Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology of Aging
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1344044
This article is part of the Research Topic Social Determinants of Alcohol and Substance Use and Mental Health: Implications for Population Health for Groups from Historically Marginalized Communities View all 5 articles

Loneliness and Global Cognitive Functioning in Racially/Ethnically Diverse US Older Adults

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, United States
  • 2 Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
  • 3 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Few studies have examined the association of loneliness and cognitive functioning in the US. We used two common measures of loneliness and examined their association in a large sample of US Black, Latino, and White adults (ages≥50). Methods: We analyzed Wave 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (N=2,757). We examined loneliness using one item from the CESD and the Felt Loneliness Measure (NFLM); cognitive functioning was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool, where higher scores indicated better functioning. We used weighted ordinary least squares regressions to examine the effects of loneliness (CESD loneliness and NFLM in separate models) on MoCA scores. In exploratory analyses, we examined if these relationships varied by race/ethnicity. We adjusted all models for sociodemographic and other salient factors (e.g., chronic disease, depressive symptoms, living alone). Results: Mean age was 63.49 years, 52% were female, and 9% were Black and 6% Latino persons. Approximately 54% endorsed feeling lonely on at least one measure; 31% (CESD) and 46% (NFLM). The relationship between loneliness measures was significant, X 2 (1, N = 2,757) = 435.493 p < 0.001. However, only 40% of lonely individuals were identified as lonely on both assessments. CESD Loneliness was inversely (β̂ =-0.274, p=0.032) associated with MoCA scores and this association did not vary by race/ethnicity. NFLM Loneliness was positively associated (β̂ =0.445, p<0.001) with higher MoCA scores for Latino participants only. Discussion: Loneliness appears to be an important predictor of cognitive functioning. However, the association of loneliness and cognitive functioning varied when using the CESD loneliness item or the NFLM. Future work is needed to understand how loneliness and its clinically relevant dimensions (social, emotional, existential, chronicity) relate to global and individual cognitive domains. Research is needed with racially/ethnically diverse older adults, particularly to understand our counterintuitive finding for Latino participants. Finally, findings also support the need for research on interventions to prevent cognitive decline targeting loneliness.

    Keywords: Alzheimer's and related dementias (ADRD), Cognitive impairment (CI), Perceived social isolation, Minority aging, African American (AA), Hispanic/Latinx

    Received: 22 Jan 2024; Accepted: 15 Apr 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Camacho, Pacheco, Moxley, Aranda, Reid and Wethington. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: David Camacho, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.