Water, Energy and Food Nexus: Policy Relevance and Challenges

Abstract

Connections between water, food, and energy are at the center of long-term economic and environmental development and protection. Water, energy and food are the keys to economic input and a necessary component of economic progress. The adoption of water management policies and techniques that support the sustainable use of resources while promoting economic growth is becoming an important concern, particularly in countries where water and food scarcity are critical or problematic. This study aimed at evaluating Water, Energy and Food Nexus (WEF), and as well as challenges of its implementation. This study looked at the articles that were published on WEF nexus between 2015 and 2021 acquired from the Scopus database, focusing on gaps and implementations. I searched for relevant key terms in the database and the search found hundreds of articles on WEF, of which 28 articles were relevant to the scope of the study and these articles were downloaded as BibTeX file for the analysis and the analysis was done using R programming. A number of insights and implications were identified based on the analyses of the findings of the reviewed research in order to increase the policy relevance and overall implementation of the WEF nexus by public policy and decision-making institutions. To boost uptake of the findings, the study gives an outline of the primary constraints and challenges that restrict the policy relevance of the WEF nexus.

Introduction

Water, Energy and Food Nexus (WEF) or the linkages between the water, energy, and food (WEF) sectors, is becoming a major academic, policy, and sociological topic that is increasingly debated in a global society, including the relationship with ecosystems, livelihoods, and the economy (Hülsmann et al., 2019; Purwanto et al., 2021). The issues of managing water, energy, and food resources at the same time while meeting several possibly conflicting objectives without jeopardizing any sector's resource-base are important and must be addressed as soon as feasible (i.e., causing the least amount of damage to other sectors). This problem necessitates a holistic strategy in which all systems are evaluated. To add to the complexity, other sectors such as economic, social, political, and environmental factors, as well as effective implementation, influence and are influenced by the WEF nexus (Bizikova et al., 2013; Nhamo et al., 2020; Rosales-Asensio et al., 2020). At the Bonn 2011 nexus Conference, the basic concept of the WEF security nexus strategy was created and widely discussed. The nexus method is characterized as a strategy that integrates management and governance across sectors and scales (Saidmamatov et al., 2020). To address policy difficulties, the confluence of academic ideas and actual execution is critical.

Initial guidance on how a nexus approach might improve the security of WEF resources by enhancing efficiency, minimizing trade-offs, developing synergies, and improving governance across sectors, as well as various policy proposals, was introduced in Hoff's study (Hoff, 2011). However, extensive investigations and critical evaluations by Endo et al. (2017) and Albrecht et al. (2018) claim that Hoff's background study and the 2011 World Economic Forum meeting (WEF, 2011) have propelled the WEF nexus to the forefront of global attention. Consequently, significant inadequacies in nexus approach frameworks and subsequent nexus studies have been found.

The WEF nexus is defined as the mutual interconnections between water, energy and food. The WEF nexus is critical to natural resource management and climate change policy because societal changes drive WEF demand increases, and continuous environmental changes are likely to impact water supply or accessibility (Mpandeli et al., 2018; Orimoloye et al., 2018; Busayo et al., 2019; Bakhshianlamouki et al., 2020; Dyosi et al., 2021). To deal with the WEF nexus, multi-sectoral water use must be harmonized and brought into line with water (basin) integrity reconstruction and/or preservation. The WEF nexus, in contrast to integrated water resources management (IWRM), emphasizes non-linear system analysis and dynamic feedbacks across water-intensive industries. The piece of knowledge relating to water in the WEF nexus has grown significantly during the last decade (Hack, 2015; Al-Saidi, 2017).

Several concepts, theories, and methodologies have been done using a nexus approach to look at the links between water, energy, and food (Mohtar and Daher, 2012; El-Gafy, 2017; Bizikova, 2019). Study has provided a thorough analysis of the WEF nexus, including basic linkages as well as institutional and policy implementation difficulties and enhancing adaptive capacity to complex global challenges (Scott et al., 2015; Busayo et al., 2019). In support of food security, sustainable agriculture, and human development, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO., 2014) offered a conceptual approach to the WEF nexus, balancing diverse user purposes and interests. In the nexus approach, the environmental effect has been analyzed while evaluating the relationships and balance between water, energy, land, and food, as well as the importance of wellbeing (Ringler et al., 2013; Orimoloye et al., 2019).

In an effort to examine the green economic growth potential of a nexus approach, Hoff (2011) presents preliminary evidence on how a nexus approach might boost water, energy, and food security by increasing efficiency, eliminating trade-offs, developing synergies, and improving governance across sectors (Tantoh et al., 2020). With this knowledge gap especially on WEF nexus implementation and policy relevance, it is critical to include relevant studies outcomes in the decision-making processes, this will help in effectively implementing WEF nexus. The role of scientific research in bridging the nexus knowledge gap, quantifying nexus critical interlinkages and interactions, and identifying trade-offs and possible synergies to support evidence-based policymaking is very important, especially in developing countries (Wichelns, 2017; Tantoh et al., 2021). Consequently, this study aimed at evaluating studied on WEF nexus and how this nexus has been implemented over the years as well as identifying the potential barriers to its implementation. The issues of managing and implementing water, energy, and food resources policy and meeting several possibly conflicting objectives without jeopardizing any sector's resource-base are important and must be addressed scientifically this will help in causing the least amount of damage to other sectors. This problem necessitates a holistic strategy in which all systems are evaluated.

Methodology

This study looked at the academic articles that were published on WEF nexus between 2015 and 2021, focusing on gaps and implementations. The first step was to go over the existing WEF nexus studies and see where they have been improved or failed to be implemented, as well as critical areas that were left out of most, if not all, of them. The second stage was to identify numerous important phrases that appear in WEF nexus studies in order to identify the knowledge, research, and application gaps. These procedures enable the most pressing concerns in current nexus research to be identified. Following that, several WEF nexus case studies were evaluated, demonstrating the extent to which WEF nexus approach practices and impediments to adoption exist. Figure 1 depicts the steps taken in this research. The framework of this study reflects these steps.

Figure 1

Primarily, the search term was WEF nexus and it was refined by excluding other irrelevant studies and document types: (article) timespan: all years' indexes: SCI-expanded, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, BKCI-S, BKCI-SSH, ESCI, CCR-EXPANDED, IC. The title-specific algorithm only retrieved primary articles and excluded other document types for the primary reasons that they were pre-article items that could be published in other forms or post-publication synthesis of primary articles. Manual validation of the total articles was further done to ascertain the specificity and efficiency of the search algorithm in recovering the subject keyword from the database (Orimoloye and Ololade, 2021). On overall, the dataset contained 28 relevant articles and was downloaded as BibTeX file.

The existing WEF nexus implementation was selected in this study based on studies published in an academic database such as Scopus databases. The databases were used to identify peer-reviewed scientific documents and other publications that used the WEF nexus concept during the period 2015–2021. Further investigation was conducted to clarify the main concerns, key terms frequently used words and variables of the studies. While not meant as comprehensive, the results are representative of the commonly presented WEF nexus available in the literature, and many gaps and barriers were identified in this study. The information on the articles on WEF nexus used in this study is presented in Table 1. The annual Growth Rate of research studies published during the period of study per year is 24.57%, while the annual average citations as presented in Table 1, is 17.36. different authors and researchers were involved in these studies, for instance, total authors of about 115 with author appearances of 127 were recorded in the studies used in the study.

Results and Discussion

Practices and Barriers to Implementing WEF Nexus Approach

The WEF nexus has the potential to provide new opportunities in any region where the nexus is well-implemented in general. However, there is also concern that these opportunities created in the medium term will only be for a small number of talented individuals, experts, causing opportunities in other competitive areas (e.g., agriculture and energy sectors). A significant barrier to the technical implementation of the WEF nexus is the absence of precise and uniform data for the whole world. No specific organization providing WEF nexus information to set up a uniform database and provide links to water-related initiatives, papers, events, etc., requires greater contributions from various regions of the world especially in developing countries. Several countries have only low levels of data availability and accuracy, while detailed socio-economic and climate data are necessary to conduct a regional and inter-regional WEF nexus analysis. Furthermore, some countries may be unwilling to share certain types of required data, as they could be considered nationally strategic (Markantonis et al., 2019).

