Medical Species Used in Russia for the Management of Diabetes and Related Disorders

Abstract

Background: Polyherbal mixtures called “medical species” are part of traditional and officinal medicine in Russia. This review aimed to analyze medical species used in Russia for the treatment of diabetes and related disorders. The information relevant to medical species, diabetes, and obesity was collected from local libraries, the online service E-library.ru, and Google Scholar. The prediction of the antidiabetic activity for the principal compounds identified in plants was performed using the free web resource PASS Online.

Results: We collected and analyzed information about the compositions, specificities of use, and posology of 227 medical species. The medical species represent mixtures of 2–15 plants, while the most frequently mentioned in the literature are species comprising 3–6 plants. The top 10 plants among the 158 mentioned in the literature include Vaccinium myrtillus L., Phaseolus vulgaris L., Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund., Urtica dioica L., Rosa spp., Hypericum spp., Galega officinalis L., Mentha × piperita L., Arctium spp, and Fragaria vesca L. The leading binary combination found in medical species comprises the leaves of V. myrtillus and pericarp of P. vulgaris; leaves of V. myrtillus and leaves of U. dioica; and leaves of V. myrtillus and aerial parts of G. officinalis. In triple combinations, in addition to the above-mentioned components, the roots of T. campylodes are often used. These combinations can be regarded as basic mixtures. Other plants are added to improve the efficacy, treat associated disorders, improve gastrointestinal function, prevent allergic reactions, etc. Meanwhile, an increase in plants in the mixture necessitates advanced techniques for quality control. A feature of medical species in Russia is the addition of fresh juices, birch sap, seaweeds, and adaptogenic plants. Modern studies of the mechanisms of action and predicted activities of the principal compounds from medicinal plants support the rationality of polyherbal mixtures. Nevertheless, the mechanisms are not well studied and reported due to the limited number of compounds. Further investigations with calculations of synergistic or additive indices are important for strengthening the scientific fundamentals for the wider use of medical species in the therapy of diabetes. Two medical species, “Arfazetin” (7 medicinal plants) and “Myrphasinum” (12 medicinal plants), are approved for use in officinal medicine. The efficacy of these species was confirmed in several in vivo experiments and clinical trials. According to modern regulatory rules, additional experiments and clinical trials are required for more detailed investigations of the mechanisms of action and confirmation of efficacy.

Conclusion: We believe that the scientifically based utilization of rich plant resources and knowledge of Russian herbal medicine can significantly contribute to the local economy as well as to the sectors seeking natural healing products.

Introduction

Disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism predispose individuals to diseases of the endocrine system, particularly diabetes. The rapid increase in patients with diabetes is one of the gravest and fastest-growing public health problems in the world. About 463 million people currently suffer from diabetes globally (IDF, 2019), of whom over 60 million were in European countries (Timmis et al., 2020), 34.2 million in the US (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020), and 4.5 million in Russia in 2017 (Dedov et al., 2018).

The mean cost of the development of a new drug from concept to market is considered to range from $314 million to $2.8 billion (Wouters et al., 2020). According to recent literature data, 50–70% of all the small-molecule therapeutics in clinical use today trace their origins to natural products (Newman and Cragg, 2020). Medicines derived from natural sources exhibit greater ranges of structural and physicochemical features that have been tailored through evolution for selective binding to functional macromolecules of the human body (Stratton et al., 2015). The intensive exploration of natural resources and utilization of the knowledge of traditional medicine provides an opportunity to reduce the time needed for development and keep costs reasonably low.

About four billion people around the world believe that, as “natural” products, herbal medicinal products (HMP) are “safe” or “safer” than conventional drugs and have turned to phytotherapeutics (Ekor, 2014). For centuries, Russia has been regarded a “herbophilious” society in which plants have been used as one of the primary foods and for the treatment of different diseases (Shikov et al., 2017). It is estimated that 58–60% of the population of Russia relies on HMP for the prophylaxis or treatment of different diseases (Shikov et al., 2011; Sammons et al., 2016). HMP currently makes up 20% of the Russian market for drugs (Akamova et al., 2017).

Medicinal plants have been effectively used for the treatment of diabetes in different systems of traditional as well as officinal medicine (Anzar, 2013; Shikov et al., 2014; Suzuki et al., 2017; Xiao and Luo, 2018; Okovitiy et al., 2018; Skalli et al., 2019; Salehi et al., 2019). The philosophy “one disease, one target, one drug” oversimplifies the mechanisms of disease and is becoming increasingly inefficient (Ulrich-Merzenich, 2014; Panossian et al., 2018; Shikov et al., 2018). Due to its multifactorial etiology, the holistic treatment of diabetes requires multi-pathway understanding and multi-targeting approaches. Modern network pharmacology studies emphasize the importance of the network-targeting, multicomponent therapy used in traditional Indian systems of medicine (Mukherjee et al., 2018; Banerjee et al., 2019), traditional Chinese medicine (Li et al., 2014; Xue et al., 2019), Kampo (Suzuki et al., 2017), etc.

Multicomponent or polyherbal mixtures for the treatment of diabetes are presented in different systems of Eastern traditional medicine (Namdul et al., 2001; Sato, 2004; Tong et al., 2012; Malgaonkar et al., 2016; Ghadge and Kuvalekar, 2017; Suzuki et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2019) as well as in European herbal medicine (Madić et al., 2021). Such traditional formulations include carefully selected leaves, stems, flowers, roots, seeds, sometimes minerals, and animal products. The main goal of complicated mixtures is to increase therapeutic efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Russian herbal medicine has adopted Eastern philosophy and a Western pragmatic approach. Herbal medicine in Russia is part of officinal medicine. According to the 14th edition of the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation, which became effective in 2018, an HMP has been defined as “a medicinal product manufactured or prepared from one kind of medicinal plant material or several kinds of raw materials and marketed in consumer-ready packaging form” (The State Pharmacopoeia of Russian Federation, 2018). The general monograph (OFS.1.4.1.0020.15) is devoted to polyherbal mixtures, which are defined with the specific term “medical species”. A “medical species” is a formulation representing a mixture of two or more types of integral, cut, or powdered medicinal plant materials, sometimes with the addition of mineral, synthetic, plant, or animal-derived substances. Medical species are used for the preparation of aqueous decoctions/infusions, occasionally in pure form as powders, powders for insufflation or ingestion, etc. (The State Pharmacopoeia of Russian Federation, 2018). Medical species have been known in Russia for centuries and were documented in the first herbalist manuscripts (Zmeev, 1896; Shikov et al., 2021). Apparently, due to their efficacy, the medical species were adopted from traditional medicine in officinal and were monographed in the first Russian military field “Pharmacopoeia Castrensis Rossica., 1765”. Thereafter, medical species were embodied in all the following pharmacopoeias of Russia.

The polyherbal mixtures used in Eastern systems of traditional medicine have gained global popularity, and several new medicinal products are being marketed in different countries. However, the potential of the medical species used in Russia remains little known and underestimated. This review aimed to analyze the medical species used in Russia for the treatment of diabetes and related disorders and enable a better understanding of the rationality of plant combinations.

Information on medical species was collected from the Pharmacopoeias of Russia (I–VI editions), Pharmacopoeias of USSR (VII–XI editions), and online State Register of Medicinal Preparations of the Russian Federation (2021). Guided by the keywords “traditional medicine + diabetes”, “phytotherapy + diabetes”, “traditional medicine + obesity”, and “phytotherapy + obesity”, we systematically searched the literature in library catalogs, on the online service E-library.ru, and on Google Scholar. Next, the publications were screened using the keyword combination “medical species”. Through this approach, 75 medical (herbalist) books were found. Some medical species were mentioned in different books. We provide several references for the same medical species in Table 1.

Results and Discussion

For centuries, medicinal plants have been used in Russia for the management of diabetes and related disorders (Zmeev, 1896; Turova and Sapozhnikova, 1989; Minaeva, 1991; Protasenya and Vasilenko, 1992; Nazina, 2007; Chekina et al., 2010; Korsun et al., 2016; Povydysh et al., 2018). The focus of the current paper is on medical species used for the therapy of diabetes and related diseases in traditional and officinal Russian medicine.

The Characteristics of the Composition of Medical Species, Their Preparation and Posology

We collected information about the composition, specificity of preparation, and posology of 227 species (Table 1). The majority of the species (148) are suggested for the treatment of diabetes; 37 species are recommended for the management of obesity, and eight species are indicated for lowering blood glucose. Several species are recommended for specific cases when diabetes is accompanied by impotence in men (5 species), diabetes accompanied by liver and gallbladder diseases (3 species), diabetes accompanied by gastritis (2 species), etc. Altogether, 158 plants are mentioned in medical species, among which 96 medicinal plants are monographed in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation and used in officinal medicine (Shikov et al., 2021). A significant proportion of the plants used in medical species are native to Russian flora.

Medical species represent mixtures of 2–15 plants. The most frequently mentioned in the literature are medical species comprising mixtures of four plants (66 species), followed by mixtures of five plants (47 species), three plants (28 species), and six plants (24 species) (Figure 1). According to some experts’ opinions, the industrial-scale production of polyherbal mixtures with more than 10 medicinal plants is not rational (Kiseleva and Chauzova, 1999). Indeed, only 18 species among the 227 described contain over 10 plants (Figure 1). However, the numbers of plants in polyherbal mixtures in Ayurveda (Parasuraman et al., 2014), Kampo (Arai et al., 2020), and traditional Chinese medicine (Xutian et al., 2014) are not limited to 10. On the other hand, the species “Myrphasinum”, approved as officinal medicine in Russia, includes 12 plants (Table 1). Although the idea of combining so many plants in one mixture is part of traditional medicine, the quality control of medical species becomes more complicated with each additional component due to challenges related to the specificity of each plant.

FIGURE 1

Medical species are prepared predominantly in form of infusions or decoctions. Infusions are common for soft plant parts such as aerial parts, leaves, and flowers. Decoctions are preferred for more hard barks, fruits, and roots. The recommended single doses vary from a tablespoon up to 200 ml and depend on the pharmacological activity of the plants in the mixture.

The Plants Most Frequently Used in Medical Species

The top 10 plants in medical species used for the therapy of diabetes and related disorders (Table 1) include Vaccinium myrtillus L. (leaves in 97, shoots in 11, and fruits in 5 species), Phaseolus vulgaris L. (pericarp in 65 species), Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund. (syn. Taraxacum officinale Wigg) (roots in 49 and leaves in 15 species), Urtica dioica L. (leaves in 49 and roots in 1 species), Rosa spp. (fruits in 44 species), Hypericum spp. (aerial parts in 37 and flowers in 6 species), Galega officinalis L. (aerial parts in 41 species and seeds in one species), Mentha × piperita L. (leaves in 29 and aerial parts in 11 species), Arctium spp. (roots in 34 and leaves in 2 species), and Fragaria vesca L. (leaves in 26, aerial parts in 5, and roots in 1 species). Although the main plant parts used in species are the same as those recorded in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation, multiple parts of some plants are utilized. Particularly, aerial parts, fruits, and roots (Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss); leaves, flowers, and roots (Sambucus nigra L.); and roots and leaves (Cichorium intybus L., Rubus caesius L., and Arctium spp.) have been used.

The Popular Combinations of Medicinal Plants and Rationality for Combination

It is believed that, in medical species, several herbs work together harmoniously to achieve an ideal therapeutic effect. Modern studies on the mechanisms of activities of individual plant extracts support the rationality of empirically composed polyherbal mixtures in traditional medicine. Furthermore, we discuss the most frequent combinations of plants used in medical species in light of their mechanisms of action. The most frequently mentioned binary combinations of plants in medical species used for the treatment of diabetes are specified in Table 2.

The leading binary combination noted in medical species (Table 2) comprises the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and pericarp of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (quoted in 40 medical species). The leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus were widely used in Europe for the treatment of diabetes for a long time before the discovery of insulin (Helmstädter and Schuster, 2010). The extract was considered a potent inhibitor of α-glucosidase, with an IC50 value not statistically significantly different from the IC50 of acarbose (Bljajić et al., 2017), and to decrease blood glucose (Cignarella et al., 1996) and glycated hemoglobin (Sidorova et al., 2017). An extract from the pericarp of Phaseolus vulgaris L. significantly decreases the levels of plasma triacylglycerol and low-density lipoprotein in the blood (Pari and Venkateswaran, 2004; Sidorova et al., 2017), lowers blood glucose and cholesterol in the blood, and inhibits α-amylase activity (Micheli et al., 2019). The normalization of lipid profiles and systemic antioxidant effects are also attributed to this plant by other scientists (Venkateswaran et al., 2002; Helmstädter, 2010; Almuaigel et al., 2017).

The next most popular binary combination includes leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and leaves of Urtica dioica L. (noted in 26 medical species). In addition to Vaccinium myrtillus L., the extract from the leaves of Urtica dioica L. reduces glycemia, potentiates the activity of insulin, enhances the utilization of glucose (El Haouari and Rosado, 2019), protects pancreatic β-cells (Golalipour and Khori, 2007), inhibits intestinal glucose absorption (Bnouham, et al., 2003), and shows total cholesterol-lowering activity (Avci et al., 2006). Eight weeks of treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with Urtica dioica extract resulted in reductions in plasma glucose, triglycerides, and liver serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase. Meanwhile, NO and superoxide markedly increased (Behzadi et al., 2016).

The combination of the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and aerial parts of Galega officinalis L. is described for 22 medical species. Complimentarily to Vaccinium myrtillus L., the extract from Galega officinalis L. reduces blood glucose, promotes the recovery of pancreatic β-cells (Sabeva et al., 2004; Shojaee et al., 2015), increases insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) (Christensen et al., 2009), normalizes neutrophils, reduces lymphoblast numbers, and inhibits the apoptosis of lymphocytes, which prevents the development and progression of diabetic complications (Nagalievska et al., 2018). Galega officinalis L. is a world-renowned herbal lineage containing metformin (Bailey, 2017). It should be noted that the efficacy of the binary combination of extracts of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Galega officinalis L. was confirmed in vivo. A dry extract of this combination (50 mg/kg) was intragastrically administered to rats with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes. After 21 days of treatment, histological examination evidenced the recovery of degenerative and focal necrobiotic changes in the parenchymatous structures of the liver and kidneys and their blood flow caused by STZ (Kurylo et al., 2018). In another study, the same combination of extracts was administered intragastrically to rats with STZ-induced diabetes for 28 days. After 7 days of treatment, blood glucose was decreased by 69% compared with control, while after 28 days of treatment, blood glucose was decreased by 25% compared with control. A positive effect of the combination was also observed in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (Kurylo et al., 2020). The rationality of the Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Galega officinalis L. combination was confirmed in a number of experiments by Achilov (2020). A screening study of the individual extracts (Vaccinium myrtillus L. (50 mg/kg) and Galega officinalis L. (70 mg/kg)) and a combination at 50 mg/kg showed that, in OGTT in rats, the combination of the extracts decreased glucose more effectively than the individual extracts. The strongest effect was observed at 60 min. Studies on models of epinephrine-induced hyperglycemia in rats, alloxan-induced diabetes in rats, and dithizone-induced diabetes in rabbits showed hypoglycemic activity of the combined extract at 60 mg/kg (Achilov, 2020). Roots of Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund. in combination with the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. are contained in 21 medical species; the former in combination with the leaves of Urtica dioica L. are used in 19 medical species, and the same in combination with the pericarp of Phaseolus vulgaris L. are used in 19 medical species (Table 2). The leaves of Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund. are also used in binary combinations with the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and leaves of Urtica dioica L. The Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund. root extract inhibits adipogenesis, regulates lipid metabolism by inhibiting fat accumulation, increases lipolysis, and normalizes cholesterol and triglyceride levels (García-Carrasco et al., 2015). The leaf extract inhibited pancreatic lipase in vitro and in vivo, reduced triglyceride levels in the plasma of mice (Zhang et al., 2008), and stimulated the release of insulin in pancreatic β-cells (Hussain et al., 2004).

All the other binary combinations are used in fewer than 10% of the medical species discussed in this review. Therefore, we summarize the mechanisms of activities of the other plants cited in Table 2 separately in Table 3. The above-mentioned literature data suggest that binary combinations provide additive/synergistic effects.

Notably, the binary combinations of the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and pericarp of Phaseolus vulgaris L.; leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and roots of Arctium spp.; and roots of Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund. and leaves of Mentha × piperita L. occur as self-sufficient medical species (Table 1).

Deeper analysis of all the medical species allowed us to identify leading ternary plant combinations, which are presented in Figure 2. It is not surprising that the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L., pericarp of Phaseolus vulgaris L., roots of Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund., leaves of Urtica dioica L., and aerial parts of Galega officinalis L. are principal members of the ternary combinations.

FIGURE 2

In Silico Probability of Antidiabetic Activity for Principal Compounds Identified in Selected Plants

The progress in computer science in symbiosis with modern pharmacology has led to the active implementation of computer-based prognosis for the activity of herb-derived compounds. Using an in silico approach, we analyzed the probability of antidiabetic activity for the principal compounds identified in the plants most often mentioned in binary and ternary combinations.

The prediction was performed using the free web resource PASS Online (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances). The prediction is based on an analysis of the structure and biological activity relationships for more than 300,000 organic compounds (Filimonov et al., 2014). Table 4 includes the prediction results for the antidiabetic efficacy of active compounds from selected medicinal plants with appropriate probability values: the likelihood of the given activity being revealed (Pa) or not revealed (Pi). If Pa>0.5, the substance is very likely to exhibit the activity (Lagunin et al., 2000).

The predicted Pa values for the active compounds identified in the most frequently used combinations of plants in medical species were over 0.5 and ranged from 0.619 for compounds from Fragaria vesca L. up to 0.976 for compounds from Hypericum perforatum L. (Table 4). The highest Pa values were found for compounds derived from Urtica dioica L., Hypericum perforatum L., Vaccinium myrtillus L., Fragaria vesca L., Linum usitatissimum L., and Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. (Pa>0.9). The diagram in Figure 3 demonstrates crosslinks between medicinal plants with a high probability of predicted antidiabetic effects (Table 4) used in medical species.

FIGURE 3

The calculated data support the rationality of the traditional use of medical species for the treatment of diabetes and its complications. Nevertheless, the chemical principles responsible for the observed effects are rarely studied. Except for the success story of metformin derived from Galega officinalis L., no other compounds are on the market. Systematic studies of the combinatory action of different plant decoctions/infusions, as well as plant-derived compounds, are needed.

Specificity of Medical Species Used in Russia

Several plants used in Russian traditional medicines for the treatment of diabetes and its complications are widely known in other countries. The leaves of Urtica dioica L., pericarp of Phaseolus vulgaris L., leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus L., and leaves and roots of Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund. are among the most frequently used components for the management of diabetes by herbalists in Croatia (Končić and Bljajić, 2019). Phaseolus vulgaris is a well-known antidiabetic plant in the Ayurveda and Unani medicine systems (Ganesan and Xu, 2017). It is widely used in medicine in Poland (Łabuda et al., 2017). The antidiabetic potential of Urtica dioica is well documented in Arabic traditional medicine (Said et al., 2008). Galega officinalis L. has been used for the treatment of diabetes in Bulgaria (Petkov, 1982), Italy (Leporatti and Ivancheva, 2003), and Iran (Nowbandegani et al., 2015).

