ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Georeservoirs

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1518758

This article is part of the Research TopicGas Hydrates and their Implications for Global Changes: Climate, Environment, and EnergyView all articles

Modeling and forecast of gas hydrate distribution in the Black Sea: main principles and approaches

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute of Geology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 2Center for Problems of Marine Geology, Geoecology and Sedimentary Ore Formation of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 3Odessa I.I.Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Gas hydrates are prevalent in marine sediments in regions characterized by certain bathymetry, geomorphology, lithology, and physics (i.e. low temperature and high pressure conditions). The gas hydrates in the Black Sea serve as not only a promising source of energy and chemical resources but also as indicators of active fault zones and sites where the latest geological and geochemical processes are unfolding. The main goal of the present studies is to examine the main factors influencing gas hydrate formation, to understand their combinations and priority, and finally to demonstrate the potential of the integrated technique for gas hydrate abundance at the regional scale. This study employs a structured workflow consisting of database compilation, geological process analysis, identification of key gas hydrate indicators, GIS-based modeling, and hazard assessment. A comprehensive GIS project for the Black Sea was developed to integrate diverse datasets, including geological, geomorphological, and oceanographic information. Spatial analysis and modeling techniques, including weighted overlay methods, were applied to assess the influence of geological and environmental factors on gas hydrate formation. Spatial analyses confirm that gas hydrates are primarily confined to continental slope, where active geological processes such as landslides and methane seepage are present. Key controlling factors include seabed geomorphology, lithology, tectonic structures, and fluid migration pathways. Structural and tectonic analysis revealed a strong correlation between gas hydrate distribution and fault systems. Additionally, mud volcanoes, paleoriver canyons, and fluid migration structures play a crucial role in hydrate formation. A susceptibility map of the Black Sea gas hydrates was created using weighted ranking of geological, geomorphological, and oceanographic parameters. The susceptibility inference process has revealed substantial knowledge gaps, as the uncertainty analysis identifies large seafloor regions with insufficient data or extremely low data density. The developed model could be applied for a better understanding of the vulnerability of areas, and to apply the methods of local predictions of gas hydrates. This model highlights potential hydrate-bearing zones and serves as a predictive tool for future exploration and hazard mitigation. This study also provides valuable insights into marine geohazard preparedness, risk reduction, and sustainable practices in the Black Sea.

Keywords: Black Sea, Gas Hydrates, Susceptibility modeling, Geohazards, Sea bed sediments

Received: 28 Oct 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ivanik, Iemelianov, Kukovska, Fedoronchuk, Shuraev, Petrushenko and Hadiatska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Olena Ivanik, Institute of Geology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.