Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies

This article is part of the Research TopicImpact of Climate Change on Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial EcosystemView all 4 articles

Integrating PLUS and InVEST Model to Project Carbon Dynamics in China's Yellow River Basin under Multi-Scenarios (1980-2100)

Provisionally accepted
Zhongbing  ChangZhongbing Chang1Jiaming  WangJiaming Wang2*Xin  XiongXin Xiong3Jun  JiangJun Jiang4Jianping  WuJianping Wu5Songjia  ChenSongjia Chen4Jie  LiJie Li4Shuo  ZhangShuo Zhang6Guangxing  JiGuangxing Ji7Baowei  QianBaowei Qian7*
  • 1Surveying and Mapping Institute Lands and Resource Department of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
  • 2College of Water Resource and Modern Agriculture, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang, China
  • 3Jiangxi Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences Lushan Botanical Garden, Jiujiang, China
  • 4Chinese Academy of Sciences South China Botanical Garden, Guangzhou, China
  • 5Guangzhou Institute of Geography Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
  • 6Forestry Policy Research Office of Zhaoqing High level Talent Training and Development Center, Municipal Bureau of Forestry, Zhaoqing, China
  • 7College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Predicting future land-use patterns and carbon storage is essential for understanding regional terrestrial ecosystems, as regional land-use change plays a crucial role in ecosystem carbon storage variations. Using the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation Model (PLUS), we simulated the 2020 land-use types in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) based on the 2010 data. Subsequently, we predicted YRB land-use types for 2030 to 2100. Finally, based on these simulated land-use patterns, we calculated the carbon storage in the YRB from 1980 to 2100 using the InVEST model. The results showed that: (1) From 1980 to 2020, the InVEST model showed that carbon storage in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) exhibited an increasing trend of 12.10%. Rapid carbon storage increases can be observed in 2000-2020 (16.9 million tons). The largest carbon storage was found in Grassland (2487.24 million tons), which accounts for 51.03% of the total carbon storage in YRB. (2) During 2030 to 2100, the grassland area showed a decrease trend in SSP1-2.6 (-12.22%). The forest area showed an increase trend in SSP1-2.6 (3.49%). (3) Among the different scenarios, SSP1-2.6 (103.99 million tons) and current scenarios (23.07 million tons) showed the largest carbon storage gains from 2030 to 2100, primarily attributed to the cultivated land and forest, despite a major loss from grassland. SSP2-4.5 showed a carbon storage loss of 23.48 million tons, while a slight gain of 6.49 million tons was observed under SSP5-8.5. (4) Carbon storage losses were primarily observed in the grassland-dominated northern regions of the YRB. In contrast, the southernmost and eastern regions showed an increasing trend. This research provides essential scientific support for optimizing land-use structure and enhancing land management strategies across the YRB basin.

Keywords: Carbon Storage, Plus model, InVEST model, Yellow River Basin, Terrestrialecosystem

Received: 12 Aug 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chang, Wang, Xiong, Jiang, Wu, Chen, Li, Zhang, Ji and Qian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jiaming Wang, wangjmecology@163.com
Baowei Qian, qianbaowei2022@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.