ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Hydrosphere
On WRF Hybrid-Dynamic Regression Approach in Heavy Rainfall Forecasting over The Northern of Thailand
Provisionally accepted
- 1Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
- 2Chiang Mai University, College of Arts, Media, and Technology, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract. Rainfall forecasting in Northern Thailand presents considerable chal-lenges due to the complex topography of the region and its highly variable climatic conditions, particularly during periods of heavy rainfall in August. This is compounded by limitations in ground-based observation data, such as missing data and sparse station coverage. This study has two primary objectives. First, it examines the sensitivity of rainfall simulations using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model to different configurations of microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes. Second, it evaluates the performance of four different approaches in forecasting models including autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural network (ANN), dynamic exponential regression and autoregressive integrated moving average (DER–ARIMA), and dynamic quadratic regression and autoregressive integrated moving average (DQR– ARIMA). The period was focused on 1–31 August from 2009–2023. The performance of both components is assessed using three statistical metrics: Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE). The results showed that the most accurate configurations in WRF model were Kessler–New Tiedtke for the Salween (RMSE = 9.85) River Basin, WSM5–New Tiedtke for the Ping (RMSE = 8.43) and Yom (RMSE = 10.41) River Basins, and WSM6–New Tiedtke for the Upper Mekong (RMSE = 13.73), Wang (RMSE = 11.10), and Nan (RMSE = 11.08) River Basins. For forecasting models, the ANN model demonstrated the highest accuracy in the Salween (RMSE = 10.66), Upper Mekong (RMSE = 15.09), and Nan (RMSE = 16.30) River Basins, while the DER–ARIMA model performed best in the Wang (RMSE = 15.63) and Yom (RMSE = 12.08) River Basins. The DQR–ARIMA model was found to be the most suitable for the Ping (RMSE = 12.04) River Basin.
Keywords: Heavy rainfall, WRF model, Microphysics, Cumulus parameterization, dynamic model
Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 27 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sirisombat, Chinram, Panityakul and Thinnukool. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Thammarat Panityakul
Orawit Thinnukool
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.