Abstract
The terminal Ediacaran shallow marine microbialites are significant for paleo-environment reconstruction and petroleum exploration. Their depositional and paleo-environmental characteristics during high-frequency sea-level fluctuations were paid less attention, which limited the understanding of their evolution and related reservoir characterization. Microbialites from the fourth member of the upper Ediacaran Dengying Formation, Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin, SW China are important records for studying their lithofacies associations and paleo-environmental constraints in high-frequency depositional sequences. Petrographic and geochemical analyses (in-situ major and trace elements and carbon and oxygen isotopes) indicate microbialites depositional and paleo-environmental evolution on a rimmed platform within a fourth-order depositional sequence. From late TST (transgressive systems tract) to early HST (highstand systems tract), thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-thin-bedded spotted thrombolite dominates the platform margin; while thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-thin bedded dark-grey wavy stromatolite dominates the platform interior. From late HST to early TST of the next fourth-order sequence, the platform margin is dominated by thick-bedded spotted thrombolite—dolograinstone, while the carbonate interior is dominated by thin-medium-bedded layered thrombolite—light-grey wavy stromatolite. Salinity correlates well with microbialite lithofacies associations: the platform interior layered thrombolite and wavy stromatolite enriched lithofacies associations are characterized by higher salinity than that of the platform margin spotted thrombolite enriched lithofacies associations. The microbialite lithofacies associations are less constrained by redox: platform interior layered thrombolite and wavy stromatolite enriched lithofacies associations are slightly more reduced than the platform interior spotted thrombolite enriched lithofacies associations. The redox analysis of the microbialites also indicates low oxygen levels of shallow marine in the study area during terminal Ediacaran, with possible oxygenation at the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary. The study suggests that the terminal Ediacaran microbialite development was controlled by both high-frequency sea-level fluctuations and paleo-environmental factors such as salinity and redox. Platform margin spotted thrombolitic reefs from late fourth-order HST to next early fourth-order TST serve as favorable microbialite reservoirs. Platform interior layered thrombolites and wavy stromatolites are regarded as potential reservoirs, which deserve more detailed depositional-paleo-environmental research.
1 Introduction
The Ediacaran—Cambrian transition is crucial in Earth history, during which a set of bioevolutionary innovations occurred, such as metazoan explosion, oxygen levels significant increase and great seawater salinity reduction (; Lyons et al., 2014; ). Microbialites, a component of marine ecological system and seawater chemistry evolution, have been broadly used to restore the paleo-oceanographic and paleo-environmental information about the setting in which they develop (; ; Riding, 2000; ). As the terminal Ediacaran microbialite is considered as a major sedimentary carrier of prokaryotic communities and activities (), its sedimentological study may shed light on the evolution of related carbonate buildups and paleo-environment during the Ediacaran—Cambrian transition. Additionally, these microbialites host economic petroleum reserves worldwide, such as the Ara Group in the Sultanate of Oman (Schröder et al., 2005) and the Dengying Formation in South China (). The sedimentological and paleo-environmenal investigation would also provide valuable information for characterizing the distribution and scale of these microbialite reservoirs, which may also facilitate future petroleum exploration.
Previous studies on terminal Ediacaran microbialites have been largely focused on their petrology and general depositional architecture (; ; ; ), while the spatial distribution of these microbialite lithofacies is still controversial. For example, studies by , and Peng et al. (2021) indicate that terminal Ediacaran thrombolites were well-developed in sub-tidal environments and stromatolites were flourished in inter-tidal settings. However, other studies hold the opposite view (; Luo et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022). Compared with studies on distribution patterns of terminal Ediacaran microbialite lithofacies or lithofacies associations in a third-order depositional sequence (Schröder et al., 2005; ; ), investigations on their distribution patterns within high-frequency sequences are relatively scarce. Precise distribution of these microbialite lithofacies or lithofacies associations in high-frequency depositional sequences should be studied further.
As the environmental constraints of Phanerozoic shallow marine carbonate factories (nutrients, salinity, temperature, seawater energy and transparency, etc.) are based on the study on the well-understood habitats of metazoans (Pomar, 2001; Pittet et al., 2002; Pomar and Haq, 2016), they cannot be all directly used to analyze the paleo-environment of Precambrian microbialite-dominated carbonate factories (Preto et al., 2019). Recent studies proposed that salinity and redox are important environmental constraints for microbialites: thrombolites prefer low-salinity and less oxygenated environments, while stromatolites are more developed in high-salinity and more oxygenated environments (Suarez-Gonzalez et al., 2019; ; ; Tang et al., 2022). Nevertheless, in most cases, the judgement of salinity and redox is mainly based on qualitative petrographic characteristics, rather than quantitative geochemical evidences. More systematic studies, integrating petrography, stratigraphy and geochemistry on the terminal Ediacaran microbialites are needed, which may enhance the understanding of their evolution and ambient seawater chemistry.
In recent studies on life and environment co-evolution during Ediacaran—Cambrian transition, the microbialites of the upper Ediacaran Dengying Formation in South China have been frequently chosen as research objects (; Shields-Zhou et al., 2013; ). Petrographic and environmental studies have been mainly conducted on microbialite samples from outcrops in the peripheral Sichuan Basin (; ; ), while less attention has been paid to the microbialites in the basin interior due to outcrop scarcity. Moreover, in the central Sichuan Basin, the upper Ediacaran Dengying Formation hosts a giant gas field, with proven natural gas reserves of 5908 × 108 m3 for the fourth member by the end of 2020 (Yan et al., 2022). In this study, careful petrographic observation and geochemical tests (in-situ major and trace elements (including REE) and carbon and oxygen isotopes) are conducted on samples collected from a series of wells in the central Sichuan Basin. The study aims to (i) identify the microbialite lithofacies associations in a fourth-order sequence stratigraphic framework; (ii) analyze the salinity and redox conditions of the lithofacies associations using proper geochemical proxies; (iii) build up a depositional - paleo-environmental evolution model for these microbialites in a fourth-order depositional sequence and evaluate their reservoir potential.
2 Geological setting
The Sichuan Basin is a 18.8 km2 diamond-shaped sedimentary basin in southwest China (Zhao and Cawood, 2012), which is tectonically located in the western Yangtze craton and bounded by the Longmenshan Fold Belt, Micangshan Uplift, Dabashan Fold Belt, Hubei-Hunan-Guizhou Fold Belt and Emeishan—Liangshan Fold Belt (Ma et al., 2007) (Figure 1A). The basin is constituted by several structural units: Central Uplift, Northwest Depression and Southeast Depression. The Central Uplift is a inherited nose-shaped paleo-uplift initiated from Ediacaran and is the location of the study area, Gaoshiti - Moxi area (Figure 1B). Influenced by the Rodinia break-up, the Ediacaran Sichuan basin was in an extensional state (Zhu et al., 2007). Triggered by the related basement faults, Deyang—Anyue Rift, a NS-trending rift, developed to the east of the Gaoshiti—Moxi uplift (; Wei et al., 2015; ).
FIGURE 1
As a result of large-scale transgression after the Marinoan glaciation, the Ediacaran strata are widely-distributed on the Yangtze craton (
Previous studies concluded the general depositional architecture of the Gaoshiti -Moxi area as a rimmed carbonate platform (
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Sampling strategy
In order to ensure that the studied samples preserve their original depositional records, they were collected from the cores with well-preserved micrite of microbialite fabrics (e.g., laminae and clots) or typical non-microbialites. To avoid the non-carbonate content and the diagenetic products, the sampling positions are far away from vugs, pores, burrow filling or fractures. When acquiring the powder samples for carbon and oxygen isotope analysis, the fresh surface of sample chips were micro-drilled.
3.2 Petrographic observation
200 core samples were selected for thin sections, which were stained using Alizarin Red S to differentiate calcite from dolomite (
3.3 Geochemical analyses
3.3.1 In-situ major and trace element analysis
Compared with whole rock analysis, in-situ analysis of major and trace elements can precisely locate a target area with the least possible visible diagenetic alteration (
3.3.2 Carbon and oxygen isotopes
23 powder samples were micro-drilled on the matrix dolostones to conduct carbon and oxygen isotope analysis at the Laboratory for Stable Isotope Geochemistry, IGGCAS. Samples (each 0.3–0.8 mg) were reacted for 10 h using the common acid bath method at 90°C and the CO2 produced was analyzed with a Finnigan-MAT 252 mass spectrometer (
4 Results
4.1 Petrography
The lithology of the Z2dn4 in the study area is divided into microbialite and non-microbialite. The microbialites are further classified into wavy stromatolite, spotted thrombolite and layered thrombolite mainly according to meso-scale microbial fabrics (Riding, 2000). Based on
4.1.1 Microbialite
Wavy stromatolite. Wavy stromatolites, characterized by distinct dense and wavy laminae, are well-developed in the study area. According to the color difference, they are further classified into “light-grey wavy stromatolites” (Figure 2A) and “dark-grey wavy stromatolites” (Figure 2B). Under the plane polarized light, the typical wavy matrix of both dark-grey wavy stromatolites and light-grey wavy stromatolites can be observed, with “Girvallena-like” fabric (Figure 3A, C. In light-grey wavy stromatolites, light-grey micro-crystalline to coarse-crystalline cements develop between the matrix layers, which are red to bright red under cathode luminescence (CL) (Figure 3B). In contrast, dark-grey micro-crystalline cements are distributed between the matrix layers of dark-grey wavy stromatolites, which is dull red or non-luminescent under CL. Wavy stromatolites are more developed in platform interior in general.
FIGURE 2

Cores of main microbialites and non-microbialites types. (A) MX105, 5335.14 m, light-grey wavy stromatolite. (B) MX105, 5356.27 m, dark-grey wavy stromatolite. (C) GS7, 5325.52 m, spotted thrombolite. (D) MX105, 5316.88 m, spotted thrombolite. (E) MX105, 5323.45 m, layered thrombolite. (F) MX105, 5303.14 m, dolograinstone. (G) GS16, 5452.86 m, dolopackstone. (H) MX105, 5362.15 m, dark-grey dolomudstone. (I) GS21, 5284 m, light-grey dolomudstone.
FIGURE 3

Micro-characteristics of main microbialites and non-microbialites. (A) MX105, 5359.5 m, light-grey wavy stromatolite. (B) (A) under cathode luminescence (CL). (C) GS21, 5226.36 m, dark-grey wavy stromatolite. (D) MX51, 5338.5 m, spotted thrombolite. (E) MX39, 5302.6 m, spotted thrombolite. (F) (E) under CL. (G) GS20, 5201.99 m, layered thrombolite. (H) MX105, 5303.3 m, dolograinstone. (I) GS20, 5220.28 m, dolopackstone. (Red arrows indicate the Girvanella-like fabrics. Yellow arrows indicate the Renalcis-like fabrics).
Spotted thrombolite. Thrombolites are characterized by macroscopically clotted fabrics (Riding, 2000). In the study area, the thrombolites with chaotic-distributed clotted fabrics on the cores are classified as “spotted thrombolite”, which are predominantly grey to dark-grey (Figures 2C,D). Under plane polarized light, the matrix, the dark-grey clotted micritic dolomite (mesoclot) is characterized by Renalcis-like fabrics (Figures 3D,E). Under CL, the micro-crystalline, medium-crystalline and coarse-crystalline cements are dull red, red and bright red, respectively (Figure 3F). Contrary to wavy stromatolites, spotted thrombolites are mainly distributed in platform margin.
Layered thrombolite. The thrombolites with horizontally-distributed clotted fabrics are classified as “layered thrombolites”, which are often dark-grey on the cores (Figure 2E). The matrix is also characterized by “Renalcis-like” fabrics under plane polarized light (Figure 3G). Although layered thrombolites can be observed in both platform margin and platform interior, they are more developed in platform interior.
4.1.2 Non-microbialite
Dolograinstone. Dologrianstones are light-gray to brownish gray and are thick-bedded or massive structured on the cores (Figure 2F). Under plane polarized light, the grains are composed of well-sorted rounded sand-sized intraclasts, ooids, oncoids, and peloids, with diameters ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 mm (Figure 3H). Fragments of stromatolites and thrombolites can be observed occasionally. Dolograinstones are observed in platform margin.
Dolopackstone. Dolopackstones are gray to brownish gray and are medium-bedded to thin-bedded structured on the cores (Figure 2G). Under plane polarized light, the grains are composed of sub-rounded to rounded intraclasts and peloids, with diameters ranging from 0.05 to 0.1 mm (Figure 3I). Stromatolite fragments are often observed. Dolopackstones are more developed in platform interior.
Dark-grey dolomudstone. Dark-grey dolomudstones are dark-grey or even black, which are more frequently distributed in platform interior (Figure 2H).
Light-grey dolomudstone. Compared with dark-grey dolomudstones, light-grey dolomudstones are much lighter in color. A few stromatolite laminae and thrombolite clots can be observed on thin sections (Figure 2I). Light-gray dolomudstones are more developed in platform interior, with occurrence of bird-eye structures.
Dolomitized karst breccia. This lithofacies is well-developed in the upper Z2dn4 close to or at the Ediacaran—Cambrian boundary. They are mainly brown and less than 1 m thick. Most karst breccias are angular to sub-angular and infilled with dolomitic mud.
4.2 High-frequency sequence stratigraphy
Based on outcrop observation and 3D seismic interpretation with well log calibration, the Dengying Formation in the Gaoshiti - Moxi area can be divided into two third-order depositional sequences: the first third-order sequence includes Z2dn1 (transgressive systems tract, TST) and Z2dn2 (highstand systems tract, HST); the second third-order sequence is composed of Z2dn3 (TST) and Z2dn4(HST) (
Following the definition of
By correlating the GR, KTH and FMI logging data with core observation and a study of recent publications, the Z2dn4 of the Gaoshiti - Moxi area is divided into five fourth-order depositional sequences (Figure 4). At the fourth-order sequence boundaries, dolomitized karst breccias are observed on cores and the FMI image suddenly turns chaotic (Wang et al., 2021). Above the sequence boundaries, dark-grey dolomudstones appear and the GR and KTH values increase sharply. The cores shown here are predominantly presented in the last fourth-order depositional sequence (Figure 5). In different stages of a fourth-order depositional sequence, various types of typical lithofacies associations develop in platform margin and platform interior, which are summarized below (Figure 6).
FIGURE 4

Fourth-order sequence stratigraphic classification of the Z2dn4 of the Gaoshiti—Moxi area. (A) Fourth-order sequence stratigraphic classfication of the Moxi area. (B) Fourth-order sequence stratigraphic classification of the Gaoshiti area.
FIGURE 5

Detailed cores distribution in fourth-order sequence stratigraphic frameworks in the Gaoshiti - Moxi area. (A) Cores distribution in fourth-order sequence stratigrahpic frameworks in the platform margin. (B) Cores distribution in fourth-order sequence stratigrahpic frameworks in the platform interior.
FIGURE 6

Microbialite lithofacies associations of the Z2dn4 of the Gaoshiti-Moxi area in a fourth-order sequence stratigraphic framework. (A) thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-thin-bedded spotted thrombolite; (B) thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-thin-bedded dark-grey wavy stromatolite; (C) thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-thin-bedded layered thrombolite; (D) thin-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-thick-bedded spotted thrombolite; (E) thick-bedded spotted thrombolite-dolograinstone; (F) thin-medium-bedded light-grey wavy stromatolite-light-grey dolomudstone; (G) thin-medium-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone-layered thrombolite-wavy stromatolite; (H) thin-medium-bedded dolopackstone-light-grey wavy stromatolite-light-grey dolomudstone; (I) thin-bedded layered thrombolite-wavy stromatolite-light-grey dolomudstone.
4.2.1 Late TST—early HST
In platform margin, thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone overlain by thin-bedded spotted thrombolite is frequently developed, with thickness of each association less than 3 m (Lithofacies Association A). In platform interior, thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone overlain by thin-bedded dark-grey wavy stromatolite (Lithofacies Association B) can be observed, with thickness less than 2 m. The other lithofacies association of platform interior, thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone overlain by thin-bedded layered thrombolite (Lithofacies Association C) is far less developed.
4.2.2 Late HST—next early TST
From late HST to early TST of the next fourth-order sequence, microbialite lithofacies associations are more diverse. The platform margin develops three types of lithofacies associations: thin-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone—thick-bedded spotted thrombolite (Lithofacies Association D); thick-bedded spotted thrombolite—dolograinstone (Lithofacies Association E); thin-medium-bedded light-grey wavy stromatolite—light-grey dolomudstone (Lithofacies Association F). The thickness of Lithofacies Associations D and E can reach 15 m, while that of Lithofacies Association F is less than 10 m. The platform interior also develops three types of lithofacies associations: thin-medium-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone—layered thrombolite—wavy stromatolite (Lithofacies Association G); thin-medium-bedded dolopackstone—light-grey wavy stromatolite—light-grey dolomudstone (Lithofacies Association H); thin-bedded layered thrombolite—wavy stromatolite—light-grey dolomudstone (Lithofacies Association I). The thickness of Lithofacies Associations G, H and I is usually less than 8 m. Lithofacies Associations E and H are referred to as “platform margin mound-shoal complex” and “platform interior mound-shoal complex” respectively (
4.3 Geochemistry
4.3.1 Major and trace element concentrations and ratios
The Al and trace element concentrations and ratios of the studied samples are summarized in Table 1 (n=23). Most samples are characterized by low Al, Th, Zr and Sc concentrations, with a few abnormally high values. These matrix dolostones have Al contents ranging from 0.001% to 0.328%, with a mean value of 0.048%. The Th concentrations are between 0.006 ppm and 0.073 ppm (mean value = 0.026 ppm); Zr concentrations are between 0.014 ppm and 3.094 ppm (mean value = 0.453 ppm); and Sc concentrations are between 0.000 ppm and 0.337 ppm (mean value = 0.057 ppm). The Sr/Ba ratios of the studied samples range from 0.680 to 9.258 (mean value = 3.800). The Ba/Nd ratios range from 0.103 to 290.516 (mean value =76.069). And the Mn/Sr ratios are between 1.305 and 23.090 (mean value = 6.437). The REE + Y concentrations, ratios and anomalies of the studied samples are presented in Table 2 (n=23). The total REE (∑REE) concentrations of matrix dolostones are generally low, ranging from 0.425 ppm to 3.393 ppm (mean value = 1.697 ppm). The Y/Ho ratios are between 25.652 and 90.611 (mean value = 46.306).
