Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Movement Science
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355821
This article is part of the Research Topic Physical Education, Health and Education Innovation View all 19 articles

Developing the optimal gross movement interventions to improve the physical fitness of 3 to 10 year-old children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China
  • 2 School of Sports Science, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China
  • 4 Donghu Primary School, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To identify the optimal parameters of gross movement interventions to yield the strongest effects on physical fitness among children aged 3-10 years and to provide a reference for the development of gross movement interventions to improve the physical fitness of children. Background: There has been a global decline in children's physical fitness. Previous studies have shown that gross movement interventions can improve children's physical fitness, but the optimal intervention parameters for achieving the strongest effects have yet to be determined. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to determine the optimal intervention parameters for yielding the strongest effects on children's physical fitness. Methods: We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and China Science and Technology Journal databases to identify randomized controlled trials on the effects of gross movement interventions (walking, running, jumping, throwing, batting, rolling, spinning, catching, and leg lifting) on children's physical fitness (upper-body strength, lower-body strength, explosive power, speed, flexibility, and balance). We included studies published up to September 2023. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed based on the PICOS framework, and the quality of the included studies was evaluated. Subgroup analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3, and the data were pooled using a random effects model to obtain the SMD (or WMD) and 95% CBM, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP 删除[李慧]: standardized mean differences (SMDs) 删除[李慧]: confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 23 studies involving 2007 healthy children aged 3-10 years met the inclusion criteria. Gross movement interventions significantly improved the explosive power of children aged 3-10 years [WMD,6.2]. The most effective intervention duration was 16-18 weeks [WMD,0.45]. The most effective intervention frequency was one session per week [WMD,1.06]. The optimal duration of single sessions was 60 minutes [WMD,0.47]. Children aged 7-10 years [WMD, 1.41] showed the most significant improvements in physical fitness after gross movement interventions. Conclusion: Gross movement interventions had a positive effect on the physical fitness of children aged 3-10 years. The optimal intervention parameters include 60-minute sessions once a week across a total duration of 16-18 weeks.

    Keywords: Gross movement, Children, Physical Fitness, Meta-analysis, 3 to 10 years old

    Received: 14 Dec 2023; Accepted: 13 Mar 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Sun, Qu and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Luping Qu, School of Sports Science, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, 273165, Shandong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.