Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Volcanology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1667680

This article is part of the Research TopicReviews in Volcanology: 2023View all 5 articles

A Review of Techniques for Characterising Scoria Cone Morphologies

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
  • 2Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • 3Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Scoria cones represent the most abundant volcanic landforms on Earth, commonly formed by mafic eruptions that produce scoria and lava during short-lived, low-volume events. Their morphology exhibits considerable variability, influenced by eruption style, tectonic setting, and post-emplacement modification. Morphometric analysis of scoria cones is critical for understanding magmatic system evolution, eruptive processes, tectonic controls, age estimation, erosional history, climate influences, hazard assessment, and paleo-reconstruction. Early studies relied on manual topographic measurements and formula-based methods to reconstruct cone geometry, but these approaches are highly sensitive to irregular morphologies and subjective parameter selection. The advent of satellite imagery, high-resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEMs), and semi-automated algorithms has revolutionised scoria cone analysis, enabling more precise and reproducible morphometric characterizations. Despite these advancements, persistent inconsistencies arise from differences in DEM resolution, cone boundary identification, and methodological choice, each contributing to uncertainty in results. The lack of a standardised methodological framework hampers direct comparison between studies and limits the reliability of derived parameters. This review synthesises current methodologies and datasets for scoria cone morphometry across diverse geomorphological, tectonic, and volcanic environments, aiming to clarify the strengths and limitations of each approach and to guide future research toward best practices in scoria cone analysis.

Keywords: Cinder cones, morphology, Volcano morphology, Digital elevation models (DEMs), volcanology

Received: 17 Jul 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bailey, Varley and Blackett. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ryan Bailey, ryanbailey10188@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.