Abstract
Seismic activity frequently occurs in the North China Plain seismic belt. Historical earthquake records for the fault southwest of Beijing are sparse, with only one significant event: the 1057 M 6 earthquake. This study focuses on the southern extension of the Nanyuan-Tongxian Fault. Using dynamic numerical methods, we simulate the rupture process of this earthquake to investigate its impact on strong ground motions in Beijing and surrounding areas. First, on the basis of the fault geometry and hydraulic fracturing stress data, we set the dynamic parameters of the fault plane and construct a curved fault model. Numerical simulation of the dynamic rupture process yielded the following results: a maximum slip of 0.75 m, an average slip of 0.49 m, a rupture duration of approximately 10 s, and a moment magnitude (Mw) of 6.5. The rupture propagated bilaterally; influenced by fault geometric bending, the peak slip rate reached 0.7 m/s on the SW side, whereas the slip rate on the NE side was smoother. The strong ground motion distribution showed a maximum intensity of VIII, which was concentrated along the fault trace with a significant hanging wall effect. Notably, owing to the combined effects of rupture directivity and fault bending, anomalously high-intensity zones appeared in areas distant from the epicenter, such as Shunyi and Tongzhou. This pattern differs significantly from the historical seismic impact pattern of the Sanhe-Pinggu Fault on the northeastern side. Further simulations of the epicenter within the fault indicate that if a future earthquake’s epicenter is located west of the fault center, Tongzhou would still face high-intensity ground motion risks. The results from both planar-fault and 3-D velocity-model simulations further demonstrate that strong ground-motion characteristics are influenced by multiple factors. This study reveals the unique seismogenic mechanism of the Nanyuan-Tongxian Fault, providing a key basis for seismic hazard assessment southwest of Beijing.
Plain language summary
This study investigates the 1057M 6 earthquake in the Beijing region via dynamic numerical simulations to understand its rupture process and potential seismic hazards. This research focused on the southern extension of the Nanyuan–Tongxian Fault and constructed a curved fault model on the basis of fault geometry and stress data. The simulation results reveal a maximum slip of 0.75 m, an average slip of 0.49 m, and a rupture duration of approximately 10 s, with a moment magnitude (Mw) of 6.5. The rupture propagated bilaterally, with significant slip rate peaks on the southwest side due to geometric bending. The strong ground motion distribution indicates a maximum intensity of VIII along the fault trace, influenced by rupture directivity and fault geometry. It is noteworthy that areas far from the epicenter, including Shunyi and Tongzhou, recorded unusually high ground-motion intensities as a result of the combined effects of rupture directivity and fault bending, and fault geometry and velocity model significantly controls rupture propagation and ground motion distribution. This study highlights the importance of fault geometry in controlling rupture propagation and ground motion distribution, providing critical insights for seismic hazard assessment in the Beijing area.
Keypoints
The 1057M 6 earthquake rupture process was simulated via dynamic numerical methods, revealing significant slip and rupture characteristics.
Strong ground motion results in high intensity in areas far from the epicenter due to rupture directivity and fault geometry.
Fault geometry and velocity model significantly controls rupture propagation and ground motion distribution, highlighting the need for detailed fault studies in seismic hazard assessments.
1 Introduction
The North China Plain seismic belt has experienced multiple earthquakes above magnitude 6, particularly in the Beijing area, where active faults are densely distributed and where seismic activities are frequent. Historical seismic records exist for most active faults. For example, the Nankou–Sunhe Fault, with a dip angle of 70°–80° (; Liang, 2019), has paleoearthquake records dating back 4,000 years (). Since the 294 AD Yanqing M 6.0 earthquake, M ≥ 6.0 earthquakes have successively occurred in Daxing, Yanqing, Tongxian, and western Beijing (), with the most recent being the 1730 western Beijing M6.5 earthquake (; Xie and Cai, 1983). Subsequently, no M ≥ 6.0 earthquakes have been recorded in the Beijing area (). Related seismic and geophysical research (; Jiao et al., 2005; Li et al., 2021; Qin et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2017a; Zhang et al., 2017b; Zhang and Zhu, 2019) has revealed the seismic geological conditions of the Beijing area, providing a solid foundation for analyzing its historical earthquakes and potential future large earthquakes.
To investigate the seismogenic mechanisms and rupture processes of historical earthquakes in Beijing and its surrounding areas, some studies have employed numerical methods to simulate the rupture process and the resulting strong ground motions, such as the 1,679 Sanhe–Pinggu M8.0 earthquake (; ; ; Liu et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2022). They have also studied the effects of ground motions generated by different strata, topographies, and surrounding earthquakes in the Beijing area (; Liao, 2017; Yang et al., 2008). The results of these studies indicate that areas in and around Beijing, such as the Babaoshan–Huangzhuang–Gaoliying Fault and the Yanhuai Basin, still possess the potential for significant seismic activity (Jiao et al., 2005; Qin et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2008; Zhang and Zhu, 2019). The above research focused primarily on faults in the northeastern part of Beijing, which have frequent historical earthquake records. In contrast, the southwestern part of Beijing has fewer historical earthquake records and is characterized mainly by the development of the eastern margin fault of the Daxing Uplift (Daxing Fault), the Nanyuan-Tongxian Fault, and the Yongdinghe Fault. The eastern margin fault of the Daxing Uplift (Daxing Fault), located in the intermediate zone between Beijing’s Daxing District and Langfang city, Hebei Province, is also known as the northern margin fault of the Gu’an Basin (). It formed under the Paleogene SE‒NW extensional stress regime of the North China Plain (Zhao and Liu, 2002) and has been notably active since the Quaternary (Li et al., 1985). This fault is approximately 90 km long and 20–40 km wide, trending NE and dipping SE. Its northern section connects to the Xiadian Fault, which generated the 1,679 Pinggu M 8.0 earthquake, and the junction area experienced the 1536 M 6.0 earthquake (Li et al., 2021). Simultaneously, this fault separates the Daxing Uplift from the Langgu Depression, controlling and influencing the tectonic evolution of the Langgu Depression ().
North of the eastern margin fault of the Daxing Uplift lies the Nanyuan–Tongxian Fault, which is approximately 110 km long. This fault serves as the boundary between the Daxing Uplift and the Beijing Depression (Zhao and Zhu, 2003). It is S shaped, dips NW at angles of 50°–70° (Jiao and Qiu, 2006; Xu et al., 2015), and is divided from north to south into three segments: the northeastern segment, central segment, and southwestern segment (Lei et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). Its southern segment extends to the Nankou–Sunhe Fault. Because the historical earthquakes on the series of parallel faults northeast of Beijing (Huangzhuang--Gaoliying Fault, Shunyi-Liangxiang Fault, Nanyuan-Tongxian Fault, and Xiadian Fault) occurred less than 400 years ago, whereas the faults southwest of Beijing (Yongdinghe Fault, southern extension of the Nanyuan-Tongxian Fault, and eastern margin fault of the Daxing Uplift) had only one recorded M 6.0 earthquake in 1,057, the accumulated regional stress in this area may have been released less than that in the northeast. Moreover, the specific location and seismogenic structure of this earthquake remain undetermined (Li et al., 2021). To investigate the rupture process of the 1057 M 6.0 earthquake on the Nanyuan–Tongxian Fault and its potential impact on strong ground motions in the Beijing area, a curved fault model is constructed here, referencing the southern extension of the Nanyuan–Tongxian Fault (Figure 1). Spectral-element methods are employed to simulate the rupture process under different scenarios and calculate the resulting ground motions and their effects on Beijing and surrounding areas.
FIGURE 1
2 Data and methods
2.1 Fault geometry
During the Eocene–Oligocene extensional rifting in the Cenozoic Neogene, a series of NE-trending normal faults developed in the Beijing region (
FIGURE 2

Numerical simulation region and fault-plane geometry. (a) Simulation domain incorporating real topography; (b) spatial position of the fault geometry with a 70° dip, a curved surface length of ∼68 km, and a width of ∼20 km.
2.2 Dynamic parameters
Investigating the constitutive relationships that pervasively govern rupture processes is the physical basis for understanding complex rupture behavior; these relationships define how stress, slip, slip rate, and other relevant physical parameters are linked on the fault plane. Friction laws are crucial because they control how earthquakes are triggered, how rupture propagates after initiation, and how it ultimately arrests. To date, most friction laws have been derived from laboratory rock-fracture experiments (
FIGURE 3

Slip-weakening friction law (
In the slip-weakening friction law, the slip-weakening distance Dc is also a critical parameter. First proposed theoretically by
FIGURE 4

Spatial distribution of slip-weakening distances on the fault plane The red star marks the epicenter.
In dynamic simulation processes, stress on the fault plane is difficult to measure directly and is typically determined via methods such as borehole measurements or hydraulic fracturing (
FIGURE 5

Variation in the principal stresses with depth. The maximum horizontal principal stress SH, the minimum horizontal principal stress Sh, and the vertical principal stress Sv increase linearly with depth and then remain constant; modified from Wang et al. (2012).
For the numerical simulations, the layered velocity model (Figure 6) at the central longitude and latitude was extracted from the USTClitho 1.0 (Unified Seismic Tomography models for continental China lithosphere) lithospheric velocity model for mainland China (Xin et al., 2018) and used as the input velocity structure.
FIGURE 6

One-dimensional layered velocity model. Derived from the USTClitho 1.0 velocity model at the epicenter’s central longitude and latitude.
2.3 Numerical method
The simulation of seismic source rupture processes can employ various methods. For earthquakes recorded at densely distributed stations, kinematic methods can be used to invert the slip distribution on the fault plane from observational data (
Because the dynamic rupture process is influenced by many factors, analytical solutions are generally unattainable; numerical methods are therefore routinely employed. A variety of numerical techniques capable of simulating seismic wave propagation have been successfully applied to dynamic rupture modeling, such as the finite-difference (FD) method introduced by Madariaga (1976) and
In this study, the spectral-element code Specfem3D (Komatitsch and Tromp, 1999; Komatitsch and Tromp, 2002a; Komatitsch and Tromp, 2002b) is employed to simulate the dynamic rupture process. Following previous work (
3 Results
On the basis of the above dynamic parameters, the dynamic rupture process of the 1057M6 earthquake in the Beijing area can be obtained. The dynamic simulation yields a maximum slip of approximately 0.75 m on the fault plane (Figure 7), an average slip of approximately 0.49 m, a rupture duration of ∼10 s, and a moment magnitude of Mw 6.5 (Figure 8), which aligns closely with M6¾ reported in earlier studies (Li et al., 2021). The maximum slip on the fault plane is located northeast of the epicenter. Owing to fault geometry, slip gradually increases to ∼0.75 m in this area. At the epicenter location, slip is not distributed uniformly in regions with significant geometric deformation (Figure 7). Simultaneously, influenced by fault geometry, the rupture propagation process on the fault plane undergoes changes (Figure 9): rupture propagates bilaterally from the epicenter; at ∼2 s, it bends on the SW side of the fault plane; at 3 s, it propagates to the upper and lower boundaries of the fault plane and reaches the maximum slip rate (∼0.7 m/s); at 4 s, rupture crosses the bend on the SW side of the fault plane, with its slip rate exceeding that of the smoother propagation process on the NE side; especially at 5.5 s, an arcuate rupture front propagating at the maximum slip rate is distinctly observable on the SW side. Moreover, affected by the greater slip-weakening distance at the upper boundary (Figure 4), the slip rate at the upper boundary during rupture is significantly lower than that at the lower section of the fault plane, and the rupture timing is delayed; at 6.5 s, the rupture propagates to the SW boundary of the fault plane, whereas the NE side achieves the maximum slip rate; at ∼8 s, it also propagates to the NE boundary of the fault plane; at ∼9 s, the rupture fully traverses the entire fault plane, with energy essentially released, with only minor slip velocities exhibited in partial areas owing to surface reflections.
FIGURE 7

Spatial distribution of fault slip obtained from dynamic simulation. The maximum slip of 0.75 m is located on the NE side of the epicenter, with an average slip of approximately 0.49 m, and it has a nonuniform distribution due to the geometric curvature of the fault; The red star marks the epicenter.
FIGURE 8

Moment magnitude function and rupture time. The curve of the seismic moment release with time shows a moment magnitude of Mw6.5, with a rupture duration of approximately 10 s. The main energy release is completed in the first 8 s, and only residual slip remains after 9 s.
FIGURE 9

Dynamic rupture propagation process. The spatiotemporal evolution of the fault slip rate; the rupture propagates bilaterally: owing to geometric bending, the SW side has a higher slip velocity peak and propagates faster than the NE side does; the upper boundary rupture is inhibited by high Dc; The red star marks the epicenter.
As a historically earthquake-prone region, Beijing has been extensively studied with respect to the impacts of historical or scenario earthquakes on strong ground motions in Beijing and surrounding areas. The peak ground acceleration in the North China Plain indicates greater seismic hazards in Tangshan, Taiyuan, and Beijing than in other regions (Yang et al., 2008). For example, the 1,679 Sanhe-Pinggu M8 earthquake occurred on the nearby Sanhe-Pinggu Fault. Various strong ground motion simulations (
FIGURE 10

Intensity distribution of strong ground motion. The intensity distribution map converted from the peak ground acceleration (PGA) of the simulated seismic motion. The Ⅷ intensity zone is concentrated along the fault trace, with a significant hanging wall effect. Owing to the influence of rupture directivity and fault bending, abnormally high intensities appear in far-field areas such as Shunyi and Tongzhou; The focal mechanism solutions are taken from the 2009–2021 dataset for mainland China and adjacent regions (
4 Discussion
4.1 The impact of the epicenter location on strong ground motion
This earthquake (the 1057 M6 earthquake) occurred nearly a thousand years ago, and the accumulated stress was relatively high. Determining the location of the next earthquake is difficult. To improve the seismic fortification requirements, two earthquakes are set on this fault to simulate the dynamic rupture process. Figure 11 shows the strong ground motions simulated at different epicentral locations. The results indicate that there is a significant directivity effect in the strong ground motions generated whether the initial rupture point is on the left side of the fault plane (Figure 11a) or the right side of the fault plane (Figure 11b) (Wang et al., 2018; Yang and Zhao, 2010). When the epicenter is on the left side of the fault plane (Figure 11a), the slip rate reaches the maximum value when the rupture propagates to the right side of the fault plane, and strong ground motions are generated in the Tongzhou area following the bending direction of the fault plane. When the epicenter is on the right side of the fault plane, the slip rate reaches the maximum value when the rupture propagates to the left side, and larger intensity areas are generated in the Gaobeidian and Zhuozhou areas. Combined with Figure 10, owing to the influence of the fault geometry and the rupture propagation process, strong ground motions are generated in the Tongzhou area if the epicenter is on the left side of the center of the entire fault.
FIGURE 11

Comparison of seismic motion scenarios at different epicentral locations. The red star indicates the set epicenter location, and the red circle represents the original epicenter location. (a) When the epicenter is on the left side of the southern segment of the fault, Tongzhou experiences high-intensity shaking. (b) When the epicenter is on the right side, the intensity increases in Gaobeidian and Zhuozhou; The focal mechanism solutions are taken from the 2009–2021 dataset for mainland China and adjacent regions (
4.2 Influence of the fault geometry
Dynamic rupture is also governed by fault geometry (
FIGURE 12

Trace of the planar fault and the spatial distribution of the resulting strong ground motion. The yellow line indicates the constructed planar fault; the blue line represents the original curved fault. The red circle denotes the epicenter—i.e., the initial rupture point. The color scale represents the intensity converted from the peak ground velocity; The focal mechanism solutions are taken from the 2009–2021 dataset for mainland China and adjacent regions (
4.3 Influence of the velocity model
In addition to the location of the initial rupture point and the fault geometry, the medium parameters also control the strong ground motion generated during dynamic rupture. To verify the ground motions of the 1,057 earthquake under different velocity models, we constructed a 3-D velocity model for the study area on the bases of USTClitho 1.0 (
FIGURE 13

3-D velocity model and velocity cross-sections near the epicenter (a) The blue line marks the surface trace of the curved fault; the yellow lines indicate the locations of the velocity cross-sections (b-e) Vp and Vs. velocity cross-sections along the yellow lines shown in (a).
The 3-D velocity model simulation revels that the hanging-wall side (southeast side) of the fault exhibits significantly greater ground motions than those produced by the 1-D layered model (Figure 10), particularly within the intensity-VII zone.
Our study area lies within the Quaternary sedimentary basin.
5 Conclusion
This study reconstructed the rupture process of the 1057M6 earthquake through dynamic numerical simulation, revealing the unique faulting mechanism and disaster characteristics of the fault southwest of Beijing. The simulation results based on the geometric structure of the Nan Yuan–Tongxian fault and the parameters of the regional stress field reveal that the earthquake rupture lasted approximately 10 s, with a maximum slip of 0.75 m and a moment magnitude of Mw6.5, which is consistent with the historically recorded magnitude of M63/4. Rupture propagation was significantly controlled by the fault geometry. The SW side experienced a sharp increase in slip velocity due to bending (peak value of 0.7 m/s), whereas the NE side experienced more stable propagation. The difference in the attenuation distance of slip at the fault boundaries further delayed the rupture process at the upper boundary.
The results of strong ground motion show that the maximum intensity of Ⅷ is distributed along the fault and that there is a significant hanging wall effect. Unlike the seismic effects of faults northeast of Beijing (such as the Sanhe–Pinggu fault), this simulation revealed abnormally high intensities in areas far from the epicenter, such as Shunyi and Tongzhou. This is the result of the combined action of the NE-dipping bend of the fault and the directivity of the rupture, forming a “rupture front effect”. A comparison of the simulation results at different epicentral locations reveals that if the fault point is located to the left of the center of the fault, the Tongzhou area will experience more intense shaking, whereas the right epicenter will experience Gaobeidian and Zhuozhou high-risk areas.
The planar-fault simulation shows that, when the rupture nucleates away from the fault’s geometric center, a pronounced directivity effect develops toward the northeastern side of the fault, producing intensities of VII or greater in XiangHe; in contrast, the curved-fault rupture does not generate a comparable intensity pattern, so the intensities produced by planar and nonplanar ruptures differ markedly in different regions. The 3-D velocity-model results further demonstrate that strong ground motion depends not only on the fault’s dynamic parameters and geometry but also on the medium encountered during rupture propagation: the greater the contrast in material properties is, the stronger the spatial asymmetry of ground motion. The greater ground motion on the southeastern side of the fault relative to the northwestern side is most likely due to the combined effects of heterogeneous media on either side of the fault and amplification by Quaternary sediments.
This earthquake occurred nearly a thousand years ago. The accumulated stress released by the southwest fault is low, and there is still a risk of recurrence in the future. The study results show that fault geometry is the key factor controlling rupture propagation and the spatial distribution of ground motion. The amplification effect of the sedimentary layer of the Beijing Basin may further exacerbate the disaster. This result provides a dynamic basis for the seismic fortification of Beijing and its surrounding areas (especially potential high-risk areas such as Tongzhou and Shunyi) and highlights the need to focus on the stress accumulation state of the Nanyuan–Tongxian fault.
Statements
Data availability statement
The focal mechanism solution data are from
Author contributions
ZX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. We are grateful to Beijing Gangzhen Technology Co., Ltd. for providing the research topic “The Impact of Strong Ground Motion on Buildings” (Fund No. YF-202520). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.
Acknowledgments
We are deeply grateful to the editors and the two reviewers for their thorough evaluation of our manuscript and for providing numerous detailed and constructive suggestions, which have greatly improved its clarity, accuracy, and overall quality. We also thank the Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics (CIG, http://geodynamics.org).
Conflict of interest
Author ZX was employed by Beijing Gangzhen Technology Co., Ltd.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbercrombieR. E.RiceJ. R. (2005). Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening?Geophys. J. Int.162 (2), 406–424. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02579.x
2
AndrewsD. J. (1976). Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks. J. Geophys. Res.81 (32), 5679–5687. 10.1029/JB081i032p05679
3
AndrewsD. J. (1980). A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth85 (B7), 3867–3877. 10.1029/JB085iB07p03867
4
AndrewsD. J. (1985). Dynamic plane-strain shear rupture with a slip-weakening friction law calculated by a boundary integral method. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.75 (1), 1–21. 10.1785/BSSA0750010001
5
BaZ. N.ZhaoJ. X.LiangJ. W.ZhangY. S.ZhangY. J. (2022). Simulation of strong ground motion in beijing area based on finite fault source model:taking the 1679 sanhe-pinggu M8 earthquake as an example. J. Seismol. Res.45 (3), 479–488. 10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2022.0048
6
BaiL. Y.LiX.QinH. M.ZhangX. L.ZhangY. Z. (2018). Study on the cyclic stratigraphy activity of nankou-sunhe fault in beijing plain since Quaternary and its tectonic significance. Geoscience32 (2), 270–278. 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2018.02.06
7
BhatH. S.OlivesM.DmowskaR.RiceJ. R. (2007). Role of fault branches in earthquake rupture dynamics. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth112 (B11). 10.1029/2007JB005027
8
CampilloM.FavreauP.IonescuI. R.VoisinC. (2001). On the effective friction law of a heterogeneous fault. J. Geophys. Research:Solid Earth106 (B8), 16307–16322. 10.1029/2000JB900467
9
CheZ. H. (1994). Study of the activity of nankou-sunhe fault. Seismol. Geol.16 (2), 115–120.
10
ChenQ. C.FengC. J.MengW.QinX. H.AnQ. M. (2012). Analysis of in situ stress measurements at the northeastern section of the longmenshan fault zone after the 5.12 wenchuan earthquake. Chin. J. Geophys.55 (12), 3923–3932. 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.12.005
11
ChengJ.RongY. F.MagistraleH.ChenG. H.XuX. W. (2019). Earthquake rupture scaling relations for mainland China. Seismol. Res. Lett.91 (1), 248–261. 10.1785/0220190129
12
ClaytonR.EngquistB. (1977). Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.67 (6), 1529–1540. 10.1785/BSSA0670061529
13
CoccoM.SpudichP.TintiE. (2006). On the mechanical work absorbed on faults during earthquake ruptures, earthquake: radiated energy and the. Phys. Earthquakes Faulting170, 237–254. 10.1029/170GM24
14
DasS.AkiK. (1977). A numerical study of two-dimensional spontaneous rupture propagation. Geophys. J. Int.50 (3), 643–668. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1977.tb01339.x
15
DayS. M. (1982a). Three-dimensional finite difference simulation of fault dynamics: rectangular faults with fixed rupture velocity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.72 (3), 705–727. 10.1785/BSSA0720030705
16
DayS. M. (1982b). Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: the effect of nonuniform prestress. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.72 (6A), 1881–1902. 10.1785/BSSA07206A1881
17
DengQ. D.ZhangP. Z.RanY. K.YangX. P.MinW.ChenL. C. (2003). Active tectonics and earthquake activities in China. Earth Sci. Front.10, 66–73.
18
DieterichJ. H. (1972). Time‐dependent friction in rocks. J. Geophys. Res.77 (20), 3690–3697. 10.1029/JB077i020p03690
19
DieterichJ. H. (1978). Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick-slip. Pure Appl. Geophys.116 (4), 790–806. 10.1007/BF00876539
20
DieterichJ. H. (1979). Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth84 (B5), 2161–2168. 10.1029/JB084iB05p02161
21
DieterichJ. H. (1981). “Constitutive properties of faults with simulated gouge,” in Mechanical behavior of crustal rocks. Editors CarterN. L.FriedmanM.LoganJ. M.StearnsD. W., 103–120. 10.1029/GM024p0103
22
DingZ.RomanelliF.ChenY. T.PanzaG. F. (2004). Realistic modeling of seismic wave ground motion in beijing city. Pure Appl. Geophys.161 (5), 1093–1106. 10.1007/s00024-003-2498-6
23
DongS.ZhangH. M. (2019). Effects of angles on dynamic ruptures on Y-type branched faults. Chin. J. Geophys.62 (11), 4156–4169. 10.6038/cjg2019M0572
24
FangT. M.LiuH.LiuY.HeF. B.ZhangL.WangH. B.et al (2016). Fundamental geological survey situations and development trend in Beijing's urbanization process. Nat. Resour. Inf. (4), 52–56. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3709.2016.04.010
25
FengC. J. (2014). Study on the present in situ stress field beneath the capital circle region. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences.
26
FestaG.VilotteJ. P. (2005). The newmark scheme as velocity-stress time-staggering: an efficient PML implementation for spectral element simulations of elastodynamics. Geophys. J. Int.161 (3), 789–812. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02601.x
27
FuC. H.GaoM. T.YuY. X. (2015). Studying on amplification effect of beijing basin on 3∼10s ground motion by numerical simulation method. J. Seismol. Res.38 (3), 448–460. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2015.03.016
28
GalvezP.SomervilleP.PetukhinA.AmpueroJ.-P.PeterD. (2020). Earthquake cycle modelling of multi-segmented faults: dynamic rupture and ground motion simulation of the 1992 Mw 7.3 landers earthquake. Pure Appl. Geophys.177 (5), 2163–2179. 10.1007/s00024-019-02228-x
29
GaoW. X.MaJ. (1993). Seismogeological environment and earthquake disasters in the capital circle[M]. Beijing: Science Press.
30
GaoM. T.YuY. X.ZhangX. M.WuJ.HuP.DingY. H. (2002). Three-dimensional finite-difference simulations of ground motions in the beijing area. Earthq. Res. China18 (4), 356–364. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2002.04.005
31
GaoM. T.JiangH.YuY. X.XuL. S.TangL. H. (2005). Effects on mechanism and rigidity of fault surface on strong ground motion. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. (17), 3101–3106.
32
GuG. X. (1984). China earthquake catalog. Beijing: Science Press.
33
GuatteriM. E.SpudichP. (2000). What can strong-motion data tell Us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws?Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.90 (1), 98–116. 10.1785/0119990053
34
GuiB. L.HeD. F.YanF. W.ZhangW. J. (2012). 3D geometry and kinematics of daxing fault: its constraints on the origin of langgu depression, bohaiwan gulf basin, China. Earth Sci. Front.19 (5), 86–99.
35
GuoX. Y.JiangC. S.HanL. B.YinH. Q.ZhaoZ. Y. (2022). Focal mechanism data set in Chinese mainland and its adjacent area(2009-2021). Natl. Earthq. Data Cent.2022. 10.12080/nedc.11.ds.2022.0004
36
GuoX. Y.HanL. B.ZhangX.ZhangZ.FangL. H.ChenK.et al (2024). Source parameters and rupture characteristics of the M6.2 jishishan earthquake in Gansu province on December 18, 2023. Prog. Earthq. Sci.54 (1), 75–85. 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2023-197
37
HastN. (1969). The state of stress in the upper part of the Earth's crust. Tectonophysics8 (3), 169–211. 10.1016/0040-1951(69)90097-3
38
HeF. B.XuX. W.HeZ. J.ZhangX. L.LiuL. Y.ZhangW.et al (2020). Research on Neogene-Quaternary stratigraphic structure and shallow tectonic features in the north section of daxing fault zone based on shallow seismic reflection profiling. Seismol. Geol.42 (4), 893–908. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.04.008
39
HuangX. M.WangL. M.XuJ.FangZ. J.ZhangY. M.XiangJ. C.et al (1991). Characteristics of neotectonic movement in beijing area. Seismol. Geol. (1), 43–51.
40
HuangX.ChenG.LiZ. L.SunJ. Z. (2012). The study on nanyuan-tongxian fault in beijing daxing planning town. Urban Geol.7 (4), 15–19. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1903.2012.04.004
41
IdaY. (1972). Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy. J. Geophys. Res.77 (20), 3796–3805. 10.1029/JB077i020p03796
42
IdeS.TakeoM. (1997). Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth102 (B12), 27379–27391. 10.1029/97JB02675
43
JiangY.YinN. (2021). Study on temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of earthquakes in beijing area, earthquake research in Shanxi. Earthq. Res. Shanxi4, 1–7. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6265.2021.04.001
44
JiangW. L.HouZ. H.XieX. S. (2001). Study on the paleoearthquake events in the changping jiuxian trench across the nankou-sunhe fault zone in the beijing plain. Sci. China Earth Sci.31 (6), 501–509. 10.1360/zd2001-31-6-501
45
JiaoQ.QiuZ. H. (2006). Research progress of major active faults in beijing Plain area. Bull. Inst. Crustal Dyn. (18), 72–84.
46
JiaoQ.QiuZ. H.FanG. S. (2005). Analysis on recent tectonic activity and seismicity of babao shan-huangzhuang-gaoliying fault in Beijing region. J. Geodesy Geodyn.25 (4), 50–54. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5942.2005.04.011
47
KomatitschD.TrompJ. (1999). Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int.139 (3), 806–822. 10.1046/J.1365-246X.1999.00967.X
48
KomatitschD.TrompJ. (2002a). Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-I. Validation. Geophys. J. Int.149 (2), 390–412. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01653.x
49
KomatitschD.TrompJ. (2002b). Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-II. Three-dimensional models, oceans, rotation and self-gravitation. Geophys. J. Int.150 (1), 303–318. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01716.x
50
KomatitschD.TsuboiS.TrompJ. (2005). The spectral-element method in seismology. Geophys. Monograph-American Geophys. Union205, 205–227. 10.1029/157GM13
51
KomatitschD.TrompJ.GargR.GhartiH. N.NagasoM.OralE.et al (2024). SPECFEM/specfem3d: SPECFEM3D v4.1.1 (v4.1.1). Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.10823181
52
Le PichonX.KreemerC.Chamot-RookeN. (2005). Asymmetry in elastic properties and the evolution of large Continental strike-slip faults. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth110 (B3). 10.1029/2004JB003343
53
LeiX. D.QiB. S.GuanW.ZhaoY.DuD.YanG. X.et al (2021). Research on the faults identification based on gravity anomaly in beijing plain. Chin. J. Geophys.64 (4), 1253–1265. 10.6038/cjg2021O0210
54
LiF. Q.WangL. J. (1979). Stress measurements in north China. Chin. J. Geophys.22 (01), 1–8.
55
LiZ. Y.KangL. X.LiX. G. (1985). Description of the neotectonic map of heibei plain and its surrounding areas. Beijing: Science Press.
56
LiY. H.WuQ. J.PanJ. T.ZhangF. X.YuD. X. (2013). An upper-mantle S-wave velocity model for east Asia from rayleigh wave tomography. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.377-378, 367–377. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.06.033
57
LiZ. F.LiY. B.ZhouB. G.ZhuG. J.LiuB. J.WuJ. (2021). New insight on the Holocene activity of the eastern marginal fault of daxing uplift, beijing Plain. Seismol. Geol.43 (6), 1671–1681. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.06.018
58
LiangY. N. (2019). A study of structure and activity of the north part of Nankou-sunhe fault in beijing. Geol. Bull. China38 (5), 858–865. 10.12097/gbc.dztb-38-5-858
59
LiaoL. (2017). Simulation of three-dimensional topographic effects on seismic ground motion in capital region based upon the spectral-element method. Seismol. Geomagnetic Observation Res.38 (1), 7–14. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2017.01.002
60
LiuB. Y.ShiB. P.ZhangJ. (2007). Strong motion simulation by the composite source modeling: a case study of 1679 m8.0 sanhe-pinggu earthquake. Acta Seismol. Sin.29 (3), 302–313. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.03.009
61
LiuC. L.ZhengY.GeC.XiongX.XuH. Z. (2013). Rupture process of the M7.0 lushan earthquake, 2013, Sci. China Earth Sci.43 (6), 1020–1026. 10.1360/zd-2013-43-6-1020
62
LongF.WenX. Z.XuX. W. (2006). Empirical relationships between magnitude and rupture length, and rupture area, for seismogenic active faults in north China. Seismol. Geol.28 (4), 511–535. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2006.04.001
63
MaJ.MaS. L.LiuL. Q.DengW. H.MaW. T.LiuT. C. (1996). The evolution of the fault geometric structure and physical field, as well as the instability characteristics. Acta Seismol. Sin.18 (2), 200–207.
64
MaC. H.QianF.ZhangH. M. (2021). Simulation of rupture process and its influence factors of the 2013 MS7.0 lushan earthquake. Chin. J. Geophys.64 (1), 170–181. 10.6038/cjg2021O0114
65
MadariagaR. (1976). Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.66 (3), 639–666. 10.1785/BSSA0660030639
66
Matsu'uraM.KataokaH.ShibazakiB. (1992). Slip-dependent friction law and nucleation processes in earthquake rupture. Tectonophysics211 (1-4), 135–148. 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90056-C
67
MiyatakeT. (1992). Reconstruction of dynamic rupture process of an earthquake with constraints of kinematic parameters. Geophys. Res. Lett.19 (4), 349–352. 10.1029/92GL00082
68
NiuW. Z.HeF. B.LiuZ. H.CuiY. B.BaiL. Y.WangA. G.et al (2023). Determination of the northeast section of the nanyuan–Tongxian fault in beijing and research on its Quaternary activity. J. Geomechanics (in Chinese)29 (6), 879. 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023032
69
OhnakaM.YamashitaT. (1989). A cohesive zone model for dynamic shear faulting based on experimentally inferred constitutive relation and strong motion source parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth94 (B4), 4089–4104. 10.1029/JB094iB04p04089
70
OhnakaM.KuwaharaY.YamamotoK. (1987). Constitutive relations between dynamic physical parameters near a tip of the propagating slip zone during stick-slip shear failure. Tectonophysics144 (1-3), 109–125. 10.1016/0040-1951(87)90011-4
71
OkuboP. G.DieterichJ. H. (1984). Effects of physical fault properties on frictional instabilities produced on simulated faults. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth89 (B7), 5817–5827. 10.1029/JB089iB07p05817
72
OkuboP. G.DieterichJ. H. (1986). State variable fault constitutive relations for dynamic slip. Earthquake Source Mechanics37, 25–35. 10.1029/GM037p0025
73
PalmerA. C.RiceJ. R. (1973). The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences332 (1591), 527–548. 10.1098/rspa.1973.0040
74
PanB.XuJ. D.GuanK. C. Z.HeH. L. (2006). Simulation of the near-fault strong ground motion in beijing region. Seismology and Geology28 (4), 623–634.
75
PateraA. T. (1984). A spectral element method for fluid dynamics: laminar flow in a channel expansion. Journal of computational Physics54 (3), 468–488. 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90128-1
76
PeyratS.OlsenK.MadariagaR. (2001). Dynamic modeling of the 1992 landers earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth106 (B11), 26467–26482. 10.1029/2001JB000205
77
QinX. H.ZhangP.FengC. J.SunW. F.TanC. X.ChenQ. C.et al (2014). In-situ stress measurements and slip stability of major faults in beijing region, China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics57 (7), 2165–2180. 10.6038/cjg20140712
78
RanH. L. (2011). Empirical relations between earthquake magnitude and parameters of strike-slip seismogenic active faults associated with historical earthquakes in Western China. Seismology and Geology33 (3), 577–585. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.03.008
79
RuinaA. (1983). Slip instability and state variable friction laws. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth88 (B12), 10359–10370. 10.1029/JB088iB12p10359
80
SerianiG.PrioloE. (1991). High-order spectral element method for Acoustic wave modeling. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts1991, 1561–1564. 10.1190/1.1888989
81
SunilkumarT. C.ZhangZ.WangZ.WangW.HeZ. (2024). Unveiling the mechanisms of the 1819 M 7.7 kachchh earthquake, India: integrating physics-based simulation and strong ground motion estimates. Earth and Space Science11 (8), e2023EA003308. 10.1029/2023EA003308
82
ThurberC.ZhangH.WaldhauserF.HardebeckJ.MichaelA.Eberhart-PhillipsD. (2006). Three-dimensional compressional wavespeed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the parkfield, California, region. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96 (4B), S38–S49. 10.1785/0120050825
83
TintiE.BizzarriA.PiatanesiA.CoccoM. (2004). Estimates of slip weakening distance for different dynamic rupture models. Geophysical Research Letters31 (2), L02611. 10.1029/2003GL018811
84
WanY. G. (2010). Contemporary tectonic stress field in China. Earthquake Science23 (4), 377–386. 10.1007/s11589-010-0735-5
85
WangY. H.CuiX. F.HuX. P.XieF. R. (2012). Study on the stress state in upper crust of China mainland based on in-situ stress measurements. Chinese Journal of Geophysics55 (09), 3016–3027. 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.09.020
86
WangM. F.ZhengA.YuX. W.ZhangW. B. (2018). Study on the influence of local mountainous topography to fault dynamic rupture. Acta Seismologica Sinica40 (6), 737–752. 10.11939/jass.20180022
87
WangZ. J.LiY. L.WangW. Q.ZhangW. Q.ZhangZ. G. (2022). Revisiting paleoearthquakes with numerical modeling: a case study of the 1679 sanhe–pinggu earthquake. Seismological Research Letters94 (2A), 720–730. 10.1785/0220220208
88
WeeksJ. D.TullisT. E. (1985). Frictional sliding of dolomite: a variation in constitutive behavior. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth90 (B9), 7821–7826. 10.1029/JB090iB09p07821
89
WengH. H.AmpueroJ. P. (2019). The dynamics of elongated earthquake ruptures. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth124 (8), 8584–8610. 10.1029/2019JB017684
90
WesselP.SmithW. H. F.ScharrooR.LuisJ.WobbeF. (2013). Generic mapping tools: improved version released. Transactions American Geophysical Union94 (45), 409–410. 10.1002/2013EO450001
91
WuM. J.ZhuH. B.YueX. Y.LinX. D.LiH. (2013). Analysis on potential earthquake risk of Capital Zone based on multiple seismicity parameters. North China Earthquake Sciences31 (1), 25–30. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1375.2013.01.005
92
XieY. S.CaiM. B. (1983). Compilation of historical seismological data. China, Beijing: Science Press.
93
XieZ. D.YuX. W.ZhangW. B. (2024). Dynamic rupture process of the 2018 Hokkaido MW6.6 earthquake, Japan. Chinese Journal of Geophysics67 (8), 2972–2989. 10.6038/cjg2023Q0942
94
XieZ. D.YuX. W.ZhangW. B. (2025). Dynamic source rupture process of the 2022 Menyuan Mw6.6 earthquake, Qinghai province. Acta Seismologica Sinica47 (1), 21–36. 10.11939/jass.20230144
95
XinH. L.ZhangH. J.KangM.HeR. Z.GaoL.GaoJ. (2018). High‐resolution lithospheric velocity structure of Continental China by double‐difference seismic travel‐Time Tomography. Seismological Research Letters90 (1), 229–241. 10.1785/0220180209
96
XuX. W.YuG. H.RanY. K.YangX. P.ZhangL. M.SunF. L.et al (2015). Introduction to active faults in Chinese cities: findings from the detection of active faults in 20 cities. Beijing: Science Press, 380–403.
97
XuX. W.HanZ. J.YangX. P. (2016). Seismotectonic map in China and its adjacent regions. Beijing: Science Press.
98
XuC. Y.ZhangY.WangR.HuaS.XuY.DaiD.et al (2023). Application of MEMS data to fast inversion of rupture process: tests with recordings from the IRREEW network. Seismological Research Letters94 (4), 1821–1835. 10.1785/0220220369
99
YangD. X.ZhaoY. (2010). Effects of rupture forward directivity and fling step of nearfault ground motions on seismic performance of base-isolated building structure. Acta Seismologica Sinica32 (5), 579–587. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2010.05.007
100
YangY.ShiB. P.SunL. (2008). Seismic hazard estimation based on the distributed seismicity in northern China. Acta Seismologica Sinica30 (2), 198–208. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2008.02.009
101
YuanJ.ZhuS. B. (2016). Distributions of strong ground motion due to dynamic ruptures across a bimaterial fault: implications for seismic hazard analyses. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences131, 81–94. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.09.010
102
ZhangQ. W.ZhuS. B. (2019). The coulomb stress changes and seismicity on some major faults in north China. Seismology and Geology41 (3), 649–669. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.03.008
103
ZhangW.IwataT.IrikuraK.SekiguchiH.BouchonM. (2003). Heterogeneous distribution of the dynamic source parameters of the 1999 chi-chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth108 (B5). 10.1029/2002JB001889
104
ZhangL.BaiL. Y.CaiX. M.WangJ. M.LiuY.HeF. B.et al (2014). An analysis of the activity of the northwest part of nankou-sunhe fault. Geology in China41 (3), 902–911. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2014.03.017
105
ZhangL. F.BunichiroS.LiaoW. L.LiJ. G.WangQ. L. (2016). Controlling factors analysis of dynamic rupture propagation simulation of curved fault based on boundary integral equation method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics59 (3), 981–991. 10.6038/cjg20160320
106
ZhangL.BaiL. Y.ZhaoY.ZhangX. L.YangT. S.CaiX. M.et al (2017a). The difference of deposition rate in the boreholes at the junction between nankou-sunhe fault and huangzhuang-gaoliying fault and its response to fault activity in the beijing area. Seismology and Geology39 (5), 1048–1065. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.05.013
107
ZhangL.ZhangX. L.BaiL. Y.YangT. S.CaiX. M.LiangY. N. (2017b). Activity study and disaster effect analysis of the north section of Huangzhuang-Gaoliying fault in Beijing. Journal of Geomechanics23 (4), 548–557. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2017.04.006
108
ZhangZ. G.ZhangW. Q.ChenX. F. (2019). Dynamic rupture simulations of the 2008 Mw 7.9 wenchuan earthquake by the curved grid finite-difference method. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth124 (10), 10565–10582. 10.1029/2019JB018630
109
ZhaoH. G.LiuC. Y. (2002). Study on the segmentation of the daxing fault. Oil and Gas Geology23 (4), 368–371. 10.11743/ogg20020414
110
ZhaoZ. H.ZhuH. J. (2003). The main characteristics of geological environment and present situation of geological hazard in plain area of Shunyi, Beijing. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control14 (2), 61–66. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2003.02.013
111
ZhaoL.LiY. M.CuiW. J.LuoY.ZhangY. Q.TianF.et al (2018). Disaster characteristics and influence factors for ground fissures at songzhuang village in beijing. Journal of Engineering Geology (in Chinese)26 (6), 1600–1610. 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-426
112
ZhaoL.LiY. M.LuoL.LiuJ. R.CuiW. J.ZhangY. Q.et al (2021). An extension-dominant 9-km-long ground failure along a buried geological fault on the eastern beijing Plain, China, Engineering Geology, 289, 106168. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106168
113
ZhouH.ChenX. F. (2008). Simulation of strong ground motion in beijing city due to the zhangbei earthquake. Progress in Geophysics23 (5), 1355–1366.
114
ZhuS. B. Y.JieY. (2016). Mechanisms for the fault rupture of the 2008 wenchuan earthquake (MS=8.0) with predominately unilateral propagation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics59 (11), 4063–4074. 10.6038/cjg20161111
115
ZobackM. D.TsukaharaH.HickmanS. (1980). Stress measurements at depth in the vicinity of the san andreas fault: implications for the magnitude of shear stress at depth. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth85 (B11), 6157–6173. 10.1029/JB085iB11p06157
Summary
Keywords
Nanyuan–Tongxian fault, dynamic simulation, strong ground motion, potentialearthquake, rupture intensity
Citation
Xie Z (2025) Dynamics of the 1057 M 6 earthquake rupture and seismic hazard implications for the Beijing region, China. Front. Earth Sci. 13:1669495. doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1669495
Received
19 July 2025
Accepted
23 September 2025
Published
17 October 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Paolo Capuano, University of Salerno, Italy
Reviewed by
Liangyu Zhu, China Earthquake Administration, China
Fang Ouyang, China Earthquake Administration, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2025 Xie.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhangdi Xie, xiezhangdi20@mails.ucas.ac.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.