In terms of potential WEF trade-offs, since product systems are so intertwined, measures taken at the local level to improve one aspect of the WEF nexus may cause burdens to be shifted to other areas, resulting in negative consequences for water, energy, or food security. To avoid this, when evaluating different policy options, a lifecycle perspective should be used. Industry, for example, uses lifecycle methodologies and procedures to address water risks. Water security impacts extend beyond manufacturing sites throughout the entire supply chain, particularly in the case of agricultural products, which frequently require considerable amounts of water and energy for management and harvesting. The virtual water content of traded products could be a useful indicator for assessing supply chain trade-offs. The lack of lifecycle-based data to supplement local databases in various regions is a critical issue (Table 2) that would require significant improvement in national accounting. Issues with water, energy, and food are sometimes not critical in some places since only one of the three components is affected. As a result of the WEF, certain countries, particularly those in developing countries, have had security difficulties. Some of these activities or issues may not be applicable to or adopted by all countries; however, this does not negate their importance as food for thought.

WEF Nexus Opportunities: A Review of Current Approaches and Policies

A number of insights and implications have been identified based on the analyses of the findings of the reviewed research in order to increase the policy relevance and overall implementation of the WEF nexus by public policy and decision-making institutions. To boost uptake of the findings, the study identified various challenges in facilitating effective implementation of the WEF nexus as well as the acceptability between researchers and policymakers. This study also gives an outline of the primary constraints and challenges that restrict the policy-relevance of the WEF nexus analyses in this study.

The information in Figure 2 summarized the evolution of WEF nexus-related research used in the studies examined in this study in a wordcloud. Wordcloud was used on the titles of the published papers selected based on the search words. It indicates the predominant word or term used in the WEF coupled with its potential implementation studies. It is easy to distinguish and figure out different areas of associations and prominent terms within the wordcloud (Afuye et al., 2021a; Orimoloye et al., 2021a). This was done to know the research trends in the WEF nexus research field and to identify the most emerging and frequent keywords used in the field. For instance, the relevant words or frequently mentioned words in the WEF nexus studies are water, food, decision making, sustainable development which were mentioned 11, 10, 9, and 7 times respectively in the author's key terms used in WEF nexus studies (Figure 2). These connote that all these prominent themes are relevant in WEF nexus studies.

Figure 2

The information in Figure 3 depicts the word dynamics of WEF nexus studies. Word dynamics analysis is a tool for classifying things that focuses on existent (rather than calculated, such as through profiles) linkages between them, such as in WEF nexus investigations. In WEF nexus research, a scientific article merges numerous existing networks, such as themes or word co-networks, into a new original network (based on objects). The word dynamics were produced using the top 10 most often used words (Figure 3). In order to analyze word dynamics, frequent words were also extracted each year. The function “mk.test” in the package “word dynamics” was used to execute trend analysis (growing or decreasing over the last few years), with the significance level of the Mann Kendall test set at 0.05 (Liu et al., 2019; Afuye et al., 2021b). In year 2018, water, food, sustainable development, energy and water supply was mentioned 3, 3, 3, 1, and 2 respectively (Table 3).

Figure 3

Identified WEF Nexus Approach Practices and Barriers to Its Implementation

In economic terms, water is considered a common good with no substitutes. The equitable distribution of this natural resource is controlled by social fairness and efficient allocation (Markantonis et al., 2019). Through trade-offs and an understanding of the multiple stakes involved, the Nexus can provide ways forward in some specific regions where freshwater supplies are limited and need to be allocated efficiently to feed the industrial, residential, agricultural and energy sectors. Individually addressing productive sectors and related natural resources results in high opportunity costs across a variety of uses, as well as higher transaction costs between nexus sectors. As a result, minimizing high transaction costs should be at the forefront of any economic measures considered when adopting (or designing) a WEF nexus approach. Furthermore, water and energy distribution are monopolies with highly regulated externalities that produce both positive and negative externalities. Water provision may have positive externalities in terms of public health benefits, but energy and food production may have negative externalities (point and diffuse pollution). Water pricing should encompass social, environmental, and cultural aspects which are difficult to assess or put into monetary terms when it comes to water management. Water services are heavily subsidized in most parts of the world, particularly in developing countries, and water rates mostly reflect investment and maintenance expenses rather than the resource's potential cost or scarcity. Although water pricing is an important tool, it is insufficient due to the inelastic nature of water demand (raising prices would not significantly reduce usage) and the necessity for sufficient subsidies to help consumers and farmers minimize their expenditures.

