treatment for infection, or receiving blood pressure or cardiac medications. Infants meeting study criteria were approached for consent, and consented infants were eligible to participate in a maximum of six skin-to-skin sessions (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Participant screening and enrollment.

The study sessions consisted of a 30-min observation period prior to the skin-to-skin care, a skin-to-skin care session lasting at least 30-min, and a 30-min observation period after completion of skin-to-skin care, as described below. During the skin-to-skin epoch, each infant was positioned upright on the parent's chest, with the infant's head turned towards one side. Heart rate variability data were collected by placing three electrocardiogram (ECG) leads and a pneumogram on the infant and was recorded using the BioPac Systems MP150 hardware (California, USA), the DA100C (pneumogram), the ECG100c (hardwired) equipment, and Acqknowledge 4.4 software. Initially a wireless system was used to capture data; however, interference from other NICU equipment necessitated switching to a hardwired system. All data presented in this manuscript were acquired with the hardwired system. HRV sensors and the pneumogram were removed following data collection completion, using massage oil to reduce skin irritation.

The SDNN, the RMSSD, and standard deviation of deceleration (SDDec) were used as the measures of heart rate variability (HRV). Both SDNN and RMSSD are time-domain measures, with SDNN reflecting parasympathetically-mediated changes and RMSSD reflecting vagally mediated changes in the HRV (15). SDNN provides insight into the overall heart rate variability, while RMSSD reflects short-term variation from one beat to the next (16). SDDec was calculated as it measures the standard deviation of all NN-intervals, and thus can provide information on regulatory instability (16). QRSTool was used to clean the HRV data and obtain 5 min segments of data from the following timepoints relative to the 30 min STS session: 5 min before starting skin-to-skin (pre skin-to-skin), the first 5 min of the skin-to-skin session (during, beginning of skin-to-skin), the last 5 min of the 30 min skin-to-skin session (during, end of skin-to-skin), and the first 5 min once the infant was placed back into the bed (post skin-to-skin session). The 30-min skin-to-skin session time was chosen as it is challenging for many caregivers to be present for multiple hours at the bedside. Additionally, while other studies have used longer periods, any positive changes observed in 30 min would support skin-to-skin when possible. Kubios HRV Scientific was used to obtain SDNN and RMSSD from the interbeat interval (IBI) obtained from QRSTool, and SDDec was calculated from the RR intervals given by Kubios using the equation from O. Nasario-Junior (17).

Statistical analysis

Measures of HRV were taken across the pre, during, and post skin-to-skin sessions. SDNN, RMSSD, and SDDec were analyzed separately, using Friedman's tests followed by post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for significant results. We analyzed these measures for 5 min at the beginning of the skin-to-skin contact session, then repeated the analysis with 5 min during the end portion of the skin-to-skin session to determine whether the effect of the contact on HRV changed over the course of the session. Skin-to-skin session HRV measures were then compared to post-session measures to evaluate persistence of any changes. Prior to analysis, the distributions of HRV measures within the two groups at each time point were tested for normality using Shapiro–Wilk tests. None of the HRV measures were normally distributed within groups according to these tests, so Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to evaluate differences between groups. We also tested the hypothesis that there would be a difference between sessions with mother and father. For this analysis, observations were separated into two groups according to which parent provided the skin-to-skin contact.

A p-value of 0.05 was used to determine significance for the analyses. All analyses were conducted in R 4.1.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Ten infants between 25 5/7–29 6/7 weeks gestational age and 7–41 days postnatal age completed 22 sessions while receiving respiratory support, either positive pressure ventilation or nasal cannula oxygen, with continuous positive airway pressure support being the most common (Table 1). One participant's data was unusable; therefore, 20 sessions from 9 participants were included in the analyses. All skin-to-skin sessions lasted more than 30 min. Table 2 shows participants' characteristics at birth, with the corrected age at the time of each session shown in Supplementary Table S1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Number of sessions completed on varying respiratory support.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Participant characteristics.

SDNN and RMSSD were significantly decreased between the pre-skin-to-skin data and the last 5 min of the skin-to-skin session, reflecting a more mature pattern. As anticipated, there was no difference between pre-session and the first 5 min of the skin-to-skin session (Table 3). The post-hoc tests showed significant differences between pre-skin-to-skin care and during the session for both SDNN and RMSSD, and a significant difference between the during- and post- skin-to-skin session for RMSSD (Table 4). There was no significant difference in these measures prior to skin-to-skin contact with either parent, ruling out any underlying bias.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Results using Friedman's test for comparing three domains of HRV before, during and after skin-to-skin care; additionally showing the beginning of skin-to-skin compared to the end of skin-to-skin sessions.

TABLE 4

Table 4. SDNN and RMSSD post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests comparing pre skin-to-skin with post skin-to-skin, pre skin-to-skin with the end of skin-to-skin, and the end of skin-to-skin with post skin-to-skin.

The Mann–Whitney U-tests showed no statistically significant difference in infant HRV measures between sessions with fathers and mothers at any time point, though the limited sample size does not allow for assessment of heart rate variability from skin-to-skin between mothers and fathers Table 5). Table 6 shows the median and interquartile range for three HRV measures at each time point for the full sample.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Results of the Mann–Whitney U-tests comparing mothers and fathers at each timepoint.

TABLE 6

Table 6. HRV measure at each time point for full sample.

Discussion

In this pilot study, the effects of skin-to-skin on three variables of HRV (SDNN, RMSSD, and SDDec) were analyzed during 20 skin-to-skin sessions in nine preterm infants. We assessed the preterm infant's autonomic nervous system regulation during skin-to-skin with both mothers and fathers. We found that at the end of a 30-min skin-to-skin session, SDNN and RMSSD showed a significantly more mature autonomic nervous system pattern, indicating a change from a predominantly sympathetic state to predominantly parasympathetic activity (6). The change observed in SDNN persisted for at least 10 min after the infant was placed back in his/her bed, suggesting continuation of the effect. Interestingly, these physiologic changes may also directly impact cerebral blood flow. As noted by Sehgal et al., significant improvements in cerebral blood flow occur in response to skin-to-skin care (18). This highlights the importance of encouraging skin-to-skin care with caregivers whenever possible, as the impact could have significant and long-lasting effects.

All infants maintained normothermia, and no session was terminated for significant bradycardia, indicating that skin-to-skin care as performed in this study was well tolerated (3, 10). As recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, infants in the NICU should be on continuous cardiac monitors, maintain airway patency with appropriate head positioning, and ensure endotracheal tubes, arterial and venous lines and other life support equipment is stable during skin-to-skin care (1).

Only one previous study looked at HRV with fathers; however, infants in that study were more mature, between 30 and 36.6 weeks' gestation (19). Although no statistically significant differences were found between mothers and fathers in this study, the small sample size included in the study does not allow us to assess whether there are differences in heart rate variability when the skin-to-skin contact is performed by the mother or the father. Our results indicate that preterm infants less than 30 weeks' gestation can physiologically benefit from skin-to-skin care with both parents, and we hope that these results encourage providers to have fathers do skin-to-skin care, not only for the development of bonding, but also for increased parasympathetic activity. It is not uncommon for fathers to be the first parent to hold their preterm infant in the NICU, depending on the mother's clinical status.

Limitations of this study included, first, a small sample size of 9 babies; however, even with this limited sample size we observed beneficial changes in the HRV measures monitored, which supports a large effect size and may encourage further exploration of the effects of skin-to-skin care. Second, although our goal was to examine HRV in preterm infants requiring respiratory support, including intubated infants, no infant was receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of skin-to-skin sessions. Third, the postnatal day of life during which skin-to-skin was completed varied, which can affect heart rate variability. Similarly, certain medical conditions such as a patent ductus arteriosus may also impact the heart rate variability, but was not collected as it was beyond the scope of this project. Additionally, we did not have the resources to analyze the entire HRV session and were therefore unable to determine whether the effects of skin-to-skin lasted longer than 10 min after the end of a session. Lastly, we did not require parents to terminate skin-to-skin after the 30 min; therefore, some infants continued a session for up to 120 min, and we did not analyze how the duration of skin-to-skin care may have affected the results. Strengths of this study include the design, where each infant acted as his/her own control, the inclusion of extremely preterm infants receiving respiratory support, and the inclusion of sessions with fathers.