TABLE 1
| Sample no. | Depth | Lithology | LFA | Al | Th | Zr | Sc | V | Ni | Sr | Ba | U | Nd | Sr/Ba | Ba/Nd | Mn/Sr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX105-1 | 5303.30 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.106 | 0.073 | 0.397 | 0.067 | 2.838 | 0.620 | 107.988 | 52.570 | 0.073 | 0.233 | 2.054 | 225.414 | 1.388 |
| MX105-2 | 5308.28 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.069 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.025 | 1.356 | 0.471 | 38.826 | 14.320 | 0.014 | 0.611 | 2.711 | 23.423 | 6.588 |
| MX105-3 | 5325.00 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.006 | 0.031 | 3.094 | 0.044 | 2.862 | 0.037 | 23.630 | 8.140 | 0.031 | 0.143 | 2.903 | 56.881 | 4.311 |
| MX105-4 | 5349.50 | Spotted thrombolite | A/D | 0.138 | 0.055 | 1.690 | 0.049 | 2.119 | 0.086 | 35.616 | 29.599 | 0.055 | 0.437 | 1.203 | 67.799 | 3.812 |
| MX105-5 | 5357.38 | Light-grey dolomudstone | F | 0.011 | 0.037 | 0.376 | 0.017 | 4.936 | 2.152 | 67.170 | 98.839 | 0.037 | 0.340 | 0.680 | 290.516 | 4.752 |
| MX51-1 | 5335.80 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | I | 0.016 | 0.028 | 0.598 | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0.213 | 44.825 | 36.800 | 0.486 | 0.332 | 1.218 | 110.944 | 8.083 |
| MX51-2 | 5342.00 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.027 | 0.036 | 0.375 | 0.035 | 0.035 | 0.271 | 63.219 | 14.384 | 0.520 | 0.204 | 4.395 | 70.410 | 1.324 |
| MX51-3 | 5347.06 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 0.001 | 0.035 | 0.243 | 0.029 | 0.029 | 1.623 | 78.123 | 36.204 | 0.279 | 0.599 | 2.158 | 60.446 | 6.231 |
| MX51-4 | 5351.69 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | 0.001 | 0.010 | 0.050 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.425 | 62.961 | 22.518 | 0.606 | 0.121 | 2.796 | 186.795 | 2.239 |
| MX51-5 | 5368.52 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.322 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.894 | 37.703 | 5.598 | 0.273 | 0.250 | 6.735 | 22.379 | 10.667 |
| MX51-6 | 5395.16 | Layered thrombolite | C | 0.328 | 0.009 | 0.629 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.385 | 31.230 | 6.902 | 0.433 | 0.147 | 4.525 | 47.080 | 1.305 |
| MX39-1 | 5277.74 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.064 | 0.069 | 0.883 | 0.337 | 15.432 | 15.400 | 40.722 | 6.318 | 0.138 | 0.380 | 6.445 | 16.635 | 4.357 |
| MX39-2 | 5292.72 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.038 | 0.024 | 7.982 | 7.980 | 42.696 | 16.293 | 0.809 | 0.066 | 2.620 | 245.760 | 4.671 |
| GS20-1 | 5206.82 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 0.011 | 0.024 | 0.108 | 0.174 | 5.522 | 0.527 | 55.585 | 22.777 | 0.195 | 0.591 | 2.440 | 38.515 | 9.972 |
| GS20-2 | 5220.28 | Dolopackstone | H | 0.021 | 0.020 | 0.590 | 0.049 | 2.446 | 0.635 | 78.895 | 61.810 | 0.865 | 0.674 | 1.276 | 91.760 | 4.074 |
| GS20-3 | 5255.13 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 0.008 | 0.038 | 0.173 | 0.120 | 1.643 | 0.386 | 50.482 | 35.050 | 0.194 | 0.546 | 1.440 | 64.169 | 2.042 |
| GS20-4 | 5261.27 | Layered thrombolite | C | 0.016 | 0.006 | 0.134 | 0.008 | 6.169 | 0.134 | 51.685 | 35.155 | 0.135 | 0.273 | 1.470 | 128.895 | 6.982 |
| GS21-1 | 5265.81 | Dark-grey wavy stromatolite | B | 0.010 | 0.021 | 0.029 | 0.083 | 7.086 | 0.020 | 30.882 | 8.535 | 0.142 | 0.278 | 3.618 | 0.276 | 23.091 |
| GS21-2 | 5284.00 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | 0.170 | 0.018 | 0.312 | 0.086 | 9.493 | 1.288 | 39.184 | 4.232 | 1.070 | 0.602 | 9.258 | 0.103 | 15.313 |
| GS21-3 | 5289.39 | Dolopackstone | H | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.028 | 0.030 | 10.872 | 0.330 | 81.474 | 19.442 | 0.279 | 0.253 | 4.191 | 0.359 | 3.785 |
| GS21-4 | 5293.63 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | 0.042 | 0.014 | 0.033 | 0.013 | 4.203 | 0.075 | 39.872 | 4.966 | 0.348 | 0.323 | 8.030 | 0.309 | 13.571 |
| GS21-5 | 5304.02 | Dark-grey wavy stromatolite | B | 0.016 | 0.010 | 0.139 | 0.037 | 2.926 | 0.400 | 48.936 | 5.807 | 0.477 | 0.225 | 8.428 | 0.163 | 7.971 |
| GS21-6 | 5313.36 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.007 | 0.013 | 0.156 | 0.014 | 1.428 | 0.306 | 54.696 | 8.035 | 0.247 | 0.179 | 6.807 | 0.560 | 1.521 |
Al content (%), trace element concentrations (ppm) and ratios of the studied samples (LFA, lithofacies association).
TABLE 2
| Sample No. | Depth | Lithology | LFA | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | Y | ∑REE | Y/Ho | DyN/ SmN | (La/La*)SN | (Ce/ Ce*)SN | (Eu/Eu*)SN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX105-1 | 5303.30 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.323 | 0.648 | 0.067 | 0.233 | 0.061 | 0.011 | 0.044 | 0.008 | 0.055 | 0.005 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.033 | 0.005 | 0.296 | 1.519 | 57.320 | 1.164 | 1.042 | 1.030 | 0.964 |
| MX105-2 | 5308.28 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.469 | 1.079 | 0.140 | 0.611 | 0.080 | 0.038 | 0.211 | 0.023 | 0.165 | 0.039 | 0.101 | 0.010 | 0.047 | 0.005 | 1.254 | 3.019 | 31.797 | 2.622 | 1.154 | 1.040 | 1.884 |
| MX105-3 | 5325.00 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.147 | 0.233 | 0.036 | 0.143 | 0.032 | 0.011 | 0.043 | 0.008 | 0.048 | 0.007 | 0.041 | 0.006 | 0.037 | 0.003 | 0.621 | 0.795 | 90.611 | 1.886 | 1.163 | 0.792 | 1.405 |
| MX105-4 | 5349.50 | Spotted thrombolite | A/D | 0.331 | 0.556 | 0.094 | 0.437 | 0.075 | 0.016 | 0.154 | 0.015 | 0.112 | 0.021 | 0.038 | 0.005 | 0.029 | 0.004 | 0.868 | 1.886 | 40.846 | 1.901 | 1.374 | 0.849 | 0.975 |
| MX105-5 | 5357.38 | Light-grey dolomudstone | F | 0.303 | 0.552 | 0.062 | 0.340 | 0.071 | 0.027 | 0.130 | 0.016 | 0.063 | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.006 | 0.056 | 0.003 | 0.613 | 1.666 | 43.473 | 1.125 | 2.635 | 1.501 | 1.613 |
| MX51-1 | 5335.80 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | I | 0.468 | 0.747 | 0.077 | 0.332 | 0.072 | 0.016 | 0.067 | 0.005 | 0.039 | 0.009 | 0.024 | 0.005 | 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.475 | 1.879 | 50.241 | 0.687 | 2.019 | 1.283 | 1.429 |
| MX51-2 | 5342.00 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.250 | 0.477 | 0.052 | 0.204 | 0.031 | 0.011 | 0.054 | 0.007 | 0.042 | 0.010 | 0.023 | 0.003 | 0.013 | 0.002 | 0.315 | 1.178 | 32.586 | 1.732 | 1.309 | 1.096 | 1.522 |
| MX51-3 | 5347.06 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 0.608 | 1.225 | 0.168 | 0.599 | 0.142 | 0.028 | 0.191 | 0.031 | 0.188 | 0.039 | 0.099 | 0.014 | 0.055 | 0.007 | 1.106 | 3.393 | 28.503 | 1.690 | 0.836 | 0.806 | 0.876 |
| MX51-4 | 5351.69 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | 0.148 | 0.249 | 0.027 | 0.121 | 0.040 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.005 | 0.037 | 0.006 | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.221 | 0.694 | 36.759 | 1.176 | 1.874 | 1.229 | 1.225 |
| MX51-5 | 5368.52 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.240 | 0.515 | 0.072 | 0.250 | 0.053 | 0.017 | 0.092 | 0.012 | 0.097 | 0.013 | 0.047 | 0.006 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.501 | 1.439 | 37.594 | 2.329 | 0.744 | 0.778 | 1.361 |
| MX51-6 | 5395.16 | Layered thrombolite | C | 0.133 | 0.280 | 0.048 | 0.147 | 0.042 | 0.004 | 0.040 | 0.013 | 0.081 | 0.017 | 0.082 | 0.009 | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.563 | 0.990 | 32.334 | 2.472 | 0.478 | 0.559 | 0.371 |
| MX39-1 | 5277.74 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.623 | 1.121 | 0.118 | 0.380 | 0.078 | 0.017 | 0.098 | 0.006 | 0.082 | 0.025 | 0.068 | 0.006 | 0.037 | 0.011 | 0.788 | 2.670 | 31.356 | 1.336 | 0.990 | 0.945 | 1.348 |
| MX39-2 | 5292.72 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.101 | 0.155 | 0.019 | 0.066 | 0.025 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.017 | 0.006 | 0.013 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.144 | 0.425 | 25.652 | 0.881 | 1.181 | 0.887 | 0.916 |
| GS20-1 | 5206.82 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 0.506 | 0.936 | 0.150 | 0.591 | 0.114 | 0.019 | 0.121 | 0.028 | 0.076 | 0.013 | 0.044 | 0.007 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.818 | 2.636 | 64.923 | 0.857 | 0.959 | 0.766 | 0.711 |
| GS20-2 | 5220.28 | Dolopackstone | H | 0.514 | 1.066 | 0.146 | 0.674 | 0.087 | 0.036 | 0.112 | 0.014 | 0.038 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.626 | 2.722 | 54.631 | 0.551 | 1.353 | 1.040 | 1.991 |
| GS20-3 | 5255.13 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 0.396 | 0.772 | 0.120 | 0.546 | 0.069 | 0.020 | 0.089 | 0.042 | 0.025 | 0.009 | 0.025 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.460 | 2.120 | 50.023 | 0.469 | 1.249 | 0.910 | 0.908 |
| GS20-4 | 5261.27 | Layered thrombolite | C | 0.279 | 0.442 | 0.070 | 0.273 | 0.073 | 0.009 | 0.069 | 0.009 | 0.078 | 0.007 | 0.028 | 0.002 | 0.022 | 0.004 | 0.428 | 1.363 | 64.804 | 1.360 | 1.101 | 0.764 | 0.673 |
| GS21-1 | 5265.81 | Dark-grey wavy stromatolite | B | 0.289 | 0.507 | 0.064 | 0.278 | 0.057 | 0.013 | 0.077 | 0.009 | 0.035 | 0.010 | 0.032 | 0.000 | 0.024 | 0.004 | 0.480 | 1.399 | 47.974 | 0.786 | 1.526 | 1.056 | 1.101 |
| GS21-2 | 5284.00 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | 0.548 | 0.923 | 0.142 | 0.602 | 0.152 | 0.026 | 0.134 | 0.016 | 0.126 | 0.025 | 0.054 | 0.005 | 0.044 | 0.004 | 0.975 | 2.799 | 39.587 | 1.055 | 1.257 | 0.853 | 0.972 |
| GS21-3 | 5289.39 | Dolopackstone | H | 0.262 | 0.394 | 0.065 | 0.253 | 0.040 | 0.007 | 0.051 | 0.007 | 0.035 | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.003 | 0.395 | 1.159 | 73.605 | 1.107 | 1.105 | 0.730 | 0.872 |
| GS21-4 | 5293.63 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | 0.239 | 0.387 | 0.064 | 0.323 | 0.063 | 0.011 | 0.070 | 0.009 | 0.054 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.004 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.395 | 1.271 | 40.928 | 1.089 | 1.743 | 0.952 | 0.852 |
| GS21-5 | 5304.02 | Dark-grey wavy stromatolite | B | 0.200 | 0.419 | 0.064 | 0.225 | 0.058 | 0.015 | 0.091 | 0.007 | 0.029 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.016 | 0.003 | 0.469 | 1.155 | 33.687 | 0.633 | 0.713 | 0.723 | 1.394 |
| GS21-6 | 5313.36 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.179 | 0.270 | 0.052 | 0.179 | 0.036 | 0.006 | 0.034 | 0.006 | 0.040 | 0.004 | 0.029 | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.004 | 0.215 | 0.852 | 55.810 | 1.402 | 0.740 | 0.554 | 0.756 |
REE+Y concentrations, ratios and anomalies of the studied samples (ppm) (LFA, llithofacies association; SN, shale normalized).
4.3.2 REE anomalies
The equations by
4.3.3 Carbon and oxygen isotopes
The δ13C and δ18O values of the studied matrix dolostone samples are summarized in Table 3. The δ13C values range from −0.860‰ to 3.150‰. And the δ18O values range from −8.990‰ to −3.450‰.
TABLE 3
| Sample No. | Depth | Lithology | LFA | δ13C | δ18O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX105-1 | 5303.30 | Dolograinstone | E | 2.520 | −8.990 |
| MX105-2 | 5308.28 | Dolograinstone | E | 0.680 | −8.730 |
| MX105-3 | 5325.00 | Dolograinstone | E | 2.340 | −5.620 |
| MX105-4 | 5349.50 | Spotted thrombolite | A/D | 2.610 | −6.400 |
| MX105-5 | 5357.38 | Light-grey dolomudstone | F | 1.530 | −4.800 |
| MX51-1 | 5335.80 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | I | 0.680 | −7.060 |
| MX51-2 | 5342.00 | Layered thrombolite | G | 0.850 | −6.810 |
| MX51-3 | 5347.06 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 1.180 | −4.720 |
| MX51-4 | 5351.69 | Light-grey wavy stromatolite | H | −0.860 | −6.550 |
| MX51-6 | 5395.16 | Layered thrombolite | C | 3.150 | −3.450 |
| MX39-1 | 5277.74 | Layered thrombolite | G | 1.500 | −4.370 |
| MX39-2 | 5292.72 | Layered thrombolite | G | 1.400 | −5.100 |
| GS20-1 | 5206.82 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 1.420 | −6.710 |
| GS20-2 | 5220.28 | Dolopackstone | H | 1.710 | −6.420 |
| GS20-3 | 5255.13 | Light-grey dolomudstone | I | 2.810 | −6.250 |
| GS20-4 | 5261.27 | Layered thrombolite | C | 2.930 | −6.250 |
| GS21-3 | 5289.39 | Dolopackstone | H | 1.310 | −5.370 |
| GS21-5 | 5304.02 | Dark-grey wavy stromatolite | B | 1.070 | -5.610 |
| GS21-6 | 5313.36 | Layered thrombolite | G | 2.090 | -3.850 |
δ13C and δ18O values of the studied samples with Mn/Sr ratios <10 (LFA, lithofacies association).
5 Discussion
5.1 Depositional evolution of microbialite lithofacies associations
5.1.1 Lithofacies associations distribution during late fourth-order TST—early fourth-order HST
Compared with individual lithofacies, lithofacies associations better indicate specific depositional settings of various microbialites in different areas of the rimmed carbonate platform within a fourth-order depositional sequence. The overall dark color and the frequent occurrence of thick-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone in Lithofacies Associations A, B and C suggest low-energy settings. The scattered clots of spotted thrombolites imply a deeper and moderate-energy sub-tidal setting, with enough accommodation (
5.1.2 Lithofacies associations distribution during late fourth-order HST—next early fourth-order TST
From late HST of fourth-order sequence to the early TST of the next, lithofacies associations are more diverse. Lithofacies Associations D, E and F are flourished in platform margin. The thick-bedded spotted thrombolites of Lithofacies Associations D and E imply that their corresponding settings are suitable for the development of large-scaled spotted thrombolitic reefs. Compared with Lithofacies Association E, Lithofacies Association D (thin-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone—thick-bedded spotted thrombolite) indicates a moderate-high-energy shallow subtidal setting closer to the open sea, where large-scaled spotted thrombolitic reefs develop. The moderate-well-sorted sub-rounded to rounded grains in dolograinstones of Lithofacies Association E (thick-bedded spotted thrombolite—dolograinstone) imply strong water agitation (
In the mean time, Lithofacies Associations G, H and I are distributed in platform interior. Lithofacies Association G (thin-medium-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone—layered thrombolite—light-grey wavy stromatolite) is the most developed lithofacies association in platform interior, corresponding to a low-moderate energy subtidal-intertidal shallow lagoonal environment where layered thrombolitic and wavy stromatolitic “patch reefs” flourish. The smaller-sized peloids and microbial fragments in dolopackstones of Lithofacies Association H (thin-medium-bedded dolopackstone—light-grey wavy stromatolite—light-grey dolomudstone) may suggest a high-energy setting with co-occurrence of wavy stromatolitic reefs and shoals (
5.2 Environmental constraints of the microbialites
5.2.1 Geochemical data reliability analysis
Terrigenous input likely alters the depositional archives of ancient carbonates, especially the Precambrian samples (Tostevin et al., 2016;
FIGURE 7

Cross-plots showing the concentration correlations of (A) Al and Sc; (B) Al and Th; (C) Al and Zr; (D) Sc and Th; (E) Zr and Th; (F) Zr and Sc; (G) Al and ∑REE; (H) Sc and ∑REE; (I) Th and ∑REE; (J) Zr and ∑REE.
FIGURE 8

PAAS-normalized patterns of REE + Y of matrix dolostones. (The REE +Y patterns of the modern seawater and Holocene microbialites, and hydrothermal dolomites are from Webb and Kamber, 2000; Nutman et al., 2010).
Diagenetic modifications may also affect the original depositional signatures of the geochemistry proxies. Although the REE in carbonates are relatively stable during diagenesis, the later fluid exchange could result in Ce enrichment, Eu deficiency and low DyN/SmN ratios and weakened REE + Y patterns with seawater signatures, which could be shown as negative correlations of (Ce/Ce*)SN and (Eu/Eu*)SN with DyN/SmN (Shields and Stille, 2001). The little correlation of Ba/Nd with (Eu/Eu*)SN, (Eu/Eu*)SN with (Ce/Ce*)SN, and DyN/SmN with (Ce/Ce*)SN indicates that the REE + Y data are not diagenetically altered (Figure 9). Moreover, if the Mn/Sr ratios of samples are less than 10 and the δ13C and δ18O values are not correlated, the carbon and oxygen isotope values can be applied for depositional paleo-environment analysis (
FIGURE 9

Cross-plots showing the correlations of (A) Ba/Nd and (Eu/Eu*)SN values; (B) (Eu/Eu*)SN and (Ce/Ce*)SN values; and (C) DyN/SmN and (Ce/Ce*)SN.
FIGURE 10

Cross-plots showing the correlations of (A) δ18O and δ13C values and (B) δ18O values and Mn/Sr ratios.
5.2.2 Paleo-salinity and redox analysis
The Sr/Ba ratio has been widely regarded as a paleo-salinity indicator for both marine and continental sediments: under low-salinity conditions, Sr and Ba occur in the forms of oxides, sulfides or soluble bicarbonates; when salinity increases to a threshold, Ba precipitates prior in the form of BaSO4, resulting in greater Sr/Ba ratios; if salinity increases continuously, Sr would precipitate in the form of SrSO4 (Paytan et al., 2007;
FIGURE 11

Salinity and redox related geochemical proxies characteristics of different microbialite lithofacies associations. (A) Box plot of the Sr/Ba ratios of microbialite lithofacies associations in platform margin and platform interior. (B) Sr/Ba ratios of individual microbialite lithofacies association. (C) Box plot of δ13C values of microbialite lithofacies associations in platform margin and platform interior. (D) Box plot of δ18O values of microbialite lithofacies associations in platform margin and platform interior. (E) (La/La*)SN values of microbialite lithofacies associations in platform margin and platform interior. (F) (Ce/Ce*)SN values of individual microbialite lithofacies association.
Besides Sr/Ba ratios, previous studies indicate that carbon and oxygen isotopes of marine carbonates can also reflect seawater salinity: the δ13C and δ18O values are positively correlated with paleo-salinity (
The (Ce/Ce*)SN value is an efficient proxy for redox analysis of marine carbonate depositional environments (
5.3 Depositional—paleo-environmental evolution of terminal Ediacaran microbialites with environmental and reservoir implications
5.3.1 A depositional—paleo-environmental evolution model
Combing the depositional distribution of the microbialite lithofacies associations with salinity and redox characteristics, a depositional - environmental evolution model for the microbialites within a fourth-order sequence of the Gaoshiti—Moxi area is established (Figure 12). From late TST to early HST, small-scaled spotted thrombolitic reefs are distributed in the low-salinity and more oxygenated sub-tidal zone of platform margin; while small-scaled dark wavy stromatolitic reefs and layered thrombolitic reefs are distributed in high-salinity and less oxygenated relatively deep lagoonal enviroments in platform interior (Figure 12A). From late HST to early TST of the next fourth-order sequence, the microbialites are more developed. In the platform margin, large-scaled spotted thrombolitic reefs are distributed in a shallow sub-tidal setting towards the open sea, thrombolitic reef—shoal complexes are distributed in the high-energy zone, and small-medium-scaled stromatolitic reefs are distributed in the inter-tidal zone close to the platform interior; all are characterized by low-salinity and less oxygenation. In the platform interior, layered thrombolitic reefs and wavy stromatolitic reefs are distributed in high-salinity and less oxygenated deep sub-tidal—shallower inter-tidal lagoons, wavy stromatolitic reef—shoal complexes are distributed in moderate-salinity and more oxgenated high-energy zone in inter-tidal areas and supra-tidal flats. Specifically, when fourth-order sea level falls, the platform interior develops various “micro-environments” with overall high salinity but diverse redox conditions; among all the lithofacies, the layered thrombolites and wavy stromatolites are characterized with the highest salinity and more reduced redox state (Figure 12B).
FIGURE 12

Depositional-paleo-environmental model of the microbialites of Z2dn4 in a fourth-order sequence stratigraphic framework of the Gaoshiti—Moxi area. (A) Depositional-paleo-environmental evolution model of the microbialites during late fourth-order TST-early fourth-order HST. (B) Depositional-paleo-environmental model of the microbialites during late fourth-order HST-next early fourth-order TST.
5.3.2 Implication for environmental constraints of terminal Ediacaran microbialites and seawater chemistry
More and more attention has been paid on paleo-environmental factors such as salinity and redox in the study of Precambrian microbialite-dominated depositional systems (Oliveri et al., 2010;
Although we also attempted to characterize the redox variation of different microbialite lithofacies and lithofacies associations, the redox variation is less distinct than expected. Our results only suggest that the wavy stromatolites and related lithofacies associations are more reduced than the remaining types, and the overall platform interior might be more oxygenated than platform margin. The redox condition of our studied samples may also help to estimate the shallow marine redox evolution in South China during terminal Ediacaran, which is still controversial. Recent studies of the sub-tidal and peritidal carbonates in Dengying Formation of peripheral Sichuan Basin suggest a highly spatial-temporal heterogeneous redox condition of the late Ediacaran shallow marine (
5.3.3 Reservoir implication
In the past few years, great progresses have been made on the exploration of the Z2dn4 in the Dengying Formation of the Gaoshiti—Moxi area, most of which are microbialite-related oil and gas reservoirs (Zou et al., 2014;
6 Conclusion
1) During terminal Ediacaran, microbialite lithofacies associations were developed on a rimmed platform within a fourth-order sequence stratigraphic framework in the Gaoshti—Moxi area, Central Sichuan Basin, SW China. From late TST to early HST, thin-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone—spotted thrombolite association dominated the platform margin; while thin-bedded dark-grey dolomudstone—dark-grey wavy stromatolite association was distributed in platform interior. From late HST to early TST of the next fourth-order sequence, the platform margin was dominated by thick-bedded spotted thrombolite—dolograinstone association, while the platform interior developed thin-medium-bedded layered thrombolite—light-grey wavy stromatolite association.
2) Based on distribution of microbialite lithofacies associations on the rimmed platform, the depositional evolution of microbialites is defined. From late TST to early HST in a fourth-order sequence, the platform margin developed scattered small-scaled spotted thrombolitic reefs, and the platform interior developed small-scaled wavy stromatolitic reefs and layered thrombolitic reefs scarcely. From late fourth-order HST to early TST of the next, large-scaled spotted thromboltic reefs and spotted thrombolitic reef—shoal complexes dominated the platform margin; and platform interior develop layered thrombolitic reefs and wavy stromatolitic reefs in deep sub-tidal—shallower inter-tidal lagoons, inter-tidal wavy stromatolitic reef—shoal complex and supra-tidal microbialite-deficient flats.
3) Salinity serves as an important environmental constraint for terminal Ediacaran microbialites, which can clearly differentiate the microbial lithofacies and lithofacies asssociations in platform margin and platform interior. The platform interior layered thrombolites and wavy stromatolites and their related lithofacies associations are characterized with higher salinity than the platform margin spotted thrombolite and other non-microbialite related lithofacies associations.
4) Redox cannot precisely characterize the variation of microbialite lithofacies associations within a fourth order depositional sequence. The redox condition of the microbialites in the Gaoshiti—Moxi area indicates that shallow marine during terminal Ediacaran was less oxygenated, and oxygenation may have occurred at the Ediacaran—Cambrian boundary.
5) Large-scaled platform margin spotted thrombolitic reefs and shoals from late fourth-order HST to next early fourth-order TST are considered as ideal oil and gas reservoirs. And the smaller-scaled platform interior layered thrombolitic and wavy stromatolitic reefs might serve as potential favorable reservoirs. Future more detailed high-frequency sequence stratigraphic study combining salinity and redox analyses is advocated for successful reservoir characterization in the platform interior.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
YZ: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing original draft, Visualization. ZL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
Funding
The study is funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDA14010201.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Fanwei Meng, Valerio Acocella and two reviewers for processing our manuscript and the instructive comments. We are also grateful to Prof. Chunfang Cai and Yongjie Hu for discussions and modifications. Denglin Han, Yunxian Feng and Linbo Wang are thanked for their assist during geochemical analyses.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AdegokeA. K.AbdullahW. H.HakimiM. H.YandokaB. M. S. (2014). Geochemical characterisation of fika Formation in the Chad (bornu) basin, northeastern Nigeria: Implications for depositional environment and tectonic setting. Appl. Geochem.43, 1–12. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.01.008
2
AitkenJ. D. (1967). Classification and environmental significance of cryptalgal limestones and dolomites, with illustrations from the cambrian and ordovician of southwestern alberta. J. Sediment. Res.37, 1163–1178. 10.1306/74D7185C-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D
3
BauM.DulskiP. (1996). Distribution of yttrium and rare-Earth elements in the penge and kuruman iron-formations, transvaal supergroup, South Africa. Precambrian Res.79 (1-2), 37–55. 10.1016/0301-9268(95)00087-9
4
BauM.M¨ollerP.DulskiP. (1997). Yttrium and lanthanides in eastern Mediterranean seawater and their fractionation during redox-cycling. Mar. Chem.56 (1–2), 123–131. 10.1016/S0304-4203(96)00091-6
5
BurneR. V.MooreL. S. (1987). Microbialites: Organosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial communities. Palaios2, 241–254. 10.2307/3514674
6
ByrneR. H.SholkovitzE. R. (1996). Chapter 158 Marine chemistry and geochemistry of the lanthanides. Handb. Phys. Chem. rare earths23, 497–593. 10.1016/S0168-1273(96)23009-0
7
CaiC.LyonsT. W.SunP.LiuD.WangD.TinoC. J.et al (2022). Enigmatic super-heavy pyrite formation: Novel mechanistic insights from the aftermath of the Sturtian Snowball Earth. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta334, 65–82. 10.1016/j.gca.2022.07.026
8
ChenD.ZhouX.FuY.WangJ.YanD. (2015). New U–Pb zircon ages of the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary strata in South China. Terra nova.27, 62–68. 10.1111/ter.12134
9
ChenY.YanZ.EzakiY.AdachiN.LiuJ. (2021). Rare Earth and yttrium elements (REY) patterns of mesostructures of miaolingian (cambrian) thrombolites at jiulongshan, shandong province, China. Palaeoworld30 (4), 627–642. 10.1016/j.palwor.2020.12.007
10
CondonD.ZhuM.BowringS.WangW.YangA.JinY. (2005). U-Pb ages from the neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation, China. Science308, 95–98. 10.1126/science.1107765
11
de OliveiraR. S.NogueiraA. C. R.RomeroG. R.TruckenbrodtW.da Silva BandeiraJ. C. (2019). Ediacaran ramp depositional model of the Tamengo Formation, Brazil. J. S. Am. Earth Sci.96, 102348. 10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102348
12
Della PortaG.WebbG. E.McDonaldI. (2015). REE patterns of microbial carbonate and cements from sinemurian (lower jurassic) siliceous sponge mounds (djebel bou dahar, high atlas, Morocco). Chem. Geol.400, 65–86. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.02.010
13
DerryL. A.BrasierM. D.CorfieldR. M.RozanovA. Y.ZhuravlevA. Y. (1994). Sr and C isotopes in lower cambrian carbonates from the siberian craton: A paleoenvironmental record during the ‘cambrian explosion’. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.128 (3-4), 671–681. 10.1016/0012-821X(94)90178-3
14
DicksonJ. (1966). Carbonate identification and Genesis as revealed by staining. J. Sediment. Res.36, 491–505. 10.1306/74D714F6-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D
15
DingY.ChenD.ZhouX.GuoC.HuangT.ZhangG. (2019). Cavity-filling dolomite speleothems and submarine cements in the Ediacaran Dengying microbialites, South China: Responses to high-frequency sea-level fluctuations in an ‘aragonite–dolomite sea. Sedimentology66 (6), 2511–2537. 10.1111/sed.12605
16
DingY.LiZ.LiuS.SongJ.ZhouX.SunW.et al (2021). Sequence stratigraphy and tectono-depositional evolution of a late Ediacaran epeiric platform in the upper Yangtze area, South China. Precambrian Res.354, 106077. 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.106077
17
DingY.SunW.LiuS.XieJ.TangD.ZhouX.et al (2022). Low oxygen levels with high redox heterogeneity in the late Ediacaran shallow ocean: Constraints from I/(Ca + Mg) and Ce/Ce* of the Dengying Formation, South China. Geobiology20, 790–809. 10.1111/gbi.12520
18
DunhamR. J. (1962). “Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures,” in Classification of carbonate rocks—a symposium. Editor HamW. (Colorado: AAPG Memoir), 108–121. 10.1306/M1357
19
EltomH. A.AbdullatifO. M.MakkawiM. H.EltoumI. E. A. (2017). Rare Earth element geochemistry of shallow carbonate outcropping strata in Saudi Arabia: Application for depositional environments prediction. Sediment. Geol.348, 51–68. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.11.005
20
FlügelE. (2010). Microfacies of carbonate rocks: Analysis, interpretation and application. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 984.
21
GaoP.LiuG.JiaC.YoungA.WangZ.WangT.et al (2016). Redox variations and organic matter accumulation on the Yangtze carbonate platform during late ediacaran–early cambrian: Constraints from petrology and geochemistry. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.450, 91–110. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.02.058
22
GermanC. R.ElderfieldH. (1990). Application of the Ce anomaly as a paleoredox indicator: The ground rules. Paleoceanography5 (5), 823–833. 10.1029/PA005i005p00823
23
GrotzingerJ.Al-RawahiZ. (2014). Depositional facies and platform architecture of microbialite-dominated carbonate reservoirs, Ediacaran–Cambrian Ara Group, Sultante of Om. AAPG Bull.98, 1453–1494. 10.1306/02271412063
24
GrotzingerJ. P.JamesN. P. (2000). Precambrian carbonates: Evolution of understanding. SEPM Soc. Sediment. Geol.67. 10.2110/pec.00.67
25
GrotzingerJ. P.KnollA. H. (1999). Stromatolites in precambrian carbonates: Evolutionary mileposts or environmental dipsticks?Annu. Rev. earth Planet. Sci.27 (1), 313–358. 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.313
26
GuoQ.StraussH.ZhuM.ZhangJ.YangX.LuM.et al (2013). High resolution organic carbon isotope stratigraphy from a slope to basinal setting on the Yangtze Platform, South China: Implications for the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition. Precambrian Res.225, 209–217. 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.10.003
27
GuoX.HuD.HuangR.WeiZ.DuanJ.WeiX.et al (2020). Deep and ultra-deep natural gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin: Progress and prospect. Nat. Gas. Ind. B7 (5), 419–432. 10.1016/j.ngib.2020.05.001
28
HaqB.HardenbolJ.VailP. (1987). Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science235 (4793), 1156–1167. 10.1126/science.235.4793.1156
29
HarwoodC. L.SumnerD. Y. (2011). Microbialites of the neoproterozoic beck spring dolomite, southern California. Sedimentology58 (6), 1648–1673. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2011.01228.x
30
HoodA. V. S.PlanavskyN. J.WallaceM. W.WangX. (2018). The effects of diagenesis on geochemical paleoredox proxies in sedimentary carbonates. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta232, 265–287. 10.1016/j.gca.2018.04.022
31
HoodA. V. S.WallaceM. W. (2015). Extreme ocean anoxia during the Late Cryogenian recorded in reefal carbonates of Southern Australia. Precambrian Res.261, 96–111. 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.02.008
32
HuM.GaoD.WeiG.YangW.XieW. (2018). Sequence stratigraphy and facies architecture of a mound-shoal-dominated dolomite reservoir in the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation, central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Geol. J.54 (3), 1653–1671. 10.1002/gj.3261
33
HuY.CaiC.PedersonC. L.LiuD.JiangL.HeX.et al (2020). Dolomitization history and porosity evolution of a giant, deeply buried Ediacaran gas field (Sichuan Basin, China). Precambrian Res.338, 105595. 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105595
34
HusinecA. (2016). Sequence stratigraphy of the red river formation, williston basin, USA: Stratigraphic signature of the ordovician katian greenhouse to icehouse transition. Mar. Petroleum Geol.77, 487–506. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.07.003
35
JiangG.Christie-BlickN.KaufmanA. J.BanerjeeD. M.RaiV. (2003). Carbonate platform growth and cyclicity at a terminal proterozoic passive margin, infra krol Formation and krol Group, lesser himalaya, India. Sedimentology50 (5), 921–952. 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2003.00589.x
36
JiangG.ShiX.ZhangS.WangY.XiaoS. (2011). Stratigraphy and paleogeography of the ediacaran Doushantuo Formation (ca. 635–551 Ma) in South China. Gondwana Res.19 (4), 831–849. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.01.006
37
KamberB. S.WebbG. E. (2007). Transition metal abundances in microbial carbonate: A pilot study based on in situ LA-ICP-MS analysis. Geobiology5 (4), 375–389. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2007.00129.x
38
KaufmanA. J.KnollA. H. (1995). Neoproterozoic variations in the C-isotopic composition of seawater: Stratigraphic and biogeochemical implications. Precambrian Res.73 (1-4), 27–49. 10.1016/0301-9268(94)00070-8
39
KeithM. L.WeberJ. N. (1964). Carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of selected limestones and fossils. Geochimica cosmochimica acta28 (10-11), 1787–1816. 10.1016/0016-7037(64)90022-5
40
KnauthL. P. (2005). Temperature and salinity history of the precambrian ocean: Implications for the course of microbial evolution. Geobiol. Object. concepts, Perspect.2005, 53–69. 10.1016/B978-0-444-52019-7.50007-3
41
LanC.XuZ.ChenH.YangW.LuC.LiP.et al (2022b). Paleoceanographic reconstruction of the ediacaran Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin, southwest China: Implications for the origin of precambrian microbial carbonates. J. Asian Earth Sci.236, 105340. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105340
42
LanC.XuZ.YangD.YangW.LuC.ChenH.et al (2022a). Stratigraphy and depositional evolution of the terminal Ediacaran platform in the central to northern Sichuan Basin, Southwest China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.601, 111142. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111142
43
LandL. (1980). “The isotopic and trace element geochemistry of dolomite: The state of the art,” in Concepts and models of dolomitization. Editors ZengerD. H.DunhamJ. B.EthingtonR. L. (Tulsa, Oklahoma: SEPM, Special publication), Vol. 28, 87–110. 10.2110/pec.80.28.0087
44
LawrenceM. G.GreigA.CollersonK. D.KamberB. S. (2006). Direct quantification of rare Earth element concentrations in natural waters by ICP-MS. Appl. Geochem.21 (5), 839–848. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.02.013
45
LiA.GaoD.HuM.ZhaoY.ZhuC.DaiY. (2021). Deposition model and main factors controlling depositional processes for microbialites in the fourth member, Dengying Formation, central Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin.2021, 1–20. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.156
46
LiF.DengJ.KershawS.BurneR.GongQ.TangH.et al (2021). Microbialite development through the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition in China: Distribution, characteristics, and paleoceanographic implications. Glob. Planet. Change205, 103586. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103586
47
LiK.SongJ.LiuS.YangD.LiZ.JinX.et al (2022). Element enrichment characteristics and paleoenvironmental significance of microbial rock fabric in late ediacaran strata from the Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin.(in Chinese with English abstract). 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.042
48
LiP. W.LuoP.ChenM.SongJ. M.JingT. F.WangG. Q. (2015). Characteristics and origin of the Upper Sinian microbial carbonate reservoirs at the northwestern margin of Tarim Basin. Oil Gas Geol.36, 416–428. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.11743/ogg20150310
49
LiY.HeD.LiD.LiS.WoY.LiC.et al (2020). Ediacaran (Sinian) palaeogeographic reconstruction of the Upper Yangtze area, China, and its tectonic implications. Int. Geol. Rev.62, 1485–1509. 10.1080/00206814.2019.1655670
50
LinX.PengJ.DuL.YanJ.HouZ. (2017). Characterization of the microbial dolomite of the upper sinian Dengying Formation in the hanyuan area of sichuan province, China. Acta Geol. Sinica-English Ed.91 (3), 806–821. 10.1111/1755-6724.13311
51
LingH.ChenX.LiD.WangD.Shields-ZhouG.ZhuM. (2013). Cerium anomaly variations in ediacaran–earliest cambrian carbonates from the Yangtze gorges area, South China: Implications for oxygenation of coeval shallow seawater. Precambrian Res.225, 110–127. 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.10.011
52
LiuJ.LiW.ZhangB.ZhouH.YuanX.ShanX.et al (2015). Sedimentary palaeogeography of the sinian in upper Yangtze region. J. Palaeogeogr.17 (6), 735–753. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.7605/gdlxb.2015.06.061
53
LiuQ.ZhuD.JinZ.LiuC.ZhangD.HeZ. (2016). Coupled alteration of hydrothermal fluids and thermal sulfate reduction (TSR) in ancient dolomite reservoirs – an example from Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, southern China. Precambrian Res.285, 39–57. 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.09.006
54
LiuY.HuZ.GaoS.GüntherD.XuJ.GaoC.et al (2008a). In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem. Geol.257 (1-2), 34–43. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004
55
LiuY.HuZ.GaoS.GüntherD.XuJ.GaoC.et al (2008b). In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem. Geol.257 (1-2), 34–43. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004
56
LuoY.TanX.ZhaoD.LuoW.LiuY.XiaoD.et al (2022). Sedimentary characteristics of microbial carbonates in the ediacaran and their geological implications: A case study of the member 4 of Dengying Formation from wellblock MX8, central Sichuan Basin. J. Palaeogeogr. Chin. Ed.24 (2), 278–291. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.7605/gdlxb.2022.02.017
57
LyonsT. W.ReinhardC. T.PlanavskyN. J. (2014). The rise of oxygen in Earth’s early ocean and atmosphere. Nature506 (7488), 307–315. 10.1038/nature13068
58
MaY.GuoX.GuoT.HuangR.CaiX.LiG. (2007). The Puguang gas field: New giant discovery in the mature Sichuan Basin, southwest China. AAPG Bull.91, 627–643. 10.1306/11030606062
59
McLennanS. (1989). Rare Earth elements in sedimentary rocks: Influence of provenance and sedimentary processes. Rev. Mineral. Geochem.21 (1), 169–200. 10.1515/9781501509032-010
60
NutmanA. P.FriendC. R.BennettV. C.WrightD.NormanM. D. (2010). ≥3700 Ma pre-metamorphic dolomite formed by microbial mediation in the isua supracrustal belt (W. Greenland): Simple evidence for early life?Precambrian Res.183 (4), 725–737. 10.1016/j.precamres.2010.08.006
61
OliveriE.NeriR.BellancaA.RidingR. (2010). Carbonate stromatolites from a messinian hypersaline setting in the caltanissetta basin, sicily: Petrographic evidence of microbial activity and related stable isotope and rare Earth element signatures. Sedimentology57 (1), 142–161. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2009.01094.x
62
PaytanA.AverytK.FaulK.GrayE.ThomasE. (2007). Barite accumulation, ocean productivity, and Sr/Ba in barite across the paleocene–eocene thermal maximum. Geology35 (12), 1139–1142. 10.1130/G24162A.1
63
PengH.MaK.ZhangX.WenL.WangY.TianX.et al (2021). Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and sedimentary evolution model of the late ediacaran in the Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin.39 (6), 1440–1450. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.119
64
PeropadreC.LiesaC. L.MeléndezN. (2013). High-frequency, moderate to high-amplitude sea-level oscillations during the late Early Aptian: Insights into the Mid-Aptian event (Galve sub-basin, Spain). Sediment. Geol.294, 233–250. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.05.019
65
PittetB.Van BuchemF. S.HillgärtnerH.RazinP.GrötschJ.DrosteH. (2002). Ecological succession, palaeoenvironmental change, and depositional sequences of Barremian–Aptian shallow-water carbonates in northern Oman. Sedimentology49 (3), 555–581. 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2002.00460.x
66
PomarL. (2001). Ecological control of sedimentary accommodation: Evolution from a carbonate ramp to rimmed shelf, upper miocene, balearic islands. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.175 (1-4), 249–272. 10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00375-3
67
PomarL.HaqB. U. (2016). Decoding depositional sequences in carbonate systems: Concepts vs experience. Glob. Planet. Change146, 190–225. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.10.001
68
PretoN.KlügelA.HimmlerT.FranceschiM. (2019). Origin of facies zonation in microbial carbonate platform slopes: Clues from trace element and stable isotope geochemistry (Middle Triassic, Dolomites, Italy). Sedimentology66 (1), 81–101. 10.1111/sed.12498
69
RidingR. (2000). Microbial carbonates: The geological record of calcified bacterial–algal mats and biofilms. Sedimentology47, 179–214. 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2000.00003.x
70
RidingR. (2011). “Microbialites, stromatolites, and thrombolites,” in Encyclopedia of geobiology. Editors ReitnerJ.ThielV. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 635–654. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9212-1_196
71
RodriguesM. G.VarejãoF. G.MatosS. A.FürsichF. T.WarrenL. V.AssineM. L.et al (2022). High-resolution taphonomy and sequence stratigraphy of internally complex, bakevelliid-dominated coquinas from the Aptian Romualdo Formation, Araripe Basin, NE Brazil. Mar. Petroleum Geol.143, 105814. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105814
72
SchröderS.GrotzingerJ. P.AmthorJ. E.MatterA. (2005). Carbonate deposition and hydrocarbon reservoir development at the precambrian–cambrian boundary: The Ara Group in South Oman. Sediment. Geol.180 (1-2), 1–28. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.07.002
73
ShieldsG.StilleP. (2001). Diagenetic constraints on the use of cerium anomalies as palaeoseawater redox proxies: An isotopic and REE study of cambrian phosphorites. Chem. Geol.175 (1–2), 29–48. 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00362-4
74
Shields-ZhouG.ZhuM.LiD.WangD.ZhuM. (2013). Cerium anomaly variations in Ediacaran–earliest Cambrian carbonates from the Yangtze Gorges area, South China: Implications for oxygenation of coeval shallow seawater. Precambrian Res.225, 110–127. 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.10.011
75
StüekenE. E.JonesS.RaubT. D.PraveA. R.RoseC. V.LinnekogelS.et al (2020). Geochemical fingerprints of seawater in the late mesoproterozoic midcontinent rift, north America: Life at the marine-land divide. Chem. Geol.553, 119812. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119812
76
Suarez-GonzalezP.ArenasC.BenitoM. I.PomarL. (2019). Interplay between biotic and environmental conditions in pre-salt messinian microbialites of the Western mediterranean (upper miocene, mallorca, Spain). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.533, 109242. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109242
77
SunY.ZhangY.XiA.TangY.ZhouR.LiuD.et al (2022). Petrographic and geochemical characteristics of oncolites in the ediacaran Dengying Formation of the upper Yangtze area, China: Implications for their paleo-environment. Sediment. Geol.442, 106296. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2022.106296
78
TaylorS. R.McClennanS. M. (1985). The continental crust: Its composition and evolution (Oxford: Blackwell), 312. 10.1086/629067
79
TangQ.CuiH.ZhangF. (2022). Neoproterozoic earth-life system. Precambrian Res.368, 106486. 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106486
80
TostevinR.ShieldsG. A.TarbuckG. M.HeT.ClarksonM. O.WoodR. A. (2016). Effective use of cerium anomalies as a redox proxy in carbonate-dominated marine settings. Chem. Geol.438, 146–162. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.06.027
81
VahrenkampV. C.SwartP. K. (1994). “Late cenozoic dolomites of the Bahamas: Metastable analogues for the Genesis of ancient platform dolomites,” in Dolomites: A volume in honour of Dolomieu. Editors PurserB.TuckerM.ZengerD. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.), Vol. 21, 133–153. 10.1002/9781444304077.ch9
82
WangJ.HeZ.ZhuD.LiuQ.DingQ.LiS.et al (2020). Petrological and geochemical characteristics of the botryoidal dolomite of Dengying Formation in the Yangtze craton, South China: Constraints on terminal ediacaran “dolomite seas”. Sed. Geol.406, 105722. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2020.105722
83
WangL.HuG.ZhaoD.TanX.WangH. (2022). Microbialites of terminal ediacaran in the upper Yangtze platform, China: From mesoscopic to nanoscale. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.585, 110729. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110729
84
WangY.WangS.YanH.ZhangY.LiJ.MaD. (2021). Microbial carbonate sequence architecture and depositional environments of member IV of the late ediacaran Dengying Formation, gaoshiti–moxi area, Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Geol. J.56 (8), 3992–4015. 10.1002/gj.4146
85
WebbG.KamberB. (2000). Rare Earth elements in Holocene reefal microbialites: A new shallow seawater proxy. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta64 (9), 1557–1565. 10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00400-7
86
WeiG.DuJ.XuC.ZouC.YangW.ShenP.et al (2015). Characteristics and accumulation modes of large gas reservoirs in Sinian-Cambrian of Gaoshiti-Moxi region, Sichuan Basin. Acta Pet. Sin.36, 1–12. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.7623/syxb201501001
87
WeiM.BaoZ.MunneckeA.LiuW.HarrisonG. W. M.ZhangH.et al (2021). Paleoenvironment of the lower–middle cambrian evaporite series in the tarim basin and its impact on the organic matter enrichment of shallow water source rocks. Minerals11 (7), 659. 10.3390/min11070659
88
WeiW.AlgeoT. J. (2020). Elemental proxies for paleosalinity analysis of ancient shales and mudrocks. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta287, 341–366. 10.1016/j.gca.2019.06.034
89
WenL.WangW. Z.LiL. J.HongH. T.LuoB.ZhangX. H.et al (2020). New understandings of distribution characteristics of Sinian Dengying Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin and its significance of oil and gas geological exploration. China Pet. Explor.25, 56–65. (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.03.006
90
XuZ. H.LanC. J.HaoF.ChenH. R.YangW. Q.MaX. L.et al (2020). Difference of mound-bank complex reservoir under different palaeogeographic environment of the Sinan Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin. J. Palaeogeogr.22, 235–250. (In Chinese with English abstract.). 10.7605/gdlxb.2020.02.074
91
YanH.HeD.JiaA.LiZ.GuoJ.PengX.et al (2022). Characteristics and development model of karst reservoirs in the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Explor. Dev.49 (4), 810–823. 10.1016/S1876-3804(22)60312-4
92
YangX.LiZ.GaoB.ZhouY. (2021). The Cambrian Drumian carbon isotope excursion (DICE) in the Keping area of the northwestern Tarim Basin, NW China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.571, 110385. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110385
93
ZhangB. M.LiuJ. J.BianL. Z.ShenY. M.JiaJ. H.ZhangL. P.et al (2009). Reef-banks and reservoir-constructive diagenesis. Earth Sci. Front.16, 270–289.
94
ZhangB.ZhengD. (2022). Sedimentological, geochemical, and geochronological constraints on the origin of the neoproterozoic luoquan formation at the southern margin of the north China craton. Int. Geol. Rev.64 (7), 911–932. 10.1080/00206814.2021.1894609
95
ZhangF.XiaoS.KendallB.RomanielloS. J.CuiH.MeyerM.et al (2018). Extensive marine anoxia during the terminal Ediacaran Period. Sci. Adv.4 (6), eaan8983. 10.1126/sciadv.aan8983
96
ZhangJ.ZhangB. M.ShanX. Q. (2014). Controlling effects of paleo-climate and paleo-ocean on formation of carbonate reservoirs. Petroleum Explor. Dev.41, 135–143. 10.1016/S1876-3804(14)60016-1
97
ZhangX.ShuD.HanJ.ZhangZ.LiuJ.FuD. (2014). Triggers for the cambrian explosion: Hypotheses and problems. Gondwana Res.25 (3), 896–909. 10.1016/j.gr.2013.06.001
98
ZhaoG.CawoodP. A. (2012). Precambrian geology of China. Precambrian Res.222-223, 13–54. 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.09.017
99
ZhengJ.ZhuY.HuangL.YangG.HuF. (2022). Geochemical characteristics and their geological significance of lower cambrian xiaoerblak Formation in northwestern tarim basin, China. Minerals12 (6), 781. 10.3390/min12060781
100
ZhouY.YangF.JiY.ZhouX.ZhangC. (2020). Characteristics and controlling factors of dolomite karst reservoirs of the Sinian Dengying Formation, central Sichuan Basin, southwestern China. Precambrian Res.343, 105708. 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105708
101
ZhuD.LiuQ.WangJ.DingQ.HeZ. (2021). Stable carbon and oxygen isotope data of Late Ediacaran stromatolites from a hypersaline environment in the Tarim Basin (NW China) and their reservoir potential. Facies67 (3), 25. 10.1007/s10347-021-00633-0
102
ZhuD.LiuQ.WangJ.HuG.DingQ. (2022). Transition of seawater conditions favorable for development of microbial hydrocarbon source–Reservoir assemblage system in the Precambrian. Precambrian Res.374, 106649. 10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106649
103
ZhuG.WangT.XieZ.XieB.LiuK. (2015). Giant gas discovery in the Precambrian deeply buried reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin, China: Implications for gas exploration in old cratonic basins. Precambrian Res.262, 45–66. 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.02.023
104
ZhuM.ZhangJ.YangA. (2007). Integrated ediacaran (sinian) chronostratigraphy of South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.254, 7–61. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.025
105
ZouC.DuJ.XuC.WangZ.ZhangB.WeiG.et al (2014). Formation, distribution, resource potential, and discovery of Sinian–Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Explor. Dev.41 (3), 306–325. 10.1016/s1876-3804(14)60036-7
Summary
Keywords
terminal Ediacaran, microbialite, high-frequency sequence, salinity, redox
Citation
Zhou Y and Li Z (2023) Terminal Ediacaran microbialite lithofacies associations with paleo-environmental constraints in a high-frequency sequence stratigraphic framework of Sichuan Basin, SW China. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1085313. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1085313
Received
31 October 2022
Accepted
26 January 2023
Published
09 February 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Fanwei Meng, China University of Mining and Technology, China
Reviewed by
Tao Yang, Nanjing University, China
Dongya Zhu, SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zhou and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhong Li, lizhong@mail.igcas.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Diagenesis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.