ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Earth and Planetary Materials
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1698922
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Structure, Characterization, and Failure Mechanisms of Geomaterials: Theoretical, Experimental, and Numerical ApproachesView all 18 articles
Experimental study on buoyancy and side friction of underground silos in sand and silty clay
Provisionally accepted- 1Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China
- 2Center International Group Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
- 3Central South University, Changsha, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In current anti-flotation designs for underground structures, buoyancy is typically calculated based on Archimedes' principle and the contribution of side friction is often neglected, potentially resulting in unnecessary construction costs. In this study, a silo model with a vertically movable base was designed to conduct buoyancy tests under various water levels in both sand and silty clay. The attenuation pattern of groundwater buoyancy was analyzed, and the contribution of side friction to anti-flotation performance was also evaluated. The results indicate that: (1) Under the same water level, pore water pressure in sand was generally higher than that in silty clay, and with faster transmission and stabilization. (2) Buoyancy in sand was typically larger than that in silty clay at identical water level. Corresponding to the water levels of 65 cm, 70 cm, and 75 cm, the reduction coefficients of buoyancy were 0.87, 0.93, and 0.98 in sand, and 0.82, 0.89, and 0.94 in silty clay respectively. (3) The side friction acting on the silo model in sand was consistently lower than that in silty clay. The ratios of side friction to theoretical buoyancy in sand were 0.35, 0.32, and 0.25 at the water levels of 65 cm, 70 cm, and 75 cm, respectively; while in silty clay, the corresponding values were 0.47, 0.41, and 0.34. In practical engineering, it might be more rational to consider the reduction of buoyancy and the contribution of side friction, especially in weakly permeable soils such as silty clay, in the anti-flotation design of underground structures.
Keywords: Underground silo, Buoyancy, side friction, pore water pressure, Reduction coefficient
Received: 04 Sep 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Chen, Zhang, Su, Zhang and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bo Yang, yangbo@haut.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.