The WEF nexus operationalization constraints must be overcome if the WEF nexus sustainability targets are to be met. Complex collaboration between interconnected sectors, diverse sectoral institutional frameworks and interests, insufficient governance frameworks, and a lack of incentive to collaborate with multiple stakeholders from many disciplines and government levels are all challenges that must be overcome (Urbinatti et al., 2020). Uncertainty and anxiety, which are brought on by the fear of the unknown as a result of changing from the usual to creative ways of doing things, are other challenges to WEF nexus implementation.

The WEF nexus has the potential to create new job opportunities particularly in water-stressed regions in general. However, there are some concerns that the new opportunities created in the medium term will only be for a small number of skilled workers, causing unemployment in other competitive sectors (e.g., agriculture) (Markantonis et al., 2019; Nhamo et al., 2020). The lack of exact and uniform data for the entire world on WEF is a key hurdle to the technical implementation of the WEF nexus. The European Environment Agency (EEA) provided the Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS) to set up a uniform database and provide links to water-related initiatives, papers, events, and so on (Markantonis et al., 2019). These systems require more contributions from countries especially, developing nations. Several nations have poor data availability and accuracy, despite the fact that precise socioeconomic and climate data are required to undertake a WEF nexus study on a sectoral and intersectoral scale (Boluwade, 2021). Furthermore, some countries may be hesitant to release particular sorts of essential data since they may be regarded as strategically important to their countries.

Limited arable and land water resources are among some of the barriers to the implementation of WEF nexus. Several measures, such as the installation of greenhouses and the use of tankers to transport water to the greenhouses, have been made to address the challenges connected with limited arable and land water resources (Adedeji et al., 2020; Adetoro et al., 2020; Orimoloye et al., 2021b). Natural phenomena such as excessive rainfall caused by cyclones and other climatic events, however, pose many obstacles to the long-term viability of these programs (Martinez et al., 2018; Boluwade, 2021). Due to a lack of a relevant database, the effects of these extreme events produced by climate change on the WEF nexus are not fully known. To the best of our knowledge, few if any research has attempted to give quantitative indicators or metrics from the perspective of climate change's effects on the WEF nexus.

In terms of potential WEF trade-offs, because product systems are so intertwined, measures taken at the local level to improve one aspect of the WEF nexus may cause burdens to be shifted to other areas, resulting in a negative consequence for water, energy, or food security. To avoid this, when evaluating different policy options, a lifecycle perspective may be used. Industry, for example, employs lifecycle methodologies and procedures to address water risks. Water security impacts extend beyond manufacturing sites throughout the entire supply chain, particularly in the case of agricultural products, which frequently require considerable amounts of water and energy for management and harvesting (Ozdogan et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2018). The virtual water content of traded products could be a useful indicator for assessing supply chain trade-offs. The lack of lifecycle-based data to supplement local databases in the water-scarce region is a difficult problem that would require significant improvements in national accounting systems. The other aspects of the WEF nexus are subject to similar considerations. In terms of energy, for example, activities such as manufacturing processes and product transportation contribute significantly to the whole system's energy and carbon footprints. The lack of engagement and trust in various stakeholders, particularly civil society, impedes the development of a nexus approach that requires a high level of cooperation and mutual trust. The responsibility for the water, food, and energy is frequently delegated to various ministries or agencies, obstructing the close contact and cooperation required to address the WEF nexus (Markantonis et al., 2019). Innovative partnerships (such as Plan Blue) must be improved at the regional or national level, while this may be difficult given the region's geographical, political, and social contrasts. Through the WEF nexus, science and policy should collaborate to initiate and promote sound planning of solutions for tackling difficulties. However, science and policy have historically had a poor level of cooperation, as they typically have opposing aims, agendas, and priorities. There is also significant doubt about governments' roles, as they do not appear to be ready or equipped to establish a WEF nexus strategy (Oludare et al., 2020). In such circumstances, innovative research may be able to assist in the advancement of the nexus discourse, with national governments responding in accordance with their interest and readiness.

In addition, the WEF nexus would necessitate tight collaboration with the private or commercial sector. The private sector possesses an in-depth understanding of manufacturing processes, management, and the marketplaces in which they operate. People who work in the private sector use natural resources or are in the business of producing or processing them, hence they must be included in the WEF nexus discussion (Lazaro et al., 2021; Naidoo et al., 2021). Because businesses rely on resources such as water, it is also in their financial interest to get involved. They can also give equipment and employees, as well as contribute to nexus solution research and development financing (Naidoo et al., 2021). Many businesses recognize the need to innovate in order to maintain long-term growth, but they are sluggish to establish the necessary links with other stakeholders, such as the public sector and research organizations. Many obstacles can be recognized, such as a lack of communication, a lack of mutual understanding, or variations in the dynamics of the various sectors. To begin a productive dialogue on how the various interests might be matched into a project or program that can simultaneously boost the entrepreneur's business model while also helping to greatly lessen the WEF nexus difficulty (Markantonis et al., 2019; Barbarà Mir, 2020), extra effort is required to overcome these barriers. The circumstances, constraints, and opportunities for the private sector's effective engagement in promoting the nexus should be examined, and strategies for moving forward should be proposed.

Implementation and Practices

In different countries, different approaches and legislation can be found (Table 4). The use of wastewater in irrigation in Italy is strictly regulated by Italian law (Markantonis et al., 2019). This makes such use extremely difficult because the prices of treatments are too high for farmers to afford. As a result, wastewater is discharged into the sea without being utilized, and wastewater is unlawfully used by farmers without being monitored. Research can help us better understand the most appropriate limitations to be adhered to, the sorts of irrigation systems that can be employed, and the types of crops that can be irrigated with wastewater without causing any health issues for the general public (Hua et al., 2021). Overall, the study's findings could help policymakers make better decisions. The link between water, energy, food security and other sectors can contribute immensely to investments, job development, innovation, and competitiveness. It can be acknowledged that some of these techniques may not be appropriate to or chosen by some countries; nonetheless, this does not negate their significance as something that should be seriously considered (Hua et al., 2021). The information in Table 4 these activities and the regions where they were implemented. The difficulties of setting and implementing different prices for different sectors that use the same resources; a lack of collaboration between science, policy, and business; a lack of coherence and cooperation between various levels of government; a limited number of success stories and guidelines to help promote innovative partnerships; and a lack of public awareness and support for innovation on WEF nexus needs to be improved.

It is vital to identify the nexus economic and environmental sectors that can benefit from a shift in the planning process in order to go from concepts to implementation. This is a vital element that is missing from the literature. This will aid in identifying regions with developmental constraints, water availability or levels, uneven water allocations by different sectoral water consumers, and areas where food and energy demand is likely to rise in the next decades. The findings or results could help the region achieve long-term economic growth and environmental restoration, among other objectives.

Conclusion

While there is evidence that the water, energy, food nexus approach adds value to sustainable development and is generating interest, if not demand, from a number of countries and institutions, the most important step to take right now is to analyze and debate the related conditions, bottlenecks, opportunities, and paths forward through structured dialogues that lead to action. The main focus of this study is to evaluate studied on water, energy, food nexus and how the nexus has been implemented over the years as well as identifying the potential barriers to its implementation. In this study, challenges and gaps and implementation of water, energy, food nexus were examined most importantly from the perspective of water, energy and food, to see how they could help promote sustainable development. Themes or words dynamics in the water, energy, food nexus research field and the most emerging and frequent keywords used in the field were identified. For instance, the relevant words or frequently mentioned words in the water, energy, food nexus studies are water, food, decision making, sustainable development which were mentioned 11, 10, 9, and 7 times respectively in the author's key terms used in water, energy, food nexus studies These connote that all these prominent themes relevant in water, energy, food nexus studies. More so, the lack of a unique or specific database for water, energy, food nexus contributed to the gaps in implementing water, energy, food nexus. In summary, it is important to establish an integrated data and analysis toolbox that incorporates existing global datasets on the water, energy, food nexus. This data or toolbox will be used to model and analyze water, energy, food resources and their interconnections at a regional or country level, this will help in having food-secured societies.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1

  AdedejiO.OlusolaA.JamesG.ShabaH. A.OrimoloyeI. R.SinghS. K.et al. (2020). Early warning systems development for agricultural drought assessment in Nigeria. Environ. Monitor. Assess.192, 1–21. 10.1007/s10661-020-08730-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AdetoroA. A.AbrahamS.ParaskevopoulosA. L.Owusu-SekyereE.JordaanH.OrimoloyeI. R. (2020). Alleviating water shortages by decreasing water footprint in sugarcane production: the impacts of different soil mulching and irrigation systems in South Africa. Groundwater Sustain. Dev.11:100464. 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100464

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AfuyeG. A.KalumbaA. M.BusayoE. T.OrimoloyeI. R. (2021b). A bibliometric review of vegetation response to climate change. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.1–13. 10.1007/s11356-021-16319-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AfuyeG. A.KalumbaA. M.OrimoloyeI. R. (2021a). Characterisation of vegetation response to climate change: a review. Sustainability13:7265. 10.3390/su13137265

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AlbrechtT. R.CrootofA.ScottC. A. (2018). The water-energy-food Nexus: a sunliystematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett.13:043002. 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Al-SaidiM. (2017). Conflicts and security in integrated water resources management. Environ. Sci. Policy73, 38–44. 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AntonelliM.TameaS. (2015). Food-water security and virtual water trade in the Middle East and North Africa. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev.31, 326–342. 10.1080/07900627.2015.1030496

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BakhshianlamoukiE.MasiaS.KarimiP.van der ZaagP.SušnikJ. (2020). A system dynamics model to quantify the impacts of restoration measures on the water-energy-food nexus in the Urmia lake Basin, Iran. Sci. Total Environ.708:134874. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134874

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  Barbarà MirL. (2020). The Water-Energy-Food Nexus to Tackle Climate Change in Morocco.

  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BellA.MatthewsN.ZhangW. (2016). Opportunities for improved promotion of ecosystem services in agriculture under the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. J. Environ. Stud. Sci.6, 183–191. 10.1007/s13412-016-0366-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BizikovaL. (2019). Integrating the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Into Policy and Decision-Making: Opportunities and Challenges. Policy and Governance in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429427718-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BizikovaL.RoyD.SwansonD.VenemaH. D.McCandlessM. (2013). The Water-Energy-Food Security Nexus: Towards a Practical Planning and Decision-Support Framework for Landscape Investment and Risk Management. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BoluwadeA. (2021). Impacts of climatic change and database information design on the water-energy-food nexus in water-scarce regions. Water Energy Nexus4, 54–68. 10.1016/j.wen.2021.03.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BusayoE. T.KalumbaA. M.OrimoloyeI. R. (2019). Spatial planning and climate change adaptation assessment: perspectives from Mdantsane Township dwellers in South Africa. Habit. Int.90:101978. 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.04.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  CabelloV.RomeroD.MusickiA.PereiraÂ. G.PeñateB. (2021). Co-creating narratives for WEF nexus governance: a quantitative story-telling case study in the Canary Islands. Sustain. Sci.16, 1363–1374. 10.1007/s11625-021-00933-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  DyosiM.KalumbaA. M.MagagulaH. B.ZhouL.OrimoloyeI. R. (2021). Drought conditions appraisal using geoinformatics and multi-influencing factors. Environ. Monitor. Assess.193, 1–19. 10.1007/s10661-021-09126-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  El-GafyI. (2017). Water–food–energy nexus index: analysis of water–energy–food nexus of crop's production system applying the indicators approach. Appl. Water Sci.7, 2857–2868. 10.1007/s13201-017-0551-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  EndoA.TsuritaI.BurnettK.OrencioP. M. (2017). A review of the current state of research on the water, energy, and food nexus. J. Hydrol.11, 20–30. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.11.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  European Commission (2019). Water - Energy nexus in Europe. Available online at: https://setis.ec.europa.eu/water-energy-nexus-europe_en#details (accessed September 25, 2021).

  • Google Scholar

• 20

  FAO. (2014). The State of Food Insecurity in the World (SOFI). https://www.fao.org/3/i4030e/i4030e.pdf

  • Google Scholar

• 21

  FedoroffN. V.BattistiD. S.BeachyR. N.CooperP. J.FischhoffD. A.HodgesC. N.et al. (2010). Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science327, 833–834. 10.1126/science.1186834

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Fernández-RíosA.LasoJ.CamposC.Ruiz-SalmónI.HoehnD.CristóbalJ.et al. (2021). Towards a Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus index: a review of nutrient profile models as a fundamental pillar of food and nutrition security. Sci. Total Environ.789:147936. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147936

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  HackJ. (2015). Application of payments for hydrological ecosystem services to solve problems of fit and interplay in integrated water resources management. Water Int.40, 929–948. 10.1080/02508060.2015.1096122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  HoffH. (2011). “Understanding the Nexus,” in Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus (Stockholm).

  • Google Scholar

• 25

  HoolohanC.LarkinA.McLachlanC.FalconerR.SoutarI.SucklingJ.et al. (2018). Engaging stakeholders in research to address water?energy?food (WEF) nexus challenges. Sustainability Sci. 13, 1415–1426.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  HuaE.WangX.EngelB. A.QianH.SunS.WangY. (2021). Water competition mechanism of food and energy industries in WEF Nexus: a case study in China. Agric. Water Manag.254:106941. 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106941

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  HülsmannS.SušnikJ.RinkeK.LanganS.van WijkD.JanssenA. B.et al. (2019). Integrated modelling and management of water resources: the ecosystem perspective on the nexus approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.40, 14–20. 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.07.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  KingC.JaafarH. (2015). Rapid assessment of the water–energy–food–climate nexus in six selected basins of North Africa and West Asia undergoing transitions and scarcity threats. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev.31, 343–359. 10.1080/07900627.2015.1026436

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  LazaroL. L. B.GiattiL. L.de OliveiraJ. A. P. (2021). Water-energy-food nexus approach at the core of businesses–How businesses in the bioenergy sector in Brazil are responding to integrated challenges?J. Cleaner Prod. 303:127102. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127102

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  LiuH.PengK.LiW.CaoY. (2019). Investigation on the trends and characteristics of articles on submerged macrophytes: perception from bibliometrics between 1991 and 2018. J. Freshw. Ecol.34, 703–713. 10.1080/02705060.2019.1676319

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  MabhaudhiT.SimpsonG.BadenhorstJ.MohammedM.MotongeraT.SenzanjeA.et al. (2018). Assessing the State of the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus in South Africa. Pretoria: Water Research Commission (WRC).

  • Google Scholar

• 32

  MarchandR. D.KohS. L.MorrisJ. C. (2015). Delivering energy efficiency and carbon reduction schemes in England: lessons from green deal pioneer places. Energy Policy84, 96–106. 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  MarkantonisV.ReynaudA.KarabulutA.El HajjR.AltinbilekD.AwadI. M.et al. (2019). Can the implementation of the water-energy-food nexus support economic growth in the Mediterranean region? The current status and the way forward. Front. Environ. Sci.7:84. 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00084

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  MartinezP.BlancoM.Castro-CamposB. (2018). The water–energy–food nexus: a fuzzy-cognitive mapping approach to support nexus-compliant policies in Andalusia (Spain). Water10:664. 10.3390/w10050664

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  MohtarR. H.DaherB. (2012). Water, Energy, and Food: The Ultimate Nexus. Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food, and Biological Engineering. Baco Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

  • Google Scholar

• 36

  MpandeliS.NaidooD.MabhaudhiT.NhemachenaC.NhamoL.LiphadziS.et al. (2018). Climate change adaptation through the water-energy-food nexus in southern Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health15:2306. 10.3390/ijerph15102306

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  NaidooD.NhamoL.MpandeliS.SobrateeN.SenzanjeA.LiphadziS.et al. (2021). Operationalising the water-energy-food nexus through the theory of change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.149:111416. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111416

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  National Planning Commission. (2013). National Development Plan Vision 2030.

  • Google Scholar

• 39

  NhamoL.MabhaudhiT.MpandeliS.DickensC.NhemachenaC.SenzanjeA.et al. (2020). An integrative analytical model for the water-energy-food nexus: South Africa case study. Environ. Sci. Policy109, 15–24. 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  OludareS. D.VictoN.MargaretS. K.Miracle NevoC.BwambaleJ. (2020). COVID-19 and the water–energy–food nexus in Africa: evidence from Nigeria, Uganda, and Tanzania. World water Policy6, 176–201. 10.1002/wwp2.12039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  OrimoloyeI. R.BelleJ. A.OloladeO. O. (2021a). Exploring the emerging evolution trends of disaster risk reduction research: a global scenario. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.18, 673–690. 10.1007/s13762-020-02847-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  OrimoloyeI. R.MazinyoS. P.KalumbaA. M.EkundayoO. Y.NelW. (2019). Implications of climate variability and change on urban and human health: a review. Cities91, 213–223. 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  OrimoloyeI. R.MazinyoS. P.NelW.IortyomE. T. (2018). Assessing changes in climate variability observation and simulation of temperature and relative humidity: a case of east london, South Africa. Res. J. Environ. Sci.12, 1–13. 10.3923/rjes.2018.1.13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  OrimoloyeI. R.OloladeO. O. (2021). Global trends assessment of environmental health degradation studies from 1990 to 2018. Environ. Dev. Sustain.23, 3251–3264. 10.1007/s10668-020-00716-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  OrimoloyeI. R.ZhouL.KalumbaA. M. (2021b). Drought disaster risk adaptation through ecosystem services-based solutions: way forward for South Africa. Sustainability13:4132. 10.3390/su13084132

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  OzdoganB.GacarA.AktasH. (2017). Digital agriculture practices in the context of agriculture 4.0. J. Econ. Finance Account.4, 186–193. 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.448

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  ProctorK.TabatabaieS. M.MurthyG. S. (2021). Gateway to the perspectives of the food-energy-water nexus. Sci. Total Environ.764:142852. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142852

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  PueppkeS. G. (2021). Ancient WEF: water–energy–food Nexus in the Distant Past. Water13:925. 10.3390/w13070925

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  PurwantoA.SušnikJ.SuryadiF. X.de FraitureC. (2021). Quantitative simulation of the water-energy-food (WEF) security nexus in a local planning context in Indonesia. Sustain. Prod. Consumption25, 198–216. 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  RinglerC.BhaduriA.LawfordR. (2013). The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): potential for improved resource use efficiency?Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.5, 617–624. 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  Rosales-AsensioE.de la Puente-GilÁ.García-MoyaF. J.Blanes-PeiróJ.de Simón-MartínM. (2020). Decision-making tools for sustainable planning and conceptual framework for the energy–water–food nexus. Energy Rep.6, 4–15. 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  SaidmamatovO.RudenkoI.PfisterS.KozielJ. (2020). Water–energy–food nexus framework for promoting regional integration in Central Asia. Water12:1896. 10.3390/w12071896

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  ScottC. A.KurianM.WescoatJ. L. (2015). “The water-energy-food nexus: Enhancing adaptive capacity to complex global challenges,” in Governing the Nexus, eds M. Kurian, R. Ardakanian (Cham: Springer), 15–38. 10.1007/978-3-319-05747-7_2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  TantohH. B.LeonardL.SimateleM. D. (2020). Strengthening the scaffolds of community flexibility: policy and institutional response to the rural water supply and sustainability challenge. Afr. Geogr. Rev.39, 208–223. 10.1080/19376812.2019.1694045

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  TantohH. B.McKayT. T.DonkorF. E.SimateleM. D. (2021). Gender roles, implications for water, land and food security in a changing climate: a systematic review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.5:259. 10.3389/fsufs.2021.707835

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  UrbinattiA. M.Dalla FontanaM.StirlingA.GiattiL. L. (2020). ‘Opening up'the governance of water-energy-food nexus: towards a science-policy-society interface based on hybridity and humility. Sci. Total Environ.744:140945. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140945

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  VenghausS.HakeJ. F. (2018). Nexus thinking in current EU policies?The interdependencies among food, energy and water resources. Envir. sci. Policy, 90, 183–192.

  • Google Scholar

• 58

  WEF (2011). Global Risks 2011 Six Edition: An Initiative of the Risk Response Network. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

  • Google Scholar

• 59

  WichelnsD. (2017). The water-energy-food nexus: is the increasing attention warranted, from either a research or policy perspective?Environ. Sci. Policy69, 113–123. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  YilliaP. T. (2016). Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Framing the Opportunities, Challenges and Synergies for Implementing the SDGs. Österreichische Wasser-und Abfallwirtschaft, 68, 86–98.

  • Google Scholar

• 61

  ZhangC.ChenX.LiY.DingW.FuG. (2018). Water-energy-food nexus: Concepts, questions and methodologies. J. Cleaner Prod. 195, 625–639.

  • Google Scholar

• 62

  ZhaoX.LiY. P.YangH.LiuW. F.TillotsonM. R.GuanD.et al. (2018). Measuring scarce water saving from interregional virtual water flows in China. Environ. Res. Lett.13:054012. 10.1088/1748-9326/aaba49

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar