ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Structural Geology and Tectonics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1594244
Shale lithofacies mechanical differences from tectonic-diagenetic coupling and their response to hydraulic fracture network propagation
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China
- 2Geological Logging Company (Geological Research Institute) of Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd, Daqing, China
- 3College of Continuing Education, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, Daqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Fracture propagation modes in shale formations exhibit significant variations across different lithofacies during tectonic deformation and hydraulic fracturing. Understanding how the mechanical properties of these lithofacies influence fracture network development is crucial for effective shale reservoir stimulation. This study investigates the organic-rich Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale in the southern Sichuan Basin. Lithofacies were classified, and their mechanical properties analyzed, focusing on stress-strain behavior and energy accumulation/release characteristics under varying stress conditions. The study also examines the fracturing behavior of single and stacked lithofacies combinations. The findings reveal five primary lithofacies in the Lower Longmaxi (Long-1) submember of the study area. Under uniaxial compression, samples from different lithofacies predominantly fail through tensile splitting, exhibiting linear elastic energy accumulation and vertical splitting fractures. Under triaxial compression, the elastic deformation phase shortens, with increased energy dissipation during plastic deformation; shear fractures become the dominant failure mode. Among the lithofacies, siliceous shale exhibits the largest stress drop and highest ratio of released elastic energy, leading to the most intense failure. Due to its brittleness, siliceous shale undergoes planar fracture propagation in stress-unloading zones. Laminated calcareous-siliceous shale demonstrates fracture propagation capacity second only to siliceous shale, while clay-rich siliceous shale shows the weakest fracture development. Hydraulic fracturing in a stacked sequence of thinly laminated siliceous shale and clay-rich siliceous shale is significantly influenced by bedding planes acting as "stress barriers." Fractures propagating upward exhibit stepped, staircase-like growth and branching, forming a complex fracture network characterized by short fracture segments, numerous branches, complex morphologies, and strong lateral connectivity. In contrast, combinations of massive siliceous shale and massive clay-rich siliceous shale (with minimal bedding) facilitate vertical stress transmission, resulting in simpler fractures that are fewer in number, longer, and more planar. These insights provide valuable guidance for identifying sweet spots and optimizing stimulation strategies in shale formations with varying lithofacies combinations.
Keywords: Fracture network propagation, Lithofacies combination, hydraulic fracturing, Mechanical Properties, Organic-rich shale, Wufeng-Longmaxi formation
Received: 15 Mar 2025; Accepted: 15 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Peng, Hu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiangdong Peng, School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.