ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1656661
This article is part of the Research TopicImpacts of Climate Change (CC) on territory and environment: materials and methods for evaluating the various CC-induced hazards and actions for reducing the consequences on the communities.View all 4 articles
Climate change impacts on hydrological regimes under spatially variable human-activity conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1Dalian University of Technology School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian, China
- 2Liaoning Provincial Water Affairs Service Center, Liaoning Provincial Department of Water Resources, Shenyang, China
- 3Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Beijing, China
- 4Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- 5Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The climate change impacts on hydrological conditions may be strongly modulated by the spatial variability of the intensity of human activities within watersheds. Despite growing recognition of climate and anthropogenic influences on hydrological regimes, comprehensive and spatially explicit assessments remain limited, hindering the development of robust watershed management and climate adaptation strategies. In this study, we propose an integrated framework for such analysis and deciphering by combining principal component analysis, hydrological modeling, and a range of variability approach to diagnose and attribute hydrological regime changes. The framework is tested on the case of the Taoer River Basin (TRB) as a representative watershed system with pronounced human-activity variation along the upstream to downstream direction. Our results show that human activities contribute only 18% to hydrological regime changes in the upstream regions, where anthropogenic influence is relatively low, compared to 49% in the downstream areas with substantially greater human interference. While the upstream areas exhibit more pronounced changes in daily maximum streamflow (78%-79%) and count of low pulses (79%), the downstream areas experience more substantial alterations in monthly average streamflow (84%-99%) and high pulse durations (85%). Overarching the humanactivity variability, the climate change impacts increase the risk of flooding, while the human activities exert greater influence in amplifying drought risk. Simulations based on CMIP6 climate projections further indicate a significant increase in the likelihood of upstream flooding. Overall, our findings highlight the necessity of spatially differentiated management and adaptation strategies, tailored to steep human-activity gradients across watershed zones, to effectively address hydrological changes under climate stress.
Keywords: Climate change impacts on hydrology, Hydrological regime alteration, Human-activity gradient, Spatial heterogeneity, hydrological modeling, CMIP6 projections
Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Pang, Jing, Wang, Shen, Yan, Zhang and Destouni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jianwei Liu, jwliu@dlut.edu.cn
Georgia Destouni, georgia.destouni@natgeo.su.se
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.