Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Pediatric Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365205

Conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of youth with childhood-onset disabilities: A scoping review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2 The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 4 School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • 5 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 6 Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 7 Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 8 Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 9 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    To examine the scope of existing literature on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of youth with childhood-onset disabilities.: A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review method. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EBSCOhost CINAHL, were searched.Results: Eight studies were selected for inclusion; four used quantitative methodology, and four used qualitative methods. Compassion was not defined a priori or a posteriori in any of the included studies. The concept of self-compassion was explicitly defined only for parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities in three studies a priori. The most reported outcome measure was self-compassion in parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities. Self-compassion among parents was associated with greater quality of life (QoL) and resiliency and lower stress, depression, shame and guilt.Discussion: There is limited evidence on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion among youth with childhood-onset disabilities. Self-compassion may be an effective internal coping process among parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities. Further research is required to understand the meaning of compassion to youth with childhood-onset disabilities, their parents and caregivers.'What this paper adds' § The conceptualization of compassion or self-compassion among youth with childhoodonset disabilities was not discussed. § Compassion was not defined a priori or a posteriori in any of the included studies.COMPASSION IN YOUTH WITH CHILDHOOD-ONSET DISABILITIES 2 § Self-compassion was conceptualized by established definitions only for parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities. § Several studies liberally used the terms 'compassion' and 'compassionate care'. § The Mindfulness-Based Positive Behavior Support program was significantly better at enhancing compassion satisfaction and reducing caregiver-perceived psychological stress.

    Keywords: compassion, Childhood-onset disabilities, Scoping review, youth & adolescence, self-compassion

    Received: 08 Jan 2024; Accepted: 02 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Patsakos, Patel, Simpson, Nelson, Penner, Perrier, Bayley and Munce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Eleni M. Patsakos, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.