Frontiers reaches 6.4 on Journal Impact Factors

Methods ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Public Health | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00058

Informed adaptations of a strength-training program through a research-practice partnership

 Meghan L. Wilson1*, Thomas E. Strayer2, Rebecca Davis3 and  Samantha M. Harden1
  • 1Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, United States
  • 2Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, United States
  • 3Virginia Cooperative Extension, United States

Efficacy and effectiveness data for strength-training programs targeting older adults have been well established, but it is evident that they are not translated within practice-based settings to have a public health impact, as most (~90%) older adults are not meeting strength-training recommendations. Strength-training interventions developed, delivered, and evaluated in highly controlled settings (e.g. eligibility requirements, certified instructor, etc.) may not reflect real-world needs. One strategy to improve these outcomes is to work through an integrated research-practice partnership (IRPP) to plan and evaluate an intervention to better fit within the intended delivery system. The purpose of this study was to describe the IRPP method by which academic and practice representatives can partner to select and adapt a best-fit strength-training program for older adults. This work was planned and evaluated using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework, applying the AIM dimensions to complement the methodology of the partnership. In this pragmatic work, members of the IRPP adapted the evidence-based program, Stay Strong, Stay Healthy (SSSH) into a new program, Lifelong Improvements through Fitness Together (LIFT). Of the health educators who agreed to be randomized to deliver LIFT or SSSH (N=9), five were randomized to SSSH and four were randomized to deliver LIFT. Fifty percent of educators randomized to SSSH delivered the program whereas 80% of the health educators randomized to LIFT delivered the program. The health educators deemed LIFT more suitable for delivery than SSSH, self-reported high rates of fidelity in program delivery, and intended on delivering the program in the following year. In conclusion, this study provides transparent methods for using an IRPP to adapt an intervention as well as preliminary outcomes related to adoption, implementation, and maintenance.

Keywords: Integrated research-practice partnership, adaptations, implementation, older adults, strength-training

Received: 31 Jul 2017; Accepted: 14 Feb 2018.

Edited by:

Colette J. Browning, Shenzhen International Primary Healthcare Research Institute, China

Reviewed by:

Mark G. Robson, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, United States
Claudia Meyer, RDNS Institute, Australia
Ninfa Purcell, Texas A&M AgriLife Research & Extension Center at Stephenville, United States  

Copyright: © 2018 Wilson, Strayer, Davis and Harden. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mrs. Meghan L. Wilson, Virginia Tech, Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, 1981 Kraft Dr., 1981 Kraft Dr., Blacksburg, 24060, Virginia, United States, meghan13@vt.edu