Skip to main content

GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Psychol., 26 February 2013
Sec. Decision Neuroscience
Volume 4 - 2013 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00085

Erratum: “Comparing the Iowa and Soochow gambling tasks in opiate users”

This article is a commentary on:

  1. Comparing the Iowa and Soochow Gambling Tasks in Opiate Users

    1. Read original article
Daniel J. Upton Daniel J. UptonRebecca Kerestes Rebecca KerestesJulie C. Stout* Julie C. Stout*
  • School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

A commentary on
Comparing the Iowa and Soochow gambling tasks in opiate users

by Upton, D J., Kerestes, R., and Stout, J. C. (2012). Front. Neurosci. 6:34. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00034

We would like to apply a correction to the pay-off distributions of the Soochow Gambling Task presented in Table 2 of the manuscript. Decks C and D do not yield a gain on every trial, which has been corrected with the addition of a “–” in columns representing decks C and D. Furthermore, the 5th and 10th trials for both decks C and D in the Soochow Gambling Task, are associated with a win of $5.25 and $3.25, respectively. This was previously not shown in the table and has been inserted.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The pay-off distributions of the Iowa Gambling Task and Soochow Gambling Task for the first 10 trials, adapted and modified from Ahn et al. (2008).

References

Ahn, W. Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagen-makers, E. J., and Stout, J. C. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cogn. Sci. 32, 1376–1402.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Citation: Upton DJ, Kerestes R and Stout JC (2013) Erratum: “Comparing the Iowa and Soochow gambling tasks in opiate users”. Front. Psychol. 4:85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00085

Received: 06 February 2013; Accepted: 06 February 2013;
Published online: 26 February 2013.

Edited by:

Scott A. Huettel, Duke University, USA

Reviewed by:

Scott A. Huettel, Duke University, USA

Copyright © 2013 Upton, Kerestes and Stout. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

*Correspondence: julie.stout@monash.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.