Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Geohazards and Georisks

This article is part of the Research TopicBridging Earth Sciences and Policy: Advances in Integrated Disaster Risk Management, volume IIView all articles

Achieving Optimal Allocation of Urban Flood Control Funds: Integrating Hydrodynamic Model-Based Risk Assessment with Diverse Multi-Objective Optimization Models

Provisionally accepted
Anfeng  ZhuAnfeng Zhu1,2Jiahao  ZhongJiahao Zhong3Yinxiang  XuYinxiang Xu4Jingtao  HaoJingtao Hao3Yongkang  MaYongkang Ma3Zegen  WangZegen Wang5*
  • 1College of Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou 325035, China, Wenzhou Zhejiang, China
  • 2Wenzhou Future City Research Institute, Wenzhou 325000, China
  • 3School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • 4Sichuan University State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Chengdu, China
  • 5School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Against the backdrop of global climate change, the increasing frequency of flooding events is imposing greater demands on urban flood prevention systems. Traditional approaches to allocating flood control funds rely primarily on historical data at the city level. However, this method often leads to inefficient and misaligned fund distribution, as it fails to account for the complex, high-dimensional nature of flood risk scenarios and the lack of systematic comparative studies on algorithmic adaptability, how well different algorithms converge to optimal solutions, and handle the high-dimensional, discrete search space characteristic of fund allocation problems. To address this issue, this study develops a refined flood risk assessment system by integrating a coupled hydrological-hydrodynamic model with socioeconomic and infrastructure data. Several multi-objective optimization algorithms are then applied to identify the most cost-effective funding allocation strategy in high-dimensional scenarios. Results show that the model accurately identifies localized high-risk areas, such as river bends and the zones where steep slopes meet the plain, shifting the allocation strategy from “regional coverage” to “targeted risk-based precision.” Notable differences were observed among optimization algorithms: the SPEA2 algorithm achieved optimal benefits while reducing the proportion of extremely high-risk areas to 0.02%. This study highlights the mechanistic advantages of hydrological-hydrodynamic models in pinpointing flood risks, clarifies how algorithmic features influence funding efficiency, and provides actionable insights for enhancing urban flood resilience and sustainable development.

Keywords: Flood risk, multi-objective optimization, Flood control funds optimization, Hydrodynamic model, Urban flood resilience

Received: 15 Oct 2025; Accepted: 27 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Zhong, Xu, Hao, Ma and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zegen Wang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.