Unlike in other systems of medicine, the juices of some plants (the berries of Viburnum opulus L., Solanum tuberosum L., and Daucus sativus Roehl. and birch sap) have been used for preparing some medical species. Interestingly, eleven medical species contain seaweeds (Cystoseira barbata (Stackh.) C. Agardh; Saccharina latissima (L.) C.E.Lane, C.Mayes, Druehl & G.W.Saunders; Fucus vesiculosus L.), and one species contains lichen (Cetraria islandica L.). It is noteworthy that several adaptogenic plants have been used in medical species. Besides the common properties of promoting the adaptability, resilience, and survival of living organisms under stress (Panossian et al., 2021), each adaptogen has some specific activity. In particular, Oplopanax elatus (Nakai) Nakai lowered blood glucose and increased insulin levels in vivo (Molokovskii et al., 2002). Glucose- and cholesterol-lowering effects, decreased glycosuria, and increased insulin levels were observed in diabetic patients after complex therapy with Oplopanax elatus (Nakai) Nakai (Klimakova and Kazmanm, 1962). Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem decreases blood glucose, inhibits insulin resistance, alleviates hyperlipidemia in vivo (Hwang et al., 2015), and improves blood glucose and lipid metabolism in humans (Abidov et al., 2006). The activity could be associated with aralosides (Pa, 0.639–0.969, Table 4). Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim.) Maxim. and its active compounds lowered blood glucose, increased glycogen levels, ameliorated insulin resistance, and increased insulin levels in vivo (Molokovskii et al., 2002; Niu et al., 2008; Ahn et al., 2013). The activity is associated with syringing and eleutheroside E (Pa, 0.684 and 0.887; Table 4). These adaptogens are not only used in medical species in traditional medicine but are included in the officinal medical species “Arfazetin” (Table 1).

Principles for Compilation of Medical Species

Due to the specific location of Russia, Russian herbal medicine has adopted the philosophy of Eastern traditional medicine and the pragmatic approach of Western medicine. One of the main principles for the compilation of the formulas used in traditional Chinese medicine is described in Shen-nong Ben-Cao Jing. An effective formula should be based on a strong monarch, accompanied by a minister, assistant, and guide, which mimics a well-organized society (Xin et al., 2014; Xutian et al., 2014). However, this principle is difficult to follow in practice, due to the multiple symptoms of diseases and polyfunctionality of medicinal plants. Therefore, many formulas of TCM contain secrets that are not always explained by rationality (Wang et al., 2021).

The philosophy and conceptualization for the compilation of medical species in Russian medicine are not well described. After a comprehensive medical examination of a patient, a Russian phytotherapeutic doctor initially prescribes a basic medical species, which includes the plants that lower blood glucose. The binary and triple combinations emphasized in this review can be regarded as basic mixtures. Diabetes is often accompanied by obesity. Therefore, the basic mixture is fortified with plants reducing hypercholesterolemia. In the case of hypertension, the species include anti-hypertensive plants. The practical doctors also take into account the peculiarities of the gastrointestinal tracts of the patients. In this respect, medical species can include plants with astringent or laxative properties. To prevent allergic reactions, doctors recommend taking a basic mixture for a week and then continuously increasing the number of plants in the medical species one by one. Plants with antiallergic properties are sometimes included in the mixtures (Kovaleva, 1972; Ladynina and Morozova, 1987; Ladynina and Morozova, 1990).

This approach could be illustrated by the following medical species frequently cited in the literature. The species 4.39 (Table 1) includes a synergistic combination of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Galega officinalis L., which effectively decreases glucose levels (Achilov, 2020; Kurylo et al., 2020). These basic plants have antidiabetic properties. Frangula alnus Mill. acts as a laxative, and Betula pendula Roth. acts as a diuretic (Belodubrovskaya et al., 2004). Another species, 4.40 (Table 1), besides the synergistic combination of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Galega officinalis L., includes Phaseolus vulgaris L., which reduces plasma triacylglycerol and low-density lipoprotein, and lowers blood glucose and cholesterol (Pari and Venkateswaran, 2004; Sidorova et al., 2017; Micheli et al., 2019). These basic plants ensure the antidiabetic effect, while Mentha × piperita L. additionally provides anti-hypertensive, antiallergic, and spasmolytic effects (Mahendran and Rahman, 2020). The species 5.10 (Table 1) comprises 5 plants. The power of the basic mixture of the synergistic combination of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Galega officinalis L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. is reinforced by Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund., which inhibits adipogenesis and fat accumulation (García-Carrasco et al., 2015). Additionally, Urtica dioica L. potentiates the activity of insulin and enhances the utilization of glucose (El Haouari and Rosado, 2019). We understand that the interpretation of the rationality of the above-mentioned medical species compilation took into account the results of modern research. Apparently, the architects of the discussed medical species compiled them according to their own experience and knowledge. Similar to the TCM formulas, some Russian medical species also have secrets that are yet to be deciphered. Nevertheless, the knowledge and practical experience of Russian traditional medicine were successfully utilized for the development of medical species used in officinal medicine.

Medical Species Used in Russian Officinal Medicine

In Russia, medical species are part of officinal medicine. Although medical species are available as OTC products, consultations with phytotherapeutic doctors are helpful and will lead to more effective results. Among the 227 medical species discussed in this review, only two, “Arfazetin” and “Myrphasinum”, are approved for use in officinal medicine. Both species are recommended in the mild form of diabetes. The medical species “Arfazetin” was developed in the All-Union Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants and was approved for medicinal use in 1986 (Ferubko et al., 2016). “Arfazetin” comprises seven medicinal plants (Table 1). In 1992, the composition of species was revised. The roots of Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem (syn. Aralia mandshurica Rupr. et Maxim.) or roots and rhizomes of Oplopanax elatus (Nakai) Nakai were excluded. Instead of these plants, the roots and rhizomes of Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim.) Maxim. were included in species at the same rate. A new species was named “Arfazetin-E”. Both these species (“Arfazetin” and “Arfazetin-E”) are now included in the State register (2021).

“Myrphasinum” was developed in 1985 by scientists from the first Moscow medical institute, named after I.M. Sechenov (Fas'kov et al., 1991), and was approved for medicinal use in 1991. The composition is complicated and includes the 12 medicinal plants (Table 1).

According to the regulatory requirements of the USSR/Russia, medical species are subject to preclinical and clinical evaluations of safety and efficacy.

Preclinical and Clinical Data

The efficacy of “Arfazetin” was studied in several experiments in vivo. Rats with alloxan-induced diabetes were administered an infusion of “Arfazetin” (10 ml/kg per day, orally) five days before alloxan injection and seven days after injection. Distilled water was administered in the control group. The blood glucose level, elevated by alloxan, was decreased in “the Arfazetin”-treated rats by 24 and 38% when compared with control on the third and seventh days, respectively, after alloxan injection. The total cholesterol, creatinine, and malondialdehyde in the blood and liver were decreased by 27, 37, 30, and 30%, respectively, compared with the control group on the seventh day after treatment. The treatment of rats with “Arfazetin” led to an increase in serum immunoreactive insulin and C-peptide after glucose load by 22 and 55%, respectively, when compared with the control group (Azhunova et al., 2001). Similar results were observed in a prolonged study. The oral administration of “Arfazetin” (5 ml/kg of infusion) to rats with alloxan-induced diabetes over 30 days (7 days before alloxan induction and 23 days after injection) resulted in decreases in blood glucose of 46 and 39%, respectively, compared with the control group on the 15th and 30th days of the experiment. On Day 30, glycogen in the liver was increased by 17% when compared with the control group (Ishankulova et al., 2013). A further study by the same group evidenced the lipid-lowering properties of “Arfazetin” (infusion, 5 ml/kg, orally). The total cholesterol in the blood decreased by 33% when compared with the negative control after 30 days of the treatment of rats with alloxan-induced diabetes. The levels of triglycerides and low- and high-density lipoproteins normalized and were equal to those in the intact group after 30 days of treatment with the infusion of “Arfazetin” (Ishankulova and Yuldasheva, 2019). In another study, the effects of “Arfazetin” on energy metabolism in rats were reported. Rats with alloxan-induced diabetes were treated with the infusion of “Arfazetin” (10 ml/kg, orally, daily) for 21 days. The control group received the same volume of distilled water. The treatment of rats with "Arfazetin" resulted in a double increase in adenosine triphosphate production in the liver when compared with control, starting from the seventh day of the experiment. The concentration of lactic acid decreased by 1.7 fold, while the activity of pyruvate kinase increased by 1.5 fold when compared with the control group after 21 days of treatment. The authors suggest positive effects of “Arfazetin” on energy metabolism (Lemza et al., 2014). The blood glucose in rats with alloxan-induced diabetes was decreased by 3.2 fold when compared with control at 3 h after the intragastric administration of a dry extract of the medical species “Arfazetin” (1,200 ng/kg). The efficacy of the extract was equal to that of gliclazide (50 mg/kg, intragastric administration) (Kvasova, 2011).

The acute and chronic toxicity of “Arfazetin” was studied in mice after oral administration. The LD₅₀ for the dry extract of “Arfazetin” was 24 g/kg (acute toxicity). No signs of toxicity were observed in the mice after 30 days of the administration of the “Arfazetin” infusion and dry extract at 1,200 mg/kg (there times a day every 4 h) (Kvasova et al., 2010).

The antidiabetic potential of the medical species “Myrphasinum” was investigated in rats. Diabetes was modulated by the subcutaneous injection of alloxan. The glucose level in the blood was increased from 5.6 mmol/L (intact group) to 9.55 mmol/L, body weights were decreased, and the rats had no appetite. The aqueous infusion of “Myrphasinum” (25 g/L) was administered to rats by an intragastric route at the dose of 5 ml/kg three times per day for two weeks. The control group was administered saline. The blood glucose in the treated group was decreased to 3.4 mol/L (vs. an increase up to 10.7 ml/L in the control group) two weeks after the beginning of treatment. The body weights and appetite were improved. Meanwhile, 25% of the animals in the control group died. The animals were observed for five extra weeks after the end of treatment with “Myrphasinum”. Three weeks after the end of treatment, the blood glucose in the treated group was equal to that in the intact group (5.77 mmol/L) and was stable until the fifth week (Grinkevich et al., 1997). In another study, outbred rats with alloxan-induced diabetes were orally administered 10 ml/kg of an infusion of “Myrphasinum” 3 times a day for three weeks. The control group received the same dose of normal saline. The treatment with “Myrphasinum” resulted in a statistically significant decrease in blood glucose by 26% compared with control. Glycogen in the liver and skeletal muscles was increased by 35 and 21% respectively, when compared with control and was equal to the level in an intact group (Dzhafarova, 2013). Subsequently, the efficacy of “Myrphasinum” in outbred rats with alloxan-induced diabetes was evaluated. The rats were treated orally with 10 ml/kg of an infusion of “"Myrphasinum” 3 times a day. The control group received normal saline. Metformin (5 mg/kg, 2 times a day) served as a positive control. The administration of “Myrphasinum” for 21 days did not affect the body weights of the rats, and no signs of toxicity were observed. The level of glucose in the “Myrphasinum”-treated group was decreased by 75% compared with control (vs. 59% in the metformin group). The insulin and C-peptide levels were dramatically reduced by 3 and 3.3 fold, respectively, in rats after alloxan injection in those treated with "Myrphasinum" (vs. 1.5 and 1.7 fold increases, respectively, in the animals treated with metformin) (Jafarova and Garayev, 2013).

We have found, in the available literature, only a few publications about clinical trials with medical species. The efficacy of “Arfazetin” was studied in a group of 32 patients (18–65 years old) with types I and II diabetes mellitus. “Arfazetin” was prepared in the form of an aqueous infusion (10 g in 400 ml) and administered in warm form at the dose of 1/3 glass, three times a day, 30 min before meals, for one month. The patients with type I diabetes (12 persons) were administered “Arfazetin” in combination with an appropriate dose of insulin and diet. The five patients with a mild form of type II diabetes were administered “Arfazetin” in combination with an appropriate diet. The group of 15 patients with a moderate form of type II diabetes were administered “Arfazetin” in combination with an appropriate dose of hypoglycemic drugs and diet. In the patients with type I diabetes treated with “Arfazetin”, a statistically significant decrease in blood glucose (by 38%) was registered at 11.00 pm when compared with 9.00 am of the same day. The effect was not cumulative. More pronounced results were observed in patients with type II diabetes. “Arfazetin” effectively ameliorated hyperglycemia. The doses of hypoglycemic drugs were reduced in 7 patients. In two patients, it was possible to maintain normal blood glucose levels without hypoglycemic drugs (Korotkova et al., 1988).

A “Myrphasinum” infusion was used in clinical praxis for the therapy of patients with and without diabetes decompensation. The treatment of patients with diabetes in the compensation stage resulted in statistically significant decreases in glucose by 15 and 44% in the blood and urine, respectively. Cholesterol and B-lipoproteins were decreased by 18 and 21%, respectively. The effects of “Myrphasinum” in patients with diabetes in the decompensation stage were less pronounced (Fas'kov et al., 1991). However, the data provided in the inventor’s certificate are limited and lacking other details.

The comparative efficacy of “Arfazetin” and “Myrphasinum” was studied in 57 patients with diabetes (22–76 years old) in an open clinical trial. The first group (26 persons) was treated with “Arfazetin”, while the second group (31 persons) received “Myrphasinum”. Basic therapy includes oral hypoglycemic drugs. “Myrphasinum” was considered more effective and resulted in a statistically significant decrease in blood glucose, surpassing “Arfazetin” in efficacy (Firsova et al., 1990). However, no more details were provided in this conference paper.

Conclusion

In this review, we analyze the compositions and potential of medical species used in Russian traditional and officinal medicine for the treatment of diabetes and related diseases. Several species besides medicinal plants contain fresh juices from berries, birch sap, and seaweeds. Another aspect of medical species is the presence of adaptogens. The philosophy and conceptualization for the compilation of medical species in Russian medicine are not well described. We have highlighted the most common binary and triple combinations of plants exploited in medical species. These combinations can be considered base mixes. Other plants are added to the mixtures to improve the efficacy, treat associated disorders, improve gastrointestinal function, prevent allergic reactions, etc. Obviously, Russian phytotherapeutic doctors compile polyherbal mixtures according to their own experience and knowledge. Modern studies of the mechanisms of action and predicted activities of the principal compounds from medicinal plants support the rationality of polyherbal mixtures. However, the mechanisms are not well studied and reported due to the limited number of compounds. Deeper investigations including gene expression will enable a better understanding of molecular mechanisms and targets. Although a few studies have evidenced possible additive/synergistic effects of herbal mixtures, additional investigations with calculations of synergistic or additive indices will assist in providing a scientific foundation for the wider use of medical species for the therapy of diabetes. Even though most medical species comprise mixtures of three to six plants, other species also deserve careful study. It appears to us that the species with seven or more plants have rationality that is difficult to explain and some secrets that are yet to be deciphered. On the other hand, modern good praxis rules require the identification of all the plants in medical species. An increase in plants in the mixture requires advanced techniques for quality control. Notably, two medical species approved for use in officinal medicine include 7 and 12 plants. The efficacy of these species was investigated in vivo. However, all the activities were proved using only one model of alloxan-induced diabetes. Clinical trials were completed in small groups, and several details are not indicated in the reports. According to modern regulatory rules, additional pharmacological experiments and clinical trials are required for more detailed investigations of the mechanisms of action and the confirmation of efficacy. We believe that the scientifically based utilization of rich plant resources and knowledge of Russian herbal medicine can significantly contribute to the local economy as well as to the sectors seeking natural healing products.

References

• 1

  AbidovM. T.del RioM. J.RamazanovT. Z.KlimenovA. L.DzhamirzeS.KalyuzhinO. V. (2006). Effects of Aralia Mandshurica and Engelhardtia Chrysolepis Extracts on Some Parameters of Lipid Metabolism in Women with Nondiabetic Obesity. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.141 (3), 343–346. 10.1007/s10517-006-0167-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AchilovD. D. (2020). Hypoglycemic Properties of Phytobiabetol Obtained Based on Plants Vaccinium Myrtillus L., Galega Oficinalis L.Thesis of PhD dissertation. Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Available at: http://repository.tma.uz/jspui/handle/1/801.

  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AhangarpourA.HeidariH.OroojanA. A.MirzavandiF.Nasr EsfehaniK.Dehghan MohammadiZ. (2017). Antidiabetic, Hypolipidemic and Hepatoprotective Effects of Arctium Lappa Root's Hydro-Alcoholic Extract on Nicotinamide-Streptozotocin Induced Type 2 Model of Diabetes in Male Mice. Avicenna J. Phytomed.7 (2), 169–179.

  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AhnJ.UmM. Y.LeeH.JungC. H.HeoS. H.HaT. Y. (2013). Eleutheroside E, an Active Component of Eleutherococcus Senticosus, Ameliorates Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetic Db/db Mice. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.2013, 934183. 10.1155/2013/934183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AkamovaA. V.NemyatykhO. D.NarkevichI. A. (2017). Multiple View Marketing Analysis of the Russian Plant-Based Drugs Market. Drug Dev. registration4 (21), 276–280.

  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AlmuaigelM. F.SeifM. A.AlbualiH. W.AlharbiO.AlhawashA. (2017). Hypoglycemic and Hypolipidemic Effects of Aqueous Extract of Phaseolus Vulgaris Pods in Streptozotocin-Diabetic Rats. Biomed. Pharmacother.94, 742–746. 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.135

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AnzarM. A. (2013). Drugs Indicated for the Management of Ziabetus Shakri (Diabetes Mellitus) in Unani Medicine-An Overview. Int. Jour. Pharmamedix India1 (3), 460–474.

  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AraiY.-C.MakinoI.IkemotoT.SaisuH.TerajimaY.OwariK. (2020). Kampo for the Treatment of Pain in Japan: A Review. Pain Ther.9 (1), 161–170. 10.1007/s40122-020-00160-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  ArokiyarajS.BalamuruganR.AugustianP. (2011). Antihyperglycemic Effect of Hypericum perforatum Ethyl Acetate Extract on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed.1 (5), 386–390. 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60085-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  AvciG.KupeliE.EryavuzA.YesiladaE.KucukkurtI. (2006). Antihypercholesterolaemic and Antioxidant Activity Assessment of Some Plants Used as Remedy in Turkish Folk Medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 107 (3), 418–423. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  Azhunova.T. A.LemzaS. V.LinkhoyevaE. I. (2001). Pharmacotherapeutic Efficacy of Complex Plant Remedy in Experimental Diabetes. Bull. East. Siberian Scientific Cent. Siberian Department Russ. Acad. Med. Sci.1-2 (77), 104–108.

  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BahramiG.MiraghaeeS. S.MohammadiB.BahramiM. T.TaheripakG.KeshavarziS.et al (2020). Molecular Mechanism of the Anti-diabetic Activity of an Identified Oligosaccharide from Rosa Canina. Res. Pharm. Sci.15 (1), 36–47. 10.4103/1735-5362.278713

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BaileyC. J. (2017). Metformin: Historical Overview. Diabetologia60 (9), 1566–1576. 10.1007/s00125-017-4318-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BalakirevG. V.GubanovI. A.KozinaE. M.SamokhinaE. B.TaranovaI. A.TugunovaO.et al (2010). Travnik. Encyclopedia of Medicinal Plants. G.A. Nepokoichitsky (editor-in-chief). 640. Moscow: Publishing House.

  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BanerjeeS.BhattacharjeeP.KarA.MukherjeeP. K. (2019). LC-MS/MS Analysis and Network Pharmacology of Trigonella Foenum-Graecum - A Plant from Ayurveda against Hyperlipidemia and Hyperglycemia with Combination Synergy. Phytomedicine60, 152944. 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152944

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BarbalhoS. M.DamascenoD. C.SpadaA. P. M.SilvaV. S. D.MartuchiK. A.OshiiwaM.et al (2011). Metabolic Profile of Offspring from Diabetic Wistar Rats Treated with Mentha piperita (Peppermint). Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med.2011, 1–6. 10.1155/2011/430237

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BarnaulovO. D. (2008). The Comparative Estimation Influence of Drugs from Russian Flora Plants on Insuline and Glucose Blood Level in Alloxane-Diabetic Rats. Psychopharmacol. Biol. Narcol.8 (3–4), 2484–2490.

  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BayaniM.Ahmadi-HamedaniM.Jebelli JavanA. (2017). Study of Hypoglycemic, Hypocholesterolemic and Antioxidant Activities of Iranian Mentha Spicata Leaves Aqueous Extract in Diabetic Rats. Iran J. Pharm. Res.16 (Suppl. l), 75–82.

  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BehzadiA. A.Kalalian-MoghaddamH.AhmadiA. H. (2016). Effects of Urtica dioica supplementation on blood lipids, hepatic enzymes and nitric oxide levels in type 2 diabetic patients: A double blind, randomized clinical trial. Avicenna J. Phytomed.6 (6), 686.

  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BelodubrovskayaG. A.BlinovaK. F.VandyshevV. V.ZhokhovaE. V.KlemperA. V.KomarovaM. N.et al (2004). Medicinal plant raw materials. Pharmacognosy: textbook. Editors YakovlevG.P.BlinovaK.. St. Petersburg: Spezlit, 765. [in Russia].

  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BhatM.ZinjardeS. S.BhargavaS. Y.KumarA. R.JoshiB. N. (2011). Antidiabetic Indian Plants: a Good Source of Potent Amylase Inhibitors. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med.2011, 1–6. 10.1093/ecam/nen040

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BlinovV. A. (2000). Medicinal Plants for Diabetes Mellitus. Moscow: Publishing house Raduga.

  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BljajićK.PetlevskiR.VujićL.ČačićA.ŠoštarićN.JablanJ.et al (2017). Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and α-glucosidase-inhibiting Activities of the Aqueous and Hydroethanolic Extracts of Vaccinium Myrtillus Leaves. Molecules22 (5), 703. 10.3390/molecules22050703

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BnouhamM.MerhfourF. Z.ZiyyatA.MekhfiH.AzizM.LegssyerA. (2003). Antihyperglycemic Activity of the Aqueous Extract of Urtica Dioica. Fitoterapia74 (7–8), 677–681. 10.1016/s0367-326x(03)00182-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  BogdanovaO.BashkirovaN. A. (2010). The Big Book of Diabetics: Everything You Need to Know about Diabetes: Moscow: AST. St. Petersburg:Prime-Euroznak, 280. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 26

  BouzghayaS.AmriM.HombléF. (2020). Improvement of Diabetes Symptoms and Complications by an Aqueous Extract ofLinum usitatissimum (L.) Seeds in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Mice. J. Med. Food23 (10), 1077–1082. 10.1089/jmf.2019.0205

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  BrusenskayaI. V.Kaz’minV. D. (2005). Treatment by Traditional Medicines. Rostov on the Don: Phoenix. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 28

  BubenchikovaV. N.BubenchikovA. A.FilippenkoN. G. (2003). Home Doctor Book: Phytotherapy in Your House. Moscow,RIPOL CLASSIC. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 29

  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2020. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human ServicesAvailable at: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf.

  • Google Scholar

• 30

  ChekinaN. A.ChukaevS. A.NikolaevS. M. (2010). Diabetes Mellitus: Possibilities of Pharmacotherapy Using Plant Remedies. Vestnik Buryatskogo Gos Universiteta12, 71–78.

  • Google Scholar

• 31

  ChenM.XuJ.WangY.WangZ.GuoL.LiX.et al (2020). Arctium Lappa L. Polysaccharide Can Regulate Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetic Rats through the SREBP-1/SCD-1 axis. Carbohydr. Res.494, 108055. 10.1016/j.carres.2020.108055

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ChirkovA. I.SeryiV. S. (1993) Medical Species (Monography). Moscow:Medicine, 287. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 33

  ChristensenK. B.MinetA.SvenstrupH.GrevsenK.ZhangH.SchraderE.et al (2009). Identification of Plant Extracts with Potential Antidiabetic Properties: Effect on Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR), Adipocyte Differentiation and Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Uptake. Phytother. Res.23 (9), 1316–1325. 10.1002/ptr.2782

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  CignarellaA.NastasiM.CavalliE.PuglisiL. (1996). Novel Lipid-Lowering Properties of Vaccinium Myrtillus L. Leaves, a Traditional Antidiabetic Treatment, in Several Models of Rat Dyslipidaemia: a Comparison with Ciprofibrate. Thromb. Res.84, 311–322. 10.1016/s0049-3848(96)00195-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  DavydovichM. G.KostarevO. V.FarkhutdinovR. G. (2008). Phytotherapy during Diabetes Mellitus. Ufa: Gilem.

  • Google Scholar

• 36

  DedovI. I.ShestakovaM. V.VikulovaO. K.ZheleznyakovaA. V.IsakovM. А. (2018). Diabetes Mellitus in Russian Federation: Prevalence, Morbidity, Mortality, Parameters of Glycaemic Control and Structure of Glucose Lowering Therapy According to the Federal Diabetes Register, Status 2017. Diabetes mellitus21 (3), 144–159. 10.14341/DM20171S810.14341/dm9686

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  DmitrievA. I.SmolyanskyB. L.KrekninA. A.MironetsT. N.VizgalovaI. I.(1994). Nutrition and phytotherapy for diabetes mellitus. Dnepropetrovsk: OGTIP “Dneprkniga” (40 p.) [In Russian]

  • Google Scholar

• 38

  DontsovV. V.DontsovI. V. (2000). Medicinal Plants and Bee Products. More than 400 Recipes and Healing Species for All Diseases. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf Publishing house, OOO “Polus”. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 39

  DremovaN. B.BubenchikovaV. N.DrozdovaI. L.DzharuM. (2003). Modern Medicines and Phytoterapy in the Complex Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes Mellitus : Educational and Methodical Manual. Kursk, Russia: Publishing house of the Kursk State Medical University. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 40

  DzhafarovaR. A. (2013). Study of Action of Phytocomplex “Antidiabet” and “Mirfazin” to Sugar in Blood Plasma and Glycogen in Liver and Muscle Tissue. Bull. Russ. Mil. Med. Acad.4, 172–174.

  • Google Scholar

• 41

  EfimovA. S.ShcherbakA. V. (1993). Phytotherapy of Obesity and Diabet. Naukova dumka, Phoenix: Kiev. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 42

  EkorM. (2014). The Growing Use of Herbal Medicines: Issues Relating to Adverse Reactions and Challenges in Monitoring Safety. Front. Pharmacol.4, 177. 10.3389/fphar.2013.00177

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  El HaouariM.RosadoJ. A. (2018). Phytochemical, Anti-diabetic and Cardiovascular Properties of Urtica Dioica L. (Urticaceae): A Review. Mrmc19 (1), 63–71. 10.2174/1389557518666180924121528

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  Fas'kovM. N.NikolaevA. V.GrinkevichN. I.BalandinaI. A.MamedovL. A.FirsovaS. V.et al (1991). Remedy for the Treatment of Diabetes. Inventor's certificate SU 1697820A1–12.

  • Google Scholar

• 45

  FattahiA.NiyaziF.ShahbaziB.FarzaeiM. H.BahramiG. (2017). Antidiabetic Mechanisms of Rosa Canina Fruits. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern Med.22 (1), 127–133. 10.1177/2156587216655263

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  FedyukovichN. I. (1998). Modern Hypoglycemic Drugs. Minsk: Universitetskoye. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 47

  FerubkoE. V.TrumpeT. E.KurmanovaE. N.KolkhirV. K.SidelnikovaG. F.SidelnikovN. I.et al (2016). Human Use of FGBNU VILARs Phytopreparations. Probl. Biol. Med. Pharm. Chem.19 (6), 11–15.

  • Google Scholar

• 48

  FilimonovD. A.LaguninA. A.GloriozovaT. A.RudikA. V.DruzhilovskiiD. S.PogodinP. V.et al (2014). Prediction of the Biological Activity Spectra of Organic Compounds Using the PASS Online Web Resource. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp.50 (3), 444–457. 10.1007/s10593-014-1496-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  FirsovaS. V.KalinkinaM. A.KorolevaT. V. (1990). Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Antidiabetic Herbal speciesAbstracts of the All-union Scientific Conference of Young Scientists and Students Dedicated to the 225 Anniversiary of the First MMI Youth for Practical Health Care. Moscow, 65.

  • Google Scholar

• 50

  GanesanK.XuB. (2017). Polyphenol-rich Dry Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Their Health Benefits. Ijms18 (11), 2331. 10.3390/ijms18112331

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  García-CarrascoB.Fernandez-DacostaR.DávalosA.OrdovásJ.Rodriguez-CasadoA. (2015). In Vitro Hypolipidemic and Antioxidant Effects of Leaf and Root Extracts of Taraxacum Officinale. Med. Sci.3 (2), 38–54. 10.3390/medsci3020038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  GhadgeA. A.KuvalekarA. A. (2017). Controversy of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Novel Move towards Combination Therapies. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev.11, S5–S13. 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.08.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  GolalipourM. J.KhoriV. (2007). The Protective Activity of Urtica Dioica Leaves on Blood Glucose Concentration and β-cells in Streptozotocin-Diabetic Rats. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci.10 (8), 1200–1204. 10.3923/pjbs.2007.1200.1204

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  GrechanyiI. A. (2013). Complete Reference Book of Medicinal Herbs and Healing Species: 600 Plants and species. Kharkiv: Family Leisure Club. Belgorod: Book Club “Family Leisure Club”. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 55

  GrinkevichN. I.NikolaevA. V.FirsovaS. V.BalandinaI. A.MamedovL. A. (1997). The Study of Specific (Antidiabetic) Activity of Multicomponent Medical Species. Scientific Proceedings All-union Scientific Research Institute Pharmacy. Resource Pharmacognostic Study Medicinal Flora USSRVol. XXV, 109–111.

  • Google Scholar

• 56

  HelmstädterA. (2010). Beans and Diabetes: Phaseolus vulgaris Preparations as Antihyperglycemic Agents. J. Med. Food13 (2), 251–254. 10.1089/jmf.2009.0002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  HelmstädterA.SchusterN. (2010). Vaccinium myrtillus as an antidiabetic medicinal plant–research through the ages. Die Pharmazie65 (5), 315–321. 10.1691/ph.2010.9402

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  Hernández-SaavedraD.Pérez-RamírezI. F.Ramos-GómezM.Mendoza-DíazS.Loarca-PiñaG.Reynoso-CamachoR. (2016). Phytochemical Characterization and Effect of Calendula officinalis, Hypericum perforatum, and Salvia Officinalis Infusions on Obesity-Associated Cardiovascular Risk. Med. Chem. Res.25 (1), 163–172. 10.1007/s00044-015-1454-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  HusainG. M.ChatterjeeS. S.SinghP. N.KumarV. (2011). Hypolipidemic and Antiobesity-like Activity of Standardised Extract of Hypericum perforatum L. In Rats. ISRN Pharmacol.2011, 1–7. 10.5402/2011/505247

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  HussainZ.WaheedA.QureshiR. A.BurdiD. K.VerspohlE. J.KhanN.et al (2004). The Effect of Medicinal Plants of Islamabad and Murree Region of Pakistan on Insulin Secretion from INS-1 Cells. Phytother. Res.18 (1), 73–77. 10.1002/ptr.1372

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  HwangK.-A.HwangY.-J.KimG. R.ChoeJ.-S. (2015). Extracts from Aralia Elata (Miq) Seem Alleviate Hepatosteatosis via Improving Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.15 (1), 1–9. 10.1186/s12906-015-0871-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  IDF (2019). Diabetes Atlas. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/ (Accessed March 26, 2012).

  • Google Scholar

• 63

  IshankulovaB. A.YuldashevaU. P. (2019). Comparative Study of Anti-diabetic Effect of Species “Marankhuch” and “Chordoru”. Proceedings of the Conference “Medical Science of the XXI century – Looking towards the Future”. Dushanbe3, 69–70.

  • Google Scholar

• 64

  IshankulovaB. A.YuldashevaU. P.UrunovaM. V. (2013). Comparative Characteristics of Some Glucose-Lowering Plants and Anti-diabetic Collections of Tajikistan on Their Basis. Avicenna Bull.1, 121125.

  • Google Scholar

• 65

  JafarovaR. A.GarayevG. Sh. (2013). Comparative Pharmacological Study of the Effect of Collection of “Antidiabet” Galenical Medicines of mulberry Leaves and white and Grass clover Medicinalis on the Course of Alloxan Modeling Diabetes Mellitus. Amea-nın Xıbırlıri. Biologiy Aelmlıriseriyası68, 125–130.

  • Google Scholar

• 66

  KiselevaT. L.ChauzovaA. V. (1999). Development of Algorithm for Preparation of Medical Species Based on the Traditional Recipes. Proceedings Book of the 3^rd International Congress Actual Problems of Creation of New Medicinal Preparations of Natural Origin. Pushkin: St-Petersburg, 211–215.

  • Google Scholar

• 67

  KiyanovaI. V. (2005). Holy apothecary. Treatment of metabolic disorders (diabet, obesity, thyroid diseases). Moscow: Orthodox Brotherhood of the Holy Apostle John the Theologian. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 68

  KlimakovaA. I.KazmanmM. A. (1962). Echinopanax Tincture in Complex Therapy of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Med. Preparations Plants, 250–258.

  • Google Scholar

• 69

  KolesovaV. G.MarchenkoV. A.SyrovezhkoN. V. (1998). Medicinal Plants: Myths and realityTraditional (Folk) Medicine in the Lens of Science. St. Petersburg: SPCPA Publishing. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 70

  KončićM. Z.BljajićK. (2019).Traditional Herbal Products Used for the Management of Diabetes in Croatia: Linking Traditional Use with α-Glucosidase-Inhibitory ActivityBioactive Food as Dietary Interventions for Diabetes. United States: Academic Press, 647–664.

  • Google Scholar

• 71

  KorodetskyA. V. (2006). Korodetskii’s green Apothecary against Diabetes: Basketplant. Stevia. Periwinkle.St. Petersburg:Piter, 92–96. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 72

  KorotkovaV. D.PerelyginaA. A.TrumpeT. E.SokolovS. Ia.LobanovaA. M. (1988). [Arfazetin in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus]. Probl. Endokrinol (Mosk)34 (4), 25–28.

  • Google Scholar

• 73

  KorsunV. F.KorsunE. V. (2010) Phytotherapy: Tradition of Russian Herbalism. Moscow: Eksmo. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 74

  KorsunV. F.TrumpeT. E.KorsunE. V.ErshovN. V.OgrenichN. A. (2016). Phytotherapy against Diabetes. Herbs of Life. Moscow: ZAO Tsentrpoligraph Publishing House. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 75

  KovalevaN. G. (1972). The Therapy with Plants. Moscow: Medizina. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 76

  KukesV. G. (1999). Phytotherapy with the Basics of Clinical Pharmacology. Moscow: Medizina. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 77

  KuoD.-H.HungM.-C.HungC.-M.LiuL.-M.ChenF.-A.ShiehP.-C.et al (2012). Body Weight Management Effect of Burdock (Arctium Lappa L.) Root Is Associated with the Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Human HepG2 Cells. Food Chem.134, 1320–1326. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  KuryloK.BudniakL.VolskaA.ZablotskyyB.KlishchI. (2020). Influence of Phytocompositions on Dynamics of Changes in Basal Glycemia and Glycemia in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rats with Streptozotocin-Nicotinamide-Induced Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. Georgian Med. News (300), 112–116.

  • Google Scholar

• 79

  KuryloK. I.KlishchI. M.NebesnaZ. M.FurdelaM. Y.VolskaA. S.LytvynyukS. O. (2018). Histological Changes in Liver and Kidneys in Experimental Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and its Correction by Administration of Galega Officinalis L. Phytocompositions. Womab14 (63), 133–136. 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-1-63-133-136

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  KvasovaT. M.DemidovaM. A.AmosovV. V. (2010). Assessment of Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Dry Extract of the Collection Arfazetin. Doctor -Aspirant6 (43), 158–162.

  • Google Scholar

• 81

  KvasovaT. M. (2011). Effect of Arfazetin Medical Species on the Experimental Diabetes Mellitus in Rats. Postgrad. Doctor5 (48), 157–162. 10.26.724/2079-8334-2018-1-63-133-136

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  LadyninaE. A.MorozovaR. S. (1987). Phytotherapy. 1st ed.Moscow: Medizina. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 83

  LadyninaE. A.MorozovaR. S. (1990). Phytotherapy. 2nd ed.Moscow: Medizina. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 84

  LadyninaE. A. (2005). The Wisdom of Herbs. Herbal Medicine and Homeopathy. Moscow: AiF-Print. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 85

  LagerA. A. (2002). Herbs’ Guide of Siberian Healer. Moscow: RIPOL CLASSIC. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 86

  LagerA. A. (1991). Phytotherapy Diseases of the Digestive System. Krasnoyarsk: Publishing house of Krasnoyarsk University. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 87

  LaguninA.StepanchikovaA.FilimonovD.PoroikovV. (2000). PASS: Prediction of Activity Spectra for Biologically Active Substances. Bioinformatics16 (8), 747–748. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.8.747

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  LavrenovaG. V.LavrenovV. K. (2007). Complete Encyclopedia of Essential Medicinal Plants. Donetsk: Stalker. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 89

  LemzaS. V.LinkhoevaE. G.ToropovaA. A.AzhunovaT. A.PetrovE. V. (2014). Influence of Plant Remedy «glucovit» on the Energy Status of Organism in Experimental Diabetes Mellitus. Bulletin of the Buryat State University, 12, 12–15.

  • Google Scholar

• 90

  LeporattiM. L.IvanchevaS. (2003). Preliminary Comparative Analysis of Medicinal Plants Used in the Traditional Medicine of Bulgaria and Italy. J. Ethnopharmacology87 (2–3), 123–142. 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00047-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  LetovaI. (2019). Diabetes Mellitus: The Best Recepies of Health. Saint-Petersburg: Dilia. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 92

  LiS.FanT.-P.JiaW.LuA.ZhangW. (2014). Network Pharmacology in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Evid Based. Complement. Altern. Med.2014, 1–2. 10.1155/2014/138460

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  LisitsynA. F.MolodozhnikovaL. M. (1989). Phytotherapy: Eclectical Medicine: Collection of Medicinal Herbs.VDNKh USSR Centralized pavilion “Health” Subject of Public Speaking “Green Cosmetics, Medicinal Herbs and Sensible Nutricion” LK. Arnica, Moskow: VDNKh USSR Centralized pavilion Health. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 94

  MadićV.PetrovićA.JuškovićM.JugovićD.DjordjevićL.StojanovićG.et al (2021). Polyherbal Mixture Ameliorates Hyperglycemia, Hyperlipidemia and Histopathological Changes of Pancreas, Kidney and Liver in a Rat Model of Type 1 Diabetes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 265, 113210. 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113210

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  MahendranG.RahmanL. U. (2020). Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Updates on Peppermint (Mentha × Piperita L.)-A Review. Phytotherapy Res.34 (9), 2088–2139. 10.1002/ptr.6664

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  MakhlayukV. P. (1991). Medicinal Plants in Traditional Medicine. Saratov: Volga Book Publishing House. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 97

  MalgaonkarM.ShirolkarA.MurthyS. N.PawarS. (2016). Ayurvedic Plants with Antidiabetic Potential. Medicinal Plants-Recent Advances in Research and Development. Germany: Springer, 439–468. 10.1007/978-981-10-1085-9_19

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  MashkovskiiM. D. (2002). Medicinal AgentsVol. 1. Moscow: Novaya Volna. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 99

  MatkovskayaA. N.TrumpeT. E.SokolovS. I. A. (1988). Phytotherapy in Combination Therapy of Diabetes Mellitus: Prelection. Moscow: Сentral Institute for Advanced Medical Training Order of Lenin. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 100

  MaznevN. I. (2005). Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: Profilactics and Threatment with Herbs. Moscow: ASS-Center. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 101

  MaznevN. I. (2014). Stop – Diabet! 500 Recepies and Useful Tips. Moscow: AST[In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 102

  Melik-GusseinovV. V.RekkandtS. A. (2014). Phytotherapy. A Reference Book for Using Medicinal Plants in Traditional and Alternative Medicine (Monography). Volgograd: VolGMU Publishing house. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 103

  MicheliL.LucariniE.TralloriE.AvaglianoC.CaroC.RussoR.et al (2019). Phaseolus vulgaris L. Extract: Alpha-Amylase Inhibition against Metabolic Syndrome in Mice. Nutrients11 (8), 1778. 10.3390/nu11081778

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  MinaevaV. G. (1991). Medicinal Plants of Siberia. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Siberian branch [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 105

  MolokovskiiD. S.DavydovV. V.KhegaiM. D. (2002). Antidiabetic Activities of Adaptogenic Formulations and Extractions from Medicinal Plants. Rastitel'nye Resursy38, 15–28.

  • Google Scholar

• 106

  MukherjeeP. K.BanerjeeS.KarA. (2018). Exploring Synergy in Ayurveda and Traditional Indian Systems of Medicine. Synergy7, 30–33. 10.1016/j.synres.2018.10.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  NagalievskaM.SabadashkaM.HachkovaH.SybirnaN. (2018). Galega Officinalis Extract Regulate the Diabetes Mellitus Related Violations of Proliferation, Functions and Apoptosis of Leukocytes. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.18 (1), 1–13. 10.1186/s12906-017-2079-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  NamdulT.SoodA.RamakrishnanL.PandeyR. M.MoorthyD. (2001). Efficacy of Tibetan Medicine as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care24 (1), 176–177. 10.2337/diacare.24.1.176

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  NazinaYu. V. (2006). Diabetes. The Best Recipes of Traditional Medicine from A to Ya. Moscow: OLMA media group. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 110

  NewmanD. J.CraggG. M. (2020). Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod.83 (3), 770–803. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  NikolaychukL. V. (1997). Treatment of Diabetes mellitus with herbs. Minsk: The modern word, 256. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 112

  NikolaychukL. V.ZubitskayaN. P. (2003). A 1000 Recepies for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Minsk: Interpresservis, 160. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 113

  NikultsevaT. M. (1994). Phytotherapy: Collection of Folk Unconversional Methods of Treatments. Moscow: TWIC, 384. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 114

  NinomiyaK.MatsudaH.KuboM.MorikawaT.NishidaN.YoshikawaM. (2007). Potent Anti-obese Principle from Rosa Canina: Structural Requirements and Mode of Action of Trans-tiliroside. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.17 (11), 3059–3064. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.03.051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  NiuH.-S.LiuI.-M.ChengJ.-T.LinC.-L.HsuF.-L. (2008). Hypoglycemic Effect of Syringin from Eleutherococcus Senticosus in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Planta Med.74 (02), 109–113. 10.1055/s-2008-1034275

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  OkovitiyS. V.NapalkovaS. M.PovydyshM. N.LuzhaninV. G.GoncharovM. Yu.YakovlevG. P. (2018). Medicinal Plants as a Source of Perspective Pharmaceutical Substances for Correcting Carbohydrate Exchange Disorders. Pharmacy67 (7), 8–13. 10.29296/25419218-2018-07-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  OnipkoV. D. (2002). Comfortable Life and Diabetes Mellitus. Saint-Petersburg: Ves[In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 118

  OrhanN.AslanM.HosbasS.DeliormanO. D. (2009). Antidiabetic Effect and Antioxidant Potential of Rosa Canina Fruits. Pharmacognosy Mag.5 (20), 309–315. 10.4103/0973-1296.58151

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  OrlovaE. A. (2001). Phytotherapy: Medicinal Sacrament of Nature. Moscow: Terra – Book Club. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 120

  OsetrovV. D. (1993). Alternative Herbal Medicine. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 121

  OsetrovV. D.ShreterA. I. (2001). Herbalist for Women. A Practical Guide to Folk and Scientific Herbal Medicine and Homeopathy. Moscow: MSP Publishing House. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 122

  PanossianA. G.EfferthT.ShikovA. N.PozharitskayaO. N.KuchtaK.MukherjeeP. K.et al (2021). Evolution of the Adaptogenic Concept from Traditional Use to Medical Systems: Pharmacology of Stress‐ and Aging‐related Diseases. Med. Res. Rev.41 (1), 630–703. 10.1002/med.21743

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  PanossianA.SeoE.-J.EfferthT. (2018). Synergy Assessments of Plant Extracts Used in the Treatment of Stress and Aging-Related Disorders. Synergy7, 39–48. 10.1016/j.synres.2018.10.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  ParasuramanS.ThingG.DhanarajS. (2014). Polyherbal Formulation: Concept of Ayurveda. Phcog. Rev.8 (16), 73–80. 10.4103/0973-7847.134229

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  PariL.VenkateswaranS. (2004). Protective Role ofPhaseolus Vulgarison Changes in the Fatty Acid Composition in Experimental Diabetes. J. Med. Food7 (2), 204–209. 10.1089/1096620041224120

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  PavlićB.TeslićN.ZenginG.ĐurovićS.RakićD.CvetanovićA.et al (2021). Antioxidant and Enzyme-Inhibitory Activity of Peppermint Extracts and Essential Oils Obtained by Conventional and Emerging Extraction Techniques. Food Chem.338, 127724. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127724

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  PetkovV. D. (1982). Modern Phytotherapy. Sofia: Medizina I. Fizkultura Publications House. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 128

  Pharmacopoeia Castrensis Rossica (1765). Military Pharmacopoeia Castrensis Rossica. 1^st Edition. Petropoli: Academia Scientiarum.

  • Google Scholar

• 129

  PigulevskayaI. S. (2018). Everything You Need to Know about Diabetes: An Essential Book for Diabetics: Types of Diabetes, Principles of Treatment, Delicious and Healthy Dishes, Proper Exercises, Traditional Medicine, Herbal Medicine. Moscow: Centerpolygraph. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 130

  PirogovS. A. (2008). Secrets Of the Medicinal Species. Expirience Of a Work of Folk Phytopracticer. Barnaul: Altai printing plant. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 131

  PodduevP. S. (2001). Medicinal Herbs and Traditional Methods of Treating Diseases: A Handbook. Bryansk: Bryansk Regional Printing House. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 132

  PopovA. P. (2004). Doctor Book of Medicinal Herbs. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoria. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 133

  PovydyshM. N.LuzhaninV. G.IvkinD. Yu.BelousovM. V.YakovlevG. P. (2018). Prospects for the Use of Phytotherapeutic Agents for Disorders of Fat and Carbohydrate Metabolism. Drug Dev. Registration (3), 130–135.

  • Google Scholar

• 134

  ProtasenyaN. I.VasilenkoYu. V. (1992). Medical Species (600 Prescriptions for the Treatment of the Most Common Diseases). Simferopol: Tavrida. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 135

  Register Russia (2021).On Line State Register of Medicinal Preparations by the Ministry of Public Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/GRLS.aspx. [In Russian] (Accessed 2021).

  • Google Scholar

• 136

  RendiukT. D. (2006). The way to the health. Herbal teas. Moscow: Drofa-Plus. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 137

  RuzhenkovaI. V. (2014). Phytotherapy of Diabetes Mellitus: Medicinal Plant Treatment. Phoenix: Rostov on the Don. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 138

  RyzhenkoV. I. (2007). Medical Species. Moscow: Onix. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 139

  SabevaN.PetkovN.OgnevaV. (2004). Effect of Galega Officinalis Extracts on Glucose Homeostasis in Streptozotocin Diabetic Mice. Comptes Rendus-Academie Bulgare des Sci.57 (2), 95–98.

  • Google Scholar

• 140

  SafonovN. N. (2016). Atlas of Medicinal Plants. 900 home Recipes that Will Help You Find health Gift Editions. Beauty and Health. Moscow: Publishing House ‘E’.

  • Google Scholar

• 141

  SaidO.FulderS.KhalilK.AzaizehH.KassisE.SaadB. (2008). Maintaining a Physiological Blood Glucose Level with 'Glucolevel', a Combination of Four Anti-diabetes Plants Used in the Traditional Arab Herbal Medicine. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med.5 (4), 421–428. 10.1093/ecam/nem047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  Said-ShahR. (2001). Spices that Heal. St. Petersburg: VES Publishing House.

  • Google Scholar

• 143

  SalehiB.AtaA.V. Anil KumarN.SharopovF.Ramírez-AlarcónK.Ruiz-OrtegaA.et al (2019). Antidiabetic Potential of Medicinal Plants and Their Active Components. Biomolecules9 (10), 551. 10.3390/biom9100551

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  Salehi NowbandeganiA.KiumarcyS.RahmaniF.DokouhakiM.KhademianS.ZarshenasM. M.et al (2015). Ethnopharmacological Knowledge of Shiraz and Fasa in Fars Region of Iran for Diabetes Mellitus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 172, 281–287. 10.1016/j.jep.2015.06.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  SammonsH. M.GubarevM. I.KrepkovaL. V.BortnikovaV. V.CorrickF.JobK. M.et al (2016). Herbal Medicines: Challenges in the Modern World. Part 2. European Union and Russia. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol.9 (8), 1117–1127. 10.1080/17512433.2016.1189326

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  SamylinaI. A.ErmakovaV. A.BobkovaN. V.AnosovaO. G. (2010). Pharmacognosia. T. 3: Medicinal Plant Raw Materials, Collections. Plant Powders. Medicines Based on Ground Plant Raw Materials. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 147

  SatoY. (2004). The Treatment Strategy for Diabetes Mellitus by Kampo Medicine. Kampo Med. Nihon Toyo Igaku Zasshi55 (6), 737–750. 10.3937/KAMPOMED.55.737

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  SeredinR. M.SokolovS. D. (1973). Medichinal Plants and Their Usage. Stavropol: Stavropol’s Publishing house. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 149

  ShikovA. N.NarkevichI. A.FlisyukE. V.LuzhaninV. G.PozharitskayaO. N. (2021). Medicinal Plants from the 14th Edition of the Russian Pharmacopoeia, Recent Updates. J. Ethnopharmacology268, 113685. 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113685

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  ShikovA. N.PozharitskayaO. N.KamenevI. Yu.MakarovV. G. (2011). Medicinal and Spice Plants in Russia. Z. Arznei&Gewurzpflanzen16, 135–137.

  • Google Scholar

• 151

  ShikovA. N.PozharitskayaO. N.MakarovV. G. (2018). Challenges in the Investigation of Combinatory Modes of Action of Nutrients and Pharmaceuticals. Synergy7, 36–38. 10.1016/j.synres.2018.10.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  ShikovA. N.PozharitskayaO. N.MakarovV. G.WagnerH.VerpoorteR.HeinrichM. (2014). Medicinal Plants of the Russian Pharmacopoeia; Their History and Applications. J. Ethnopharmacology154 (3), 481–536. 10.1016/j.jep.2014.04.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  ShikovA. N.TsitsilinA. N.PozharitskayaO. N.MakarovV. G.HeinrichM. (2017). Traditional and Current Food Use of Wild Plants Listed in the Russian Pharmacopoeia. Front. Pharmacol.8, 841. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00841

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  ShojaeeS. S.VahdatiA.AssaeiR.SepehrimaneshM. (2015). Effect of Galega Officinalis Leaf Powder and Trigonella Foenum-Graecum Seed Powder on Blood Glucose Levels and Weight Gain in a Diabetes Mellitus Rat Model. Comp. Clin. Pathol.24 (1), 145–148. 10.1007/s00580-013-1873-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  SidorovaY.ShipelinV.MazoV.ZorinS.PetrovN.KochetkovaA. (2017). Hypoglycemic and Hypolipidemic Effect of Vaccinium Myrtillus L. Leaf and Phaseolus vulgaris L. Seed Coat Extracts in Diabetic Rats. Nutrition41, 107–112. 10.1016/j.nut.2017.04.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  SinyakovA. F. (1992). About shoots and roots. Moscow: Physical education and sports, 272. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 157

  SinyakovA. F. (1999). Herbal Treatment. A Practical Guide. Moscow: JSC EKSMO-Press Publishing House. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 158

  SkalliS.HassikouR.ArahouM. (2019). An Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used for Diabetes Treatment in Rabat, Morocco. Heliyon5 (3), e01421. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  SklyarevskyL. I. A.GubanovI. A. (1989) Medicinal Herbs in Daily Graft. Moscow: Rosagropromizdat. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 160

  SmolianskiiB. L.LifliandskiiV. G. (2004). Diabetes Mellitus Treatment. Saint-Petersburg: Neva Publishing house. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 161

  SokolovS. Ya. (2000). Phytotherapy and Phytopharmacology: A Guide for Physicians. Moscow: Medical Information Agency. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 162

  SokolovS. Ya.ZamotaievI. P. (1984). Guide to Medicinal Plants. Phytotherapy. Moscow: Medizina. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 163

  StrattonC. F.NewmanD. J.TanD. S. (2015). Cheminformatic Comparison of Approved Drugs from Natural Product versus Synthetic Origins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.25 (21), 4802–4807. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.07.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  SuzukiH.SoneH.WatanabeK. (2017). Japanese Kampo Medicines for Diabetes Mellitus. Japanese Kampo Medicines for the Treatment of Common Diseases: Focus on Inflammation. Netherlands: Elsevier, 69–73. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809398-6.00008-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  XutianS.TaiS.YuanC. S. (2014). Handbook of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Singapore: World Scientific). (In 3 Volumes).

  • Google Scholar

• 166

  TaghizadehM.RashidiA. A.TaherianA. A.VakiliZ.Sajad SajadianM.GhardashiM. (2016). Antidiabetic and Antihyperlipidemic Effects of Ethanol Extract of Rosa Canina L. Fruit on Diabetic Rats. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern Med.21 (4), NP25–NP30. 10.1177/2156587215612626

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  TakácsI.SzekeresA.TakácsÁ.RakkD.MézesM.PolyákÁ.et al (2020). Wild Strawberry, Blackberry, and Blueberry Leaf Extracts Alleviate Starch-Induced Hyperglycemia in Prediabetic and Diabetic Mice. Planta Med.86 (11), 790–799. 10.1055/a-1164-8152

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  TarasenkoV. P.IpatevV. A.ShubinV. A.IvaninaE. V.TarasenkoI. A.KholodilovaL. V. (1998). Modern Phytotherapy. Novosibirsk: The Science. Siberian enterprise RAS. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 169

  TassaB. D.GogoiG.DasS. (2012). A Comparative Study of the Hypolipidaemic and Antioxidant Activities of Ethanolic Extracts of Leaves of Phlogacanthus Thyrsiflorus, Oxalis Corniculata L. And Fragaria Vesca in Albino Rats. Asian J. Pharm. Biol. Res.2, 12–18.

  • Google Scholar

• 170

  The State Pharmacopoeia of Russian Federation. (2018). Fourteenth ed. Moscow: Ministry of public health of Russian Federation. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 171

  TimmisA.TownsendN.GaleC. P.TorbicaA.LettinoM.PetersenS. E.De SmedtD. (2020). European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019. Eur. Heart J.41 (1), 12–85. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz859

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  TokgözH. B.AltanF. (2020). Hypericum perforatum L.: a Medicinal Plant with Potential as a Curative Agent against Obesity-Associated Complications. Mol. Biol. Rep.47 (11), 8679–8686. 10.1007/s11033-020-05912-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  TongX.-L.DongL.ChenL.ZhenZ. (2012). Treatment of Diabetes Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Past, Present and Future. Am. J. Chin. Med.40 (05), 877–886. 10.1142/S0192415X12500656

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  TrofimenkoA. G.MogilnyN. P. (1998). Doctor Book. Moscow: JSC ASTV. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 175

  TurishchevS. N. (2005). Phytotherapy for Everyone. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS.Invest. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 176

  TurishchevS. N. (2000). Rational Phytotherapy: Herbal Therapy. Moscow: Informpechat[In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 177

  TurovaA. D.SapozhnikovaE. N. (1989). Medicinal Plants of USSR and Their Applications. Moscow: Medizina [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 178

  Ulrich-MerzenichG. S. (2014). Combination Screening of Synthetic Drugs and Plant Derived Natural Products-Potential and Challenges for Drug Development. Synergy1 (1), 59–69. 10.1016/j.synres.2014.07.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  VenkateswaranS.PariL.SaravananG. (2002). Effect ofPhaseolus Vulgarison Circulatory Antioxidants and Lipids in Rats with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes. J. Med. Food5 (2), 97–103. 10.1089/109662002760178186

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  VichkanovaS. A.KolkhirV. K.SokolskayaT. A.VoskoboinikovaI. V.BykovV. A. (2009). Medicinal Products from Plants. Moscow: Scientific publication.ADRIS. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 181

  VinogradovaT. A.GazhevVinogradovB. N.VinogradovV. M.MartynovV. K. (2001). Practical Phytotherapy. Moscow: Valerie SPDEksmo-Press [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 182

  VolynchenkoV. A. (2003). Medical Herbal Species: 3600 Healing Recipies. Donetsk StalkerPublishing house ACT. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 183

  WangJ.ZhouB.HuX.DongS.HongM.WangJ.et al (2021). Deciphering the Formulation Secret Underlying Chinese Huo-Clearing Herbal Drink. Front. Pharmacol.12, 654699. 10.3389/fphar.2021.654699

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  WoutersO. J.McKeeM.LuytenJ. (2020). Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018. Jama323 (9), 844–853. 10.1001/jama.2020.1166

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  XiaoE.LuoL. (2018). Alternative Therapies for Diabetes: A Comparison of Western and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Approaches. Cdr14 (6), 487–496. 10.2174/1573399813666170519103230

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  XinS.JiaY.HuinanQ. (2014). Research Progress and Prospect of Shennong Bencao Jing. Chin. Arch. Traditional Chin. Med.32 (9), 2151–2154.

  • Google Scholar

• 187

  XuY. X. Z.XiS.QianX. (2019). Evaluating Traditional Chinese Medicine and Herbal Products for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. J. Diabetes Res.2019, 1–6. 10.1155/2019/9182595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  XueJ.ShiY.LiC.SongH. (2019). Network Pharmacology‐based Prediction of the Active Ingredients, Potential Targets, and Signaling Pathways in Compound Lian‐Ge Granules for Treatment of Diabetes. J. Cel. Biochem.120 (4), 6431–6440. 10.1002/jcb.27933

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  YordanovD.NikolovP.BoychinovA. S. P. (1972). Phytotherapy. Sofia: Medicine and Physical Education. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 190

  ZagaykoA. L.ChumakO. I.FilimonenkoV. P.KoshevoyO. M. (2016). Investigation of the Effect of Dry Extracts from the Leaves of Cowberry and Bilberry Adding L-Arginine on Metabolic Parameters in Experimental Diabetes Type II. Ukr. Bìofarm. Ž.3 (44), 70–74. 10.24959/ubphj.16.43

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  ZeljkovićĆ. S.ŠiškováJ.KomzákováK.De DiegoN.KaffkováK.TarkowskiP. (2021). Phenolic Compounds and Biological Activity of Selected Mentha Species. Plants10 (3), 550. 10.3390/plants10030550

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  ZhangJ.KangM.-J.KimM.-J.KimM.-E.SongJ.-H.LeeY.-M.et al (2008). Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitory Activity of taraxacum Officinale In Vitro and In Vivo. Nutr. Res. Pract.2 (4), 200–203. 10.4162/nrp.2008.2.4.200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  ZmeevL. E. (1896). Russkie Vrachebniki: A Study in the Field of Our Ancient Medical Writing. Saint-Petersburg: Typography by Lamakov, 276. [In Russian].

  • Google Scholar

• 194

  ŁabudaH.BuczkowskaH.PaplińskiR.NajdaA. (2017). Secondary Metabolites of Phaseoli Pericarpium. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus16 (6), 187–200. 10.24326/asphc.2017.6.17

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar