CORRECTION article

Front. Psychiatry, 07 May 2024

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1396070

Corrigendum: Reevaluating hikikomori and challenging loneliness assumptions in Japan: A cross-sectional analysis of a nationwide internet sample

  • Department of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan

Article metrics

View details

1

Citations

1,2k

Views

463

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in the Title. Instead of “Reevaluating hikikomori: challenging assumptions and redefining loneliness in Japan”, it should be “Reevaluating hikikomori and challenging loneliness assumptions in Japan: A cross-sectional analysis of a nationwide internet sample”.

In the published article, there was an error in the Affiliations. Instead of “Department of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita, Japan”, it should be “Department of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan”.

In the published article, there was an error in the Abstract, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated: “A sample of 623 participants, representative of Japanese internet users aged 16 and above, underwent factor analysis.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“A sample of 623 participants, representative of Japanese internet users aged 16 and above, was included for analysis.”

In the published article, there was an error in the Keywords. Instead of “loneliness, hikikomori, social withdrawal, outgoing behaviors, mental health”, the keywords should be “loneliness, hikikomori, social withdrawal, outgoing behaviors, mental health, cross-sectional, secondary analysis, nationwide sample”.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2, column 4, row 7. The high score for ‘Killing time’, rarely/never, was incorrectly captured as “25 (146%)”. The correct score is “25 (14.6%)”.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2, column 3, row 47. The low score for ‘P2P and FTP’, sometimes, was incorrectly captured as “42 (11.5%)”. The correct score is “52 (11.5%)”.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2, column 3, row 53. The low score for ‘Online survey or quiz’, sometimes, was incorrectly captured as “78 (7.3%)”. The correct score is “78 (17.3%)”.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2, column 3, row 60. The low score for ‘Online shopping/auctions’, often/always, was incorrectly captured as “179 (29.6%)”. The correct score is “179 (39.6%)”.

The corrected Table 2 appears below:

Table 2

UCLA loneliness scoresMeanSDEta squared
lower scoreshigher scoresp value
Official purpose (study/work)rarely/never211 (46.7%)72 (42.1%)0.23843.012.10.00
sometimes81 (17.9%)26 (15.2%)41.912.0
often/always160 (35.4%)73 (42.7%)41.812.2
Stress releaserarely/never201 (44.5%)60 (35.1%)0.00140.912.00.02
sometimes128 (28.3%)38 (22.2%)42.210.2
often/always123 (27.2%)73 (42.7%)44.413.6
Killing timerarely/never105 (23.2%)25 (14.6%)0.00538.910.60.03
sometimes123 (27.2%)37 (21.6%)41.810.3
often/always224 (49.6%)109 (63.7%)44.013.2
Communicationrarely/never223 (49.3%)96 (56.1%)0.26743.712.30.02
sometimes116 (25.7%)41 (24%)42.011.7
often/always113 (25%)34 (19.9%)39.811.8
Associatingrarely/never359 (78.8%)128 (74.9%)0.02642.212.30.00
sometimes59 (13.1%)17 (9.9%)41.811.4
often/always37 (8.2%)26 (15.2%)44.411.9
Expanding hobbies and network of friendsrarely/never341 (75.4%)132 (77.2%)0.54942.612.20.00
sometimes56 (12.4%)16 (9.4%)41.310.0
often/always55 (12.2%)23 (13.5%)41.813.7
Resourcingrarely/never26 (5.8%)5 (2.9%)0.25842.18.70.00
sometimes59 (13.1%)19 (11.1%)42.611.0
often/always367 (81.2%)147 (86%)42.412.5
Sharing problemsrarely/never376 (83.2%)135 (78.9%)0.4642.012.20.01
sometimes50 (11.1%)23 (13.5%)44.111.1
often/always26 (5.8%)13 (7.6%)44.512.6
Building community networkrarely/never388 (85.8%)153 (89.5%)0.42142.812.40.01
sometimes27 (6%)9 (5.3%)40.69.5
often/always37 (8.2%)9 (5.3%)38.710.6
Online datingrarely/never441 (97.6%)158 (92.4%)0.01142.112.10.01
sometimes5 (1.1%)5 (2.9%)47.510.4
often/always6 (1.3%)8 (4.7%)50.612.9
Assessing pornographyrarely/never371 (82.1%)121 (70.8%)0.00841.511.90.02
sometimes49 (10.8%)31 (18.1%)45.412.5
often/always32 (7.1%)19 (11.1%)45.813.0
Using anonymous online bulletin boards (2ch etc.)rarely/never316 (69.9%)93 (54.4%)<.00140.911.30.03
sometimes87 (19.2%)40 (23.4%)44.012.2
often/always49 (10.8%)38 (22.2%)46.914.4
Blogging and SNSrarely/never219 (48.5%)83 (48.5%)0.89442.312.10.00
sometimes86 (19%)35 (20.5%)43.311.4
often/always147 (32.5%)53 (31%)41.912.7
Release personal updates and work presentationsrarely/never380 (84.1%)139 (81.3%)0.24642.412.20.00
sometimes32 (7.1%)19 (11.1%)44.211.7
often/always40 (8.8%)13 (7.6%)40.611.8
Assessing Youtube/iTunes etc.rarely/never210 (46.5%)54 (31.6%)0.00340.811.00.01
sometimes114 (25.2%)53 (31%)44.112.3
often/always128 (28.3%)64 (37.4%)43.113.3
P2P and FTPrarely/never364 (80.5%)128 (74.9%)0.29842.312.40.00
sometimes52 (11.5%)25 (14.6%)42.710.3
often/always36 (8%)18 (10.5%)42.612.7
Online gamingrarely/never382 (84.5%)134 (78.4%)0.0541.912.20.01
sometimes43 (9.5%)17 (9.9%)43.510.7
often/always27 (6%)20 (11.7%)46.012.8
Online survey or quizrarely/never27 (6%)12 (7%)0.89146.012.60.01
sometimes78 (17.3%)29 (17%)42.211.7
often/always347 (76.8%)130 (76%)42.112.2
Financial transactionrarely/never227 (50.2%)96 (56.1%)0.29443.212.50.01
sometimes110 (24.3%)41 (24%)42.911.6
often/always115 (25.4%)34 (19.9%)40.011.7
Online shopping/auctionsrarely/never99 (21.9%)33 (19.3%)0.39341.610.80.00
sometimes174 (38.5%)60 (35.1%)42.511.6
often/always179 (39.6%)78 (45.6%)42.713.2

Distributions of UCLA loneliness scores among different Internet use habits.

Chi-square test were used to explore the relationship between loneliness and various everyday internet use habits. To ensure the validity of our statistical tests, the homogeneity of variances using Levene’s and Welch’s tests were assessed. One-way ANOVA to facilitate the comparison of means. Effect sizes, employing Cohen’s classification for eta-squared were calculated to gauge the magnitude of effects, small (.01), medium (.06), or large (.14). (N=623).

The author apologizes for these errors and states that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

loneliness, hikikomori, social withdrawal, outgoing behaviors, mental health, cross-sectional, secondary analysis, nationwide sample

Citation

Yong R (2024) Corrigendum: Reevaluating hikikomori and challenging loneliness assumptions in Japan: A cross-sectional analysis of a nationwide internet sample. Front. Psychiatry 15:1396070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1396070

Received

05 March 2024

Accepted

17 April 2024

Published

07 May 2024

Volume

15 - 2024

Edited and reviewed by

Lené Levy-Storms, University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Roseline Yong,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics