Abstract
Currently, lung ultrasound (LUS) is widely used worldwide for the diagnosing conditions such as neonatal pneumothorax (PTX) and pleural effusion, which are both common conditions during the neonatal period. However, the coexistence or simultaneous occurrence of both conditions, namely, hydropneumothorax, is relatively rare in clinical practice. Ultrasound enables a reliable diagnosis and can be used to guide and monitor appropriate treatment. In this case report, we describe a new ultrasound sign, the air–fluid point, which we propose as a specific sign for the diagnosis of neonatal hydropneumothorax.
Introduction
In recent years, lung ultrasound (LUS) has been successfully applied in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of various lung diseases in newborn infants, and the technology has become well-established (1–5). LUS plays an irreplaceable and important role in the treatment of severe and complex lung diseases (6). Currently, LUS is widely used worldwide, and in some institutions, it has even replaced chest x-ray (CXR) as the routine imaging modality used in neonatal intensive care units (7). Pleural effusion and pneumothorax (PTX) are common conditions in newborns, and ultrasound can easily yield a clear diagnosis and be used to guide and monitor appropriate treatment (8–10). However, the simultaneous occurrence of both conditions, namely, hydropneumothorax, is a relatively rare condition in clinical practice. The ultrasound manifestations of neonatal hydropneumothorax have not yet been reported in the literature. The patient whose case is presented here was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) because of premature birth, congenital pleural effusion, and respiratory distress. Pneumothorax subsequently occurred, leading to a diagnosis of hydropneumothorax through ultrasound examination. In this report, the ultrasound imaging characteristics of hydropneumothorax are introduced to expand the scope of LUS applications.
Case presentation
A female infant with a gestational age of 31 weeks and 2 days was delivered via emergency cesarean section owing to unknown causes of fetal heart rate reduction. She was admitted to the NICU because of premature birth and mild respiratory difficulties shortly after birth. LUS examination on admission revealed anechoic areas in the bilateral thoracic cavities and a significant number of confluent B-lines in both lungs but no lung consolidation with air bronchograms. Therefore, the patient was initially diagnosed with congenital pleural effusion and transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) according to the LUS findings, and noninvasive respiratory support was administered to the infant (Figure 1) (informed consent to publish the images and videos was obtained from the parents).
Figure 1
To determine the characteristics of the pleural effusion, thoracentesis was performed, resulting in drainage of pale yellow fluid from both sides of the thoracic cavity. Routine examination of the pleural fluid revealed a total cell count of 3,567 × 106/L, of which neutrophils accounted for 98.8% of the total cells. The results of the Leve-Ivanoff test were negative. The specific gravity of the pleural fluid was 1.020. Biochemical analysis revealed the following: 3.94 mmol/L of Glu, 112 IU/L of LDH and 23.6 g/L of protein. The results of the chylous test were positive. Both the pleural fluid and blood cultures were negative. The infant was confirmed to have congenital chylous pleural effusion.
The patient's condition was relatively stable on the first and second days after birth, with noninvasive respiratory support maintaining stable vital signs. However, her respiratory distress suddenly worsened on the third day after birth, and the oxygen concentration required invasive respiratory support to maintain normal blood oxygen saturation without any obvious triggers. LUS reexamination revealed clear pleural lines and A-lines on B-mode ultrasound of the left anterior chest, axilla, and back. The stratosphere sign appeared on M-mode ultrasound. Real-time ultrasound revealed the disappearance of lung sliding. According to the diagnostic and grading criteria of PTX, this child meets the diagnostic criteria for severe PTX in the left thoracic cavity (9–11) (Figure 2, Supplementary Video S1). Moreover, ultrasound signs indicating a moderate degree of PTX were also observed in the anterior chest and the upper axillary region of her right thoracic cavity (9–11). In the lower field of the right axilla, an anechoic dark area was observed, and alternating visibility of the lung sliding was observed between the upper and lower fields on real-time ultrasound. Under M-mode ultrasound, these areas presented as alternating characteristics between the beach sign and the stratosphere sign, similar to the lung point (11, 12), confirming a small amount of pleural effusion combined with moderate pneumothorax, specifically hydropneumothorax (Figure 3, Supplementary Video S2).
Figure 2
Figure 3
Owing to the presence of pneumothorax on both sides of the thoracic cavity and the severity of the patient's condition, closed thoracic drainage was performed. Two days later, both the pneumothorax and pleural effusion had fully resolved. After continuing treatment for another two weeks, the infant was able to breastfeed normally, and her vital signs remained stable. There was no recurrence of pleural effusion or pneumothorax, and the patient was discharged from the hospital and fully recovered.
Discussion
Chylous pleural effusion is the most common type of congenital pleural effusion observed in newborns, and injury to or disruption of the thoracic duct, which is responsible for chyle transport, is considered to be the major cause of chylothorax (13, 14). Although congenital chylothorax is not common, it can lead to a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate as high as 28% (14). Because of the rapid growth of chylous effusion and the frequent need for continuous closed thoracic drainage via thoracentesis in severe cases, we cannot rule out that bilateral pneumothorax may have been caused by accidental injury to the pleura during the thoracic puncture procedure. However, inadequate respiratory support and the resulting undertreatment of respiratory distress are more likely to be the main causes. Owing to timely monitoring, detection, and treatment with point-of-care ultrasound, a satisfactory outcome was achieved for the infant.
PTX is a common, critical condition encountered in the NICU, with an incidence rate of 1%–2% in term infants and 6% in premature infants with respiratory distress, according to the literature (15, 16). The development and application of LUS have revealed that the incidence of PTX in NICU patients with high-risk factors may be as high as 10% (16). The occurrence of PTX is associated with a 5.27-fold increase in neonatal mortality and a 30% higher incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) among surviving premature infants. Therefore, timely, rapid and accurate diagnosis, as well as prompt and correct puncture treatment, are essential in patients with risk factors (5, 17).
Ultrasound is a simple and effective imaging procedure for the diagnosis of pleural effusion and pneumothorax (8–11). However, when both conditions occur simultaneously, ultrasound techniques for diagnosing these conditions and identifying specific ultrasound imaging features observed in the field of neonatology have not yet been explored. The infant in our case study showed signs of PTX, such as clear pleural lines and A-lines, as well as pleural effusion indicated by the absence of echoic dark areas, simultaneously on B-mode ultrasound. On real-time ultrasound, gas and fluid alternate at their interface, and this type of air–fluid demarcation point is referred to as the “air–fluid point” in this paper. Under M-mode ultrasound, gas signs (a characteristic stratospheric sign) and liquid signs (a characteristic sand on the beach sign) alternately emerge, and the point where they alternate is called the “air‒fluid point”. Therefore, although hydropneumothorax is extremely rare in clinical practice, accurate diagnosis via ultrasound is feasible provided that technicians are highly skilled in ultrasound diagnostic techniques for pneumothorax and effusion. Notably, the “normal” findings on B-mode ultrasound for an infant with breathing difficulties do not necessarily indicate true normality; it is necessary to observe pneumothorax under real-time ultrasound and, if necessary, to conduct M-mode ultrasound for verification.
In conclusion, this article presents a typical case in which the “air-fluid point” was introduced as a specific ultrasound sign to aid in the diagnosis of neonatal hydropneumothorax. Of course, its reliability still needs further verification through the accumulation of more cases, particularly given potential differences in ultrasound manifestations at different gas-to-liquid ratios.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
JL: Visualization, Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Software, Data curation, Investigation, Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PJ: Writing – review & editing, Software, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Conceptualization, Visualization, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Project administration, Methodology, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Clinical Research Special Fund (No.320.6750.2024-3-32).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1637262/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Video S1PTX manifestations on real-time ultrasound. On real-time ultrasound, the pleural lines and A-lines are clearly visible, but lung sliding disappears. These signs are the most important indicators for the diagnosis of PTX via ultrasound.
Supplementary Video S2The air–fluid point: A specific ultrasound sign of hydropneumothorax. On real-time ultrasound, the demarcation point where gas and fluid alternate at their interface can be observed; this point is referred to as the air‒fluid point in this paper.
Abbreviations
CXR, chest x-ray; LUS, lung ultrasound; PTX, pneumothorax; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
References
1.
LiuJ. Lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of neonatal lung disease. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2014) 27(8):856–861. 10.3109/14767058.2013.844125
2.
KurepaDZaghloulNWatkinsLLiuJ. Neonatal lung ultrasound exam guidelines. J Perinatol. (2018) 38(1):11–22. 10.1038/jp.2017.140
3.
LiuJCopettiRSorantinELovrenskiJRodriguez-FanjulJKurepaDet alProtocol and guidelines for point-of-care lung ultrasound in diagnosing neonatal pulmonary diseases based on international expert consensus. J Vis Exp. (2019) 145:e58990. 10.3791/58990
4.
SinghYTissotCFragaMVYousefNCortesRGLopezJet alInternational evidence-based guidelines on point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS working group of the European society of paediatric and neonatal intensive care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. (2020) 24(1):65. 10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9
5.
LiuJInchingoloRSuryawanshiPGuoBBKurepaDCortésRGet alGuidelines for the use of lung ultrasound to optimise the management of neonatal respiratory distress: international expert consensus. BMC Med. (2025) 23(1):114. 10.1186/s12916-025-03879-5
6.
LiuJGuoYLRenXL. The roles of point-of-care lung ultrasound in saving the life of neonates with rapidly deteriorative critical lung diseases. Chest. (2024) 166(2):e51–e56. 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.005
7.
GaoYQQiuRXLiuJZhangLRenXLQinSJ. Lung ultrasound completely replaced chest x-ray for diagnosing neonatal lung diseases: a 3-year clinical practice report from a neonatal intensive care unit in China. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2022) 35(18):3565–3572. 10.1080/14767058.2020.1830369
8.
LiuJRenXLLiJJ. POC-LUS guiding pleural puncture drainage to treat neonatal pulmonary atelectasis caused by congenital massive effusion. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2020) 33(1):174–176. 10.1080/14767058.2018.1526921
9.
RaimondiFRodriguez FanjulJAversaSChiricoGYousefNDe LucaDet alLung ultrasound for diagnosing pneumothorax in the critically ill neonate. J Pediatr. (2016) 175:74–78.e1. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.018
10.
LiuJChiJHRenXLLiJChenYJLuZLet alLung ultrasonography to diagnose pneumothorax of the newborn. Am J Emerg Med. (2017) 35(9):1298–1302. 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.001
11.
LiuJKurepaDFelettiFAlonso-OjembarrenaALovrenskiJCopettiRet alInternational expert consensus and recommendations for neonatal pneumothorax ultrasound diagnosis and ultrasound-guided thoracentesis procedure. J Vis Exp. (2020) 157(3):e60836. 10.3791/60836
12.
LiuJChenXXLiXWWangYChenSWFuW. Lung ultrasonography to diagnose transient tachypnea of the newborn. Chest. (2016) 149(5):1269–1275. 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.024
13.
BhatnagarMFisherARamsaroopSCarterAPippardB. Chylothorax: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management-a comprehensive review. J Thorac Dis. (2024) 16(2):1645–1661. 10.21037/jtd-23-1636
14.
ReschBSever YildizGReitererF. Congenital chylothorax of the newborn: a systematic analysis of published cases between 1990 and 2018. Respiration. (2022) 101(1):84–96. 10.1159/000518217
15.
HorbarJDBadgerGJCarpenterJHFanaroffAAKilpatrickSLaCorteMet alTrends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991-1999. Pediatrics. (2002) 110(1 Pt 1):143–51. 10.1542/peds.110.1.143
16.
HadzicDSkokicFHusaricEAlihodzicHSofticDKovacevicD. Risk factors and outcome of neonatal pneumothorax in tuzla canton. Mater Sociomed. (2019) 31(1):66–70. 10.5455/msm.2019.31.66-70
17.
JoshiAKumarMRebekahGSanthanamS. Etiology, clinical profile and outcome of neonatal pneumothorax in tertiary care center in south India:13 years experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2022) 35(3):520–524. 10.1080/14767058.2020.1727880
Summary
Keywords
air–fluid point, hydropneumothorax, lung ultrasound, newborn infant, pneumothorax, pleural effusion
Citation
Liu J and Jiang P (2025) Case Report: Air–fluid point: a specific ultrasound sign for the diagnosis of hydropneumothorax in newborn infants. Front. Pediatr. 13:1637262. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1637262
Received
29 May 2025
Accepted
01 September 2025
Published
16 September 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Letizia Capasso, Federico II University Hospital, Italy
Reviewed by
Iuri Corsini, Careggi University Hospital, Italy
Luca Bonadies, University of Padua, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Liu and Jiang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jing Liu liujingbj@live.cn; liujing8001@mail.ccmu.edu.cn
ORCID Jing Liu orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-840X
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.