%A Liu,Yiran E. %A LeBoa,Christopher %A Rodriguez,Marcela %A Sherif,Beruk %A Trinidad,Chrisele %A del Rosario,Michael %A Allen,Sophie %A Clifford,Christine %A Redding,Jennifer %A Chen,Wei-ting %A Rosas,Lisa G. %A Morales,Carlos %A Chyorny,Alexander %A Andrews,Jason R. %D 2022 %J Frontiers in Public Health %C %F %G English %K COVID-19,Incarceration,jails,Infection Control,stakeholder engagement,community-based research,Seroprevalance,Mental Health %Q %R 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854343 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2022-June-14 %9 Original Research %# %! COVID-19 preventive measures in jails %* %< %T COVID-19 Preventive Measures in Northern California Jails: Perceived Deficiencies, Barriers, and Unintended Harms %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.854343 %V 10 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 2296-2565 %X BackgroundCarceral facilities are high-risk settings for COVID-19 transmission. Little is known about the hidden burden of infection or practical barriers to infection control in these settings, especially in jails. There is also limited research on the mental health impacts of the pandemic among people living and working in carceral facilities.MethodsBetween July 8, 2020 and April 30, 2021, we performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antibody testing and administered a questionnaire among residents and staff of four Northern California jails. We utilized multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographic and carceral characteristics, to analyze factors associated with prior infection, including perceived likelihood of prior infection and access to new masks. We additionally assessed the implementation of, perceptions toward, and impacts of COVID-19 policies in practice. We engaged stakeholder representatives, including incarcerated individuals, to guide study design, procedures, and results interpretation.ResultsWe enrolled 788 jail residents and 380 jail staff. Nearly half of residents and two-thirds of staff who were antibody-positive had not previously tested positive for COVID-19. Among residents without a prior COVID-19 diagnosis, antibody positivity was significantly associated with perceived likelihood of prior infection (adjusted OR = 8.9; 95% CI, 3.6–22.0). Residents who had flu-like illness in jail cited inadequate responses to reported illness and deterrents to symptom reporting, including fears of medical isolation and perceptions of medical neglect. Residents also disclosed deficient access to face masks, which was associated with antibody positivity (adjusted OR = 13.8, 95% CI, 1.8–107.0). Worsened mental health was pervasive among residents, attributed not only to fear of COVID-19 and unsanitary jail conditions but also to intensified isolation and deprivation due to pandemic restrictions on in-person visitation, programs, and recreation time.ConclusionCarceral settings present significant challenges to maintaining infection control and human rights. Custody officials should work diligently to transform the conditions of medical isolation, which could mitigate deterrents to symptom reporting. Furthermore, they should minimize use of restrictive measures like lockdowns and suspension of visitation that exacerbate the mental health harms of incarceration. Instead, custody officials should ensure comprehensive implementation of other preventive strategies like masking, testing, and vaccination, in conjunction with multisector efforts to advance decarceration.