Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 08 June 2017
Sec. Personality and Social Psychology

Corrigendum: Pulling Rank: Military Rank Affects Hormone Levels and Fairness in an Allocation Experiment

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 2Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

A corrigendum on
Pulling Rank: Military Rank Affects Hormone Levels and Fairness in an Allocation Experiment

by Siart, B., Pflüger, L. S., and Wallner, B. (2016). Front. Psychol. 7:1750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01750

In the original article, there was an error. In the Acknowledgment section, a wrong name was used.

A correction has been made to the acknowledgment section, [Paragraph 1]:

We thank all participating soldiers and helpers on site. We thank the Austrian Armed Forces especially (Vzlt Greiß, Olt Bachmann, Dr. Martin Jancuska) and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Defense and Sports Science, Research and Development Division (Brigadier Hofmeister, Adelheid Obwaller) for making this study possible. We are grateful to Elisabeth Pschernig and Samy El- Makarem for their support in the ELISA laboratory. We are grateful to Martin Fieder and Markus Koppensteiner for their council in matters of statistics and proof-reading this manuscript and to Peter Kuttenberger for his contribution to the programing of the experiment. This article was supported by the Open Access Publishing Fund of the University of Vienna.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Keywords: hierarchy, status, military rank, cortisol, testosterone, allocation experiment, social

Citation: Siart B, Pflüger LS and Wallner B (2017) Corrigendum: Pulling Rank: Military Rank Affects Hormone Levels and Fairness in an Allocation Experiment. Front. Psychol. 8:955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00955

Received: 21 May 2017; Accepted: 23 May 2017;
Published: 08 June 2017.

Edited and reviewed by: Mark Hallahan, College of the Holy Cross, United States

Copyright © 2017 Siart, Pflüger and Wallner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Benjamin Siart, benjamin.siart@univie.ac.at

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.