ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Georeservoirs
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1623905
A sustainable approach to deep geothermal energy exploitation: Feasibility of clustered U-shaped multi-branch wells
Provisionally accepted- 1Key Laboratory of Deep Petroleum Intelligent Exploration and Development, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- 2College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- 3State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
To overcome the limitations of unstable heat extraction power and low efficiency in current deep geothermal energy exploitation technologies, we propose a novel and sustainable approach using clustered U-shaped multi-branch wells (UMW). This method enables efficient heat exchange by circulating working fluid through U-shaped wells, where thermal energy is transferred between the working fluid and the reservoir via the wellbore wall, avoiding any material exchange. For the validation of UMW method, based on the high-temperature and high-pressure thermal conductivity tests using hot dry rock samples from the Gonghe Basin, we developed a UMW field-scale reservoirwellbore coupling model to assess the efficient heat extraction processes and the potential generating power of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The results highlight that high injection rates lead to rapid thermal breakthrough and a sharp decline in early-stage heat extraction power, indicating the need for careful optimization of operational parameters. The average heat recovery power of a single set of six branch wells over a 50-year operating cycle is ~4.32 MW. The ORC power generation capacity was conservatively estimated at ~284.4 kW over the first 21.5 years, and ~144.6 kW over the 50-year period. Sensitivity analysis of injection rates and the number of branch wells further suggests that balancing short-term power and long-term thermal stability requires adjusting injection rates, the number of branch wells, well spacing, and branch well operational schematic. We also provide a partial quantitative relationship between ORC power and operational parameters (injection rate and the number of branch wells) for optimization. This study demonstrates the promising potential of the UMW method for sustainable deep geothermal energy development. Future research will focus on refining quantitative optimization strategies for injection rates and operational cycles to ensure efficient and long-term heat extraction while maintaining system stability.
Keywords: Deep geothermal energy, numerical simulation, U-shaped multi-branch wells, Organic Rankine cycle, Reservoir-wellbore algorithm
Received: 06 May 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Li, Zhang, Kong, Zheng, Ma, Zhang, He and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Shouding Li, Key Laboratory of Deep Petroleum Intelligent Exploration and Development, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Zhaobin Zhang, Key Laboratory of Deep Petroleum Intelligent Exploration and Development, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.