Abstract
Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease caused by Toxoplasma gondii, a protozoan that infects warm-blooded animals and humans. Approximately one third of the global population is infected by T. gondii. We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the risk factors and One Health knowledge of toxoplasmosis in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. From July through December 2020, we collected data using questionnaires. The results showed that 60% of participants had heard or read about the disease, 23.3% of participants had no knowledge about the disease, and 16.8% participants were not sure about the disease. More than half of the participants (53.3%) reported that toxoplasmosis was caused by toxins, 5.3% reported that toxoplasmosis was an animal disease, 13.8% reported that toxoplasmosis was a human disease, 65.8% reported that it was both an animal and human disease, and 15.3% reported that it was neither an animal nor a human disease. Approximately 80.5% of participants reported that individuals acquired toxoplasmosis by changing cat litter. Our study findings revealed a low level of knowledge and awareness about toxoplasmosis among males. Therefore, there should be awareness programs to educate individuals about the risks of this deadly disease and to provide information on the major routes of transmission.
Introduction
Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular protozoan Toxoplasma gondii (1). T. gondii is an obligate intracellular parasite that naturally exists in one of three forms: (1) oocysts, which release sporozoites, are only produced in the small intestines of cats and are released into the environment through their feces; (2) tissue cysts, which release bradyzoites; and (3) tachyzoites, which are the proliferative form (2). Type I, II, and III strains of T. gondii have been identified in Europe, parts of Asia, and US where type II strain is mostly involved in human toxoplasmosis (3). Type I and type III strains are prevalent in Central and South America (4). Approximately 33% of the total human population has been affected by T. gondii (1). Countries in North America, Southeast Asia, Northern Europe, and Saharan African have low prevalence rates (10% to 30%), Central and Southern Europe have moderate prevalence rates (30% to 50%), and tropical African countries and Latin America have high prevalence rates of toxoplasmosis (5). The seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis was 29.45% from Southern Punjab, Pakistan (6). In Pakistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has 40.6% of the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in women with poor obstetric history (7).
In humans, toxoplasmosis is transmitted by consuming raw or inadequately cooked meat (8), by inadvertently ingesting oocysts passed into feces by cats, either in a cat litter box or outdoors in the soil (9), and from mother to her unborn fetus (10). T. gondii infection, which is a life-threatening disease, results in retinal infection in both healthy and immunocompromised individuals (11). In immunocompromised individuals, toxoplasmosis is mostly asymptomatic (12); however, 10% of those infected may develop lymphadenitis, ocular toxoplasmosis (chorioretinitis), and mild flu-like and/or mononucleosis-like symptoms (13).
Due to their non-specificity, the clinical symptoms of toxoplasmosis are not reliable for diagnosis. While traditional diagnostic methods are based on serological tests and bioassays, a variety of molecular methods have been recently used for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis (14). Some of the diagnostic tests for toxoplasmosis include microscopy (15), bioassays (16), dye test (17), modified agglutination test (18), latex agglutination test (19), indirect hemagglutination test (20), indirect fluorescent antibody test (21), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (22), immunosorbent agglutination assay (23), immunochromatographic test (24), piezoelectric immunoagglutination assay (25), Western blot (26), and avidity test (27). Pharmaceutical interventions against toxoplasmosis include either a combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine with folic acid or a combination of pyrimethamine and macrolide antibiotics or lincosamide. For congenital toxoplasmosis, pregnant women are treated with spiramycin (12).
Toxoplasmosis, which affects both animals and humans, causes major economic losses (28). In the livestock sector of Pakistan, different diseases cause annual economic loss of 79 billion Pakistani rupees (PKR) (29). Despite having such significant impact, very few studies have explored the prevalence of toxoplasmosis in Pakistan. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of toxoplasmosis among university students of twin cities, Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan.
Results
Socio-Demographic Characteristics
Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (n = 400). Most of the participants (86%) were females. The majority of the participants (65.5%) were 18 to 25 years of age, 25.5% were 26 to 35 years of age, 5.5% were 36 to 45 years of age. Among the participants, 46.5% were from Punjabi, 15.3% were from Kashmiri, 7.8% were from Pathan, and 8% were from ethnicity. Approximately, 45% of the participants were in a Bachelor's program, 29.3% were in a master's program, 16.8% were in a PhD program.
Table 1
| Variable | Characteristics | Participants (N) | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 18–25 | 262 | 65.5 |
| 26–35 | 102 | 25.5 | |
| 36–45 | 22 | 5.5 | |
| >45 | 14 | 3.5 | |
| Sex | Male | 56 | 14.0 |
| Female | 344 | 86.0 | |
| Ethnicity | Punjabi | 186 | 46.5 |
| Sindhi | 13 | 3.3 | |
| Pathan | 31 | 7.8 | |
| Blochi | 25 | 6.3 | |
| Gilgiti | 32 | 8.0 | |
| Kashmiri | 61 | 15.3 | |
| Islamabad territory | 35 | 8.8 | |
| Other | 17 | 4.3 | |
| Religion | Muslims | 350 | 87.5 |
| Non-muslim | 50 | 12.5 | |
| Marital status | Married | 122 | 30.5 |
| Single | 278 | 69.5 | |
| Education | Bachelors | 180 | 45.0 |
| Master | 117 | 29.3 | |
| Ph.D. | 67 | 16.8 | |
| Post Doc | 36 | 9.0 | |
| Occupation | Farmer (Household livestock) | 68 | 17.0 |
| Worker at livestock facilities | 40 | 10.0 | |
| Other | 292 | 73.0 | |
| Residence | Rural | 142 | 35.5 |
| Urban | 258 | 64.5 | |
| Income per month | <15,000 PKR (including pocket money) | 151 | 37.7 |
| 20,000–30,000 PKR | 86 | 21.5 | |
| >30,000 PKR | 163 | 40.8 | |
| Number of family members | <5 | 79 | 19.8 |
| 5–10 | 295 | 73.8 | |
| 11–15 | 26 | 6.5 |
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants.
Knowledge on Toxoplasmosis
Among the participants, 60% had heard or read about the disease, 23.3% had no knowledge about the disease, and 16.8% were not sure about the disease. We performed Chi square test to assess the relationship among the categorical variables. Out of 400 participants, 53.3% reported that toxoplasmosis was caused by a toxin, 13.8% reported that toxoplasmosis was not caused by a toxin, and 33% had no knowledge on the cause of toxoplasmosis. Only a limited (19.3%) number of participants had been tested for toxoplasmosis, 67.5% of the participants were aware that toxoplasmosis was caused by an infection, and 26.3% reported that they had no knowledge on the causes of toxoplasmosis. The majority (69.8%) of the participants thought that a transmission source was cat feces, and 75.3% were aware that parasites were shed in the feces of infected cats. Approximately 58.5% of the participants reported that toxoplasmosis could be caused by touching raw meat and contaminated soil/sand and 26.8% of the participants had no knowledge about this. A significant number (68%) of participants reported that pregnant women could develop serious complications from toxoplasmosis, and 48.5% reported that the fetus and newborn could develop serious complications from toxoplasmosis. The majority (71.3%) of the participants reported that toxoplasmosis was transmitted from animals to humans, and 64% of the participants believed that toxoplasmosis is symptomatic. Approximately 47.5% of the participants reported that toxoplasmosis could cause miscarriages or stillbirth (Table 2).
Table 2
| Variable | Characteristics | Participants (N) | Frequency (%) | Statistical analysis (Chi Square) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Have you heard or read about toxoplasmosis? | Yes | 240 | 60.0 | X2= 23.449 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 93 | 23.3 | ||
| May be | 67 | 16.8 | ||
| Can bacteria infect animals? | Yes | 355 | 88.8 | X2 = 144.7348 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 14 | 3.5 | ||
| Do not know | 31 | 7.8 | ||
| Is toxoplasmosis caused by a toxin? | Yes | 213 | 53.3 | X2 = 22.8448 df = 2 p = 0.000011 |
| No | 55 | 13.8 | ||
| Do not know | 132 | 33.0 | ||
| Have you ever been tested for toxoplasmosis? | Yes | 77 | 19.3 | X2 = 39.9216 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 323 | 80.8 | ||
| Is toxoplasmosis an infection? | Yes | 270 | 67.5 | X2 = 65.4362 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 25 | 6.3 | ||
| Do not know | 105 | 26.3 | ||
| Is the parasite shed in the feces of infected cats? | Yes | 301 | 75.3 | X2 = 99.0611 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 14 | 3.5 | ||
| Do not know | 85 | 21.3 | ||
| Is the parasite present in raw or undercooked meat? | Yes | 311 | 77.8 | X2 = 103.7767 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 14 | 3.5 | ||
| Do not know | 75 | 18.8 | ||
| Is the parasite present in unpasteurized milk? | Yes | 268 | 67.8 | X2 = 58.9505 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 29 | 7.3 | ||
| Do not know | 98 | 24.8 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by clean up the cat litter box? | Yes | 279 | 69.8 | X2 = 65.1131 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 27 | 6.8 | ||
| Do not know | 94 | 23.5 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis be caused by touching raw meat? | Yes | 235 | 58.8 | X2 = 25.2688 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 58 | 14.5 | ||
| Do not know | 107 | 26.8 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by touching sand/soil in the garden or yard? | Yes | 224 | 56.0 | X2 = 26.4293 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 52 | 13.0 | ||
| Do not know | 124 | 31.0 | ||
| Do pregnant women develop serious complications from toxoplasmosis? | Yes | 272 | 68.0 | X2 = 87.0261 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 15 | 3.8 | ||
| Do not know | 113 | 28.2 | ||
| Do unborn and/or newborn children develop serious complications from toxoplasmosis? | Yes | 251 | 62.7 | X2 = 57.6997 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 27 | 6.8 | ||
| Do not know | 122 | 30.5 | ||
| Does toxoplasmosis in a pregnant women cause fever and flu-like symptoms? | Yes | 194 | 48.5 | X2 = 42.8536 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 33 | 8.3 | ||
| Do not Know | 173 | 43.3 | ||
| Does toxoplasmosis in pregnant women cause swollen glands? | Yes | 160 | 40.0 | X2 = 46.3457 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 31 | 7.8 | ||
| Do not know | 209 | 52.3 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis in pregnant women cause no symptoms? | Yes | 153 | 38.3 | X2 = 11.4422 df = 2 p = 0.003276 |
| No | 71 | 17.8 | ||
| Do not know | 176 | 44.0 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis be transferred from a pregnant woman to her fetus if she became infected during her pregnancy? | Yes | 186 | 46.5 | X2 = 17.4235 df = 2 p = 0.000165 |
| No | 60 | 15.0 | ||
| Do not know | 154 | 38.5 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis be transferred from a pregnant woman to her fetus if she became infected before her pregnancy? | Yes | 164 | 41.0 | X2 = 10.0036 df = 2 p = 0.006726 |
| No | 74 | 18.5 | ||
| Do not know | 162 | 40.5 | ||
| Can an infant with toxoplasmosis with no signs of illness at birth develop illness later in life? | Yes | 218 | 54.5 | X2 = 40.3357 df = 2 p = 0.00001 |
| No | 36 | 9.0 | ||
| Do not know | 146 | 36.5 | ||
| Can an infant with toxoplasmosis be treated with medicine? | Yes | 209 | 52.3 | X2 = 49.4146 df = 2 p = 0.00001 |
| No | 29 | 7.2 | ||
| Do not know | 162 | 40.5 | ||
| In which stage of gestation is toxoplasmosis highly severe? | First | 31 | 7.8 | X2 = 38.1639 df = 3 p = 0.00001 |
| Second | 56 | 14.0 | ||
| Third | 117 | 29.3 | ||
| Do not know | 196 | 49.0 | ||
| Are you aware that pregnant women should not smoke? | Yes | 317 | 79.3 | X2 = 96.641 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 19 | 4.8 | ||
| Do not know | 64 | 16.0 | ||
| Can women who have toxoplasmosis before they get pregnant transmit it to the baby? | Yes | 195 | 48.8 | X2 = 15.8341 df = 2 p = 0.000364 |
| No | 64 | 16.0 | ||
| Do not know | 141 | 35.3 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis be treated in pregnant women? | Yes | 248 | 62.0 | X2 = 60.5088 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 25 | 6.3 | ||
| Do not know | 127 | 31.8 | ||
| Do infants with toxoplasmosis develop vision problems? | Yes | 238 | 59.5 | X2 = 48.0302 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 32 | 8.0 | ||
| Do not know | 130 | 32.5 | ||
| Should cat litter be replaced daily? | Yes | 283 | 70.8 | X2 = 59.0899 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 33 | 8.3 | ||
| Do not know | 84 | 21.0 | ||
| Can pregnant women avoid toxoplasmosis by consuming thoroughly cooked meat? | Yes | 263 | 65.8 | X2 = 57.3761 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 29 | 7.2 | ||
| Do not know | 108 | 27.0 | ||
| Can individuals avoid toxoplasmosis by washing and peeling all fruits and vegetables before consumption? | Yes | 270 | 67.5 | X2 = 59.3376 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 29 | 7.2 | ||
| Do not know | 101 | 25.3 | ||
| Which is the diagnostic method of toxoplasmosis in the fetus? | Ultrasound | 244 | 61.0 | X2 = 23.6343 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| CT Scan | 77 | 19.3 | ||
| Do not know | 79 | 19.8 | ||
| Toxoplasma gondii is a | Bacterium | 37 | 9.3 | X2 = 125.594 df = 5 p = 5 |
| Virus | 46 | 11.5 | ||
| Parasite | 221 | 55.3 | ||
| Fungi | 7 | 1.8 | ||
| Insect | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| I am not sure | 88 | 22.0 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis be transmitted from animals to humans? | Yes | 285 | 71.3 | X2 = 88.1145 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 16 | 4.0 | ||
| Do not know | 99 | 24.8 | ||
| Is toxoplasmosis associated with symptoms? | Yes | 256 | 64.0 | X2 = 37.3477 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 47 | 11.8 | ||
| Do not know | 97 | 24.3 | ||
| Does toxoplasmosis affect only pregnant women? | Yes | 154 | 38.5 | X2 = 13.9087 df = 2 p = 0.000954 |
| No | 180 | 45.0 | ||
| Do not know | 66 | 16.5 | ||
| Does toxoplasmosis cause miscarriage or stillbirth? | Yes | 190 | 47.5 | X2 = 10.4531 df = 2 p = 0.005372 |
| No | 76 | 19.0 | ||
| Do not know | 134 | 33.5 |
Knowledge of toxoplasmosis.
Attitudes Toward Toxoplasmosis
Among the participants, 5.3% believed that toxoplasmosis was an animal disease, 13.8% thought that toxoplasmosis was a human disease, 65.8% thought it was both an animal and human disease, and 15.3% thought it was not either of them. Most of the participants (87.3%) routinely washed their hands after gardening. Approximately, 85.8% of the participants washed their hands after changing the cat litter and after handling raw meat. Most of the participants (89%) cooked meat wel-prior to consumption, and 86.3% avoided raw milk. A significant number of participants (86.5%) reported consuming untreated water, and the majority (80%) of the participants considered toxoplasmosis to be a dangerous disease. A small number (33.5%) of participants had consumed undercooked meat, and 64.5% had direct contact with cats. Approximately, 56.7% of participants had attended training related to livestock. A significant number (83%) of participants supported initiatives for the control of toxoplasmosis. There were no significant differences in the results when asked how health should be ensured when buying or receiving new livestock. Approximately 55% of the participants thought that toxoplasmosis-suspected cases should seek the advice of healthcare providers (Table 3).
Table 3
| Variable | Characteristics | Participants (N) | Frequency (%) | Statistical analysis (Chi Square) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is your perception about toxoplasmosis? | Serious animal disease | 21 | 5.3 | X2 = 67.7315 df = 3 p < 0.00001 |
| Serious human disease | 55 | 13.8 | ||
| Both | 263 | 65.8 | ||
| None | 61 | 15.3 | ||
| Do you routinely wash your hands after gardening? | Yes | 349 | 87.3 | X2 = 68.8634 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 51 | 12.7 | ||
| Do you routinely wash your hands after changing the cat litter box? | Yes | 343 | 85.8 | X2 = 60.7863 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 57 | 14.2 | ||
| Do you routinely wash your hands after handling raw meat? | Yes | 343 | 85.8 | X2 = 60.7863 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 57 | 14.2 | ||
| Do you thoroughly cook meat before consumption? | Yes | 356 | 89.0 | X2 = 79.7086 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 44 | 11.0 | ||
| Do you avoid consuming raw milk? | Yes | 345 | 86.3 | X2 = 63.3665 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 55 | 13.7 | ||
| Do you avoid consuming untreated water? | Yes | 346 | 86.5 | X2 = 64.6975 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 54 | 13.5 | ||
| Is toxoplasmosis dangerous? | Yes | 320 | 80.0 | X2 = 89.0025 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 26 | 6.5 | ||
| Do not know | 54 | 13.5 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis be transmitted by consuming inadequately washed vegetables and undercooked meat? | Yes | 308 | 77.0 | X2 = 71.8426 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 35 | 8.8 | ||
| Do not know | 57 | 14.2 | ||
| Do you consume undercooked meat? | Yes | 134 | 33.5 | X2 = 9.3647 df = 1 p = 0.002212 |
| No | 266 | 66.5 | ||
| Do you have direct contact with a cat? | Yes | 258 | 64.5 | X2 = 7.1107 df = 1 p = 0.007662 |
| No | 142 | 35.5 | ||
| Are fruits and vegetables in contact with cat feces? | Yes | 200 | 50.0 | X2 = 8.8076 df = 2 p = 0.012231 |
| No | 110 | 27.5 | ||
| Do not know | 90 | 22.5 | ||
| Do you wash kitchen utensils after contact with raw meat and unwashed fruits and vegetables? | Yes | 327 | 81.8 | X2 = 43.4781 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 73 | 18.2 | ||
| Do you wear personal protective equipment while handling your cat? | Yes | 258 | 64.5 | X2 = 7.1107 df = 1 p = 0.007662 |
| No | 142 | 35.5 | ||
| Have you attended any training, awareness session or workshop related to livestock? | Yes | 173 | 43.3 | X2 = 1.4752 df = 1 p = 0.224526 not significant |
| No | 227 | 56.7 | ||
| Will you support any initiative to control toxoplasmosis? | Yes | 332 | 83.0 | X2 = 48.3184 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 68 | 17.0 | ||
| Does toxoplasmosis affect the production of livestock? | Yes | 281 | 70.3 | X2 = 55.2524 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 36 | 9.0 | ||
| Do not know | 83 | 20.7 | ||
| How can health be ensured when buying or receiving new livestock? | Seek veterinary advice | 139 | 34.8 | X2 = 6.0507 df = 3 p = 0.109168 not significant |
| Rely on own experience | 68 | 17.0 | ||
| Acquire from known and/or trusted people | 111 | 27.7 | ||
| None | 82 | 20.5 | ||
| What should an individual with suspected toxoplasmosis do? | Pray | 34 | 8.5 | X2 = 37.2797 df = 3 p < 0.00001 |
| Visit health facility | 220 | 55.0 | ||
| Consuming herbal products | 66 | 16.5 | ||
| Visit local chemist and acquire medicine | 80 | 20.0 |
Attitudes toward toxoplasmosis.
Practices Toward Toxoplasmosis
Most of the participants (71%) fed their cats dry or commercial cat food and did not let their cats kill and eat rodents. Approximately, 61.8% of the participants reported that they avoided stray cats, and 70% of the participants did not allow someone else change the cat litter box. A significant number (83.3%) of participants boiled milk before consumption, and 87.8% ensured their houses were free of waste. Most participants (86.5%) kept foods covered in containers, and 78.3% separated sick animals from healthy ones. A significant number (72.8%) of participants used protective clothes while handling livestock (Table 4).
Table 4
| Variable | Characteristics | Participants (N) | Frequency (%) | Statistical analysis (Chi Square) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Do you feed your cat dry or commercial food and not let it kill and eat rodents? | Yes | 284 | 71.0 | X2 = 15.9079 df = 1 p = 0.000066 |
| No | 116 | 29.0 | ||
| Do you avoid stray cats? | Yes | 247 | 61.8 | X2 = 4.5799 df = 1 p = 0.03235 |
| No | 153 | 38.2 | ||
| Do you let someone else change the cat litter box? | Yes | 280 | 70.0 | X2 = 14.2602 df = 1 p = 0.000159 |
| No | 120 | 30.0 | ||
| Do you change the cat litter box daily? | Yes | 323 | 80.8 | X2 = 39.9216 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 77 | 19.2 | ||
| Do you have a vegetable garden at home? | Yes | 275 | 68.8 | X2 = 12.3626 df = 1 p = 0.000438 |
| No | 125 | 31.2 | ||
| Do you boil milk before consumption? | Yes | 333 | 83.3 | X2 = 49.3434 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 67 | 16.7 | ||
| Do you ensure that your house is free of waste? | Yes | 351 | 87.8 | X2 = 71.7934 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 49 | 12.2 | ||
| Do you store food in covered containers? | Yes | 346 | 86.5 | X2 = 64.6975 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 54 | 13.5 | ||
| Do you keep newly purchased animals in quarantine for some time? | Yes | 236 | 59.0 | X2 = 2.6469 df = 1 p = 0.103753 not significant |
| No | 164 | 41.0 | ||
| Do you separate sick animals from healthy animals? | Yes | 313 | 78.3 | X2 = 32.0952 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 87 | 21.7 | ||
| Do you use any kind of protective clothing while handling livestock? | Yes | 291 | 72.8 | X2 = 19.0916 df = 1 p = 0.000012 |
| No | 109 | 27.2 |
Practices toward toxoplasmosis.
Risk Factors Associated With Toxoplasmosis
A significant number (80.5%) of participants thought that individuals could acquire toxoplasmosis by changing the cat litter, and 76.8% of participants responded that individuals could acquire toxoplasmosis by consuming raw/undercooked meat. Most participants (72.5%) believed that individuals could get toxoplasmosis by consuming raw milk, while 14.2% were not aware of this. Among the participants, 69.5% considered blood transfusion to be cause of toxoplasmosis, 13.7% considered that blood transfusion was not a cause of toxoplasmosis, and 16.8% had no knowledge about this. A significant number (68.3%) of participants thought toxoplasmosis could be transmitted by gardening without gloves. Among the participants, 47% believed that immunocompromised, pregnant women were at high risk of toxoplasmosis, 20.3% believed that pregnant women had a moderate risk of toxoplasmosis, 6.5% people reported that pregnant women had a low risk of toxoplasmosis, and 26.2% had no knowledge (Table 5).
Table 5
| Variable | Characteristics | Participants (N) | Frequency (%) | Statistical analysis (Chi Square) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by changing cat litter? | Yes | 322 | 80.5 | X2 = 39.073 df = 1 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 78 | 19.5 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by consuming raw/undercooked meat? | Yes | 307 | 76.8 | X2 = 67.7466 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 43 | 10.7 | ||
| Do not know | 50 | 12.5 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by consuming raw milk? | Yes | 290 | 72.5 | X2 = 52.0668 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 53 | 13.3 | ||
| Do not know | 57 | 14.2 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by consuming raw vegetables? | Yes | 276 | 69.0 | X2 = 41.6118 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 63 | 15.8 | ||
| Do not know | 61 | 15.2 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis through blood transfusions? | Yes | 278 | 69.5 | X2 = 43.5633 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 55 | 13.7 | ||
| Do not know | 67 | 16.8 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by consuming untreated water? | Yes | 286 | 71.5 | X2 = 48.9029 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 55 | 13.7 | ||
| Do not know | 59 | 14.8 | ||
| Can individuals acquire toxoplasmosis by gardening without gloves? | Yes | 273 | 68.3 | X2 = 40.4536 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 56 | 14.0 | ||
| Do not know | 71 | 17.7 | ||
| What is the risk level of toxoplasmosis among immunocompromised, pregnant women? | High | 188 | 47.0 | X2 = 36.8318 df = 3 p < 0.00001 |
| Medium | 81 | 20.3 | ||
| Low | 26 | 6.5 | ||
| Do not know | 105 | 26.2 |
Risk factors of toxoplasmosis.
One Health Knowledge of Toxoplasmosis
The majority (61.5%) of the participants knew about One Health, and 14% had no knowledge about One Health. Approximately 60.3% of participants knew about zoonosis, 26.5% were not aware of zoonosis, and 13.2% of participants were not sure about the concept of zoonosis. Out of 400 participants, 232 (58%) knew that toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic infection, and 18 participants (4.5%) had no knowledge on this. Only 8.8% of participants reported that toxoplasmosis was present in humans, 11% people reported that toxoplasmosis was present in livestock, 62.7% reported that toxoplasmosis was present in both humans and livestock, while 17.5% were not sure about this. Among the participants, 37.3% thought that toxoplasmosis causes blindness, 23.2% thought that toxoplasmosis did not cause blindness, and 39.5% were not sure about this (Table 6).
Table 6
| Variable | Characteristics | Participants (N) | Frequency (%) | Statistical analysis (Chi Square) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Do you know about one health? | Yes | 246 | 61.5 | X2 = 29.2344 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 56 | 14.0 | ||
| Not sure | 98 | 24.5 | ||
| Do you have knowledge on zoonosis? | Yes | 241 | 60.3 | X2 = 29.381 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 106 | 26.5 | ||
| Not sure | 53 | 13.2 | ||
| Is toxoplasmosis a zoonotic disease? | Yes | 232 | 58.0 | X2 = 72.8102 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 18 | 4.5 | ||
| Not sure | 150 | 37.5 | ||
| How is toxoplasmosis transmitted? | Soil | 10 | 2.5 | X2 = 93.52 df = 5 p = 0 |
| Water | 12 | 3.0 | ||
| Livestock | 56 | 14.0 | ||
| a and b | 21 | 5.3 | ||
| a and c | 224 | 56 | ||
| Not sure | 77 | 19.2 | ||
| Which organisms does toxoplasmosis affect? | Human | 35 | 8.8 | X2 = 51.988 df = 3 p < 0.00001 |
| Livestock | 44 | 11.0 | ||
| Both human and livestock | 251 | 62.7 | ||
| Not sure | 70 | 17.5 | ||
| Does toxoplasmosis go away? | Yes | 211 | 52.8 | X2 = 54.5757 df = 2 p < 0.00001 |
| No | 26 | 6.5 | ||
| Not sure | 163 | 40.7 | ||
| Can toxoplasmosis-infected individuals go blind? | Yes | 149 | 37.3 | X2 = 4.1335 df = 2 p = 0.126594 not significant |
| No | 93 | 23.2 | ||
| Not sure | 158 | 39.5 |
One health knowledge about toxoplasmosis among participants.
Association Among Different Variables Based on ANOVA
We used one-way ANOVA to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences among the means of three or more independent groups. We used six specific independent variables, i.e., age, sex, ethnicity, education, religion, and marital status, and five dependent variables, i.e., knowledge, attitudes, practices, risk factors, and One Health. Our ANOVA results revealed that age was associated (p < 0.05) with attitudes and One Health; however, there were no significant associations with sex. Ethnicity was associated (p < 0.05) with knowledge and One Health; religion was associated (p < 0.05) with One health; and marital status was associated (p < 0.05) with knowledge, attitudes, risk factors, and One health. Likewise, the education of the participants was associated (p < 0.05) with knowledge, risk factors, and One Health (Table 7).
Table 7
| Variable | Knowledge | Attitude | Practices | Risk factors | One health | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | SE | P-value | M | SD | SE | P-value | M | SD | SE | P-value | M | SD | SE | P-value | M | SD | SE | P-value | |
| Age (in years) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 18–25 | 18.48 | 9.00 | 0.556 | 0.097 | 13.26 | 3.44 | 0.212 | 0.009 | 8.33 | 2.60 | 0.161 | 0.090 | 5.46 | 2.70 | 0.167 | 0.472 | 3.59 | 2.42 | 0.150 | 0.006 |
| 26–35 | 21.04 | 9.38 | 0.929 | 13.24 | 3.90 | 0.386 | 8.25 | 2.73 | 0.270 | 5.87 | 2.78 | 0.275 | 4.37 | 2.57 | 0.255 | |||||
| 36–45 | 20.36 | 10.97 | 2.339 | 11.27 | 4.76 | 1.015 | 7.09 | 3.94 | 0.840 | 5.59 | 3.26 | 0.695 | 4.18 | 2.84 | 0.605 | |||||
| above 45 | 21.00 | 11.57 | 3.092 | 10.71 | 5.06 | 1.352 | 7.07 | 3.54 | 0.946 | 4.86 | 3.51 | 0.937 | 5.36 | 2.92 | 0.782 | |||||
| Gender | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Female | 19.38 | 9.37 | 0.505 | 0.769 | 13.15 | 3.68 | 0.198 | 0.219 | 8.30 | 2.69 | 0.145 | 0.060 | 5.60 | 2.73 | 0.147 | 0.414 | 3.92 | 2.50 | 0.135 | 0.441 |
| Male | 18.98 | 9.27 | 1.239 | 12.48 | 4.09 | 0.547 | 7.55 | 3.17 | 0.424 | 5.27 | 3.11 | 0.416 | 3.64 | 2.76 | 0.369 | |||||
| Ethnicity | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Islamabad territory | 22.14 | 7.87 | 1.330 | 0.009 | 13.66 | 3.23 | 0.545 | 0.313 | 8.66 | 2.62 | 0.443 | 0.664 | 6.40 | 2.45 | 0.414 | 0.220 | 4.74 | 2.33 | 0.394 | <0.001 |
| Kashmiri | 16.62 | 7.75 | 0.993 | 12.82 | 4.08 | 0.522 | 8.11 | 2.07 | 0.266 | 4.87 | 2.60 | 0.333 | 2.82 | 1.94 | 0.248 | |||||
| Punjabi | 19.13 | 9.40 | 0.689 | 13.44 | 3.31 | 0.243 | 8.25 | 2.56 | 0.188 | 5.77 | 2.67 | 0.196 | 3.93 | 2.61 | 0.192 | |||||
| Blochi | 20.12 | 11.81 | 2.362 | 11.60 | 5.16 | 1.031 | 7.64 | 3.85 | 0.770 | 5.48 | 3.51 | 0.703 | 4.80 | 2.69 | 0.539 | |||||
| Gilgiti | 23.47 | 9.48 | 1.676 | 12.59 | 4.25 | 0.751 | 7.81 | 3.59 | 0.634 | 5.25 | 3.03 | 0.535 | 5.22 | 2.38 | 0.421 | |||||
| Other | 15.35 | 7.87 | 1.908 | 12.53 | 2.60 | 0.631 | 8.29 | 1.53 | 0.371 | 5.29 | 2.20 | 0.534 | 2.35 | 1.62 | 0.392 | |||||
| Pathan | 19.03 | 10.64 | 1.911 | 12.68 | 4.63 | 0.831 | 7.87 | 4.04 | 0.725 | 5.10 | 3.40 | 0.611 | 3.32 | 2.68 | 0.481 | |||||
| Sindhi | 21.31 | 7.28 | 2.020 | 12.54 | 3.45 | 0.958 | 9.23 | 1.48 | 0.411 | 5.54 | 2.63 | 0.730 | 4.23 | 2.20 | 0.611 | |||||
| Religion | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Muslim | 18.93 | 9.40 | 0.503 | 0.024 | 13.02 | 3.72 | 0.199 | 0.646 | 8.09 | 2.77 | 0.148 | 0.048 | 5.55 | 2.77 | 0.148 | 0.935 | 3.77 | 2.52 | 0.135 | 0.013 |
| Non-muslim | 22.10 | 8.49 | 1.201 | 13.28 | 3.96 | 0.560 | 8.92 | 2.65 | 0.375 | 5.52 | 2.93 | 0.414 | 4.72 | 2.47 | 0.349 | |||||
| Marital status | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Married | 21.54 | 9.85 | 0.891 | 0.002 | 12.43 | 4.49 | 0.406 | 0.026 | 8.20 | 2.99 | 0.271 | 0.997 | 6.00 | 2.75 | 0.249 | 0.032 | 4.69 | 2.53 | 0.229 | <0.001 |
| Single | 18.35 | 8.96 | 0.537 | 13.33 | 3.34 | 0.200 | 8.20 | 2.67 | 0.160 | 5.35 | 2.78 | 0.167 | 3.53 | 2.46 | 0.147 | |||||
| Qualification | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Bachelors | 16.33 | 8.43 | 0.629 | <0.001 | 12.89 | 3.83 | 0.285 | 0.565 | 8.31 | 2.57 | 0.192 | 0.870 | 5.02 | 2.72 | 0.203 | 0.005 | 3.07 | 2.22 | 0.166 | <0.001 |
| Masters | 20.21 | 9.70 | 0.896 | 12.91 | 3.82 | 0.353 | 8.04 | 2.80 | 0.259 | 5.84 | 2.72 | 0.252 | 3.98 | 2.65 | 0.245 | |||||
| Ph.D | 22.85 | 8.79 | 1.074 | 13.58 | 3.54 | 0.433 | 8.13 | 3.08 | 0.376 | 6.15 | 2.84 | 0.346 | 4.99 | 2.42 | 0.296 | |||||
| Post doc | 24.83 | 8.42 | 1.404 | 13.33 | 3.46 | 0.576 | 8.25 | 3.06 | 0.511 | 6.17 | 2.79 | 0.465 | 5.58 | 2.22 | 0.370 | |||||
Association between demographic characteristics and knowledge, attitude, practices, one health, and risk factors (ANOVA).
Statistical Analysis Using Log-Linear Regression
Log-linear regression analysis involves using a dependent variable measured by frequency counts with categorical or continuous independent predictor variable. Log-linear analysis is a technique used in statistics to examine the relationship between more than two categorical variables. The technique is used for both hypothesis testing and model building. In this study, we used the independent variables age, gender, ethnicity, education, religion, and marital status and the dependent variables knowledge, attitudes, practices, risk factors, and One Health. We applied log-linear regression on age and the dependent variables and obtained different p-values, rate ratios, and R2McF. Mostly high R2McF values represent goodness of fit. With the dependent variable knowledge, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 18.48, and an R2McF value of 0.0124. With attitude as the dependent variable, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 13.256, and an R2McF value of 0.0241. With the dependent variable practices, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 8.332, and an R2McF value 0.0119. With risk factors, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 5.458, and an R2McF value of 0.00430. Finally, with One Health, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 3.59, and an R2McF value of 0.0220. The highest and lowest R2McF values were obtained for attitudes and risk factors, respectively.
We applied a log-linear regression on the independent variable gender and the dependent variables. With knowledge, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 19.378, and an R2McF value of 1.73e-4. With attitudes, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 13.145, and an R2McF value of 0.00307. With practices, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 8.302, and an R2McF value of 0.00633. With risk factors, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 5.596, and an R2McF value of 0.00115. With One Health, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 3.924, and an R2McF value of 0.00113. The highest and lowest R2McF values were obtained for knowledge and One Health, respectively.
We applied log-linear regression on the independent variable ethnicity and the dependent variables. With knowledge, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 22.143, and an R2McF value of 0.0367. With attitudes, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 13.657, and an R2McF value of 0.0168. With practices, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 8.657, and an R2McF value of 0.00868. With risk factors, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 6.400, and an R2McF value of 0.0161. With One Health, we obtained p < 0.001, a rate ratio of 4.743, and an R2McF value of 0.0672. The highest and lowest R2McF values were for One Health and practices, respectively (Table 8).
Table 8
| Knowledge | Attitude | Practices | Risk factor | One health | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | 95% CI (Lower–upper) | Rate ratio | P | R2McF | 95% CI (Lower–upper) | Rate ratio | P | R2McF | 95% CI (Lower–upper) | Rate ratio | P | R2McF | 95% CI (Lower–upper) | Rate ratio | P | R2McF | 95% CI (Lower–upper) | Rate ratio | P | R2McF |
| Intercept | Lower 2.8884 Upper 2.945 | 18.48 | <0.001 | Lower 2.5512 Upper 2.6177 | 13.256 | <0.001 | Lower 2.0782 Upper 2.16206 | 8.332 | <0.001 | Lower 1.6453 Upper 1.749 | 5.458 | <0.001 | Lower 1.2147 Upper 1.342 | 3.59 | <0.001 | |||||
| Age (in years) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 26–35–18–25 | Lower 0.0790 Upper 0.181 | 1.14 | <0.001 | 0.0124 | Lower −0.0644 Upper −0.0613 | 0.998 | 0.962 | 0.0241 | Lower −0.0900 Upper 0.06905 | 0.990 | 0.796 | 0.0119 | Lower −0.0222 Upper 0.169 | 1.076 | 0.133 | 0.00430 | Lower 0.0841 Upper 0.309 | 1.22 | <0.001 | 0.0220 |
| 36–45–18–25 | Lower 4.33e-4 Upper 0.194 | 1.10 | 0.049 | Lower −0.2909 Upper −0.0332 | 0.850 | 0.014 | Lower −0.3237 Upper 0.00114 | 0.851 | 0.052 | Lower −0.1601 Upper 0.208 | 1.024 | 0.798 | Lower −0.0619 Upper 0.366 | 1.16 | 0.164 | |||||
| Above 45–18–25 | Lower 0.0103 Upper 0.246 | 1.14 | 0.033 | Lower −0.3763 Upper −0.0494 | 0.808 | 0.011 | Lower −0.3654 Upper 0.03735 | 0.849 | 0.110 | Lower −0.3599 Upper 0.127 | 0.890 | 0.347 | Lower 0.1647 Upper 0.635 | 1.49 | <0.001 | |||||
| Intercept | Lower 2.9401 Upper 2.9881 | 19.378 | <0.001 | Lower 2.547 Upper 2.6052 | 13.145 | <0.001 | Lower 2.080 Upper 2.15321 | 8.302 | <0.001 | Lower 1.677 Upper 1.7667 | 5.596 | <0.001 | Lower 1.314 Upper 1.4206 | 3.924 | <0.001 | |||||
| Gender | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Male–female | Lower −0.0854 Upper 0.0441 | 0.980 | 0.532 | 1.73e-4 | Lower −0.131 Upper 0.0279 | 0.950 | 0.203 | 0.00307 | Lower −0.197 Upper 0.00759 | 0.910 | 0.070 | 0.00633 | Lower −0.183 Upper 0.0621 | 0.941 | 0.334 | 0.00115 | Lower −0.222 Upper 0.0728 | 0.928 | 0.322 | 0.00113 |
| Intercept | Lower 3.0271 Upper 3.1679 | 22.143 | <0.001 | Lower 2.525 Upper 2.7039 | 13.657 | <0.001 | Lower 2.046 Upper 2.2710 | 8.657 | <0.001 | Lower 1.725 Upper 1.98725 | 6.400 | <0.001 | Lower 1.405 Upper 1.7088 | 4.743 | <0.001 | |||||
| Ethnicity | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Kashmiri–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.3802 Upper −0.1932 | 0.751 | <0.001 | 0.0367 | Lower −0.177 Upper 0.0505 | 0.939 | 0.276 | 0.0168 | Lower −0.208 Upper 0.0783 | 0.937 | 0.375 | 0.00868 | Lower −0.447 Upper −0.09999 | 0.761 | 0.002 | 0.0161 | Lower −0.733 Upper −0.3068 | 0.595 | <0.001 | 0.0672 |
| Punjabi–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.2240 Upper −0.0686 | 0.864 | <0.001 | Lower −0.114 Upper 0.0815 | 0.984 | 0.743 | Lower −0.171 Upper 0.0754 | 0.953 | 0.447 | Lower −0.247 Upper 0.04107 | 0.902 | 0.161 | Lower −0.356 Upper −0.0195 | 0.829 | 0.029 | |||||
| Blochi–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.2080 Upper 0.0164 | 0.909 | 0.094 | Lower −0.309 Upper −0.0174 | 0.849 | 0.028 | Lower −0.306 Upper 0.0561 | 0.883 | 0.176 | Lower −0.368 Upper 0.05738 | 0.856 | 0.152 | Lower −0.223 Upper 0.2468 | 1.012 | 0.920 | |||||
| Gilgiti–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.0422 Upper 0.1585 | 1.060 | 0.256 | Lower −0.214 Upper 0.0515 | 0.922 | 0.231 | Lower −0.270 Upper 0.0648 | 0.902 | 0.230 | Lower −0.398 Upper 0.00197 | 0.820 | 0.052 | Lower −0.119 Upper 0.3104 | 1.100 | 0.383 | |||||
| 0ther–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.5065 Upper −0.2259 | 0.693 | <0.001 | Lower −0.248 Upper 0.0753 | 0.917 | 0.295 | Lower −0.243 Upper 0.1570 | 0.958 | 0.674 | Lower −0.434 Upper 0.05490 | 0.827 | 0.129 | Lower −1.046 Upper −0.3558 | 0.496 | <0.001 | |||||
| Pathan–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.2585 Upper −0.0443 | 0.860 | 0.006 | Lower −0.208 Upper 0.0590 | 0.928 | 0.274 | Lower −0.264 Upper 0.0734 | 0.909 | 0.268 | Lower −0.431 Upper −0.02407 | 0.796 | 0.028 | Lower −0.602 Upper −0.1101 | 0.701 | 0.005 | |||||
| Sindhi–Islamabad territory | Lower −0.1757 Upper 0.0988 | 0.962 | 0.583 | Lower −0.263 Upper 0.0923 | 0.918 | 0.346 | Lower −0.147 Upper 0.2756 | 1.066 | 0.552 | Lower −0.410 Upper 0.12094 | 0.865 | 0.286 | Lower −0.419 Upper 0.1907 | 0.892 | 0.463 | |||||
| Intercept | Lower 2.9164 Upper 2.965 | 18.93 | <0.001 | Lower 2.5375 Upper 2.596 | 13.02 | <0.001 | Lower 2.05433 Upper 2.128 | 8.09 | <0.001 | Lower 1.670 Upper 1.759 | 5.554 | <0.001 | Lower 1.2720 Upper 1.380 | 3.77 | <0.001 | |||||
| Religion | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-muslim–Muslim | Lower 0.0914 Upper 0.219 | 1.17 | <0.001 | 0.00967 | Lower −0.0616 Upper 0.101 | 1.02 | 0.634 | 4.21e-4 | Lower −0.00271 Upper 0.197 | 1.10 | 0.057 | 0.00668 | Lower −0.132 Upper 0.120 | 0.994 | 0.923 | 1.13e-5 | Lower 0.0873 Upper 0.364 | 1.25 | 0.001 | 0.0110 |
| Intercept | Lower 3.032 Upper 3.108 | 21.541 | <0.001 | Lower 2.4695 Upper 2.570 | 12.43 | <0.001 | Lower 2.0418 Upper 2.1657 | 8.20 | <0.001 | Lower 1.719 Upper 1.8642 | 6.000 | <0.001 | Lower 1.463 Upper 1.627 | 4.689 | <0.001 | |||||
| Marital status | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single–married | Lower −0.207 Upper −0.113 | 0.852 | <0.001 | 0.0193 | Lower 0.0103 Upper 0.130 | 1.07 | 0.022 | 0.00993 | Lower −0.0742 Upper 0.0745 | 1.00 | 0.997 | 2.44e-8 | Lower −0.203 Upper −0.0257 | 0.892 | 0.011 | 0.00766 | Lower −0.386 Upper −0.180 | 0.753 | <0.001 | 0.0320 |
| Intercept | Lower 2.757 Upper 2.829 | 16.33 | <0.001 | Lower 2.5161 Upper 2.5975 | 12.89 | <0.001 | Lower 2.067 Upper 2.1683 | 8.311 | <0.001 | Lower 1.5475 Upper 1.678 | 5.02 | <0.001 | Lower 1.039 Upper 1.206 | 3.07 | <0.001 | |||||
| Qualification | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Masters–bachelors | Lower 0.159 Upper 0.267 | 1.24 | <0.001 | 0.0816 | Lower −0.0639 Upper 0.0657 | 1.00 | 0.978 | 0.00406 | Lower−0.114 Upper 0.0487 | 0.968 | 0.430 | 0.00126 | Lower 0.0522 Upper 0.251 | 1.16 | 0.003 | 0.0216 | Lower 0.136 Upper 0.383 | 1.30 | <0.001 | 0.0861 |
| Ph.D–bachelors | Lower 0.274 Upper 0.398 | 1.40 | <0.001 | Lower −0.0247 Upper 0.1286 | 1.05 | 0.184 | Lower −0.120 Upper 0.0766 | 0.979 | 0.667 | Lower 0.0870 Upper 0.320 | 1.23 | <0.001 | Lower 0.348 Upper 0.620 | 1.62 | <0.001 | |||||
| Post doc–bachelors | Lower 0.344 Upper 0.494 | 1.52 | <0.001 | Lower −0.0648 Upper 0.1317 | 1.03 | 0.504 | Lower −0.132 Upper 0.1171 | 0.993 | 0.908 | Lower 0.0596 Upper 0.353 | 1.23 | 0.006 | Lower 0.436 Upper 0.759 | 1.82 | <0.001 | |||||
Association between demographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, practices, one health, and risk factors (log-linear regression).
Discussion
Toxoplasmosis is a major global zoonotic disease that has a deleterious effect on human health, with severe consequences in immunocompromised, pregnant women (10). Consumption of contaminated raw meat, water, fruits, and vegetables; contact with cats; and exposure to soil contaminated with cat feces are the main transmission routes (11). Out of 400 participants, 240 (60%) were aware of toxoplasmosis. Similar findings have been reported in Northeast Ethiopia (1).
Our study findings revealed that 87.3 and 85.5% of participants washed their hands after gardening and changing the cat litter, respectively. Additionally, 89% of participants thoroughly cooked meat prior to consumption, and 86.3% avoided drinking raw milk. A study from Ethiopia reported that among pregnant women, 77.6% washed their hands after gardening, 64.7% washed their hands after changing the cat litter, and 62.2% washed their hands after handling raw meat. Furthermore, 85.9% of the pregnant women reported that they did not avoid drinking untreated water (1). In our study, 80% of participants considered toxoplasmosis to be a dangerous disease, and 33.5% reported that they had not consumed undercooked meat. In contrast, a study reported that 51.4% of participants did not consider toxoplasmosis to be a severe disease. Additionally, 48% individuals were unsure whether toxoplasmosis was spread via consumption of inadequately washed vegetables (30). Our study showed that 81.8% of participants washed their kitchen utensils after contact with raw meat or unwashed fruits and vegetables. Similar findings were obtained in Brazil, where 24.7% of pregnant women reported washing kitchen utensils (31). Approximately 30% of the participants did not allow anyone else to change the cat litter box. Similar findings have been reported in a study conducted in Northeast Ethiopia where 51.3% women responded that they did not allow someone else to change the cat litter box (1).
Most of the participants (76.8%) reported that toxoplasmosis was acquired by consuming raw/undercooked meat. These findings were consistent with those of a study carried out in Mexico, where more than half of the respondents correctly defined the routes of transmission: (1) consumption of raw or undercooked foods, unwashed fruits and vegetables and (2) direct contact with cats (32). In our study, 69.5% of participants considered blood transfusion to be a cause of toxoplasmosis. In one of the surveys, 27.7% of the participants did not assume that blood transfusion could spread toxoplasmosis, and 38.5% believed that it could be transmitted from the mother to her fetus (33). Approximately 68.3% of participants responded that gardening without gloves could be a transmission source of toxoplasmosis. In a study conducted in the US, 29% of the participants thought that toxoplasmosis could be transmitted by gardening without gloves (34). Our study findings showed that immunocompromised pregnant women had a high risk of toxoplasmosis similar to the findings of Desta who reported there is a high risk of toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised, pregnant women (77.9%) (1). The majority (58%) of participants reported that toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic infection. A previous study reported that 33.82% of participants were aware that toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease (1).
Strength, Limitations, and Future Recommendations
The limited amount of knowledge about toxoplasmosis emphasized to provide and promote health education regarding toxoplasmosis especially awareness regarding transmission of disease in the pregnant women. It is important to improve primary health care system of the country for the better control, management, and prevention of the disease. Moreover, it is stressed that in the study population to commence health education and awareness campaigns for the community and to design relevant policies for the guidance of the government and stakeholders to reduce the risk of disease. In the study design, the use of close questionnaire is one of the limitation, where free form response was not allowed. In our study included the participants from university which is not representative of the situation of whole country. The strength of the study is maximum number of female participants and preliminary study on the knowledge about toxoplasmosis among university students in Pakistan.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in Islamabad and Rawalpindi district of Punjab, Pakistan, also known as twin cities. The terrain consists of plains and mountains in the metropolitan area of Islamabad and Rawalpindi. In the mountainous terrain of Margala hills is the northern part of the metropolitan area, while Rawalpindi is situated on the Pothohar plateau (35).
Participants
The study participants included students from universities of the twin cities that were enrolled in different degree programs (Bachelors, Masters, Ph.D., and Post doc). The sample size was calculated using Raosoft software (http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html; 5% margin of error, 95% confidence level, and 50% response distribution). Four hundred questionnaires were randomly distributed and filled by the participants. We collected data from July through December 2020.
Sample Size
A questionnaire was designed to access the knowledge, attitude, practices, risk factor and one health regarding toxoplasmosis. A total of 400 questionnaires were administrated. The questionnaire was categories into the following sections as demography (n = 17), knowledge (n = 34), attitude (n = 19), practices (n = 11), risk factors (n = 8), and one health (n = 7).
Data Collection
We developed a structured questionnaire to collect the data. After obtaining verbal informed consent from the participants, we conducted interviews. A team was trained for interviews, data collection, and record keeping. A supervisor routinely coordinated the interview process to ensure adequate data collection and record maintenance. The purpose of study was explained to the participants. The questionnaire consisted of six sections. The first section was on the socio-demographics of the participants. The second section was on the knowledge on toxoplasmosis, including common signs, symptoms, and diagnostic tests used for toxoplasmosis. The third section was on the attitudes and perceptions toward toxoplasmosis. The fourth section was on practices performed when toxoplasmosis was either suspected or diagnosed. The fifth section was on major risk factors of the disease, and the sixth section was on One Health questions regarding toxoplasmosis.
Statistical Analysis
We generated a database using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and calculated basic frequencies. We used descriptive statistics to initially analyze the data and classified the variables into independent and dependent variables. We performed statistical analysis using Jamovi software (version 1.6.7; https://www.jamovi.org) to observe the factors involved in the occurrence of toxoplasmosis. The relationship between various factors influencing knowledge, attitudes, and practices was analyzed. For data analysis, we used Chi square test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and log-linear regression.
Conclusions
There is a low level of knowledge and awareness regarding toxoplasmosis among males. Therefore, there should be awareness programs to educate individuals about the risks of this deadly disease and to provide information on the major routes of transmission. Our study highlights the need of toxoplasmosis awareness to reduce the burden and economic impact of the disease.
Funding
This study was supported by the Fifth Round of Three-Year Public Health Action Plan of Shanghai (Grant No. GWV-10.1-XK13 to JC), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81772225 and 81971969 to JC), and the Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China (Grant No. WSBKFKT2017-01). The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of COMSATS University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
HA and KS designed and supervised the study. TM and KS performed the data collection. KS, SS, SA, MA, HA, and JC conducted statistical and data analysis. SN drafted the manuscript. SS and JC performed critical revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Kaleem Imdad and Naseer Shah for their assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- WHO
World Health Organization
- NZDs
Neglected Zoonotic Diseases
- T. gondii
Toxolasma gondii
- DALYs
Disability Adjusted Life Years.
Abbreviations
References
1.
DestaAH. Knowledge, attitude and practice of community towards zoonotic importance of toxoplasma infection in central Afar Region, North East Ethiopia. Int J Biomed Sci Eng. (2015) 3:74–81. 10.11648/j.ijbse.20150306.12
2.
SaadatniaGGolkarM. A review on human toxoplasmosis. Scand J Infect Dis. (2012) 44:805–14. 10.3109/00365548.2012.693197
3.
TavallaMOormazdiHAkhlaghiLShojaeeSRazmjouEHadighiRet al. Genotyping of toxoplasma gondii isolates from soil samples in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Parasitol. (2013) 8:227–33.
4.
StillwaggonECarrierCSSautterMMcLeodR. Maternal serologic screening to prevent congenital toxoplasmosis: a decision-analytic economic model. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis. (2011) 5:e1333. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001333
5.
Robert-GangneuxFDardéML. Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2012) 25:264–96. 10.1128/CMR.05013-11
6.
TasawarZAzizFLasharMHShafiSAhmadMLalVet al. Seroprevalence of human toxoplasmosis in southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Life Soc Sci. (2012) 10:48–52.
7.
RehmanFShahMAliARapisardaAMCCianciA. Seroprevalence and risk factors of toxoplasma gondii infection in women with recurrent fetal loss from the province of khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. (2020) 14:115–21. 10.3233/NPM-190323
8.
PomaresCAjzenbergDBornardLBernardinGHasseineLDardéMLet al. Toxoplasmosis and horse meat, France. Emerg Infect Dis. (2011) 17:1327–8. 10.3201/eid1707.101642
9.
CDC. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. (2000). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4902a5.htm#:~:text=Etiologic%20Factors%3A%20Toxoplasma%20can%20be,exposure%20to%20cat%20litter%20or (accessed February 9, 2021)
10.
HamptonMM. Congenital toxoplasmosis: a review. Neonatal Netw. (2015) 34:274–8. 10.1891/0730-0832.34.5.274
11.
FurtadoJMSmithJRBelfortRGatteyDWinthropKL. Toxoplasmosis: a global threat. J Glob Infect Dis. (2011) 3:281–4. 10.4103/0974-777X.83536
12.
AntczakMDzitkoKDługońskaH. Human toxoplasmosis–Searching for novel chemotherapeutics. Biomed Pharmacother. (2016) 82:677–84. 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.05.041
13.
DelairEMonnetDGrabarSDupouy-CametJYeraHBrézinAP. Respective roles of acquired and congenital infections in presumed ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol. (2008) 146:851–5. 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.027
14.
LiuQWangZDHuangSYZhuXQ. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasites Vect. (2015) 8:292. 10.1186/s13071-015-0902-6
15.
da SilvaPDShiraishiCSda SilvaAVGonçalvesGFSant'AnaDDde Almeida AraújoEJ. Toxoplasma gondii: a morphometric analysis of the wall and epithelial cells of pigs intestine. Exp Parasitol. (2010) 125:380–3. 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.03.004
16.
DubeyJPDarringtonCTiaoNFerreiraLRChoudharySMollaBet al. Isolation of viable Toxoplasma gondii from tissues and feces of cats from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Parasitol. (2013) 99:56–8. 10.1645/GE-3229.1
17.
AshburnDChattertonJMWEvansRJossAWLHo-YenDO. Success in the toxoplasma dye test. J Infect. (2001) 42:16–9. 10.1053/jinf.2000.0764
18.
ZhuCCuiLZhangL. Comparison of a commercial ELISA with the modified agglutination test for detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sera of naturally infected dogs and cats. Iran J Parasitol. (2012) 7:89–95.
19.
OncelTVuralGBabürCKiliçS. Detection of Toxoplasmosis gondii seropositivity in sheep in yalova by sabin feldman dye test and latex agglutination test. Turkish J Parasitol. (2005) 29:10–2.
20.
WebsterJPDubeyJP. Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. Parasites Vect. (2010) 3:112. 10.1186/1756-3305-3-112
21.
SucilathangamGPalaniappanNSreekumarCAnnaT. IgG - indirect fluorescent antibody technique to detect seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients in southern districts of Tamil Nadu. Indian J Med Microbiol. (2010) 28:354–7. 10.4103/0255-0857.71835
22.
WangZGeWLiJSongMSunHWeiFet al. Production and evaluation of recombinant granule antigen protein GRA7 for serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cattle. Foodborne Pathog Dis. (2014) 11:734–9. 10.1089/fpd.2014.1749
23.
RemingtonJSEimstadWMAraujoFG. Detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies with antigen-tagged latex particles in an immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. (1983) 17:939–41. 10.1128/jcm.17.5.939-941.1983
24.
TerkawiMAKameyamaKRasulNHXuanXNishikawaY. Development of an immunochromatographic assay based on dense granule protein 7 for serological detection of toxoplasma gondii infection. Clin Vac Immunol. (2013) 20:596–601. 10.1128/CVI.00747-12
25.
WangHLeiCLiJWuZShenGYuR. A piezoelectric immunoagglutination assay for Toxoplasma gondii antibodies using gold nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectro. (2004) 19:701–9. 10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00265-3
26.
StroehleASchmidtKHeinzerINaguleswaranAHemphillA. Performance of a western immunoblot assay to detect specific anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies in human saliva. J Parasitol. (2005) 91:561–3. 10.1645/GE-423R
27.
BonyadiMRBastaniP. Modification and evaluation of avidity IgG testing for differentiating of Toxoplasma gondii infection in early stage of pregnancy. Cell J. (2013) 15:238–43.
28.
AhmedHMalikAMustafaIArshadMKhanMRAfzalSet al. Seroprevalence and spatial distribution of toxoplasmosis in sheep and goats in north-eastern region of Pakistan. Korean J Parasitol. (2016) 54:439–46. 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.4.439
29.
NazirFKhanMA. Trends in Milk Production Through Community Participation. Lahore: The Nation (2009).
30.
MahfouzMSElmahdyMBahriAMobarkiYMAltalhiAABarkatNAet al. Knowledge and attitude regarding toxoplasmosis among Jazan University female students. Saudi J Med Sci. (2019) 7:28. 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_33_17
31.
MouraIPDSFerreiraIPPontesANBicharaCNC. Toxoplasmosis knowledge and reventive behavior among pregnant women in the city of Imperatriz, Maranhão, Brazil. Ciência Saúde Coletiva. (2019) 24:3933–46. 10.1590/1413-812320182410.21702017
32.
LaboudiMAit HamouSMansourIHilmiISadakA. The first report of the evaluation of the knowledge regarding toxoplasmosis among health professionals in public health centers in Rabat, Morocco. Trop Med Health. (2020) 48:1–8. 10.1186/s41182-020-00208-9
33.
SenosySA. Knowledge and attitudes about toxoplasmosis among female university students in Egypt. Int J Adolesc Med Health. (2020). 10.1515/ijamh-2019-0207
34.
KravetzJDFedermanDG. Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. Am J Med. (2005) 118:212–6. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.08.023
35.
BruceRWardlawBRMartinWEHaydriIH. Stratigraphic Analysis of Paleocene and Lower Eocene Rocks Adjacent to the Potwar Plateau, Northern Pakistan (2018).
Summary
Keywords
knowledge, attitude, practices, risk factor, one health, toxoplasmosis, Pakistan
Citation
Maqsood T, Shahzad K, Naz S, Simsek S, Afzal MS, Ali S, Ahmed H and Cao J (2021) A Cross-Sectional Study on the Association Between Risk Factors of Toxoplasmosis and One Health Knowledge in Pakistan. Front. Vet. Sci. 8:751130. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.751130
Received
31 July 2021
Accepted
26 October 2021
Published
18 November 2021
Volume
8 - 2021
Edited by
Si-Yang Huang, Yangzhou University, China
Reviewed by
Wei Cong, Shandong University, China; Zedong Wang, First Hospital of Jilin University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Maqsood, Shahzad, Naz, Simsek, Afzal, Ali, Ahmed and Cao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haroon Ahmed haroonahmad12@yahoo.comJianping Cao caojp@yahoo.com
This article was submitted to Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.