Due to a production error, a citation in Table 1 was incorrectly written as “Bronwen et al. (2019)”, and its reference was incorrectly written as “Bronwen, H., Ethier, J. P., and Wilson, D. R. (2019). Experimental traffic noise attracts birds during the breeding season. Behav. Ecol. 30, 1591–1601. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arz123”. The correct citation is “Hennigar et al. ()” and the correct reference is “Hennigar, B., Ethier, J. P., and Wilson, D. R. (2019). Experimental traffic noise attracts birds during the breeding season. Behav. Ecol. 30, 1591–1601. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arz123”.
Due to a production error, some citations in Table 1 were missing from the reference list in the HTML and XML versions of the original article. These missing references appear at the end of this Erratum and have now been added to the HTML and XML versions of the original article.
Due to a production error, some citations in Table 1 were incorrectly written in the HTML and XML. Marín-Gómez et al. () was incorrectly written as Marin-Gomez et al. (2021), Stuart et al. () was incorrectly written as Carley et al. (2019), and Francis et al. () was incorrectly written as Mitchell et al. (2015). These references appear at the end of the Erratum and have now been added to Table 1 and the reference list in the HTML and XML.
Due to a production error, the name of one of the authors was incorrectly spelt in the reference for “Sánchez-González et al. ()” in the PDF file as “Sánchez-Gonzálezz”. The correct spelling is “Sánchez-González”.
Due to a production error, the original article was incorrectly categorized as a Mini Review and is now correctly categorized as a Systematic Review.
The publisher apologizes for these mistakes. The original version of this article has been updated.
References
1
Arroyo-SolísA.CastilloJ. M.FigueroaE.López-SánchezJ. L.SlabbekoornH. (2013). Experimental evidence for an impact of anthropogenic noise on dawn chorus timing in urban birds. J. Avian Biol.44, 1–9. 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05796.x
2
ChanA. A. Y.-H.Giraldo-PerezP.SmithS.BlumsteinD. T. (2010). Anthropogenic noise affects risk assessment and attention: the distracted prey hypothesis. Biol. Lett.6, 458–461. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.1081
3
CiachM.FröhlichA. (2017). Habitat type, food resources, noise and light explain the species composition, abundance and stability of a winter bird assemblage in an urban environment. Urban Ecosyst.20, 547–559. 10.1007/s11252-016-0613-6
4
Da SilvaA.SamploniusJ. M.SchlichtE.ValcuM.KempenaersB. (2014). Artificial night lighting rather than traffic noise affects the daily timing of dawn and dusk singing in common European songbirds. Behav. Ecol.25, 1037–1047. 10.1093/beheco/aru103
5
Dorado-CorreaA. M.Rodríguez-RochaM.BrummH. (2016). Anthropogenic noise, but not artificial light levels predicts song behaviour in an equatorial bird. R. Soc. Open Sci.3:160231. 10.1098/rsos.160231
6
FrancisM. J.SpoonerP. G.MatthewsA. (2015). The influence of urban encroachment on squirrel gliders (Petaurus norfolcensis): effects of road density, light and noise. Wildlife Res.42, 324–333. 10.1071/WR14182
7
HanafiS.ChongL. P.MaruthaveeranS.YeongK. L. (2019). Vocal response of oriental magpie robin (Copsychus saularis) to urban environmental factors in peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana.48, 2061–2069. 10.17576/jsm-2019-4810-01
8
HennigarB.EthierJ. P.WilsonD. R. (2019). Experimental traffic noise attracts birds during the breeding season. Behav. Ecol.30, 1591–1601. 10.1093/beheco/arz123
9
InjaianA. S.FrancisC. D.OuyangJ. Q.DominoniD. M.DonaldJ. W.FuxjagerM. J.et al. (2020). Baseline and stress-induced corticosterone levels across birds and reptiles do not reflect urbanization levels. Conserv. Physiol.8, coz110. 10.1093/conphys/coz110
10
IssadS. M.BenhafriN.El AllaliK.FarsiH.Ouali-HassenaouiS.Dekar-MadouiA. (2021). Effects of prolonged night-time light exposure and traffic noise on the behavior and body temperature rhythmicity of the wild desert rodent, Gerbillus tarabuli. Chronobiol. Int.38, 415–425. 10.1080/07420528.2020.1862858
11
LeeJ. G. H.Macgregor-ForsI.YehP. J. (2017). Sunrise in the city: disentangling drivers of the avian dawn chorus onset in urban greenspaces. J. Avian Biol.48, 955–964. 10.1111/jav.01042
12
Marín-GómezO. H.García-ArroyoM.Sánchez-SarriaC. E.Sosa-LópezJ. R.Santiago-AlarconD.Macgregor-ForsI. (2020). Nightlife in the city: drivers of the occurrence and vocal activity of a tropical owl. Avian Res.11, 9. 10.1186/s40657-020-00197-7
13
MorelliF.BenedettiY.Ibáñez-ÁlamoJ. D.TryjanowskiP.JokimäkiJ.Kaisanlahti-JokimäkiM.-L.et al. (2021). Effects of urbanization on taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic avian diversity in Europe. Sci. Total Environ.795:148874. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148874
14
RussA.ReitemeierS.WeissmannA.GottschalkJ.EinspanierA.KlenkeR. (2015). Seasonal and urban effects on the endocrinology of a wild passerine. Ecol. Evol.5, 5698–5710. 10.1002/ece3.1820
15
Sánchez-GonzálezK.Aguirre-ObandoO. A.Ríos-ChelénA. A. (2020). Urbanization levels are associated with the start of the dawn chorus in vermilion flycatchers in Colombia. Ethol. Ecol. Evol.33, 377–393. 10.1080/03949370.2020.1837963
16
SenzakiM.BarberJ. R.PhillipsJ. N.CarterN. H.CooperC. B.DitmerM. A.et al. (2020). Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature587, 605–609. 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7
17
StuartC. J.GrabarczykE. E.VonhofM. J.GillS. A. (2019). Social factors, not anthropogenic noise or artificial light, influence onset of dawn singing in a common songbird. Auk136, ukz045. 10.1093/auk/ukz045
18
WillemsJ. S.PhillipsJ. N.VosbigianR. A.VillablancaF. X.FrancisC. D. (2021). Night lighting and anthropogenic noise alter the activity and body condition of pinyon mice (Peromyscus truei). Ecosphere12, e03388. 10.1002/ecs2.3388
Summary
Keywords
multisensory pollution, anthropogenic noise, emergent properties, synergism, antagonism, artificial light at night (ALAN)
Citation
Frontiers Production Office (2022) Erratum: A systematic review of research investigating the combined ecological impact of anthropogenic noise and artificial light at night. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:995057. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.995057
Received
15 July 2022
Accepted
15 July 2022
Published
17 August 2022
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
10 - 2022
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Frontiers Production Office.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office production.office@frontiersin.org
This article was submitted to Urban Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.