Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Geohazards and Georisks

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1702688

Spatial consistency assessment and landslide susceptibility prediction optimization

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Jiangsu Geological Bureau, Nanjing, China, Nanjing, China
  • 2Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

At present, although a variety of landslide susceptibility models can achieve high prediction accuracy, their results are significantly inconsistent in spatial distribution, resulting in high prediction uncertainty, which brings challenges to the optimization of assessment methods suitable for such complex geological disasters. In order to reduce the uncertainty, this study proposes a machine learning ensemble modeling method with spatial consistency analysis. Taking Ruijin City of Jiangxi Province as the study area, based on the selection of 12 impact factors and hyperparameter optimization, three algorithms of XGBOOST, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were used to generate landslide susceptibility maps. All the models performed well, and the AUC value was between 0.84 and 0.93. However, the spatial consistency analysis showed that the spatial correlation across maps between the models was only 0.78 to 0.84, indicating that despite the high accuracy, there was still obvious spatial heterogeneity and uncertainty in the prediction. Therefore, a Logistic Regression (LR) fusion model was constructed with the historical landslide compilation as the dependent variable and the results of the three models as the independent variables. It was found that XGBOOST contributed the most, followed by RF and SVM. By integrating the three prediction results, the comprehensive susceptibility map was finally obtained, which was better than the single model in spatial consistency (correlation coefficient 0.87-0.91) and prediction accuracy (AUC=0.95). This research framework effectively reduces the uncertainty in landslide prediction and improves the reliability and accuracy of the assessment results.

Keywords: uncertainty, landslide, prediction, susceptibility, machine learning (ML)

Received: 10 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 zhou and Xing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yin Xing, xingyin@usts.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.