Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1332930
Editorial: The intersection among the internet and social media use, mental health, and Trust & Safety practices
- 1TaskUs Inc., New Braunfels, TX, United States
- 2Department of Education, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy
- 3Department of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Wellbeing SA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Editorial on the Research Topic
The intersection among the internet and social media use, mental health, and Trust & Safety practices
In our increasingly digital world, the presence of online platforms has become an undeniable reality. Whether we welcome this transformation or not, it is nearly impossible to ignore the profound impact these platforms have on our daily lives. Discourse on understanding such impact appears to coalesce into three main domains: (a) safety of the platform users; (b) Trust and Safety (T&S) practices of the platforms, which may include policies and design choices; and (c) safety of the professionals who enforce platform T&S policies, such as content moderators.
Historically, these domains were largely examined in isolation from one another. A wealth of knowledge exists in academia on the potential impact of online platforms on users' wellbeing (1, 2), but most studies were conducted from a purely academic perspective with few studies originating with a collaboration between academia and industry. Given this dearth of publicly available knowledge that is both theoretically relevant for academia and practical for industry implementation, T&S policies and practices are at times crafted based on well-intentioned but untested assumptions. It is important to note that some individual platforms do conduct critical research within their own organization to inform T&S decisions. However, it is difficult to discern the extent and breadth of this internal knowledge as few studies are published externally. The limited amount of industry research that is shared publicly has faced criticism of non-objectivity and potential bias despite its high relevance for real-world applications. Furthermore, the critical work of content moderators, which is integral to maintaining the safety of online communities, has historically received scant attention in both academic and industry research. This is a critical gap of knowledge as it is challenging—if not impossible—to enforce T&S policies and ensure the safety of online users without ensuring the safety of content moderators.
The time has come for us to recognize that these domains cannot and should not be examined in isolation. The challenges of creating and sustaining safe online communities are immense, and they necessitate a collective effort. In recent years, we have witnessed commendable efforts to foster more open and transparent dialogues and collaboration among academia, industry, civil society, and government. Initiatives such as the first journal dedicated to T&S, the establishment of the first Trust & Safety research conference, and the founding of the Trust and Safety Professional Association (TSPA) and Trust and Safety Foundation (TSF) signify the growing recognition of the need for joint efforts in this arena. However, we still have much room to improve.
This is precisely why we have initiated this special Research Topic, “The intersection among the internet and social media use, mental health, and Trust & Safety practices,” to serve as yet another channel to bridge the gap and stimulate open dialogues. We aspire to use this opportunity to bring together academic researchers and industry entities with the shared goal of making online platforms safer for everyone.
Special topic research perspectives
In this special topic collection, a total of four empirical research articles tackle a range of issues and represent perspectives from academic and industry organizations across the globe. First, academic researchers (Piksa et al.) from Norway and Poland conducted a study on misinformation and found that users were more likely to engage with a news item when it aligns with their preconceived beliefs. This study adds to the existing literature on the spread of misinformation on online platforms and suggests that traditional fact-checking interventions may be insufficient to reduce misinformation.
Second, academic researchers (Son et al.) from Korea found correlations between suicide and self-injury attempts with search term volumes on these topics. This finding supports the potential utility of leveraging online systems to predict suicide risk and offer interventions.
The third paper (Kawabe et al.) studied teacher awareness of internet addiction among elementary school students in Japan. The study showed that most teachers did not approach students with problematic internet use and had little knowledge on how to best intervene. The study called for more education and support for professionals who regularly interact with students so that they can help promote healthy internet use among minors.
Lastly, Torralba et al. established the first trait-based employment screener for content moderators in the Philippines. By assessing traits that may predict success in content moderation, this screener demonstrated the potential to protect thousands of content moderators' psychological health. This study also represents a collaboration between academic and industry institutions; it showcases how impactful research can be when the strength of academic research (e.g., research rigor) is combined with the strength of industry research (e.g., ecological validity, scalability).
Together, these articles highlight the many, though by no means exhaustive, facets of challenges that we must solve to promote a safe and healthy online experience: misinformation, suicide and self-injury, wellbeing for youth and children, and protection of our frontline T&S professionals. The articles contained within this special edition provide us with a glimpse into the immense potential that lies in uniting research on topics that were often studied separately.
A call for ongoing collaboration and research
This special topic collection signifies the potential for interdisciplinary collaboration and cross-sector engagement in addressing the multifaceted challenges of the digital age. We hope that this issue will inspire further partnerships between academia and industry and serve as a catalyst for even more impactful research that promotes a safer, healthier, and more responsible digital world.
XH: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. CM: Writing—review & editing. LM: Writing—review & editing.
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
XH wishes to thank Jean Claffey, Amanda Menking, and Rachel Lutz Guevara for their feedback on the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
XH was employed by TaskUs Inc.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
1. Ivie EJ, Pettitt A, Moses LJ, Allen NB. A meta-analysis of the association between adolescent social media use and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. (2020) 275:165–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.014
Keywords: social media, mental health, Trust and Safety, content moderation, internet
Citation: Huang X, Massullo C and McLoughlin LT (2023) Editorial: The intersection among the internet and social media use, mental health, and Trust & Safety practices. Front. Psychiatry 14:1332930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1332930
Received: 03 November 2023; Accepted: 06 November 2023;
Published: 20 November 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Wulf Rössler, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
Copyright © 2023 Huang, Massullo and McLoughlin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xieyining Huang, firstname.lastname@example.org
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship