CORRECTION article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 25 July 2023

Sec. Sustainable Food Processing

Volume 7 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1247312

Corrigendum: Potential and unrealized future possibilities of browntop millet in the food sector

  • 1. Department of Home Science (Foods and Nutrition), University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

  • 2. Department of Food Technology, Vivekananda College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

  • 3. Department of Food Technology, Shaheed Rajguru College of Applied Science, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

Article metrics

View details

848

Views

354

Downloads

In the published article, the reference for Niharika V. et al., 2020 was not cited in the article due to referencing the studies of two different authors with similar names. The full reference is as follows: “Niharika, V., Rao, B. G., Tushara, M., and Rao, V. S. (2020). Studies on performance of browntop millet indigenous collections for grain yield and nutritional traits. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 9, 2636–2638.”

In the published article, the reference for Niharika V. et al., 2020 was incorrectly cited in a few places throughout the article as “Niharika, B., Jaipuriar, D. S., Ranjan, R., and Vaishnav, V. (2020). A study to explore the biochemical properties of locally grown millets. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. (IJRAR) 1, 375–382.”. It should be “Niharika, V., Rao, B. G., Tushara, M., and Rao, V. S. (2020). Studies on performance of browntop millet indigenous collections for grain yield and nutritional traits. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 9, 2636–2638.”

These citations have been corrected in the following places.

Results, Origin and production, paragraph 4; Results, Nutritional attributes, Table 3; Results, Nutritional attributes, Table 4; Results, Nutritional attributes, paragraph 8; Results, Nutritional attributes, Figure 5 legend; Results, Nutritional attributes, Figure 6 legend.

In the published article, the reference for Niharika B. et al., 2020 was incorrectly written as “Niharika, B., Jaipuriar, D. S., Ranjan, R., and Vaishnav, V. (2020). A study to explore the biochemical properties of locally grown millets. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. (IJRAR) 1, 375–382.” It should be “Niharika, B., Jaipuriar, D. S., Ranjan, R., and Vaishnav, V. (2020). A study to explore the biochemical properties of locally grown millets. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 7, 375–382.”

In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. In the row “Browntop millet,” the numeric values did not line up with the corresponding references. The corrected Table 3 appears below.

Table 3

Cereal grainEnergy (kj) (***↓)Carbohydrates (gm) (***↓)Crude fiber (gm) (***↓)Fat (gm) (***↓)Protein (gm) (***↓)
Browntop millet (Roopa, 2015) (Niharika V. et al., 2020)1,414 –71.32 –– 8.061.89 –8.98 ↓16.24% 10.72
Rice (Longvan et al., 2017)1,491 ± 15 ↑5.4%78.24 ± 1.07 ↑9.7%2.81 ± 0.42 ↓65.1%0.52 ± 0.05 ↓72.5%7.94 ± 0.58 ↓25.9%
Wheat (Longvan et al., 2017)1,347 ± 23 ↓4.7%64.72 ± 1.74 ↓9.3%11.23 ± 0.77 ↑39.3%1.47 ± 0.05 ↓22.2%10.59 ± 0.60 ↓1.2%
Sorghum (Longvan et al., 2017)1,398 ± 13 ↓1.1%67.68 ± 1.03 ↓5.1%10.22 ± 0.49 ↑26.8%1.73 ± 0.3 ↓8.5%9.97 ± 0.43 ↓7.0%
Pearl millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1,456 ± 18 ↑3.0%61.78 ± 0.85 ↓13.4%11.49 ± 0.62 ↑42.5%5.43 ± 0.64 ↑187.3%10.96 ± 0.26 ↑2.2%
Proso millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1,388 ± 10 ↓1.8%66.19 ± 1.19 ↓7.2%6.39 ± 0.60 ↓20.7%2.55 ± 0.13 ↑34.9%8.92 ± 1.09 ↓16.8%
Finger millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1,342 ± 10 ↓5.1%66.82 ± 0.73 ↓6.3%11.18 ± 1.14 ↑38.7%1.92 ± 0.14 ↑1.6%7.16 ± 0.63 ↓33.2%
Little millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1,449 ± 19 ↑2.5%65.55 ± 1.29 ↓8.1%7.72 ± 0.92 ↓4.2%3.89 ± 0.35 ↑105.8%10.13 ± 0.45 ↓5.5%
Barnyard millet (Gopalan et al., 2021)1,284 ↓9.19%65.5 ↓8.8%9.8 ↑21.6%2.2 ↑16.4%6.2 ↓42.2%
Foxtail millet (Gopalan et al., 2021)1,384 ↓2.1%60.9 ↓14.6%8 ↓0.7%4.3 ↑127.5%12.3 ↑14.7%
Kodo millet (Patil et al., 2020)1,500 ± 10.62 ↑6.1%71.80 ± 0.60 ↑0.7%6.12 ± 0.10 ↓ 24.1%4.48 ± 0.52 ↑137.0%7.7 ± 0.05 ↓28.2%

Energy and macro-nutrient content of different millets and staple cereals compared with the browntop millet (in percent).

*

↑ indicates percent (%) higher amount compared to BTM.

**

↓ indicates percent (%) lower amount compared to BTM.

Baseline data adapted from Roopa (2015), Longvan et al. (2017), Niharika V. et al. (2020), Patil et al. (2020), and Gopalan et al. (2021).

In the published article, there was an error in Table 4 as published. In the row “Browntop millet,” the numeric values did not line up with the corresponding references. The corrected Table 4 appears below.

Table 4

Cereal grainAsh content (gm) (***↓)Calcium (mg) (***↓)Iron (mg) (***↓)Phosphorus (mg) (***↓)Zinc (mg) (***↓)
Browntop millet (Kishore et al., 2021) (Niharika V. et al., 2020)2.13 ± 0.21 –28 13.97 ↓50.1%7.72 ↓12.9% 8.86276 –2.5 2.11 ↓15.6%
Rice (Longvan et al., 2017)0.56 ± 0.08 ↓73.7%7.49 ± 1.26 ↓73.2%0.65 ± 0.11 ↓92.7%96 ± 16.30 ↓65.2%1.21 ± 0.1 7 ↓51.6%
Wheat (Longvan et al., 2017)1.42 ± 0.19 ↓33.3%39.36 ± 5.65 ↑40.6%3.97 ± 0.7 8 ↓55.2%315 ± 41.8 ↑14.1%2.85 ± 0.6 5 ↑14%
Sorghum (Longvan et al., 2017)1.39 ± 0.34 ↓34.7%27.60 ± 3.71 ↑1.4%3.95 ± 0.94 ↓55.4%274 ± 35.7 ↓0.7%1.96 ± 0.31 ↓21.6%
Pearl millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1.37 ± 0.17 ↓35.7%27.35 ± 2.16 ↓2.3%6.42 ± 1.04 ↓27.5%289 ± 25.3 ↑4.7%2.76 ± 0.36 ↑10.4%
Proso millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1.72 ± 0.27 ↓19.2%15.27 ± 1.28 ↓45.5%2.34 ± 0.46 ↓73.6%101 ± 5.2 ↓60.4%1.65 ± 0.18 ↓34%
Finger millet (Longvan et al., 2017)2.04 ± 0.34 ↓4.2%364 ± 58.0 ↑1200%4.62 ± 0.36 ↓47.9%210 ± 58.4 ↓23.9%2.53 ± 0.51 ↑1.2%
Little millet (Longvan et al., 2017)1.34 ± 0.16 ↓37.1%16.06 ± 1.54 ↓42.6%1.26 ± 0.44 ↓85.8%130 ± 27.5 ↓52.9%1.82 ± 0.1 4 ↓27.8%
Barnyard millet (Gopalan et al., 2021)4.4 ↑106.6%20 ↓28.6%5.0 ↓43.6%280 ↑1.4%3.0 ↑20%
Foxtail millet (Gopalan et al., 2021)3.3 ↑54.9%31 ↑10.7%2.8 ↓68.4%290 ↑5.1%2.4 ↓4%
Kodo millet (Patil et al., 2020)1.96 ± 0.05 ↓1.9%39.63 ± 0.76 ↑41.5%3.55 ± 0.32 ↓59.9%378.65 ± 1.04 ↑37.2%2.08 ± 0.20 ↓16.8%

Comparison of micro-nutrients content of millets and staple cereals with the browntop millet (in percent).

*

↑ indicates percent (%) higher amount compared to BTM.

**

↓ indicates percent (%) lower amount compared to BTM.

Baseline data adapted from Longvan et al. (2017), Niharika V. et al. (2020), Patil et al. (2020), Gopalan et al. (2021), and Kishore et al. (2021).

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    GopalanC.Rama SastryB. V.BalasubramanianS. C. (revised by Rao, B. S. N.DeosthaleY. G.PantK. C.) (2021). Nutritive Value of Indian Foods (NVIF). National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad, India.

  • 2

    KishoreA. S.RekhaK. B.HussainS. A.MadhaviA. (2021). Quality enhancement of nutri-cereal BTM through agronomic practices. Curr. Sci. 120, 468470.

  • 3

    LongvanT.AnanthanR.BhaskaracharyK.VenkaiahK. (2017). Indian Food Composition Tables (IFCT). Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrition.

  • 4

    NiharikaB.JaipuriarD. S.RanjanR.VaishnavV. (2020). A study to explore the biochemical properties of locally grown millets. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev.7, 375382.

  • 5

    NiharikaV.RaoB. G.TusharaM.RaoV. S. (2020). Studies on performance of browntop millet indigenous collections for grain yield and nutritional traits. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.9, 26362638.

  • 6

    PatilR. B.VijayalakshmiK. G.VijayalakshmiD. (2020). Physical, functional, nutritional, phytochemical and antioxidant properties of kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.9, 23902393. 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.348

  • 7

    RoopaO. M. (2015). Nutritional Analysis and Development of Value-added Products from Brown-top Millet (Dissertation/Master's thesis). Department of Food Science and Nutrition, UAS, Bengaluru, India.

Summary

Keywords

browntop millet, physiochemical properties, nutrients, uses, benefits

Citation

Singh S, Suri S and Singh R (2023) Corrigendum: Potential and unrealized future possibilities of browntop millet in the food sector. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7:1247312. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1247312

Received

25 June 2023

Accepted

10 July 2023

Published

25 July 2023

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

7 - 2023

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Shivani Singh

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics