ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Petrology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1588243
This article is part of the Research TopicStructural Processes, Petrogenesis, Mineralization, and Geochronology in the Earth’s CrustView all 7 articles
Geochronology and geochemistry of the Fogang granitic batholith and its implications for uranium mineralization
Provisionally accepted- 1College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China
- 2Research Institute No. 290, China National Nuclear Corporation, Shaoguan, China
- 3School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- 4Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Corp. Ltd, Xi'an, China
- 5School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The E-W-striking Fogang granitic batholith represents the largest composite batholith in Guangdong province. The Pajiang uranium deposit has been identified in the southwestern portion of the Fogang granitic batholith. This deposit is hosted by the porphyritic biotite granite and the two-mica granites. In this study, zircon U-Pb dating, whole-rock geochemistry, and zircon trace element contents of porphyritic biotite granite and two-mica granites in the Pajiang area of the Fogang granitic batholith were systematically investigated. The results reveal that the geochronology of the porphyritic biotite granite, medium-to fine-grained two mica granite, and fine-grained two-mica granite are 156.7 ±0.7 Ma, 155.3 ±1.6 Ma, and 153.8 ±1.4 Ma, respectively. The porphyritic biotite granite is characterized by high SiO2, alkalis, and metaluminous to peraluminous (A/CNK = 0.95-1.21) but low rare earth contents (∑REE:107 ppm-465 ppm,) and negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.12-0.60), indicative of highly fractionated S-type granite. The porphyritic biotite granite, medium-to fine-grained two mica granite, and fine-grained two-mica granite all show high Rb/Sr values (1.52-41.7), indicating they originated from mature continental crust material. The porphyritic biotite granite has CaO/Na2O ratios of 0.06 -0.70, suggesting its source was a mix of pelitic and clastic rocks. The medium-to finegrained two mica granite, and fine-grained two-mica granite have lower CaO/Na2O ratios, indicating their source was pelitic rocks. The zircon trace element results indicate that the porphyritic biotite granite has a relatively higher oxygen fugacity (fO2 = -13.2), followed by the medium-to fine-grained two mica granite and the finegrained two-mica granite, which exhibit relatively lower oxygen fugacity (fO2 = -20.2, -17.3, respectively). Under low oxygen fugacity conditions, U tends to crystallize as independent uranium-bearing minerals during the magmatic stage. The crystallization processes of the medium-to fine-grained two-mica granite and the fine-grained two-mica granite are thus particularly favorable for the formation of uranium-bearing minerals such as uraninite and thorite. These minerals are susceptible to dissolution by hydrothermal fluids during subsequent uranium mineralization stages, thereby releasing U and providing a substantial source for mineralization. This further suggests that the two-mica granites serve as significant uranium source rocks for granite-type uranium deposits and hold favorable implications for mineral exploration.
Keywords: Fogang granitic batholith, Zircon U-Pb dating, S-type granites, wholerock geochemistry, Uranium source, Pajiang area
Received: 05 Mar 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hu, Ding, Liu, Wei, Qi and Qiu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Weicheng Ding, College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China
Bin Liu, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.