You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Earth Sci., 20 October 2025

Sec. Economic Geology

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1627479

Correction: Experimental procedures, influencing parameters, and future prospects of geological sequestration of carbon dioxide

  • 1. CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company Limited, Beijing, China

  • 2. National Engineering Research Center of Oil and Gas Drilling and Completion Technology, Beijing, China

  • 3. National Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Flexible Coal Power Generation and Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage, Beijing, China

Article metrics

View details

734

Views

72

Downloads

The following references were erroneously omitted:

“Davoodi, S., Al-Shargabi, M., Wood, D. A., Rukavishnikov, V. S., and Minaev, K. M. (2023). Review of technological progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization. Gas Science and Engineering, 117: 205070.

Davoodi, S., Al-Shargabi, M., Wood, D. A., Mehrad, M., and Rukavishnikov, V. S. (2024). Carbon dioxide sequestration through enhanced oil recovery: a review of storage mechanisms and technological applications. Fuel, 366: 131313.”

The citation for Davoodi et al., 2023 was missing from the captions of Figure 3,5, where Li et al., 2013 was erroneously cited. The citation for Davoodi et al., 2024 was missing from the captions of Figures 6,7; in Figure 6, Vega and Kovscek, 2010 was erroneously cited. The corrected captions appear below.

“Figure 3. Technologies applicable to carbon capture (Source from Davoodi et al., 2023).

Figure 5. Carbon sequestration cost (USD/tCO2) with respect to emission reduction potential (GtCO2) of various technologies (Source from Davoodi et al., 2023).

Figure 6. Risk assessment of factors affecting CO2-EOR projects: (A) factors itemized with mitigation strategies; (B) matrix displaying risk factors in terms of probability and impact with traffic-light color coding (Source from Davoodi et al., 2024).

Figure 7. Timeline of advancements in worldwide uptake of carbon capture, utilization, and carbon storage (CCUS) technology. (Source from Davoodi et al., 2024).”

The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

carbon capture and storage, storage efficiency, geological conditions, technology innovation, carbon neutrality

Citation

Dai K, Xia Y, Yuan G, Liu T, Zhang H, Song H and Yuan H (2025) Correction: Experimental procedures, influencing parameters, and future prospects of geological sequestration of carbon dioxide. Front. Earth Sci. 13:1627479. doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1627479

Received

12 May 2025

Accepted

18 August 2025

Published

20 October 2025

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

13 - 2025

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Kun Dai,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics