Abstract
Natural habitats are increasingly affected by anthropogenically driven environmental changes resulting from habitat destruction, chemical and light pollution, and climate change. Organisms inhabiting such habitats are faced with novel disturbances that can alter their modes of signaling. Coloration is one such sensory modality whose production, perception and function is being affected by human-induced disturbances. Animals that acquire pigment derivatives through diet are adversely impacted by the introduction of chemical pollutants into their environments as well as by general loss of natural habitat due to urbanization or logging leading to declines in pigment sources. Those species that do manage to produce color-based signals and displays may face disruptions to their signaling medium in the form of light pollution and turbidity. Furthermore, forest fragmentation and the resulting breaks in canopy cover can expose animals to predation due to the influx of light into previously dark environments. Global climate warming has been decreasing snow cover in arctic regions, causing birds and mammals that undergo seasonal molts to appear conspicuous against a snowless background. Ectotherms that rely on color for thermoregulation are under pressure to change their appearances. Rapid changes in habitat type through severe fire events or coral bleaching also challenge animals to match their backgrounds. Through this review, we aim to describe the wide-ranging impacts of anthropogenic environmental changes on visual ecology and suggest directions for the use of coloration both as an indicator of ecological change and as a tool for conservation.
Introduction
The recent intersection of multiple global crises—climate change and public health—has brought the aesthetic enjoyment of “nature” to the forefront of collective human consciousness. As a species that tends to place the visual above other senses of perception, our knowledge systems are often centered around visual observations of natural phenomena and natural life, color in particular. As such, changes in our visual environments are often the first to be noticed and studied. Natural environments have been shaped by human societies for millennia (Sullivan et al., 2017), but recent decades have seen an acceleration of habitat loss and destruction due to changing land-use and climate. The rate of these changes outpaces natural rates of adaptation (; ). As these systems face threats from climate change, habitat loss and pollution, visual ecologists must reckon with the ramifications for the production, perception, evolution, and application of coloration. The introduction of novel stressors and the amplification of pre-existing ones beyond levels that animals can behaviorally ameliorate presents a range of consequences for the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of these populations. While visual ecologists and biologists have thus far been engaged in questions around the mechanisms of color production and perception, the field has yet to provide a synthetic understanding of the effects of anthropogenic stressors on these mechanisms. Conversely, conservation science has yet to incorporate cues from visual ecology as way to monitor populations at risk.
Over the course of this review, we attempt to lay out the documented effects of various anthropogenic stressors on different aspects of visual ecology. The production of color, either through de novo synthesis or dietary acquisition, is impacted from multiple directions by environmental pollution and habitat loss (Peneaux et al., 2021). The fragmentation or loss of a habitat also leads to a fragmentation of the dietary resources essential for the sequestering of pigmentary compounds such as carotenoids. In order for color phenotypes to function properly, the color patterns must be perceived under optimal lighting conditions, whether in ambient air or water. Rapid changes to the photic environment due to environmental pollution and landscape change disrupt the perception and processing of signals that are often crucial to species’ recognition and mate choice. Furthermore, color patterns used to achieve crypticity or thermoregulation can be rendered ineffective, and even counterproductive, due to accelerated changes to climate patterns and the seasonal composition of habitats. Additionally, epidermal color traits present great potential as non-invasive yet powerful indicators of environmental change, while the colorscape of an ecosystem, measured through the color composition and variation within and across species in the community presents an interesting alternative metric to report on the health of ecosystems. Finally, we outline present uses of visual information from the natural world for ecological monitoring and possibilities for the future incorporation of visual ecology for conservation.
Color Production
Central to the study of animal coloration is the presence of pigment sources in the animal’s habitat, whether as prey or plant material. This dependence of coloration on environmental conditions means that the color traits are often honest indicators of individual quality (; Naguib and Nemitz, 2007). Only individuals with good access to the necessary nutrients or the ability to overcome stresses can express costly phenotypes. Color in animals may be presented through either pigment deposition in the epidermis or through nanostructures such as those found in bird feathers and lepidopteran wings. Of the many pigment classes, the two most used, especially in birds, are melanin and carotenoids, each of which have different mechanisms of production. Carotenoids are primarily acquired through diet and are costly and energy intensive to produce, thereby indicative of the ability of individuals to compete and forage for the necessary dietary components (). Melanin (eumelanin and phaeomelanin) is synthesized endogenously in melanocytes and may be limited by oxidative stress, hormones, and amino acid precursors (). Pteridines are another class of pigments that are not as well studied as carotenoids or melanin but are increasingly regarded as indicators of individual quality (Stuart-Fox et al., 2021). Although structural coloration is primarily dependent on the incidence of light in the environment, some aspects of structural colors may be condition-dependent and constrained by protein availability in the diet (Prum, 2006). Anthropogenic landscape and climate change have introduced novel environmental constraints ranging from a direct loss of nutrient sources due to habitat loss to the effects of temperature change on endocrinology and biochemical pathways essential to pigment production.
Carotenoids
Carotenoid-based ornamental traits have been established as condition-dependent and therefore honestly indicative of individual quality (, ) based on experimental and correlational studies (Weaver et al., 2018). The term “individual quality” is an index of body condition, used primarily in the context of female mate choice (Weaver et al., 2017) and sexual selection for male ornamental traits (), which include highly plastic color signals. Several studies that experimentally manipulate the availability of carotenoid sources in the diet have demonstrated this plasticity and subsequent link between the habitat and quality (Peneaux et al., 2021; Stuart-Fox et al., 2021). This link may be disrupted when the carotenoid-based coloration is constrained by the environment in two ways—(a) through lack of availability of carotenoid sources such as insects, fruits and young shoots in the habitat and (b) constraints on other non-carotenoid macro-nutrients in the habitat, such as proteins and fats that are necessary for carotenoid absorption and expression through signals. As landscapes and habitats decline in quality, carotenoid-based coloration may start to be construed as an indicator of habitat condition rather than individual quality (; Weaver et al., 2018; Peneaux et al., 2021).
The concept of using carotenoids as biological indicators of environmental changes is not a novel one (). There is extensive literature on the relationship between the amount of carotenoid or carotenoid precursors available in the environment and the signal quality of animals, primarily avian species, which use carotenoid-based coloration. While a considerable proportion of the literature in this field is dedicated to experimentally inducing variation in carotenoid availability through captive breeding and diet manipulation to show the direct link between carotenoids in the environment and the level of display as ornaments in birds (; ; Shawkey et al., 2006), some studies have relied on field observations of nesting in the wild. Free-ranging birds with wider growth bands on their tails (dependent on better overall nutrition) exhibit more saturated colorful plumage (dependent on carotenoid availability) (; Senar et al., 2003). The American kestrel (Falco sparverius) sequesters carotenoid-based yellow coloration in patches around the eyes, above the bill and on the tarsi (Figure 1). These patches of color are on the skin, and not on plumage and therefore can be directly linked to pigment deposition in the epidermis and not optic structures as seen in feathers. present data on the genetic vs. environmental contributions to variation in carotenoid coloration in kestrels, collected through cameras set up in nest boxes to record prey variability and through spectrophotometry to quantify carotenoid levels. They found that the abundance of voles in territories was negatively associated with plasma carotenoid concentration in the predatory birds. Those that consumed relatively higher proportions of voles over other prey types, such as grasshoppers, frogs, dragonflies, or small birds, had lower concentrations of carotenoids, suggesting that environmental limits on the diversity of prey can lead to compromised color-based signaling as well as poorer health and quality. In a second study () the authors exposed juvenile and adult kestrels to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) through diet and measured plasma carotenoid concentrations and plumage coloration before and during the breeding period. Their results showed that PCBs disrupted both color deposition and plasma carotenoid levels during the breeding period. In male kestrels that were fed PCBs, plumage coloration became significantly duller. PCB exposed females did not lose carotenoid-based color during the breeding session, as expected and as seen in control females. Female kestrels fed the control diet lost their carotenoid coloration due to the routine allocation of carotenoids to eggs. The disruption of this mechanism by PCBs highlights the many ways organic pollutants can affect reproductive fitness. Another study by showed that PCB contaminated females experienced delays in egg laying. In yet another case of carotenoid-based signaling reflective of individual health, studied the coloration of bills and eye-rings in the great black-backed gull (Larus marinus). They found that adult male gulls in better condition (measured as residuals from the regression between body size and body weight) showed bills and eye-rings with higher color saturation while female gulls with higher color intensity laid larger eggs and had greater clutch sizes.
FIGURE 1
Carotenoid based displays may be further environmentally constrained by the energetic costs of pigment production. Acquisition of carotenoids is dependent on both the availability of pigments as well as the availability of sufficient caloric content in the environment (
Melanin
Although melanin-based coloration has often been thought of as being primarily under genetic control with little influence from environmental factors (
Structural Coloration
Sexually selected structural color ornaments are considered honest signals of quality due to their diet-driven plasticity. Protein is especially limiting for structural coloration of plumage and skin as well as tissue and feather formation through keratin and collagen. Certain colors commonly used for signals in birds are often produced through a combination of pigments and structural coloration (Prum and Torres, 2003). It is this association between pigment and optic structures that make macronutrients like proteins and fats important limiting factors in addition to carotenoid intake. Indeed, protein intake, or the lack thereof, has been found to affect other non-carotenoid based visual signals as well. Male blue tit nestlings with lower plasma protein concentrations exhibit tail feathers in a more vivid blue/UV (Peters et al., 2007). Lower levels of proteins circulating in the bloodstream are indicative of these proteins being allocated to the formation of nanostructures in feathers instead. In another study that investigated the effects of cholesterol level variation in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) ornamental coloration, researchers found that bill coloration faded significantly in finches whose diets had less cholesterol (
Pollutants and Color Production
In addition to being impacted by dietary constraints, integumentary pigmentation and structurally derived colors are also affected by anthropogenic pollution. These pollutants can range from pharmaceuticals, to pesticides, to industry-related compounds, to metals (
TABLE 1
| Anthropogenic factor | Independent variable | Taxa | Color trait | Effect on coloration/signaling | References |
| Organic pollutants | |||||
| Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) | Dietary supplementation of fuel oil (ml) (from Prestige oil spill) | Yellow legged gulls (Larus michahellis) | Red bill spot (for sexual signaling) | Decrease in size and color intensity of red bill spot | Pérez et al., 2010 |
| Herbicide (paraquat dichloride) | Paraquat concentration (g/L) | House finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) | Red plumage | Decrease in plumage hue (carotenoid based) | |
| Organochlorine compounds | PCB and DDT concentration in plasma | Harriers (Circus maurus) | Plumage | Lower carotenoid hue and saturation in chicks and adults with higher levels of DDT; nestlings with DDT had yellower plumage than those without | |
| Organochlorine compounds | Dietary PCB concentration | American kestrels (Falco sparverius) | Plumage, tarsi and eye-rings | PCB fed male kestrels showed duller plumage colors | |
| Herbicide (Diquat dibromide) | Diquat dosage in drinking water | Red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) | Beak spot and eye rings | Diquat fed adult male partridges showed paler beak and eye rings | |
| Metals | |||||
| Metal pollution from vehicular traffic | Distance from major road traffic; Feather metal concentration | Great tit (Parus major) | Breast feathers | Birds found farther away from the polluted site had higher carotenoid chroma; higher feather metal scores associated with lower UV chroma | |
| Metal pollution | Mercury (Hg) concentration in feathers | Great tit (Parus major) | Yellow breast patch | Decrease in brightness of yellow breast patch with Hg concentrations | |
| Metal pollution | Cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) concentration in feathers | Great tit (Parus major) | Black breast stripes | Increase in size of melanin-based black breast stripe in birds collected closer to pollution sites. | |
| Metal pollution | Heavy metal concentration in feathers (Al, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Sb, Se, Zn, and V) | Tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) | Plumage | Declines in plumage brightness | |
| Metal pollution | Lead (Pb) concentration in feathers | Feral Pigeons (Columbus livia) | Plumage | Birds exposed to lead had lower iridescent feather brightness. |
The effects of anthropogenic pollutants on plumage coloration in birds.
Perception and Signal Visibility
Visual modes of communication require that the signal passes to the receiver without undue disruption. Animals rely on ambient light for the visual processing of color signals—it can modulate the level of contrast between patches of color and thus the efficacy of the signal itself (
The effects of water turbidity have been well documented in cichlids and guppies (
Butterflies that rely on lighting environment for the efficacy of their defensive coloration mechanisms are particularly dependent on forest cover for survival. As they employ a combination of pigmentation and structural coloration to achieve a fine balance between color for thermoregulation and as an anti-predator strategy, significant changes in both climate and land use patterns mark them as especially vulnerable. In a wide-ranging comparative study of the effects of deforestation on coloration in Amazonian butterflies, Spaniol et al. (2020) show how in recent years, butterflies have experienced a reduction in diversity of defensive coloration strategies. Primary growth forests, especially in the tropics (
Artificial light at night is a unique feature of modern human society that affects many aspects of animal behavior (
Functional Aspects of Coloration
Rapid environmental change can be expected to impact the functionality of color patterns as much as it does their acquisition and perception. One of the most striking effects of climate change on the adaptive function of coloration is seen in arctic mammals and birds that undergo seasonal color change to achieve crypsis against their changing backgrounds. As the duration of annual snow cover shortens with warmer temperatures each year (Post et al., 2009), arctic animals are faced with mismatching their backgrounds, leading to increased predation risk (Pedersen et al., 2017). Similarly, ectotherms that rely on coloration for thermoregulation must contend with warmer temperatures by either evolving lighter colored bodies or shifting their ranges to cooler and shadier regions. Changes to the landscape, in the form of forest fragmentation or wildfires, can compound on the effects of climate change and severely affect the distribution of morphotypes within a polymorphic population.
Climate Change in Mammals
Climate change has diverse effects on animal coloration (Figure 2). Some animals that inhabit upper temperate and polar regions or migrate between them undergo seasonal color change. These animals, primarily birds and mammals that use coat or plumage color polyphenism to camouflage against snow, are directly compromised by seasonal mismatches between daylength and modern changes in temperature and precipitation (
FIGURE 2

Animals whose colors are impacted by climate change. (A) The Orange sulfur butterfly (Colias eurytheme) in Nogales, Arizona by Alan Schmierer. C. eurytheme relies on wing color to reach optimal temperatures for flying and foraging. (B) Snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) in Denali National Park by Tim Rains. Snowshoe hares are increasingly experiencing camouflage mismatch with decreases in snow cover due to climate change. (C) Least weasel (Mustela nivalis) in Bialowieza Forest by Stormbringer76. Weasels in their winter pelage are also experiencing camouflage mismatch with decreasing snow cover and period. (D) Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) in Aston Township, Pennsylvania by Derek Ramsey. Monarch wing color darkness is important for flight endurance during migration.
Photoperiod is the primary driver of seasonal polyphenism in arctic mammals that undergo molting to match the backgrounds of their changing landscape (Zimova et al., 2018). Although photoperiod itself is not affected by climate change, the discrepancy between seasonal transitions and photoperiod is particularly important as a driver of increased mortality due to camouflage mismatch between coat color and habitat substrates that change with season (Zimova et al., 2020b). Snowshoe hares undergo seasonal molts to match their background, between a uniform brown coat in summer and a uniform white in winter, with intermediate phases of brown and white patches during the seasonal transitions in autumn and spring. In a series of studies on phenotypic plasticity of snow-shoe hares (Lepus americanus) in response to decreased snow cover and mismatches with coat color, researchers used data collected over 3 years on snowpack and color polyphenism to illustrate the extent of seasonal mismatch and associated mortality (
In another example,
Climate Change in Insects
Ectotherms that rely on body color for thermal regulation are particularly affected by changing global temperatures. Darker colored animals have an advantage over lighter colored animals in cooler climates as they are more efficient at increasing their body temperatures above that of the ambient atmosphere (
Monarch butterflies, whose migration cycles are the source of much concern in recent years (Zylstra et al., 2021), depend on wing coloration for their flight ability. Indeed, the link between butterfly wing color and flight ability has been established through studies by of Pieris butterflies in North America (
Zeuss et al. (2014) extended the relationship between coloration and thermoregulation to entire clades by conducting a phylogenetic comparison of butterflies and dragonflies’ color lightness and thermal environments to demonstrate a correlation between the two. Their models showed that ventral wing surfaces became lighter with increasing temperatures in European butterflies. The authors also found that dragonfly assemblages across Europe became lighter colored over the last century. They attribute this directional change to climate warming forcing a skew in thermoregulatory coloration. They also predict range shifts in darker colored insects toward cooler and shadier regions.
As insect clades experience shifts toward color lightness or darkness due to broad changes in climate patterns, the plant assemblages they interact with are also expected to shift to adapt to an altered sensory and thermal landscape too (Shrestha et al., 2018). Flowers that generally rely on color to signal to pollinators must reach a trade-off between thermoregulation through pigmentary absorption of solar radiation and colors that are visible to their specific insect pollinator’s vision systems (
Landscape Change
The interaction of habitat fragmentation and climate change as separate but interlinked creates new environments that force species to either adapt rapidly or perish. While climate change may cause directional selection for traits that ameliorate thermal and drought related stresses, landscape change narrows the breadth of adaptations possible by reducing the potential for range expansion (Figure 3). Deforestation and intense fire events that have increased in frequency in recent years (
FIGURE 3

Animals whose coloration are impacted by landscape change. (A) Pygmy grasshopper (Tetrix subulata) by Hedwig Storch. Melanic morphs of the pygmy grasshopper are favored over non-melanic morphs after a fire event. (B) Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) in Joshua Tree National Park by Hannah Schwalbe. The western fence lizard has been shown to perch on burnt twigs after a fire event to match its background better. (C) Eastern red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus) in Mississauga, Ontario by Ryan Hodnett. The striped morph of the eastern red-backed salamander relies on cooler and more moist microclimates that are declining due to forest fragmentation and climate change. (D) Humbug dacyllus (Dascyllus aruanus) in Lembeh, Indonesia by Rickard Zerpe. The dascyllus is one species of reef-dwelling fish that is experiencing greater predation rates due to coral bleaching.
Fire
Fire melanism is a well-documented trait occurring in animals that inhabit fire-dominant ecosystems (
The chaparral ecosystem of California is characterized by a fire season that is crucial to the community ecology and assemblages of that region. Over the course of a seasonal cycle, the landscape undergoes significant changes to its visual characteristics, ranging from dark and soot covered immediately post fire to verdant in the winter. Background matching and selective perching behavior in the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) have been studied as adaptations to fire (
Marine
The wide-ranging impacts of coral bleaching caused by climate change have been well documented, but the exact causes of declines in coral associated fish species have yet to be comprehensively laid out with empirical evidence.
Large scale changes to the marine landscape can include increased levels of anthropogenic noise pollution. While the bulk of literature addressing the ecological consequences of noise from ports and ships examines their effects on acoustic channels of communication and signaling,
Application
Thus far in the review, we have presented the impacts of anthropogenic landscape and climate change on the production, perception, and functionality of color patterns in a range of taxa. In demonstrating the inhibitory effects of environmental pollutants on the acquisition of pigments and pigmentary precursors, we suggest the use of ornamental color traits as non-invasive indicators of environmental change. The disruption of color signals and communication in terrestrial and aquatic systems by forest fragmentation, artificial light, and turbidity raises implications for the conservation of these systems. These anthropogenic modifications to the environment are particularly important as novel stimuli that can severely affect species and populations with low genetic or phenotypic variation and low levels of plasticity to accommodate these changes. The close link between the functionality of adaptive color phenotypes and climate and landscape factors especially highlights the need for conservation policies and practices that incorporate coloration and visual ecology.
Environmental Indicators
Coloration can be an indicator of environmental change. For example, ocean color remote sensing (OCRS) monitors ocean phytoplankton at potentially very large geographic scales. Started in 1998, the advantages of OCRS are access to biogeochemical proxies in remote areas, coverage several times each day, and the capability of separating chlorophyll concentrations and irradiance. Since it is satellite driven, OCRS can be obscured by cloud cover, sea ice or turbidity of river water that limit coverage (
At a smaller scale, coral bleaching is a sensitive measure of the effects of changing sea temperatures because coral polyps expel zooanthellae which produce reactive oxygen species with increasing temperatures, and these are toxic to corals. Other triggers of bleaching are solar irradiance, changes in salinity, pollution, and ocean acidification (
Normalized difference vegetation index is a method of measuring reflectance of the planet in the red and near-infrared bands (NIR) as viewed by satellite (
Coloration as an Instrument for Conservation
There are numerous anecdotes and limited evidence that coloration in nature attracts people to it and promotes conservation sympathy (
FIGURE 4

Wildflower superbloom in Southern California, March 2020 (Photo by Tim Caro).
The Woodland Trust in United Kingdom advertises membership using brightly colored spring flowers.1 Examples of colorful animals being used in conservation are numerous and include poison dart frogs, toucans, parrots, and birds of paradise. For instance, penguin species with brighter red or yellow coloration feature more in publications (Stokes, 2007). In an experimental study, 19–29 year-old Czech citizens preferred lighter colored passerines, especially blue and green birds, although they preferred patterned birds if they had been manipulated to a gray scale (
FIGURE 5

Human bird color preferences (η2 = 0.028). **The mean difference is significant at the 0.01 level. Adapted from Thömmes and Hayn-Leichsenring (2021).
TABLE 2
| Nation | Bird | Coloration |
| Guatemala | Resplendent quetzal (Pharomachrus mocinno) | Green, red, white |
| Honduras | Scarlet macaw (Ara macao) | Red, yellow, blue |
| Nicaragua and El Salvador | Turquoise-browed motmot (Eumomota superciliosa) | Turquoise, green, orange, black, white |
| Belize | Keel-billed toucan (Ramphastos sulfuratus) | Green, orange, blue, yellow, black, scarlet |
| Cuba | Cuban trogon (Priotelus temnurus) | Black, gray, red, metallic blue |
| Puerto Rico | Puerto Rican spindalis (Spindalis portoricensis) | Black, white, orange, olive green |
| Haiti | Hispaniolan trogon (Priotelus roseigaster) | Green, blue, red, white, gray |
| Peru | Andean cock-of-the-rock (Rupicola peruvianus) | Orange, brown |
| Venezuela | Venezuelan troupial (Icterus icterus) | Black, orange, white |
| Not colorful | ||
| Mexico | Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) | Brown |
| Costa Rica | Clay-colored thrush (Turdus grayi) | Two shades of brown |
| Panama | Harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja) | White, dark gray |
| Dominican Republic | Palmchat (Dulus dominicus) | Brown, ochre |
| Columbia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Chile | Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) | Gray-brown |
| Guyana | Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) | Brown, gray, speckled white |
| Brazil | Rufous-bellied thrush (Turdus rufiventris) | Gray, ochre |
| Paraguay | Bare-throated bellbird (Procnias nudicollis) | White, black face |
| Argentina | Rufous hornero (Furnarius rufus) | Light rufous |
| Uruguay | Southern lapwing (Vanellus chilensis) | Black, white, gray-brown |
National birds of Latin America. Bold indicates colorful species.
Bold indicates colorful species.
FIGURE 6

National birds of South American countries. Clockwise from the left: (A) Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao), the national bird of Honduras, by Bernard Dupont in Puerto Jimenez, Costa Rica. (B) Keel-billed toucan (Ramphastos sulfuratus), the national bird of Belize, by Lauri Vain at Macaw Mountain Bird Park and Nature Reserve, Honduras. (C) Turquoise browed motmot (Eumomota superciliosa), the national bird of Nicaragua and El Salvador, by Asa Berndtsson in Costa Rica. (D) Andean cock-of-the-rock (Rupicola peruviana), the national bird of Peru, by Jerry Thomspon at San Diego Zoo, United States. (E) Resplendent Quetzal (Pharomachrus mocinno), the national bird of Guatemala, by Cephas in Monteverde, Costa Rica. (F) Venezuelan Troupial (Icterus icterus), the national bird of Venezuela by Betty Wills at Bonaire, Venezuela.
Some systematic research has explored the ability of coloration in animals to generate willingness to pay for conservation activities. Prokop and Fančovičová (2013) manipulated pictures of conspicuous aposematic taxa and showed them to 10–20 year-old children and young adults in Slovakia. They found that conspicuous pictures elicited a greater willingness to protect the same species rendered cryptic.
FIGURE 7

Charismatic and colorful flagship species from around the world used in conservation and restoration campaigns. Clockwise from top left: (A)Acinonyx jubatus (Cheetah in Sabi Sands by James Temple), one example of colorful and charismatic but endangered species used to head conservation campaigns and used often to promote eco-tourism and mammal conservation research in the southern African countries. (B)Enteroctopus dofleini (GFNMS—Giant Pacific Octopus—NOAA). Marine conservation organizations and the Monterey Bay and Seattle aquaria along the west coast of North America have used the Pacific giant octopus in promotional campaigns and merchandize to raise funds for their projects. (C)Amphiprion ocellaris (Clown anemonefish in Papua New Guinea by Nick Hobgood). The clown anemonefish (Amphiprion ocellaris) is instantly recognizable as a representative of tropical coral reefs and a recent study by
Avenues for Future Research
Here, we briefly outline a series of future research possibilities on coloration and conservation as they relate to production, perception, function and application. Regarding the production of color, we see that the establishment of baseline levels of color diversity and saturation in populations is important for monitoring trends and trajectories of the evolutionary ecology of taxa. Using color as a qualitative measure of the health of an ecosystem presents a relatively non-invasive avenue for investigating the effects of large-scale landscape changes on phenotypic diversity, and by extension, the general biodiversity of a system. As this review and others (
With regard to color perception in anthropogenically altered habitats, it is necessary to establish large scale quantitative measures of color traits along gradients of environmental change. These metrics may be constructed through systematic meta-analyses of each eco-system type to create standards against which climate change and landscape change can be assessed. By determining linkages between the phenotypic plasticity of color traits to genetic and epigenetic variation, we may more accurately evaluate the mechanisms by which color traits are affected by anthropogenic changes to the environment. Finally, color based measures of environmental changes may present more visually appealing ways of engaging with the general public when communicating climate and conservation science.
Conclusion
Reviews that bridge the link between visual ecology and human induced environmental changes are limited at present (
In this review we have tried to unpick the relationship between coloration and anthropogenic change to show that coloration in nature as viewed in 1900 will not be the same as coloration viewed in 2100. Changes will be brought about by alterations in pigment production and structural coloration influenced by dietary changes, themselves mediated by landscape change. Changes in air or water transmission media will create new selection pressures on signal coloration usually making species less colorful. Changes in climate and landscape will alter the strength of selection by effecting coloration-background mismatch in color changing organisms and polymorphic species. More optimistically, coloration as an indicator of landscape change, and at a large scale has the potential to attract people’s interest in nature and promote funding and effort toward the conservation agenda. Nature’s palette is always changing due to alteration in natural and sexual selection pressures but now we can expect some rapid changes ahead.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
MK collected the literature and drafted the manuscript. TC conceived of the study, revised, and edited drafts. Both authors contributed to the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
References
1
AdamsJ. M.KangC.June-WellsM. (2014). Are tropical butterflies more colorful?Ecol. Res.29685–691. 10.1007/s11284-014-1154-1
2
AertsR.HonnayO.Van NieuwenhuyseA. (2018). Biodiversity and human health: mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces.Br. Med. Bull.1275–22. 10.1093/bmb/ldy021
3
Alonso-AlvarezC.GalvánI. (2011). Free radical exposure creates paler carotenoid-based ornaments: a possible interaction in the expression of black and red traits.PLoS One6:e19403. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019403
4
AtmehK.AndruszkiewiczA.ZubK. (2018). Climate change is affecting mortality of weasels due to camouflage mismatch.Sci. Rep.8:7648. 10.1038/s41598-018-26057-5
5
BabinM.BélangerS.EllingsenI.ForestA.Le FouestV.LacourT.et al (2015). Estimation of primary production in the Arctic Ocean using ocean colour remote sensing and coupled physical-biological models: strengths, limitations and how they compare.Prog. Oceanography139197–220. 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.08.008
6
BortolottiG. R.FernieK. J.SmitsJ. E. (2003). Carotenoid concentration and coloration of American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) disrupted by experimental exposure to PCBs.Funct. Ecol.17651–657. 10.1046/J.1365-2435.2003.00778.X
7
BortolottiG. R.TellaJ. L.ForeroM. G.DawsonR. D.NegroJ. J. (2000). Genetics, local environment and health as factors influencing plasma carotenoids in wild American kestrels (Falco sparverius).Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.2671433–1438. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1160
8
BoudinE.CarcailletF.TribotA. S.CarabeuxQ.DeterJ.ClaverieT.et al (2020). Coral reef fish: not just a matter of beauty!Front. Young Minds8:13. 10.3389/frym.2020.00013
9
BriolatE. S.GastonK. J.BennieJ.RosenfeldE. J.TrosciankoJ. (2021). Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators.Nat. Commun.12:4163. 10.1038/s41467-021-24394-0
10
BuckleyL. B.KingsolverJ. G. (2012). The demographic impacts of shifts in climate means and extremes on alpine butterflies.Funct. Ecol.26969–977. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01969.x
11
Camargo-dos-SantosB.GonçalvesB. B.BellotM. S.GuermandiI. I.BarkiA.GiaquintoP. C. (2021). Water turbidity-induced alterations in coloration and courtship behavior of male guppies (Poecilia reticulata).Acta Ethol.24127–136. 10.1007/s10211-021-00369-8
12
CarlsonT. N.RipleyD. A. (1997). On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index.Remote Sensing Environ.62241–252. 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1
13
CaroT. (2010). Conservation by Proxy: Indicator, Umbrella, Keystone, Flagship, and Other Surrogate Species.Washington, DC: Island Press.
14
CaroT.StoddardM. C.Stuart-FoxD. (2017). Animal coloration research: why it matters.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B.372:20170047. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0333
15
CarterE. E.TregenzaT.StevensM. (2020). Ship noise inhibits colour change, camouflage, and anti-predator behaviour in shore crabs.Curr. Biol.30R211–R212. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.014
16
CattauM. E.WessmanC.MahoodA.BalchJ. K. (2020). Anthropogenic and lightning-started fires are becoming larger and more frequent over a longer season length in the U.S.A.Global Ecol. Biogeography29668–681. 10.1111/geb.13058
17
ChapmanB. B.MorrellL. J.KrauseJ. (2009). Plasticity in male courtship behaviour as a function of light intensity in guppies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.631757–1763. 10.1007/s00265-009-0796-4
18
ChatelainM.GaspariniJ.FrantzA. (2016). Trace metals, melanin-based pigmentation and their interaction influence immune parameters in feral pigeons (Columbia livia).Ecotoxicology25521–529. 10.1007/s10646-016-1610-5
19
ChhayaV.LahiriS.JaganA. M.MohanR.PathawN. A.KrishnanA. (2021). Community bioacoustics: studying acoustic community structure for ecological and conservation insights.Front. Ecol. Evol.9:706445. 10.3389/fevo.2021.706445
20
ChungJ. S.ZmoraN. (2008). Functional studies of crustacean hyperglycemic hormones (CHHs) of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus - the expression and release of CHH in eyestalk and pericardial organ in response to environmental stress.FEBS J.275693–704. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06231.x
21
ChungJ. S.DircksenH.WebsterS. G. (1999). A remarkable, precisely timed release of hyperglycemic hormone from endocrine cells in the gut is associated with ecdysis in the crab Carcinus maenas.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.2313103–13107. 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13103
22
CiofiniA.MercatelliL.HariyamaT.UgoliniA. (2021). Sky radiance and spectral gradient are orienting cues for the sandhopper Talitrus saltator (Crustacea, Amphipoda).J. Exp. Biol.224:jeb239574. 10.1242/jeb.239574
23
CiutiS.NorthrupJ. M.MuhlyT. B.SimiS.MusianiM.PittJ. A.et al (2012). Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear.PLoS One7:e50611. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050611
24
Clusella-TrullasS.NielsenM. (2020). The evolution of insect body coloration under changing climates.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.4125–32. 10.1016/j.cois.2020.05.007
25
CokerD. J.PratchettM. S.MundayP. L. (2009). Coral bleaching and habitat degradation increase susceptibility to predation for coral-dwelling fishes.Behav. Ecol.201204–1210. 10.1093/beheco/arp113
26
CosentinoB. J.MooreJ.KarrakerN. E.OulleteM. J.GibbsP. (2017). Evolutionary response to global change: climate and land use interact to shape color polymorphism in a woodland salamander.Ecol. Evol.75426–5434. 10.1002/ece3.3118
27
CurtinP.PapworthS. (2020). Coloring and size influence preferences for imaginary animals, and can predict actual donations to species-specific conservation charities.Conservation Lett.13:e12723.
28
DauweT.EensM. (2008). Melanin- and carotenoid-dependent signals of great tits (Parus major) relate differently to metal pollution.Naturwissenschaften95969–973. 10.1007/s00114-008-0400-1
29
DavisA. K. (2009). Wing color of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in Eastern North America across Life Stages: migrants are “Redder” than breeding and overwintering stages.Psyche: J. Entomol.2009:705780. 10.1155/2009/705780
30
DavisA. K.ChiJ.BradleyC.AltizerS. (2012). The redder the better: wing color predicts flight performance in monarch butterflies.PLoS One7:e41323. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041323
31
DelheyK.PetersA. (2016). Implications for conservation of anthropogenic impacts on visual communication and camouflage.Conservation Biol.311–36. 10.1111/cobi.12834
32
DesouhantE.GomesE.MondyN.AmatI. (2019). Mechanistic, ecological, and evolutionary consequences of artificial light at night for insects: review and prospective.Entomol. Exp. Appl.16737–58. 10.1111/eea.12754
33
DuquetteC. A.LossS. R.HovickT. J. (2021). A meta-analysis of the influence of anthropogenic noise on terrestrial wildlife communication strategies.J. Appl. Ecol.581112–1121. 10.1111/1365-2664.13880
34
ElgertC.LehtonenT. K.KaitalaA.CandolinU. (2021). The duration of artificial light defines sexual signalling in the common glow-worm.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.75:154. 10.1007/s00265-021-03093-2
35
EndlerJ. A. (1980). Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata.Evolution34:76. 10.2307/2408316
36
EndlerJ. A. (1993). The color of light in forests and its implications.Ecol. Monographs431–27. 10.2307/2937121
37
FargalloJ.LaaksonenT.KorpimäkiE.WakamatsuK. (2007). A melanin-based trait reflects environmental growth conditions of nestling male Eurasian kestrels.Evol. Ecol.21157–171. 10.1007/s10682-006-0020-1
38
FayR.MichlerS.LaesserJ.JeanmonodJ.SchaubM. (2020). Large-Scale vole population synchrony in central europe revealed by kestrel breeding performance.Front. Ecol. Evol.7:512. 10.3389/fevo.2019.00512
39
FernieK. J.SmitsJ. E.BortolottiG. R.BirdD. M. (2001). Reproduction success of American kestrels exposed to dietary polychlorinated biphenyls.Environ. Toxicol. Chem.20776–781. 10.1002/etc.5620200412
40
FitzpatrickB. M.ShookK.IzallyR. (2009). Frequency-dependent selection by wild birds promotes polymorphism in model salamanders.BMC Ecol.9:12. 10.1186/1472-6785-9-12
41
ForsmanA.AhnesjöJ.CaesarS.KarlssonM. (2008). A model of ecological and evolutionary consequences of color polymorphism.Ecology8934–40. 10.1890/07-0572.1
42
ForrestJ.Miller-RushingA. J. (2010). Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B3653101–3112. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0145
43
FryntaD.LiškováS.BültmannS.BurdaH. (2010). Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity.PLoS One5:e12568. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012568
44
García-HerasM. S.ArroyoB.SimmonsR. E.CamareroP. R.MateoR.GarcíaJ. T.et al (2017). Pollutants and diet influence carotenoid levels and integument coloration in nestlings of an endangered raptor.Sci. Total Environ.60299–307. 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.06.048
45
GastonK. J.BennieJ.DaviesT. W.HopkinsJ. (2013). The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal.Biol. Rev.88912–927. 10.1111/brv.12036
46
GiraudeauM.ChavezA.ToomeyM. B.McGrawK. J. (2015a). Effects of carotenoid supplementation and oxidative challenges on physiological parameters and carotenoid-based coloration in an urbanization context.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.69957–970. 10.1007/s00265-015-1908-y
47
GiraudeauM.Mateos-GonzalezF.CotínJ.Pagani-NuñezE.Torné-NogueraA.SenarJ. C. (2015b). Metal exposure influences the melanin and carotenoid-based colorations in great tits.Sci. Total Environ.532512–516. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.021
48
GouldK. S. (2004). Nature’s Swiss army knife: the diverse protective roles of anthocyanins in leaves.J. Biomed. Biotechnol.2004314–320. 10.1155/S1110724304406147
49
GrantA. H.RansomT. S.LiebgoldE. B. (2018). Differential survival and the effects of predation on a color polymorphic species, the red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus).J. Herpetol.52127–135. 10.1670/16-185
50
GreenD. A. (2021). Monarch butterfly migration as an integrative model of complex trait evolution.Am. Nat.198142–157. 10.1086/714526
51
GreenspoonP. B.SpencerH. G. (2021). Avoiding extinction under nonlinear environmental change: models of evolutionary rescue with plasticity.Biol. Lett.17:2021045920210459. 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0459
52
GriffithS. C.ParkerT. H.OlsonV. A. (2006). Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red?Animal Behav.71749–763. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.016
53
GroomS.SathyendranathS.BanY.BernardS.BrewinR.BrotasV.et al (2019). Satellite ocean colour: current status and future perspective.Front. Mar. Sci.6:485. 10.3389/fmars.2019.00485
54
GrunstM. L.GrunstA. S.PinxtenR.BervoetsL.EensM. (2020). Carotenoid - but not melanin-based plumage coloration is negatively related to metal exposure and proximity to the road in an urban songbird.Environ. Pollut.256:113473. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113473
55
HallC. M.ScottD.GösslingS. (2011). Forests, climate change and tourism.J. Heritage Tour.6353–363. 10.1080/1743873X.2011.620252
56
HamiltonW. D.ZukM. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?Science218384–387. 10.1126/science.7123238
57
HanleyD.MillerN. G.FlockhartD. T. T.NorrisR. D. (2013). Forewing pigmentation predicts migration distance in wild-caught migratory monarch butterflies.Behav. Ecol.241108–1113. 10.1093/beheco/art037
58
HeinrichsJ. A.BenderD. J.SchumakerN. H. (2016). Habitat degradation and loss as key drivers of regional population extinction.Ecol. Modell.33564–73. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.05.009
59
HemingsonC. R.MihalitsisM.BellwoodD. R. (2022). Are fish communities on coral reefs becoming less colourful?Glob. Change Biol.1–12. 10.1111/gcb.16095
60
HillG. E. (1995). Ornamental traits as indicators of environmental health: condition-dependent display traits hold promise as potent biomonitors.BioScience4525–31. 10.2307/1312532
61
HillG. E. (2000). Energetic constraints on expression of carotenoid-based plumage coloration.J. Avian Biol.31559–566. 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310415.x
62
HillG. E. (2006). “Environmental regulation of ornamental coloration,” in Bird Coloration: Function and Evolution, edsHillG. E.McGrawK. J. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
63
HillG. E.MontgomerieR. (1994). Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, B.25847–52. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0140
64
HockingB. (1964). Fire melanism in some african grasshoppers.Evolution18332–335. 10.2307/2406407
65
Hoegh-GuldbergO. (1999). Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs.Mar. Freshwater Res.50839–866. 10.1071/MF99078
66
HoffmanR. J. (1978). Environmental uncertainty and evolution of physiological adaptation in colias butterflies.Am. Natural.112999–1015. 10.1086/283343
67
HuttonP.McGrawK. J. (2016). Urban impacts on oxidative balance and animal signals.Front. Ecol. Evol.4:54. 10.3389/fevo.2016.00054
68
JaworJ. M.BreitwischR. (2003). Melanin ornaments, honesty, and sexual selection.Auk120249–265. 10.1093/auk/120.2.249
69
KarlssonM.CaesarS.AhnesjöJ.ForsmanA. (2008). Dynamics of colour polymorphism in a changing environment: fire melanism and then what?Oecologia154715–724. 10.1007/s00442-007-0876-y
70
KarpestamE.MerilaitaS.ForsmanA. (2012). Reduced predation risk for melanistic pygmy grasshoppers in post-fire environments.Ecol. Evol.22204–2212. 10.1002/ece3.338
71
KarpestamE.MerilaitaS.ForsmanA. (2013). Detection experiments with humans implicate visual predation as a driver of colour polymorphism dynamics in pygmy grasshoppers.BMC Ecol.13:17. 10.1186/1472-6785-13-17
72
KingsolverJ. G. (1983a). Ecological significance of flight activity in Colias butterflies: implications for reproductive strategy and population structure.Ecology64546–551. 10.2307/1939974
73
KingsolverJ. G. (1983b). Thermoregulation and flight in Colias butterflies: elevational patterns and mechanistic limitations.Ecology64534–545. 10.2307/1939973
74
KingsolverJ. G. (1995). Fitness consequences of seasonal polyphenism in Western white butterflies.Evolution49942–954. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02329.x
75
KingsolverJ. G.BuckleyL. B. (2015). Climate variability slows evolutionary responses of Colias butterflies to recent climate change.Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.282:1802. 10.1098/RSPB.2014.2470
76
KingsolverJ. G.WiernaszD. C. (1991). Seasonal polyphenism in wing-melanin pattern and thermoregulatory adaptation in pieris butterflies.Am. Nat.137816–830. 10.1086/285195
77
KoskiM. H.MacQueenD.AshmanT.-L. (2020). Floral pigmentation has responded rapidly to global change in ozone and temperature.Curr. Biol.304425–4431. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.077
78
KristiansenK. O.BustnesJ. O.FolstadI.HelbergM. (2006). Carotenoid coloration in great black-backed gull Larus marinus reflects individual quality.J. Avian Biol.376–12. 10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03667.x
79
LaceyE. P.LovinM. E.RichterS. J.HeringtonD. A. (2010). Floral reflectance, color, and thermoregulation: what really explains geographic variation in thermal acclimation ability of ectotherms?Am. Natural.175335–349. 10.1086/650442
80
LauranceW. F. (2004). Forest-climate interactions in fragmented tropical landscapes.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B359345–352. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1430
81
LifshitzN.St ClairC. C. (2016). Coloured ornamental traits could be effective and non-invasive indicators of pollution exposure for wildlife.Conservation Physiol.4:cow028. 10.1093/conphys/cow028
82
LifshitzN.St. ClairC. C. (2019). Iridescent coloration of Tree Swallows relates to environmental metal pollution.Avian Conservation Ecol.14:7. 10.5751/ACE-01411-140207
83
LillywhiteH. B.FriedmanG.FordN. (1977). Color matching and perch selection by lizards in recently burned chaparral.Copeia1977115–121. 10.2307/1443512
84
LimM. L. M.SodhiN. S.EndlerJ. A. (2008). Conservation with sense.Science319:581. 10.1126/science.319.5861.281b
85
LiškováS.LandováE.FryntaD. (2015). Human preferences for colorful birds: vivid colors or pattern?Evol. Psychol.13339–359. 10.1177/147470491501300203
86
López-IdiáquezD.TeplitskyC.GrégoireA.FargevieilleA.Del ReyM.de FranceschiC.et al (2022). Long-term decrease in coloration: a consequence of climate change?Am. Natural [Preprint]. 10.1086/719655
87
McGrawK. J. (2006a). “Mechanisms of carotenoid-based coloration,” in Bird Coloration, Mechanisms and Measurements, edsHillG. E.McGrawK. J. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
88
McGrawK. J. (2006b). “Mechanisms of melanin-based coloration,” in Bird Coloration, Mechanisms and Measurements, edsHillG. E.McGrawK. J. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
89
McGrawK. J.ParkerR. S. (2006). A novel lipoprotein-mediated mechanism controlling sexual attractiveness in a colorful songbird.Physiol. Behav.87103–108. 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2005.09.001
90
McGrawK. J.HillG. E.ParkerR. S. (2005). The physiological costs of being colourful: nutritional control of carotenoid utilization in the American Goldfinch, Carduelis tristis.Animal Behav.69653–660. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.018
91
McMahonS. (2020). America’s Fall Destinations will have to Balance Coronavirus Safety with a Tourism Comeback.Washington, DC: The Washington Post
92
MeadowsM. G.RoudybushT. E.McGrawK. J. (2012). Dietary protein level affects iridescent coloration in Anna’s hummingbirds, Calypte anna.J. Exp. Biol.2152742–2750. 10.1242/JEB.069351
93
MillsL. S.ZimovaM.OylerJ.RunningS.AbatzoglouJ. T.LukacsP. M. (2013). Camouflage mismatch in seasonal coat color due to decreased snow duration.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.1107360–7365. 10.1073/pnas.1222724110
94
MøllerA. P. (1991). Sexual ornament size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry.Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.24359–62. 10.1098/rspb.1991.0010
95
MonasterioC.SalvadorA.IraetaP.DíazJ. A. (2009). The effects of thermal biology and refuge availability on the restricted distribution of an alpine lizard.J. Biogeogr.361673–1684. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02113.x
96
MurciaC. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation.Trends Ecol. Evol.1058–62. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6
97
NaguibM.NemitzA. (2007). Living with the past: nutritional stress in juvenile males has immediate effects on their plumage ornaments and on adult attractiveness in zebra finches.PLoS One2:e901. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000901
98
OwensA. C. S.LewisS. M. (2018). The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: a review and synthesis.Ecol. Evol.811337–11358. 10.1002/ece3.4557
99
PacynaA. D.RumanM.MazerskiJ.PolkowskaŻ (2018). Biological responses to environmental contamination. how can metal pollution impact signal honesty in avian species?Ecol. Evol.87733–7739. 10.1002/ECE3.4192
100
PattenM. A.Smith-PattenB. D. (2012). Testing the microclimate hypothesis: light environment and population trends of neotropical birds.Biol. Conservation15585–93. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.004
101
PedersenS.OddenM.PedersenH. C. (2017). Climate change induced molting mismatch? mountain hare abundance reduced by duration of snow cover and predator abundance.Ecosphere8:e01722. 10.1002/ecs2.1722
102
PeneauxC.HansbroP. M.GriffinA. S. (2021). The potential utility of carotenoid-based coloration as a biomonitor of environmental change.IBIS16320–37. 10.1111/ibi.12866
103
PérezC.LoresM.VelandoA. (2010). Oil pollution increases plasma antioxidants but reduces coloration in a seabird.Oecologia163875–884. 10.1007/s00442-010-1677-2
104
PetersA.DelheyK.JohnsenA.KempenaersB. (2007). The condition-dependent development of carotenoid based and structural plumage in nestling blue-tits: males and females differ.Am. Nat.169S122–S136. 10.1086/510139
105
PostE.ForchhammerM. C.ImsR. A.JeppesenE.KleinD. R.MadsenJ.et al (2009). Ecological dynamics across the arctic associated with recent climate change.Science3251355–1358. 10.1126/science.1173113
106
ProkopP.FančovičováJ. (2013). Does colour matter? the influence of animal warning coloration on human emotions and willingness to protect them.Animal Conservation16458–466. 10.1111/acv.12014
107
PrumR. O. (2006). “Anatomy, physics, and evolution of structural colors,” in Bird Coloration, Mechanisms and Measurements, edsHillG. E.McGrawK. J. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
108
PrumR. O.TorresR. (2003). Structural colouration of avian skin: convergent evolution of coherently scattering dermal collagen arrays.J. Exp. Biol.2062409–2429. 10.1242/JEB.00431
109
RochaE. A.LuzF. A.RossatoD. O.MillanC. (2015). Does fire disturbance change insect composition and the frequency of darker phenotypes in a grassland community?Braz. J. Biosci.13219–223.
110
RosenthalG. G. (2007). Spatiotemporal dimensions of visual signals in animal communication.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.38155–178. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095745
111
RosenthalG. G.Stuart-FoxD. (2012). “Environmental disturbance and animal communication,” in Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences, edsCandolinU.WongB. B. M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
112
RowellC. H. F. (1971). The variable coloration of the Acridoid grasshoppers.Adv. Insect Physiol.8145–198. 10.1016/s0065-2806(08)60197-6
113
SeehausenO.TeraiY.MagalhaesI. S.CarletonK. L.MrossoH. D. J.MiyagiR.et al (2008). Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish.Nature455620–626. 10.1038/nature07285
114
SeehausenO.van AlphenJ. J. M.WitteF. (1997). Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection.Science2771808–1811. 10.1126/science.277.5333.1808
115
SelzO. M.PierottiM. E. R.MaanM. E.SchmidC.SeehausenO. (2014). Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species.Behav. Ecol.25612–626. 10.1093/beheco/aru024
116
SenarJ. C.FiguerolaJ.DoménechJ. (2003). Plumage coloration and nutritional condition in the great tit Parus major: the roles of carotenoids and melanins differ.Naturwissenschaften90234–237. 10.1007/s00114-003-0414-7
117
ShawkeyM. D.HillG. E.McGrawK. J.HoodW. R.HugginsK. l. (2006). An experimental test of the contributions and condition dependence of microstructure and carotenoids in yellow plumage coloration.Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.2732985–2991. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3675
118
ShresthaM.GarciaJ. E.BukovacZ.DorinA.DyerA. G. (2018). Pollination in a new climate: assessing the potential influence of flower temperature variation on insect pollinator behaviour.PLoS One13:e0200549. 10.1371/journal.pone.0200549
119
SokolovaI. M.FrederichM.BagweR.LannigG.SukhotinA. A. (2012). Energy homeostasis as an integrative tool for assessing limits of environmental stress tolerance in aquatic invertebrates.Mar. Environ. Res.791–15. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.04.003
120
SpaniolR. L.DuarteL. D. S.MendoncaM. D. S.IserhardC. A. (2019). Combining functional traits and phylogeny to disentangling Amazonian butterfly assemblages on anthropogenic gradients.Ecosphere10:e02837. 10.1002/ecs2.2837
121
SpaniolR. L.MendonçaM. D. S.HartzS. M.IserhadC. A.StevensM. (2020). Discolouring the Amazon Rainforest: how deforestation is affecting butterfly coloration.Biodiversity Conservation292821–2838. 10.1007/s10531-020-01999-3
122
SpitschanM.AguirreG.BrainardD.SweeneyA. M. (2016). Variation of outdoor illumination as a function of solar elevation and light pollution.Sci. Rep.6:26756. 10.1038/srep26756
123
SteelZ. L.SaffordH. D.ViersJ. H. (2015). The fire frequency-severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests.Ecosphere6:8. 10.1890/ES14-00224.1
124
StokesD. L. (2007). Things we like: human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation.Hum. Ecol.35361–369. 10.1007/s10745-006-9056-7
125
Stuart-FoxD.RankinK. J.LutzA.ElliottA.HugallA. F.McLeanC. A.et al (2021). Environmental gradients predict the ratio of environmentally acquired carotenoids to self-synthesised pteridine pigments.Ecol. Lett.242207–2218. 10.1111/ele.13850
126
SullivanA.BirdD.PerryG. (2017). Human behaviour as a long-term ecological driver of non-human evolution.Nat. Ecol. Evol.1:0065. 10.1038/s41559-016-0065
127
SullivanC. E.KoskiM. H. (2021). The effects of climate change on floral anthocyanin polymorphisms.Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.288:1946. 10.1098/rspb.2020.2693
128
TallamyD. W.ShriverW. G. (2021). Are declines in insects and insectivorous birds related?Ornithol. Appl.123:1. 10.1093/ornithapp/duaa059
129
ThömmesK.Hayn-LeichsenringG. (2021). What instagram can teach US about bird photography: the most photogenic bird and color preferences.I-Perception12:20416695211003585. 10.1177/20416695211003585
130
TyczkowskiJ. K.HamiltonP. B. (1986). Evidence for differential absorption of zeacarotene, cryptoxanthin, and lutein in young broiler chickens.Poultry Sci.651137–1140. 10.3382/ps.0651137
131
van der KooiC. J.KevanP. G.KoskiM. H. (2019). The thermal ecology of flowers.Ann. Bot.124343–353. 10.1093/aob/mcz073
132
van der SluijsI.GrayS. M.AmorimM. C. P.BarberI.CandolinU.HendryA. P.et al (2011). Communication in troubled waters: responses of fish communication systems to changing environments.Evol. Ecol.25623–640. 10.1007/s10682-010-9450-x
133
VeneskyM. D.AnthonyC. D. (2007). Antipredator adaptations and predator avoidance by two colour morphs of the Eastern red-backed salamander, Plethodon cinereus.Herpetologica63450–458. 10.1007/s10531-020-01999-3
134
WaleM. A.SimpsonS. D.RadfordA. N. (2013). Size-dependent physiological responses of shore crabs to single and repeated playback of ship noise.Biol. Lett.9:20121194. 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1194
135
WangK.DickinsonR. E.LiangS. (2009). Clear sky visibility has decreased over land globally from 1973 to 2007.Science3231468–1470. 10.1126/science.1167549
136
WattW. B. (1968). Adaptive significance of pigment polymorphisms in Colias butterflies. I. variation of melanin pigment in relation to thermoregulation.Evolution22437–458. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1968.tb03985.x
137
WattW. B. (1969). Adaptive significance of pigment polymorphisms in Colias butterflies. II. thermoregulation and photoperiodically controlled melanin variation in Colias eurytheme.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.63767–774. 10.1073/pnas.63.3.767
138
WeaverR. J.KochR. E.HillG. E. (2017). What maintains signal honesty in animal colour displays used in mate choice?Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.372:2016034320160343. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0343
139
WeaverR. J.SantosE. S. A.TuckerA. M.WilsonA. E.HillG. E. (2018). Carotenoid metabolism strengthens the link between feather coloration and individual quality.Nat. Commun.9:73. 10.1038/s41467-017-02649-z
140
YangC.WangJ.LyuN.LloydH. (2021). Comparison of digital photography and spectrometry for evaluating colour perception in humans and other trichromatic species.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.75:151. 10.1007/s00265-021-03071-8
141
ZeussD.BrandlR.BrändleM.RahbekC.BrunzelS. (2014). Global warming favours light-coloured insects in Europe.Nat. Commun.5:3874. 10.1038/ncomms4874
142
ZimovaM.HackländerK.GoodJ. M.Melo-FerreiraJ.AlvesP. C.MillsL. S. (2018). Function and underlying mechanisms of seasonal colour moulting in mammals and birds: what keeps them changing in a warming world?Biol. Rev.931478–1498. 10.1111/brv.12405
143
ZimovaM.MillsL. S.NowakJ. J. (2016). High fitness costs of climate change induced camouflage mismatch.Ecol. Lett.19299–307. 10.1111/ele.12568
144
ZimovaM.MillsL. S.LukacsP. M.MitchellM. S. (2014). Snowshoe hares display limited phenotypic plasticity to mismatch in seasonal camouflage.Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.281:2014002910.1098/RSPB.2014.002
145
ZimovaM.GieryS. T.NeweyS.NowakJ. J.SpencerM.MillsL. S. (2020a). Lack of phenological shift leads to increased camouflage mismatch in mountain hares.Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.287:20201786.
146
ZimovaM.SirénA. P. K.NowakJ. J.BryanA. M.IvanJ. S.MorelliT. L.et al (2020b). Local climate determines vulnerability to camouflage mismatch in snowshoe hares.Global Ecol. Biogeography29503–515. 10.1111/geb.13049
147
ZubK.SönnichsenL.SzafrańskaP. A. (2008). Habitat requirements of weasels Mustela nivalis constrain their impact on prey populations in complex ecosystems of the temperate zone.Oecologia157571–582. 10.1007/s00442-008-1109-8
148
ZylstraE. R.RiesL.NeupaneN.SaundersS. P.RamirezM. I.Rendon-SalinasE.et al (2021). Changes in climate drive recent monarch butterfly dynamics.Nat. Ecol. Evol.51441–1452. 10.1038/s41559-021-01504-1
Summary
Keywords
coloration, visual environment, climate change, landscape change, conservation
Citation
Koneru M and Caro T (2022) Animal Coloration in the Anthropocene. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:857317. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.857317
Received
18 January 2022
Accepted
22 March 2022
Published
22 April 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Daniel Marques Almeida Pessoa, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Reviewed by
Pedro De Moraes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil; Nathaniel Jay Dominy, Dartmouth College, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Koneru and Caro.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Manisha Koneru, io21732@bristol.ac.ukTim Caro, tmcaro@ucdavis.edu
This article was submitted to Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.