In conclusion, our study supports previous studies that found skin-to-skin care to be safe for preterm infants. In addition, we showed that such sessions can lead to a more mature autonomic nervous system pattern, as measured by heart rate variability, and that this benefit was similar for fathers and mothers.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by UNM Health Sciences Human Research Protections Program. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

ES: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JG: Formal Analysis, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JS: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. KW: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This project is supported by an award from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health under grant number UL1TR001449.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this paper have nothing to disclose concerning possible financial or personal relationships with commercial entities that may have a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this presentation. The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Pediatrics and the Division of Neonatology at the University of New Mexico for their support of this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1269405/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Baley J, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Skin-to-skin care for term and preterm infants in the neonatal ICU. Pediatrics. (2015) 136(3):596–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bisanalli S, Nesargi S, Govindu RM, Rao SP. Kangaroo mother care in hospitalized low birth-weight infants on respiratory support: a feasibility and safety study. Adv Neonatal Care. (2019) 19(6):E21–5. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ludington-Hoe SM, Ferreira C, Swinth J, Ceccardi JJ. Safe criteria and procedure for kangaroo care with intubated preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. (2003) 32(5):579–88. doi: 10.1177/0884217503257618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Engler AJ, Ludington-Hoe SM, Cusson RM, Adams R, Bahnsen M, Brumbaugh E, et al. Kangaroo care: national survey of practice, knowledge, barriers, and perceptions. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. (2002) 27(3):146–53. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200205000-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Smith SL. Heart period variability of intubated very-low-birth-weight infants during incubator care and maternal holding. Am J Crit Care. (2003) 12(1):54–64. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2003.12.1.54

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Porges SW. Cardiac vagal tone: a physiological index of stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (1995) 19(2):225–33. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(94)00066-a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Reed MJ, Robertson CE, Addison PS. Heart rate variability measurements and the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias. QJM. (2005) 98(2):87–95. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. de Souza Filho LFM, de Oliveira JCM, Ribeiro MKA, Moura MC, Fernandes ND, de Sousa RD, et al. Evaluation of the autonomic nervous system by analysis of heart rate variability in the preterm infants. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2019) 19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1166-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Fairchild KD. Predictive monitoring for early detection of sepsis in neonatal ICU patients. Curr Opin Pediatr. (2013) 25(2):172–9. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e8fe6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kommers DR, Joshi R, van Pul C, Atallah L, Feijs L, Oei G, et al. Features of heart rate variability capture regulatory changes during kangaroo care in preterm infants. J Pediatr. (2017) 182:92–8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chiera M, Cerritelli F, Casini A, Barsotti N, Boschiero D, Cavigioli F, et al. Heart rate variability in the perinatal period: a critical and conceptual review. Front Neurosci. (2020) 14:561186. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.561186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chen EM, Gau ML, Liu CY, Lee TY. Effects of father-neonate skin-to-skin contact on attachment: a randomized controlled trial. Nurs Res Pract. (2017) 2017:8612024. doi: 10.1155/2017/8612024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Inan Yurdagul N, Esenay F. Effect of kangaroo care applied by mothers and father in premature infants: a crossover study. J Neonatal Nurs. (2023) 29(3):501–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jnn.2022.08.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. (1978) 92(4):529–34. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health. (2017) 5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Joshi R, Kommers D, Guo C, Bikker JW, Feijs L, van Pul C, et al. Statistical modeling of heart rate variability to unravel the factors affecting autonomic regulation in preterm infants. Sci Rep. (2019) 9(1):7691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44209-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Nasario-Junior O, Benchimol-Barbosa PR, Nadal J. Refining the deceleration capacity index in phase-rectified signal averaging to assess physical conditioning level. J Electrocardiol. (2014) 47(3):306–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sehgal A, Nitzan I, Jayawickreme N, Menahem S. Impact of skin-to-skin parent-infant care on preterm circulatory physiology. J Pediatr. (2020) 222:91–7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Vogl JL, Dunne EC, Liu C, Bradley A, Rwei A, Lonergan EK, et al. Kangaroo father care: a pilot feasibility study of physiologic, biologic, and psychosocial measures to capture the effects of father-infant and mother-infant skin-to-skin contact in the neonatal intensive care unit. Dev Psychobiol. (2021) 63(5):1521–33. doi: 10.1002/dev.22100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar