Abstract
Tidal wetlands are highly dynamic ecosystems that are susceptible to changes in sea level and flooding from storm surges. Among them, salt marshes play a key role in coastal protection as they contribute to wave attenuation through their regulating ecosystem services, thereby promoting sediment deposition and shoreline stabilization. However, the resilience of salt marshes, particularly those that have been modified and cultivated for centuries, is questionable in the face of accelerated sea-level rise (SLR) and increasing run-up heights of storm surges. In this context, this study aims to investigate the historical foraminiferal records of two sedimentary salt marsh archives from the Wadden Sea area (Dithmarschen and North Frisia, Germany) that have been modified to varying degrees by human management activities over the last century. The foraminiferal records document how physico-chemical traits of salt marshes of the central Wadden Sea have responded to storm tide inundation over the last century, providing information about salt marsh stability and vulnerability. Abnormally grown tests of the salt marsh indicator species Entzia macrescens increased in number between 1950 CE and the late 1980s, indicating the concurrent increase of environmental stress caused by the effects of times of increased salt marsh flooding. These trends can be linked to observations of amplified North Sea storm surges, corroborating that salt marsh ecosystems respond to changing climate conditions. Differences in the number of abnormal foraminifera between the studied salt marshes suggest a particularly high vulnerability of intensively human-modified coastal wetland ecosystems to amplified storm climate conditions.
1 Introduction
Salt marsh ecosystems are known for their unstable conditions, characterized by large fluctuations and gradients in various environmental parameters, which could give rise to different stressors (e.g., ). Important stressors encompass shifts in temperature and salinity, as well as specific hydrodynamic conditions including storm-tide frequency, exposure to wave energy, and deposition of sediment event layers. Although salt marsh systems are generally well adapted to such an environment, extreme variations in abiotic factors may constrain the optimal or tolerance ranges of the system (; ). The natural feedbacks between plant growth, sedimentation and morphodynamics, which allows a salt marsh to adapt to sea-level rise, have been altered at many coasts by human activities, such as diking, drainage, and transition to pasture land (Kirwan and Megonigal, 2013). While natural stressors already affect the salt marsh ecosystem, anthropogenic impacts further contribute to these pressures. However, our understanding of how these human-altered salt marshes influence various ecosystem components and salt marsh organisms remains incomplete.
Most of today’s mainland salt marshes in the German Wadden Sea have been affected through land reclamation measures (Meier, 2004). Of these, the most important measures include the construction of groin fields made of brushwood fences in the foreshore of the dikes, which ensures a hydrodynamically calmed settlement space in which fine sediment can be deposited. This strategy results in accelerated accretion of the terrain, and thereby promoting the colonization of the tidal flats by halophytic pioneer plants (Hofstede and Schirmacher, 1996; Gettner, 2003; Hofstede, 2003). Given the economic viability as agricultural land and for resource extraction, the reclaimed land was then traditionally used for livestock grazing as well as haymaking and harvesting marsh sods (Meier, 2004; ; ). However, some measures changed the morphology of the salt marshes (such as diking and drainage), others influenced the local erosion and sedimentation processes (such as groins or dredging channels for navigation purposes) or even changed the ecological and biological conditions of the marshes (such as disrupting natural tidal patterns, water movement, and nutrient cycling; Suchrow et al., 2012; Kirwan et al., 2016a; Siemes et al., 2020; Gläsner, 2023). Although intensive foreshore management measures in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany) have been reduced since the establishment of the Wadden Sea National Park in 1985 CE and are nowadays mainly restricted to the areas near the dike base, the formerly cultivated salt marshes still show a rather poor conservation status according to the EU Habitats Directive (LLUR, State Office for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas, 2020). Yet the regularly flooded salt marshes provide various ecosystem services and therefore urgently need to be protected, conserved, and ecologically restored (; ). In principle, massive dikes that border the shoreline are the most common coastal protection structures in northern Germany (Kelletat, 1992). On the seaward side of the dikes, however, salt marshes provide regulating services by serving as a natural buffer zone against heavy swells and storm surges from the North Sea and by attenuating incoming wave energy and current-induced shear stress (; Kirwan and Megonigal, 2013; Möller et al., 2014). Thus, salt marshes likewise contribute to coastal protection and play an essential role for future-proof and sustainable coastal protection concepts as so-called ‘Nature-based Solution’ (NbS) approach (Narayan et al., 2016; Schoonees et al., 2019). This principle involves using green and soft infrastructure, such as salt marshes, to supplement or replace conventional coastal protection structures, thereby simultaneously enhancing the ecological value of the coast while preserving its protective function (Pontee et al., 2016). Another important regulating ecosystem service is the incorporation of organic carbon-rich suspended matter during flooding of the marshes at high and storm tides, making salt marshes one of the most important ‘Blue Carbon’ players (Kathilankal et al., 2008; Mcleod et al., 2011; Kirwan and Mudd, 2012; Müller et al., 2018).
The resilience of salt marshes depends largely on their ability to grow vertically by incorporating suspended sediments introduced by recurrent flooding around the mean high water level (MHW; Van Proosdij et al., 2006), ensuring sediment accretion rates higher than sea-level rise (SLR), and on their potential to migrate laterally further inland as sea level rises (; ; Kirwan and Megonigal, 2013; Kirwan et al., 2016b). In fact, an important response, and thus the underlying natural long-term stability of salt marshes, through dynamic adaptation to changing hydrodynamic conditions, is their migration to adjacent uplands (salt marsh transgression; Miller et al., 2021; Walters et al., 2021). A slowed SLR combined with sufficient sediment supply is the key driver of salt marsh formation, both by creating accommodation and by filling the newly formed space through sediment accretion (Watson et al., 2014; ). Nevertheless, coastal salt marshes are in urgent need of conservation and protection (), as ecosystems are expected to be more frequently and intensively exposed to the effects of extreme high sea levels (ESLs) under the influence of global warming by the year 2100 CE (; ; IPCC, 2019; Lang and Mikolajewicz, 2020; IPCC, 2022). Although salt marshes are, in principle and to some degree, capable of creating new equilibria between their vertical growth and water level fluctuations through self-reinforcing interactions between plant communities and morphodynamics (; Van de Ven et al., 2023), there is an upper limit to optimal SLR rates for salt marsh growth (Morris et al., 2002). If SLR rates are too high, the vegetation will no longer be able to achieve sufficient elevation gain to be still in equilibrium with sea level; a limitation that is further exacerbated when regional sediment availability is low (Morris et al., 2002; ; ; ). Furthermore, the rate of transgression of salt marshes also depends on local morphology, aboveground vegetation, and engineered barriers in the hinterland (Kirwan et al., 2016a; ).
In this context, the question remains as to how and to what extent anthropogenically modified coasts and their cultivated ecosystems can withstand more frequent and more intense occurring ESLs and the associated increased run-up heights of storm surges. This question arises given that in the human-altered salt marshes on the Wadden Sea coast, natural features such as a varying morphology and diverse plant communities are no longer present, but instead the salt marshes are characterized by flattened and drained areas with altered soil chemical properties and mature successional stages of mono-dominant plant species (e.g., Van Wijnen et al., 1997; Morris et al., 2002; ; ). According to the Flora-Fauna-Habitat Directive (or Habitats Directive), such cultivated salt marshes show considerable deficits with regard to their conservation status, and it is assumed that this in turn may degrade the ecosystem services of the salt marshes in the long term (Wessels, 2021). Furthermore, the artificially straightened marsh areas that lie well above the MHW level hardly experience any tide-induced sedimentation and are thus almost detached from the marine environment – a circumstance whose long-term effects are not yet fully understood (; ; ; ). Ultimately, the massive dikes prevent the spatio-temporal dynamics of the salt marshes accompanying SLRs (Kirwan et al., 2016a). Accordingly, today’s cultivated salt marshes along the German Wadden Sea coast are suspected of being particularly vulnerable under rising sea levels, as coastal narrowing and habitat loss can occur if the salt marshes are prevented from migrating upland by anthropogenic structures (Van der Wal and Pye, 2004; Pontee, 2011), and at the same time experience hardly any marine sediment input (). Human interventions have thus significantly affected the natural physico-chemical gradients as well as the plant communities of today’s Wadden Sea salt marshes, and the cultivation of salt marshes will also have a considerable impact on their future development and survival.
To better assess the evolution of salt marshes under climatic and anthropogenic influences, it is crucial to reconstruct salt marsh evolution over the past 20th century, when climatic and non-climatic factors increasingly influence coastal ecosystems (He and Silliman, 2019). Tidal flats and salt marshes are colonized by a variety of benthic foraminiferal species. Benthic foraminifera are unicellular organisms that can account for up to 50% of eukaryotic biomass in coastal areas (Moodley et al., 2000). Along the tidal frame, foraminiferal taxa exhibit distinct vertical zonation, and similar to salt marsh plants, they closely follow physico-chemical gradients along salt marsh successional stages (such as salinity, substrate, and pH that are linked to inundation and elevation of the terrain; Scott and Medioli, 1986; Scott and Leckie, 1990; Müller-Navarra et al., 2016). In the differentiation and taxonomic identification of the foraminiferal species, the test material and wall structure are of particular relevance. The test materials can be i) non-mineralized and organic, ii) agglutinated (i.e., they collect sediment particles from the surrounding habitat), or iii) consisting of calcium carbonate (porcellaneous or hyaline; Marszalek et al., 1969; Goldstein, 1999). These tests have a high potential to be preserved in the sediment for a long time, making foraminifera good bioindicators (e.g., Marszalek et al., 1969; ). In the intertidal zone, the calcareous foraminifera occur preferentially in the tidal flats, which are very frequently to permanently flooded, while in the adjacent vegetated salt marshes, which are rarely to not flooded at all, primarily agglutinated foraminifera live (Horton et al., 1999a). In this regard, dead or fossilized tests of benthic foraminifera deposited at the coastal environments and integrated into the sedimentary archives provide information that can be used to reconstruct past ecosystems ().
Although the use of foraminifera to reconstruct environmental conditions in different salt marsh areas has proven successful, comparatively little information is available from the Wadden Sea on the distribution of recent and fossil salt marsh foraminifera. This may be due to the fact that the cultivated salt marshes along the German Wadden Sea coast lack a pronounced landward rise in surface elevation, resulting not only in the absence of distinct vertical salt marsh zonation but also in the absence of foraminiferal zonation with respect to the tidal frame (Müller-Navarra et al., 2016), complicating the use of foraminifera as a proxy for reconstructing past salt marsh development and environmental change. Therefore, the question arises how past environmental changes and the associated responses of a coastal ecosystem can be reconstructed and assessed in this region using intertidal benthic foraminifera. Commonly, a general differentiation between tidal influences and marsh development can be reconstructed based on the relative abundance of calcareous tidal flat and agglutinated salt marsh foraminifera. However, as foraminifera are considered to be one of the microorganism groups most sensitive to coastal environmental degradation (), intertidal foraminifera may also be suitable for assessing environmental and anthropogenic stressors on (cultivated) Wadden Sea salt marshes during the 20th century. Hence, further information on changes in the ecosystem state can be derived by abnormalities in the test morphology of benthic foraminifera, as foraminifera can encounter unfavorable environmental conditions by modifying their test shapes (e.g., Geslin et al., 2000; Geslin et al., 2002; Polovodova and Schönfeld, 2008; ; Martínez et al., 2023).
In this study, the historical benthic foraminiferal records of two sedimentary salt marsh archives from Schleswig-Holstein, central Wadden Sea, have been evaluated. The selected study sites have been heavily modified over the last century by human activities such as foreshore management measures and coastal protection structures. Today, the two sites differ such that since the establishment of the Wadden Sea National Park, many management activities have largely ceased at one site, while the other site continues to be managed. Since both sites have undergone different histories of intensive land use and degrees of modification (e.g., drainage frequency, grazing intensity, times of dike construction), whereas the influence of long-term climate change and associated storm surge dynamics along the central Wadden Sea coast should have exerted similar environmental stress at both sites, this study is twofold: i) to test whether intertidal benthic foraminifera (calcareous and agglutinated indicator species) can be used to reconstruct and to assess the evolution of local coastal ecosystems in the Wadden Sea area over the past century, and ii) to investigate how cultivated salt marshes in the Wadden Sea have responded to different non-climatic (foreshore management and coastal protection measures) but similar natural external influences (such as hydrodynamics), potentially indicated by test modifications of representative foraminifera in response to stress.
2 Regional setting
In Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, most of the mainland salt marshes have been anthropogenically modified to some degree (Figure 1A). This includes the typical use of groins made out of brushwood fences to promote foreshore development. The fences are installed on the tidal flats in front of the salt marshes, where they form a hydrodynamically calmed settlement space in which fine sediments can be deposited (Hofstede, 2003; ). At the same time, it is a common practice to construct drainage ditches on salt marshes, which improves soil aeration and reduces soil waterlogging, thus favoring the occurrence of species that are well adapted to dry to moderately moist and well-drained soils, such as couch grass (Elymus spp.; ). In this way, a mature vegetation stage of the salt marsh succession is achieved at an accelerated rate (Schröder et al., 2002; Rupprecht et al., 2015). The drainage ditches also reduce tidal currents so that fine sediments are deposited within the artificial channels. For maintenance, it is necessary to dredge the material accumulated in the ditches, subsequently placing the material on the surrounding salt marsh areas (Hofstede, 2003; Stock and Maier, 2016). In this way, drained groin fields in the foreshore enable a spatial expansion of the land–sea transition, and equally lead to improved accretion of the terrain and acceleration of salt marsh maturing (; Von Lieberman et al., 1998). The areas are usually grazed, with mainly sheep being used for this purpose (pers. comm. LKN.SH, 2022). Since 1985 CE, however, German intertidal systems are under national nature protection and belong to the Wadden Sea National Park (Stock, 2003; ). With the aim of ecologically restoring the salt marsh areas, the maintenance of artificial drainage ditches has been abandoned in many areas and grazing reduced or stopped. Since the original goal of land reclamation has been given up, no new groins are being built on the Schleswig-Holstein mainland coast today and the maintenance of existing groins has been gradually reduced since the 1980s ().
Figure 1
However, the investigated coastal salt marsh north of the embanked Friedrichskoog polder (Figure 1C), located in Dithmarschen of the federal state Schleswig-Holstein, is still actively managed, leaving the area streaked by drainage ditches and intensively grazed by sheep (
Figure 2

Salt marsh cross-section profiles. Elevation of the salt marsh platforms relative to the tidal frame in the Bay of Tümlau (TB13-1; top – b in Figure 1) and Friedrichskoog (GeoHH-FK; bottom – c in Figure 1), and the erosional cliffs at which the sediment sequences were taken. The lateral extent of the salt marshes is given here as the distance between the seaward side of the dike base and the seaward salt marsh edge. The salt marsh heights as well as the tidal data (HAT = highest astronomical tide, MHWS = mean high water spring, MHW = mean high water) are given in relation to the German reference level ‘Normalhöhennull’ (NHN). Salt marsh elevation data were acquired with the Leica Geosystems GNSS field controller (Viva Uno CS10) equipment (in the Bay of Tümlau in 2013) and with LiDAR sensing (in Friedrichskoog from 2005 to 2007; non-vegetation corrected). Elevation data were provided by Müller-Navarra et al. (2016) and the Schleswig-Holstein Agency for Coastal Defence, National Park and Marine Conservation (LKN.SH), tidal data were provided by the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency of Germany (BSH).
To assess the extent to which foraminiferal data reflect local environmental factors and site-specific conditions caused by different land use histories, or are more likely to reflect super-regional factors such as storm climate variability, a second salt marsh site was considered for comparison (Bay of Tümlau), with the data collected there being based on the studies by Müller-Navarra et al. (2019) and made available by the authors for this work. The Bay of Tümlau is located on the west coast of the Eiderstedt peninsula in North Frisia, Schleswig-Holstein (Figure 1B). The salt marshes in the Bay of Tümlau were also intensively managed in the last century, and the drainage ditches were maintained (dredged) every three to seven years (pers. comm. LKN.SH, 2017). Since the founding of the National Park, however, these foreshore management measures have been largely limited to the area near the dike, leaving the salt marshes largely untouched (Hofstede and Schirmacher, 1996). As a result, the artificial drainage ditches have filled themselves in over time or have been actively filled in and are now only relics, as are the brushwood fences on the tidal flats in front of the salt marshes (
3 Materials and methods
This study builds on the investigation of the 1.16 m long sediment-filled and U-shaped plastic profile (‘U-channel’) named GeoHH-FK that was retrieved from the erosional cliff face at the seaward side of the salt marsh at Friedrichskoog in November 2016 CE (54°2’35.02’’N, 8°52’20.41’’E; Figure 1C). For further details see
The obtained sediment sequence GeoHH-FK was sampled at 0.5 cm spacing, in which every second sample was considered for foraminiferal analyses, giving 116 samples in total with a sediment volume of ~1.75 cm3 each. Sediment sequence TB13-1 was sampled in 1 cm steps and performed by Müller-Navarra et al. (2019), resulting in a sediment volume of ~2.56 cm3 per sample. After sampling took place, all samples were preserved in 96% ethanol to avoid degradation of the organic components and buffered with a carbonate solution to prevent dissolution of the calcareous components. Counting of foraminiferal individuals was carried out on subsamples (splits) from the wet-sieved 63–500 µm size fraction. The splits were obtained by means of a wet-splitter (Scott and Hermelin, 1993), into which each sample was placed for at least one hour to allow the sediment to fully and evenly settle down, producing eight equal splits per sample. The number of splits that need to be counted for their foraminiferal content depends on the minimum number of total individuals (Schönfeld et al., 2012). As foraminiferal species richness is rather low in salt marshes (Murray, 2006), foraminiferal analyses within this study are based on a target value of at least 100 individuals per split, since a number of 100 counted foraminiferal individuals is sufficient to provide statistical reliability, which is at least valid for those species making up >5% of the total fauna (
Based on the observations of Müller-Navarra et al. (2017), who identified abnormally grown tests of Entzia macrescens in active salt marshes on the island of Sylt, regular and irregular tests of E. macrescens were also distinguished from each other in this study and counted separately. The irregularly grown individuals were referred to as E. macrescensirregular. To avoid the quantitative integration of potential intra-specific morphological variations, following
Figure 3

Regular and irregular tests of Entzia macrescens (
Since the North Sea coast is basically exposed to several storm surges per year (Gerber et al., 2016), but the flood risk itself additionally depends on the prevailing wind direction and strength during a storm surge, both parameters were considered in this study. In addition, it is pointed out in literature that when assessing the impact of storm surges, strong wind conditions should last for at least six hours to account for both the different timing of MHW along the North Sea coast (Gerber et al., 2016) and the tidal phase, as there is also a positive relationship between rising tides and storm surges (Horsburgh and Wilson, 2007). In order to define meteorologically forced changes in sea level (storm surge events) that should have flooded the coasts with high probability, the German Meteorological Service (DWD) supplied historical wind data (for the stations at Husum, Büsum, and Cuxhaven) and the BSH provided seawater level observations (for the tide gauge at Cuxhaven; Figure 1A). All datasets were filtered to only consider severe wind conditions (hereafter referred to as storminess) and high seawater levels (hereafter referred to as storm tides) in this study. These include the daily mean values of the westerly winds (≥180° to 360° azimuth), which have wind speeds of ≥7 Beaufort (Bft), and the annual number of extreme sea level highs where the observed seawater level (daily peak values) exceeds the MHW by ≥1.5 m (Gerber et al., 2016). A correction with respect to tidal predictions, i.e., the subtraction of the full tidal cycles from the observed seawater level (Pugh, 1987), was not carried out for the Cuxhaven tide gauge record, because the tide surge interaction is rather complex and the generation of surges is associated with rising tides (Horsburgh and Wilson, 2007). Accordingly, the high seawater levels shown and discussed in here are the result of both storm surges and tides, i.e., storm tides.
4 Results
Within the sediment sequence GeoHH-FK from Friedrichskoog, a total of 48 foraminiferal taxa were identified (27 taxa at genus level and another 21 taxa at species level). Of these, the majority belong to the recent calcareous benthic tidal flat foraminifera (on average ~71%), mainly consisting of Ammonia spp., Cribroelphidium selseyense, and Haynesina germanica. It was observed that the highest number of calcareous foraminifera occurred in the lower part of the sedimentary sequence (below 86 cm depth and chronologically before 1940 CE), with absolute abundance here reaching up to 3,255 specimens cm−3 (Figure 4A). The total amount of agglutinated foraminifera averaged 20% of the total fauna, with a maximum density of 795 specimens cm−3. Among the group of agglutinated foraminifera, E. macrescens is the most dominant species (on average ~13%), reaching a maximum density within the sediment of about 615 specimens cm−3 (Figure 4B). In contrast to the group of calcareous foraminifera, the agglutinated foraminifera represented by E. macrescens are somewhat more evenly distributed across the sediment sequence GeoHH-FK in terms of their absolute abundance, but slightly more E. macrescens individuals occurred in the central part of the sequence and after 1930 CE (Figure 4B). The separately counted foraminifera, i.e., the abnormally grown tests of E. macrescens, reached values of up to 250 specimens cm−3 at Friedrichskoog, which accounts for >30% of the total fauna in the respective sediment samples. The density of abnormally grown tests successively increased from about 78 cm depth in the sediment sequence (which chronologically corresponds to about the 1950s) until maximum values are reached at 43 cm depth (about the mid-1980s). Subsequently, the values drop back to the previous low level (Figure 5B).
Figure 4

Benthic foraminiferal abundances. (A) Absolute abundance (numbers per cm3) of calcareous benthic foraminifera (CBF), mainly comprising common tidal flat taxa such as Ammonia spp., C. selseyense, and H. germanica (sketches not to scale), displaying a general decrease after the embankment of the polder ‘Tümlauer-Koog’ at the Bay of Tümlau in 1935 CE and construction of the dam ‘Trischendamm’ at Friedrichskoog between 1934 and 1936 CE. (B) Salt marsh evolution at Friedrichskoog (GeoHH-FK, dark green) and the Bay of Tümlau (TB13-1, light green) during the past century, represented by the abundance of the salt marsh indicator species E. macrescens. Data from the Bay of Tümlau were taken from Müller-Navarra et al. (2019).
Figure 5

Time series of storm-climate observations with response of foraminifera. (A) Number of storm tide events observed per year (dark grey) when the seawater level at the Cuxhaven tide gauge exceeds the mean high water (MHW) by ≥1.5 m, and number of storm days per year (referred to as storminess) observed at Husum, Büsum, and Cuxhaven (light grey circles) when westerly winds exceed ≥7 Bft (corresponding to ≥14 m s−1). (B) Abundances (numbers cm−3) of abnormally grown tests of E. macrescens in the intense human-modified salt marsh at Friedrichskoog (GeoHH-FK, dark green) and in the comparatively less modified salt marsh at the Bay of Tümlau (TB13-1, light green); note the different y-axes scaling. The foraminiferal sketch is not to scale. (C) Ratio of abnormal to regularly grown E. macrescens individuals. The yellow shaded area indicates enhanced storm climate activity in the North Sea, with the dark yellow area marking the maximum storm tide activity during the 1990s. Data from the Bay of Tümlau were taken from Müller-Navarra et al. (2019).
For the sediment sequence TB13-1 from the Bay of Tümlau, Müller-Navarra et al. (2019) identified 24 foraminiferal taxa in total (12 taxa at genus level and another 12 taxa at species level). The proportion of calcareous (on average ~49%) and agglutinated (on average ~48%) foraminifera of the total fauna is almost equal here. According to the authors, the most common calcareous species are Ammonia batava, Cribroelphidium selseyense, Cribroelphidium williamsoni, and H. germanica, while the most abundant agglutinated species are B. pseudomacrescens, E. macrescens, and Trochammina inflata. Similar to the sequence of GeoHH-FK, it was observed for TB13-1 that the highest number of calcareous foraminifera occurred in the lower part of the sedimentary sequence, below about 90 cm depth (also corresponding approximately to the time before 1940 CE). The calcareous foraminiferal density in TB13-1 is with maximum 20,000 specimens cm−3 considerably higher than in GeoHH-FK (Figure 4A). With about 700 specimens cm−3, average abundances of agglutinated foraminifera within sediment sequence TB13-1 are similar to those of GeoHH-FK. The same applies to E. macrescens that reached up to 685 specimens cm−3 (on average ~37%). However, the absolute abundance trends of E. macrescens over time are not consistent with GeoHH-FK. For example, TB13-1 shows slightly higher densities from about 67 cm depth bottom-up (starting from the second half of the last century; Figure 4B). Further details on the foraminifera faunal composition found in the Bay of Tümlau can be obtained from Müller-Navarra et al. (2019). Among the abnormally grown E. macrescens, up to 30 specimens cm−3 could be identified at the Bay of Tümlau, which accounts for >9% of the total fauna in the respective sediment samples. Thus, the relative abundance of E. macrescensirregular in sequence TB13-1 is much lower than in GeoHH-FK. Nevertheless, the trend over time is very similar to that of GeoHH-FK, so that the density of individuals increases gradually, i.e., from the mid-1960s to the 1990s (Figure 5B), corresponding to a depth range of 67 to 26 cm, reaching a maximum in the late 1980s and followed by relatively low values until today. However, E. macrescensirregular appeared somewhat later in the Bay of Tümlau (in the mid-1960s), whereas at Friedrichskoog an increase of E. macrescensirregular was already recorded from the first half of the 20th century.
The results of the statistical cross-correlation analyses between E. macrescensirregular (specimens density at both study sites) and tide gauge records of storm tides (number of events per year) showed that the best correlations (Bay of Tümlau: p-value = 0.005; Friedrichskoog: p-value = 0.001) were obtained when the highest numbers of abnormally grown foraminifera occurred three to five years after a period of frequent storm tides (Bay of Tümlau: lag = −3; Friedrichskoog: lag = −5).
5 Discussion
5.1 Intertidal foraminiferal indicator species
Benthic salt marsh foraminifera have a very short life cycle, often reproducing once a year between May and June (Lehmann, 2000; Schönfeld et al., 2012). Foraminifera are thus particularly sensitive and usually respond very quickly to certain environmental factors (such as seawater chemistry, temperature, substrate or water motion) and their spatio-temporal changes (Scott and Leckie, 1990;
Among the agglutinated species, E. macrescens (previously named Jadammina macrescens) is of particular importance, as this species colonizes the salt marshes along the southeastern North Sea coast in large numbers (Müller-Navarra et al., 2016;
Although E. macrescens specimens occur in similar average absolute quantities at Friedrichskoog and the Bay of Tümlau, the temporal trends exhibit specific differences (Figure 4B). The latter may be due to the different salt marsh development histories at the sites (see Section 5.2). At both sites, however, there is also a conspicuous appearance in the number of irregularly grown tests of E. macrescens specimens (here referred to as E. macrescensirregular), revealing striking abnormal chambers together with abnormal twisted tests (Figures 3A–C, 5B). As foraminifera usually react very quickly to any kind of environmental changes, E. macrescens seems to have responded directly to environmental disturbances at both sites with an increasing number of abnormally grown tests (see Section 5.3).
The composition of foraminiferal assemblages is primarily determined by abiotic environmental factors (Sen Gupta, 1999). Similarly, abiotic stressors likely also determine the occurrence of morphological abnormalities with enhanced stress leading to increased numbers of abnormally grown foraminifera (see also Nigam et al., 2008). In fact, morphological abnormalities of another high marsh species (Trochamminita irregularis) are known to occur in naturally formed estuarine salt marshes on the Pacific coast (Oregon, USA; Milker, pers. observ.) as well as observed in small numbers in semi-natural salt marshes and lagoons of the North Sea and Baltic Sea regions (Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Lehmann, 2000). However, test abnormalities are well known here and characteristically occur for this species. Another agglutinated salt marsh species that has irregularly designed tests is Polysaccammina ipohalina (Lehmann, 2000). Interestingly, its uniserial chamber construction with frequent directional changes bears some resemblance to the test abnormalities observed for E. macrescens in this study. However, P. ipohalina is actually also more common in the mangroves and marshes of the Atlantic coast (i.e., Santa Catarina and Paraná, Brazil;
5.2 Historical salt marsh development
At many salt marsh sites, it can be observed that annual storm surges that temporarily inundate the salt marshes are necessary for the required sediment supply, which allows the salt marshes to grow vertically (Stumpf, 1983;
However, the tidal wetlands in front of the dikes at Friedrichskoog have experienced increased erosion since the completion of the polder embankment in 1852–1854 CE (
A similar pattern could be observed for the total time span considered (~1920–2013 CE) of the sedimentary salt marsh record in the Bay of Tümlau (TB13-1; Müller-Navarra et al., 2019). More specifically, this means that the lower part of the TB13-1 record is likewise dominated by typical calcareous tidal flat foraminifera. They indicate deposition of sediments under marine influences until about 1940 CE, and then again temporarily between the late 1940s to the mid-1950s (Figure 4A; Müller-Navarra et al., 2019). From the end of the 1950s at the latest, however, the values of calcareous foraminifera are similarly low as those in Friedrichskoog (Figure 4A). The embankment of the local polder (named ‘Tümlauer-Koog’) in 1935 CE and the subsequent drainage measures of the foreshore apparently further weakened the marine influence, which in turn favored a progressive development of the marshes fronting dikes at the Bay of Tümlau (Figure 1B). This is illustrated by the contemporaneous increase of the agglutinated foraminifera, specifically the cosmopolitan salt marsh species E. macrescens (Figure 4B; Müller-Navarra et al., 2019). While from the second half of the 20th century the foreshore areas were intensively managed, and grazing and drainage in particular played a major role, these measures were largely abandoned when the Wadden Sea National Park was established in 1985 CE (LLUR, State Office for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas, 2001). Since 2001 CE at the latest, a (re-)establishment of semi-natural high marsh conditions has been observed, which can be identified by an increased heterogeneous salt marsh vegetation (Stock et al., 2005) and the corresponding agglutinated foraminifera, such as B. pseudomacrescens (Müller-Navarra et al., 2019).
In addition, and considering the periods of salt marsh development, the established coastal salt marshes at Friedrichskoog and in the Bay of Tümlau have essentially been able to keep pace with the rise in mean sea level (MSL) through their vertical growth over the past century. During this period, both sites have received sufficient sediment carried in by the storm tides. These findings are documented by local sediment accretion rates of 1.16 cm yr−1 (GeoHH-FK) and 1.31 cm yr−1 (TB13-1) on average (
5.3 Causes of test abnormalities: the different stressors
In modern environments, the appearance of abnormally grown foraminifera is often thought to be due to environmental shifts, such as those triggered by man-made chemical or heavy metal pollution (Yanko et al., 1998; Stouff et al., 1999; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008;
Both records of E. macrescensirregular exhibit a strong conformity with the regional changes in storminess and storm tide activity in the southeastern North Sea (Figure 5). While no significant long-term trends can be identified for atmospheric and astronomically driven water-level changes at the global scale for the past century, there are considerable fluctuations on a quasi-decadal time scale and at the regional level (Trenberth et al., 2007; Matulla et al., 2008; Weisse et al., 2012;
The occurrence of the E. macrescensirregular, which vary in number per site but follow the same trend of regional storm tide fluctuation, as it is further reflected by the ratio of abnormal versus regular grown tests (Figure 5C), could therefore be primarily of mechanical origin. The amplification of hydrodynamics by storm tides until the 1990s CE is most likely to have contributed to simultaneously increased turbulences and sediment re-deposition. It is likely that this effect also has caused damage to the tests of living specimens of E. macrescens, resulting in abnormal tests in their later growth cycle due to regeneration phenomena, as is reported for calcareous tidal flat foraminifera, for example (Stouff et al., 1999; Geslin et al., 2002). Interestingly, the E. macrescensirregular records are offset in time compared to the storm climate activity and are three (Bay of Tümlau; p-value = 0.005) to five years (Friedrichskoog; p-value = 0.001) behind those years when severe storm tide events occurred more frequent. This may indicate either that it takes a few years for a salt marsh system to respond, or these time lags may have been caused by the uncertainties of the age models (
As storm surges can be provoked by strong atmospheric low-pressure systems over the North Atlantic moving across the North Sea, this often also leads to high precipitation rates over Europe (e.g., Müller-Navarra and Giese, 1999; Svensson and Jones, 2002). As a result, the pore water salinity in the salt marsh soils can temporarily drop to extreme low levels, both during the periods when storm surges do not inundate the marshes and evaporation in the soil is rather small, and due to the increased precipitation associated with the storm tracks (Northrup et al., 2018). Among the abiotic factors, salinity is considered a key factor that controls the growth and reproduction of benthic foraminifera, thus setting their tolerance limits (Sen Gupta, 1999; Saraswat et al., 2015). The effect of salinity, or fresh water influx respectively, yields a lower salinity tolerance limit of about 10–15‰, at which mortality of foraminifera from coastal marine environments has been observed after only a few days (Nigam et al., 2006; Saraswat et al., 2015). Other studies, however, have shown that foraminifera can still be found alive even at 100‰ salinity, while optimal living conditions are around 33–35‰ (Nigam et al., 2006; Nigam et al., 2008). With regard to E. macrescens, it was shown by
What exactly caused the abnormalities of the investigated foraminifera and whether primarily mechanical stress (high-energy hydrodynamics) or ecological stress (salinity fluctuations) were decisive, cannot be conclusively answered in this study. Rather, it is more likely that a combination of both factors must have played a decisive role. The question arises, however, as to why the total number of abnormally grown individuals varied greatly from site to site. Reasons for this could be the different land use histories and the associated extent of human intervention. With respect to this, the main difference between the sites is that despite the establishment of the Wadden Sea National Park in the mid-1980s, the coastal management measures at Friedrichskoog were continued, at least in the area studied here, while foreshore management measures were abandoned in the Bay of Tümlau, which is a common passive habitat restoration strategy. This means that the artificial drainage ditches at Friedrichskoog are still regularly maintained today (every two to three years; pers. comm. LKN.SH, 2020), whereas in the Bay of Tümlau this has stopped. Before the National Park was established, however, the ditches had to be renewed and dredged much less frequently in the more sheltered Bay of Tümlau (every three to seven years; pers. comm. LKN.SH, 2017). Grazing also differs and is still practiced intensively in Friedrichskoog through the use of sheep, resulting in a very short sward here, while in the Bay of Tümlau it has only been practiced near the dike since the mid-1980s. Both sites therefore differ significantly in their intensive (Friedrichskoog) versus extensive (Bay of Tümlau) form of management.
Summing up, individual factors (hydrodynamics, salinity, exposure, and human interventions) and their changes or intensifications may well be within the tolerance range of E. macrescens, but in combination environmental perturbations seem to have exceeded the ecological limit (threshold), such that E. macrescens responded with increased numbers of abnormally grown tests (Figure 6A). On this basis, it can be argued that the increased rates in morphological abnormalities of E. macrescens are likely to be caused by both natural (of mechanical and ecological origins) and human-induced environmental stress. This finding is consistent with other studies that have concluded that abrupt and highly variable natural environmental changes (or interventions) are more likely to be the main cause of abnormal foraminifera growth than the effects of environmental pollution alone (e.g., Stouff et al., 1999; Geslin et al., 2002; Polovodova and Schönfeld, 2008; Martínez-Colón et al., 2009). In order to be able to give a simplified overview of the combination and effects of the stressors, a conceptual model was outlined, partly following the portfolio analysis of McKinsey & Company (e.g.,
Figure 6

Conceptual links between environmental stressors and foraminiferal test abnormalities. (A) Simplified impact diagram demonstrating the various natural and human-induced environmental-stress factors on abnormal tests of E. macrescens. (B) Conceptual model outlining the increased rates in morphological abnormalities of E. macrescens (green lines) in relation to the combined influence of environmental-stress factors, particularly when disturbances occur at increasingly higher frequency and amplitude. The nine-field portfolio denotes different scenarios of low to high stress levels in dependence on the time intervals considered, and corresponding effects on the amount of abnormally grown foraminifera. Illustrations are not to scale.
6 Conclusions
The evaluation of benthic foraminiferal records from two different Wadden Sea salt marshes in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany) contributes to a better understanding of the linkages and responses between foreshore cultivation and changes in storm climate. The main conclusions are as follows:
The sediment records of Friedrichskoog and the Bay of Tümlau reveal a similar pattern concerning the dominance of calcareous foraminifera in the lower part of the sediment sequences. Here, their abundance can be attributed to the prevailing marine depositional conditions at that time. Construction of dikes and dams at both sites in the mid-1930s to prevent land loss and flood damage resulted in a decline in calcareous tidal flat foraminifera and an increase in agglutinated salt marsh indicator species, suggesting the development of marshes fronting dikes.
Although foreshore areas were intensively managed in Schleswig-Holstein in the mid-20th century, the establishment of the Wadden Sea National Park in 1985 CE led to a (re-)establishment of more natural high marsh conditions in recent years, as evidenced by an increase in heterogeneous salt marsh vegetation and corresponding agglutinated foraminiferal species. At least this can be observed in places for the Bay of Tümlau. In Friedrichskoog, only a low diversity of salt marsh indicator species was observed, both in terms of vegetation and agglutinated foraminifera, which is attributed to the intensive foreshore management activities.
This study has shown that the intensely human-modified salt marsh at Friedrichskoog has the highest number of abnormally grown salt marsh foraminifera (here referred to as E. macrescensirregular) at times of increased storminess and storm tide activity from the mid-20th century until the late 1980s. In the less modified and somewhat extensively managed salt marsh of the Bay of Tümlau, the same species exhibited comparatively less numbers of abnormal tests during the same period of intensified storm climate conditions. The results suggest that the more the salt marsh ecosystems of the central Wadden Sea have been cultivated, the more vulnerable they appear to be to the impacts of increased natural environmental stresses (such as changes in hydrodynamics or salinity). It also follows that the effects of environmental stress are amplified when both natural drivers and anthropogenic influences are involved and both are closely linked in some way. Accordingly, combined environmental disturbances resulting from hydrodynamics, salinity, exposure, and various human activities (e.g., such as draining or grazing), occurring at high magnitude and with high frequency, have caused morphological test abnormalities of E. macrescens. As such this species is a powerful indicator for assessing or reconstructing the impact of environmental stress on coastal wetlands.
The results also illustrate the ecological sensitivity and vulnerability of human-modified coastal salt marshes from the central Wadden Sea to more frequent and intensified storm-climate conditions, although the salt marshes themselves currently appear to be able to cope with ongoing climate changes. The results of this study highlight the need for further research to assess and quantify the extent to which human interventions affect the resilience of cultivated coastal ecosystems. The results also highlight the importance of preserving and restoring salt marshes as a critical component of coastal protection strategies (such as Nature-based Solutions, NbS; Schoonees et al., 2019) in the face of current and future climate change.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: PANGAEA Open Access library: https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.927336.
Ethics statement
The manuscript presents research involving animals (single-celled protists) that does not require ethical approval for its study.
Author contributions
Field work, sample preparation and foraminifera analyses were carried out by DB, who also designed the study, wrote the main body of the article and designed the figures. FF contributed to the discussion of the foraminifera data. YM and GS contributed to field work and were involved in all data discussions, providing critical comments and major revisions during the preparation phase of the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was financially supported by grants SCHM1180/19 and MI1508/4 from the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Special Priority Program (SPP-1889) ‘Regional Sea Level Change and Society (SeaLevel)’ under the ‘SEASTORM’ project. The first author is further financed by the Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony (MWK) and the Volkswagen Foundation within the framework of the project ‘Gute Küste Niedersachsen’ (FKZ: 76251-17-5/19).
Acknowledgments
We thank the State Office for Surveying and Geoinformation Schleswig-Holstein (LVermGeo SH), the German Meteorological Service (DWD), the Agency for Coastal Defence, National Park and Marine Conservation (LKN.SH), and the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency of Germany (BSH) for providing historical observation data and for discussions. We also thank C. Wiedemann, M. Stock, and M. Padlat (National Park of the Schleswig-Holstein Wadden Sea) for the authorization to work in the coastal salt marsh at Friedrichskoog, and for providing surface elevation data of the salt marsh platform in Friedrichskoog. A very special thank you goes to K. Müller-Navarra, who provided us with the foraminiferal data and salt marsh elevation data for the Bay of Tümlau and thus added a valuable contribution to this study. And special thanks go to J. Schönfeld, for the substantial and valuable discussions. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments, which greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AllenJ. R. L. (1990). Salt-marsh growth and stratification: a numerical model with special reference to the Severn Estuary, southwest Britain. Mar. Geology95, 77–96. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(90)90042-I
2
AlveE. (1991). Benthic foraminifera in sediment cores reflecting heavy metal pollution in Soerfjord, western Norway. J. Foraminiferal Res.21, 1–19. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.21.1.1
3
AlveE. (1995). Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: a review. J. Foraminiferal Res.25, 190–203. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.25.3.190
4
AlveE.LeplandA.MagnussonJ.Backer-OweK. (2009). Monitoring strategies for re-establishment of ecological reference conditions: possibilities and limitations. Mar. Pollut. Bull.59, 297–310. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.08.011
5
AlveE.MurrayJ. W. (1999). Marginal marine environments of the Skagerrak and Kattegat: a baseline study of living (stained) benthic foraminiferal ecology. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecol.146, 171–193. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00131-X
6
AndersenT. J.SvinthS.PejrupM. (2011). Temporal variation of accumulation rates on a natural salt marsh in the 20th century – the impact of sea level rise and increased inundation frequency. Mar. Geology279, 178–187. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2010.10.025
7
Armynot du ChâteletÉ.Bout-RoumazeillesV.RiboulleauA.TrentesauxA. (2009). Sediment (grain size and clay mineralogy) and organic matter quality control on living benthic foraminifera. Rev. Micropaléontologie52, 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.revmic.2008.10.002
8
Armynot du ChâteletÉ.FrancescangeliF.FrontaliniF. (2018). Definition of benthic foraminiferal bioprovinces in transitional environments of the Eastern English Channel and the Southern North Sea. Rev. Micropaléontologie61, 223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.revmic.2018.04.001
9
ArnsA.DangendorfS.JensenJ.TalkeS.BenderJ.PattiaratchiC. (2017). Sea-level rise induced amplification of coastal protection design heights. Sci. Rep.7, 40171. doi: 10.1038/srep40171
10
ArnsA.WahlT.DangendorfS.JensenJ. (2015). The impact of sea level rise on storm surge water levels in the northern part of the German Bight. Coast. Eng.96, 118–131. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.12.002
11
BalkeT.StockM.JensenK.BoumaT. J.KleyerM. (2016). A global analysis of the seaward salt marsh extent: the importance of tidal range. Water Resour. Res.52, 3775–3786. doi: 10.1002/2015WR018318
12
BarbierE. B.HackerS. D.KennedyC.KochE. W.StierA. C.SillimanB. R. (2011). The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr.81, 169–193. doi: 10.1890/10-1510.1
13
BarbosaC. F.ScottD. B.SeoaneJ. C. S.TurcqB. J. (2005). Foraminiferal zonations as base lines for Quaternary sea-level fluctuations in south-southeast Brazilian mangroves and marshes. J. Foraminiferal Res.35, 22–43. doi: 10.2113/35.1.22
14
BartholdyA. T.BartholdyJ.KroonA. (2010). Salt marsh stability and patterns of sedimentation across a backbarrier platform. Mar. Geology278, 31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2010.09.001
15
BockelmannA.-C.NeuhausR. (2002). Competitive exclusion of Elymus athericus from a high-stress habitat in a European salt marsh. J. Ecol.87, 503–513. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00368.x
16
BoltovskoyE.ScottD. B.MedioliF. S. (1991). Morphological variations of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to changes in ecological parameters: a review. J. Paleontology65, 175–185. doi: 10.1017/S0022336000020394
17
BradyG. S. (1870). XXVI.—The Ostracoda and Foraminifera of tidal rivers. With an analysis and descriptions of the Foraminifera, by Henry B. Brady, F.L.S. Annals and Magazine of Natural History6, 273–309.
18
Bromberg GedanK.SillimanB. R.BertnessM. D. (2009). Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.1, 117–141. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163930
19
BroomeS. W.SenecaE. D.WoodhouseW. W.Jr. (1988). Tidal salt marsh restoration. Aquat. Bot.32, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(88)90085-X
20
BrunnerC. A.YeagerK. M.HatchR.SimpsonS.KeimJ.BriggsK. B.et al. (2013). Effects of oil from the 2010 Macondo well blowout on marsh foraminifera of Mississippi and Louisiana, USA. Environ. Sci. Technol.47, 9115–9123. doi: 10.1021/es401943y
21
BungenstockF.SchäferA. (2009). The Holocene relative sea-level curve for the tidal basin of the barrier island Langeoog, German Bight, southern North Sea. Global Planetary Change66, 34–51. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.07.007
22
BunzelD.MilkerY.Müller-NavarraK.ArzH. W.FriedrichJ.LahajnarN.et al. (2020). Integrated stratigraphy of foreland salt-marsh sediments of the south-eastern North Sea region. Newsletters Stratigraphy53, 415–442. doi: 10.1127/nos/2020/0540
23
BunzelD.MilkerY.Müller-NavarraK.ArzH. W.SchmiedlG. (2021). North Sea salt-marsh archives trace past storminess and climate variability. Global Planetary Change198, 103403. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103403
24
CalliesU.GrollN.HorstmannJ.KapitzaH.KleinH.MaßmannS.et al. (2017). Surface drifters in the German Bight: model validation considering windage and stokes drift. Ocean Sci.13, 799–827. doi: 10.5194/os-13-799-2017
25
CamachoS.MouraD.ConnorS.ScottD.BoskiT. (2015). Ecological zonation of benthic foraminifera in the lower Guadiana Estuary (southeastern Portugal). Mar. Micropaleontology114, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2014.10.004
26
CamphuysenK.VollaardB. (2015). “Oil pollution in the Dutch sector of the North Sea,” in Oil pollution in the North Sea, vol. 41. Eds. CarpenterA. (Switzerland: Springer International Publishing), 117–140.
27
CapotondiL.BergamiC.OrsiniG.RavaioliM.ColantoniP.GaleottiS. (2015). Benthic foraminifera for environmental monitoring: a case study in the central Adriatic continental shelf. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.22, 6034–6049. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3778-7
28
D’AlpaosD.MuddS. M.CarnielloL. (2011). Dynamic response of marshes to perturbations in suspended sediment concentrations and rates of relative sea level rise. J. Geophysical Res.116, F04020. doi: 10.1029/2011JF002093
29
DangendorfS.MudersbachC.JensenJ.AnetteG.HeinrichH. (2013a). Seasonal to decadal forcing of high water level percentiles in the German Bight throughout the last century. Ocean Dynamics63, 533–548. doi: 10.1007/s10236-013-0614-4
30
DangendorfS.MudersbachC.WahlT.JensenJ. (2013b). Characteristics of intra-, inter-annual and decadal sea-level variability and the role of meteorological forcing: the long record of Cuxhaven. Ocean Dynamics63, 209–224. doi: 10.1007/s10236-013-0598-0
31
DangendorfS.Müller-NavarraS.JensenJ.SchenkF.WahlT.WeisseR. (2014). North Sea storminess from a novel storm surge record since AD 1843. J. Climate27, 3582–3595. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00427.1
32
DavyA. J. (2002). “Development and structure of salt marshes: community patterns in time and space,” in Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology. Eds. WeinsteinM. P.KreegerD. A. (Dordrecht: Springer), 137–156.
33
DavyA. J.BakkerJ. P.FigueroaM. E. (2009). “Human modification of European salt marshes,” in Human impacts on salt marshes – a global perspective. Eds. SillimanB. R.GrosholzE. D.BertnessM. D. (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press), 311–335.
34
DavyA. J.BrownM. J. H.MossmanH. L.GrantA. (2011). Colonization of a newly developing salt marsh: disentangling independent effects of elevation and redox potential on halophytes. J. Ecol.99, 1350–1357. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01870.x
35
De RijkS. (1995). Salinity control on the distribution of salt marsh foraminifera (Great Marshes, Massachusetts). J. Foraminiferal Res.25, 156–166. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.25.2.156
36
De RijkS.TroelstraS. R. (1997). Salt marsh foraminifera from the Great Marshes, Massachusetts: environmental controls. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecol.130, 81–112. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(96)00131-9
37
DoodyJ. P. (2008). Saltmarsh conservation, management and restoration (Dordrecht: Springer), 219 pp.
38
ECA, Economics of Climate Adaptation. (2009). Shaping climate-resilient development: a framework for decision-making (Climate Works Foundation, Global Environment Facility, European Commission, McKinsey & Company, Rockefeller Foundation, Standard Chartered Bank and Swiss Re).
39
ElshanawanyR.IbrahimM. I.MilkerY.SchmiedlG.BadrN.KholeifS. E. A.et al. (2011). Anthropogenic impact on benthic foraminifera, Abu-Qir Bay, Alexandria, Egypt. J. Foraminiferal Res.41, 326–348. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.41.4.326
40
ErchingerH. F. (1971). Landgewinnung und Lahnungsbau im Wattgebiet. Die Küste21, 102–108.
41
EsselinkP.PetersenJ.ArensS.BakkerJ. P.BunjeJ.DijkemaK. S.et al. (2009). “Salt marshes, Thematic Report No. 8,” in Quality Status Report 2009, Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 25. Eds. MarencicH.VlasJ. (Wilhelmshaven, Germany: Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group).
42
EsselinkP.van DuinW. E.BunjeJ.CremerJ.FolmerE. O.FrikkeJ.et al. (2017). “Salt marshes,” in Wadden Sea Quality Status Report 2017. Ed. KloepperS.et al (Wilhelmshaven, Germany: Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group).
43
FagherazziS.KirwanM. L.MuddS. M.GuntenspergenG. R.TemmermanS.D’AlpaosA.et al. (2012). Numerical models of salt marsh evolution: ecological, geomorphic, and climatic factors. Rev. Geophysics50, RG1002. doi: 10.1029/2011RG000359
44
FagherazziS.MariottiG.LeonardiN.CanestrelliA.NardinW.KearneyW. S. (2020). Salt marsh dynamics in a period of accelerated sea level rise. J. Geophysical Research: Earth Surface125, e2019JF005200. doi: 10.1029/2019JF005200
45
FagherazziS.MariottiG.WibergP. L.McGlatheryK. J. (2013). Marsh collapse does not require sea level rise. Oceanography26, 70–77. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2013.47
46
FatelaF.TabordaR. (2002). Confidence limits of species proportions in microfossil assemblages. Mar. Micropaleontology45, 169–174. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8398(02)00021-X
47
FeaginR. A.Lozada-BernardS. M.RavensT. M.MöllerI.YeagerK. M.BairdA. H. (2009). Does vegetation prevent wave erosion of salt marsh edges? PNAS106, 10109–10113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901297106
48
FerraroF.Meyer-RouxS.MuellenhoffO.PavlihaM.SvetakJ.TarchiD.et al. (2009). Long term monitoring of oil spills in European seas. Int. J. Remote Sens.30, 627–645. doi: 10.1080/01431160802339464
49
Feyling-HanssenR. W. (1972). The foraminifer Elphidium excavatum (Terquem) and its variant forms. Micropaleontology18, 337–354. doi: 10.2307/1485012
50
FischerO. (1957). Das Wasserwesen an der schleswig-holsteinischen Nordseeküste, Dithmarschen (Berlin: Dritter Teil: das Festland. Verlag von Dietrich Reimer).
51
FleetD. M.ReinekingB. (2000). “Have efforts to clean up the marine environment been successful? – German beached bird surveys provide an index for oil pollution levels in the southern North Sea,” in Oil and hydrocarbon spills II: modelling, analysis and control. Eds. BrebbiaC. A.RodriguezG. R. (Southampton, Boston: WIT Press), 117–126.
52
FrancescangeliF.Armynot du ChateletE.BillonG.TrentesauxA.BouchetV. M. P. (2016). Palaeo-ecological quality status based on foraminifera of Boulognesur-Mer harbour (Pas-de-Calais, Northeastern France) over the last 200 years. Mar. Environ. Res.117, 32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.04.002
53
FrancescangeliF.BouchetV. M. P.TrentesauxA.Armynot du ChateletE. (2017). Does elevation matter? Living foraminiferal distribution in a hyper tidal salt marsh (Canche Estuary, Northern France). Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.194, 192–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.06.023
54
FrancescangeliF.MilkerBunzelD.ThomasH.NorbisrathM.SchönfeldJ.et al. (2021). Recent benthic foraminiferal distribution in the Elbe Estuary (North Sea, Germany): a response to environmental stressors. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.251, 107198. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107198
55
FrancescangeliF.PortelaM.Armynot du ChateletE.BillonG.AndersenT. J.BouchetV. M. P.et al. (2018). Infilling of the Canche Estuary (eastern English Channel, France): insight from benthic foraminifera and historical pictures. Mar. Micropaleontology142, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2018.05.003
56
FrontaliniF.BuosiC.Da PeloS.CoccioniR.CherchiA.BucciC. (2009). Benthic foraminifera as bio-indicators of trace element pollution in the heavily contaminated Santa Gilla lagoon (Cagliari, Italy). Mar. pollut. Bull.58, 858–877. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.01.015
57
FrontaliniF.CoccioniR. (2008). Benthic foraminifera for heavy metal pollution monitoring: a case study from the central Adriatic Sea coast of Italy. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.76, 404–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.07.024
58
GehrelsW. R.NewmanS. W. G. (2004). Salt-marsh foraminifera in Ho Bugt, western Denmark, and their use as sea-level indicators. Geografisk Tidsskrift Danish J. Geogr.104, 97–106. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2004.10649507
59
GerberM.GanskeA.Müller-NavarraS.RosenhagenG. (2016). Categorisation of meteorological conditions for storm tide episodes in the German Bight. Meteorologische Z.25, 447–462. doi: 10.1127/metz/2016/0660
60
GeslinE.DebenayJ.-P.DulebaW.BonettiC. (2002). Morphological abnormalities of foraminiferal tests in Brazilian environments: comparison between polluted and non-polluted areas. Mar. Micropaleontology45, 151–168. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8398(01)00042-1
61
GeslinE.StouffV.DebenayJ.-P.LesourdM. (2000). “Environmental variation and foraminiferal test abnormalities,” in Environmental micropaleontology: the application of microfossils to environmental geology. Ed. MartinR. E. (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), 191–215.
62
Gettner. (2003). Vegetationsveränderungen in Festland-Salzmarschen an der Westküste Schleswig-Holsteins – elf Jahre nach Änderung der Nutzung Vol. 30 (Kieler Notizen zur Pflanzenkunde in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg 30 (Kiel)), 69–83.
63
GläsnerD. (2023). The impacts of management measures on the lateral dynamics of salt marshes in the Wadden Sea region. Master’s thesis. (Hannover (Germany): Leibniz University Hannover, Ludwig-Franzius-Institute of Hydraulic, Estuarine and Coastal Engineering), 97 pp.
64
GoldsteinS. T. (1999). “Foraminifera: a biological overview,” in Modern foraminifera. Ed. Sen GuptaB. K. (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 37–55.
65
HammerØ.HarperD. A. T.RyanP. D. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica4, 1–9.
66
HaslettS. K.DaviesP.StrawbridgeF. (1997). Reconstructing Holocene sea-level change in the Severn Estuary and Somerset Levels: the foraminifera connection. Archaeology Severn Estuary8, 29–40.
67
HaywardB. W.FigueiraB. O.SabaaA. T.BuzasM. A. (2014). Multi-year life spans of high salt marsh agglutinated foraminifera from New Zealand. Mar. Micropaleontology109, 54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2014.03.002
68
HeQ.SillimanB. R. (2019). Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol.29, R1021–R1035. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.042
69
HofstedeJ. L. A. (2003). Integrated management of artificially created salt marshes in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Wetlands Ecol. Manage.11, 183–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1024248127037
70
HofstedeJ.SchirmacherR. (1996). Vorlandmanagement in Schleswig-Holstein. Die Küste58, 61–73.
71
HorsburghK.WilsonC. (2007). Tide-surge interaction and its role in the distribution of surge residuals in the North Sea. J. Geophysical Res.112, C08003. doi: 10.1029/2006JC004033
72
HortonB. P. (1999). The distribution of contemporary intertidal foraminifera at Cowpen Marsh, Tees Estuary, UK: implications for studies of Holocene sea-level changes. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecol.149, 127–149. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00197-7
73
HortonB. P.EdwardsR. J. (2006). Quantifying Holocene sea-level change using intertidal foraminifera: lessons from the British Isles (Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Fredericksburg, Special Publication). 40, 97 pp.
74
HortonB. P.EdwardsR. J.LloydJ. M. (1999a). UK intertidal foraminiferal distributions: implications for sea-level studies. Mar. Micropaleontology36, 205–223. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8398(99)00003-1
75
HortonB. P.EdwardsR. J.LloydJ. M. (1999b). A foraminiferal-based transfer function: implications for sea-level studies. J. Foraminiferal Res.29, 117–129. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.29.2.117
76
HottingerL. C. (2000). Functional morphology of benthic foraminiferal shells, envelopes of cells beyond measure. Micropaleontology46, 57–86.
77
IPCC (2019). IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Eds. PörtnerH.-O.RobertsD. C.Masson-DelmotteV.ZhaiP.TignorM.PoloczanskaE.MintenbeckK.AlegríaA.NicolaiM.OkemA.PetzoldJ.RamaB.WeyerN. M. (Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press). doi: 10.1017/9781009157964
78
IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Eds. PörtnerH.-O.RobertsD. C.TignorM.PoloczanskaE. S.MintenbeckK.AlegríaA.CraigM.LangsdorfS.LöschkeS.MöllerV.OkemA.RamaB. (Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press). doi: 10.1017/9781009325844
79
JenningsA. E.NelsonA. R. (1992). Foraminiferal assemblage zones in Oregon tidal marshes – relation to marsh floral zones and sea level. J. Foraminiferal Res.22, 13–29. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.22.1.13
80
KaminskiM. A.AmaoA. O.GarrisonT. F.FioriniF.MagliverasS.TawabiniB. S.et al. (2020). An Entzia-dominated marsh-type agglutinated foraminiferal assemblage from a salt marsh in Tubli Bay, Bahrain. Geology Geophysics Environ.46, 189–204. doi: 10.7494/geol.2020.46.3.189
81
KathilankalJ. C.MozdzerT. J.FuentesJ. D.D’OdoricoP.McGlatheryK. J.ZiemanJ. C. (2008). Tidal influences on carbon assimilation by a salt marsh. Environ. Res. Lett.3, 44010. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044010
82
KelletatD. (1992). Coastal erosion and protection measures at the German North Sea coast. J. Coast. Res.8, 699–711.
83
KempA. C.HortonB. P.CulverS. J. (2009). Distribution of modern salt-marsh foraminifera in the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system of North Carolina, USA: implications for sea-level research. Mar. Micropaleontology72, 222–238. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2009.06.002
84
KempA. C.WrightA. J.CahillN (2020). Enough is enough, or more is more? Testing the influence of foraminiferal count size on reconstructions of paleo-marsh elevation. J. Foraminiferal Res.50, 266–278. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.50.3.266.
85
KirwanM. L.MuddS. M. (2012). Response of salt-marsh carbon accumulation to climate change. Nature489, 550–553. doi: 10.1038/nature11440
86
KirwanM. L.TemmermanS.SkeehanE. E.GuntenspergenG. R.FagherazziS. (2016b). Overestimation of marsh vulnerability to sea level rise. Nat. Climate Change6, 253–260. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2909
87
KirwanM. L.WaltersD. C.ReayW. G.CarrJ. A. (2016a). Sea level driven marsh expansion in a coupled model of marsh erosion and migration. Geophysical Res. Lett.43, 4366–4373. doi: 10.1002/2016GL068507
88
LalK. K.BonettiC.WoodroffeC. D.RogersK. (2020). Contemporary distribution of benthic foraminiferal assemblages in coastal wetlands of south-eastern Australia. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.245, 106949. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106949
89
LangA.MikolajewiczU. (2020). Rising extreme sea levels in the German Bight under enhanced CO2 levels: a regionalized large ensemble approach for the North Sea. Climate Dynamics55, 1829–1842. doi: 10.1007/s00382-020-05357-5
90
LehmannG. (2000). Vorkommen, Populationsentwicklung, Ursache fleckenhafter Besiedlung und Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Foraminiferen in Salzwiesen und Flachwasser der Nord- und Ostseeküste Schleswig – Holsteins (Kiel (Germany: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Kiel University).
91
LeonardiN.CarnacinaI.DonatelliC.GanjucN. K.PlaterA. J.SchuerchM.et al. (2018). Dynamic interactions between coastal storms and salt marshes: a review. Geomorphology301, 92–107. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.11.001
92
LeonardiN.GanjuN. K.FagherazziS. (2016). A linear relationship between wave power and erosion determines salt-marsh resilience to violent storms and hurricanes. PNAS113, 64–68. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510095112
93
LintnerM.LintnerB.WanekW.KeulN.von der KammerF.HofmannT.et al. (2021). Effects of heavy elements (Pb, Cu, Zn) on algal food uptake by Elphidium excavatum (Foraminifera). Heliyon7, e08427. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08427
94
LLUR, State Office for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas. (2020). FFH-Bericht 2019 des Landes Schleswig-Holstein. (Methodik, Ergebnisse und Konsequenzen. Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt, Natur und Digitalisierung des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (Kiel)), 132 pp. Available at: https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/D.
95
LLUR, State Office for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas. (2001). Vorlandmanagementkonzept – Erfahrungsbericht 1995–2000 (Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume (Kiel)), 40.
96
LorenzenJ. (1960). 25 Jahr Forschung im Dienst des Küstenschutzes. Die Küste8, 7–28.
97
MarszalekD. S.WrightR. C.HayW. W. (1969). Function of the test in foraminifera. Gulf Coast. Assoc. Geological Societies Trans.19, 341–352.
98
MartínezL. T.MarchantM.UrbinaM. (2023). Are physiological responses in foraminifera reliable environmental stress bioindicators? A systematic review. Environ. Res.216, 114515. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114515
99
Martínez-ColónM.HallockP. (2010). Preliminary survey on foraminiferal responses to pollutants in Torrecillas Lagoon Puerto Rico. Caribbean J. Sci.46, 1–6. doi: 10.18475/cjos.v46i1.a14
100
Martínez-ColónM.HallockP.Green-RuízC. (2009). Strategies for using shallow-water benthic foraminifers as bioindicators of potentially toxic elements: a review. J. Foraminiferal Res.39, 278–299. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.39.4.278
101
Martínez-ColónM.HallockP.Green RuízC.SmoakJ. M. (2018). Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution: Torrecillas lagoon (San Juan Bay Estuary), Puerto Rico. Ecol. Indic.89, 516–527. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.045
102
MatullaC.SchönerW.AlexanderssonH.von StorchH.WangX. L. (2008). European storminess: late nineteenth century to present. Climate Dynamics31, 125–130. doi: 10.1007/s00382-007-0333-y
103
McleodE.ChmuraG. L.BouillonS.SalmR.BjörkM.DuarteC. M.et al. (2011). A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ.9, 552–560. doi: 10.1890/110004
104
MeierD. (2004). Man and environment in the marsh area of Schleswig–Holstein from Roman until late Medieval times. Quaternary Int.112, 55–69. doi: 10.1016/S1040-6182(03)00065-X
105
MierwaldU.RomahnK. (2006). Die Farn- und Blütepflanzen Schleswig-Holsteins, Rote Liste Band 1 (Kiel: Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein).
106
MilkerY.HortonB. P.NelsonA. R.EngelhartS. E.WitterR. C. (2015). Variability of intertidal foraminiferal assemblages in a salt marsh, Oregon, USA. Mar. Micropaleontology118, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.04.004
107
MillerC. B.RodriguezA. B.BostM. C. (2021). Sea-level rise, localized subsidence, and increased storminess promote saltmarsh transgression across low-gradient upland areas. Quaternary Sci. Rev.265, 107000. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107000
108
MöllerI.KudellaM.RupprechtF.SpencerT.PaulM.van WesenbeeckB. K.et al. (2014). Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Nat. Geosci.7, 727–731. doi: 10.1038/NGEO2251
109
MoodleyL.BoschkerH. T. S.MiddelburgJ. J.PelR.HermanP. M. J.de DeckereE.et al. (2000). Ecological significance of benthic foraminifera: 13C labelling experiments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.202, 289–295. doi: 10.3354/meps202289
110
MorrisJ. T.SundareshwarP. V.NietchC. T.KjerfveB.CahoonD. R. (2002). Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology83, 2869–2877. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2869:ROCWTR]2.0.CO;2
111
MovellanA.SchiebelR.ZubkovM. V.SmythA.HowaH. (2012). Protein biomass quantification of unbroken individual foraminifers using nano-spectrophotometry. Biogeosciences9, 3613–3623. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3613-2012
112
MudersbachC.WahlT.HaighI. D.JensenJ. (2013). Trends in high sea levels of German North Sea gauges compared to regional mean sea level changes. Continental Shelf Res.65, 111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.06.016
113
MüllerP.LadigesN.JackA.SchmiedlG.KutzbachL.JensenK.et al. (2018). Assessing the long-term carbon-sequestration potential of the semi-natural salt marshes in the European Wadden Sea. Ecosphere10, e02556. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2556
114
Müller-NavarraS.GieseH. (1999). Improvements of an empirical model to forecast wind surge in the German Bight. German J. Hydrography51, 385–405. doi: 10.1007/BF02764162
115
Müller-NavarraK.MilkerY.BunzelD.LindhorstS.FriedrichJ.ArzH. W.et al. (2019). Evolution of a salt marsh in the southeastern North Sea region – anthropogenic and natural forcing. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.218, 268–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.022
116
Müller-NavarraK.MilkerY.SchmiedlG. (2016). Natural and anthropogenic influence on the distribution of salt marsh foraminifera in the Bay of Tümlau, German North Sea. J. Foraminiferal Res.46, 61–74. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.46.1.61
117
Müller-NavarraK.MilkerY.SchmiedlG. (2017). Applicability of transfer functions for relative sea-level reconstructions in the southern North Sea coastal region based on salt-marsh foraminifera. Mar. Micropaleontology135, 15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.06.003
118
MurrayJ. (2006). Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera (Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).
119
NarayanS.BeckM. W.RegueroB. G.LosadaI. J.van WesenbeeckB.PonteeN.et al. (2016). The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PloS One11, e0154735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
120
NigamR.KurtarkarS. R.SaraswatR.LinshyV. N.RanaS. S. (2008). Response of benthic foraminifera Rosalina leei to different temperature and salinity, under laboratory culture experiment. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom88, 699–704. doi: 10.1017/S0025315408001197
121
NigamR.SaraswatR.KurtarkarS. R. (2006). Laboratory experiment to study the effect of salinity variations on benthic foraminiferal species - Pararotalia nipponica (Asano). J. Geological Soc. India67, 41–46.
122
NorthrupK.CapoociM.SeyfferthA. L. (2018). Effects of extreme events on arsenic cycling in salt marshes. J. Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences123, 1086–1100. doi: 10.1002/2017JG004259
123
PaillardD.LabeyrieL.YiouP. (1996). Macintosh program performs time-series analysis. Eos77, 379. doi: 10.1029/96EO00259
124
PolovodovaI.SchönfeldJ. (2008). Foraminiferal test abnormalities in the western Baltic Sea. J. Foraminiferal Res.38, 318–336. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.4.318
125
PonteeN. (2011). Reappraising coastal squeeze: a case study from north-west England. Maritime Eng.164, 127–138. doi: 10.1680/maen.2011.164.3.127
126
PonteeN.NarayanS.BeckM. W.HoskingA. H. (2016). Naturebased solutions: lessons from around the world. Proc. Institution Civil Engineers - Maritime Eng.169, 29–36. doi: 10.1680/jmaen.15.00027
127
PughD. T. (1987). Tides, surges, and mean sea level (Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons).
128
RöhrsW. (1938). Der Dammbau zur Sicherung des Seedeiches an der Friedrichskoogspitze in Süderdithmarschen. Westküste2, 1–15.
129
RupprechtF.WannerA.StockM.JensenK. (2015). Succession in saltmarshes – large-scale and long-term patterns after abandonment of grazing and drainage. Appl. Vegetation Sci.18, 86–98. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12126
130
SaraswatR.KouthankerM.KurtarkarS. R.NigamR.NaqviS. W. A.LinshyV. N. (2015). Effect of salinity induced pH/alkalinity changes on benthic foraminifera: a laboratory culture experiment. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.153, 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.12.005
131
SchederJ.FrenzelP.BungenstockF.EngelM.BrücknerH.PintA. (2019). Vertical and lateral distribution of foraminifera and ostracoda in the East Frisian Wadden Sea – developing a transfer function for relative sea-level change. Geologica Belgica22, 99–110. doi: 10.20341/gb.2019.007
132
SchönfeldJ. (2018). Monitoring benthic foraminiferal dynamics at Bottsand coastal lagoon (western Baltic Sea). J. Micropalaeontology37, 383–393. doi: 10.5194/jm-37-383-2018
133
SchönfeldJ.AlveE.GeslinE.JorissenF.KorsunS.SpezzaferriS.et al. (2012). The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal BIo-MOnitoring) initiative – towards a standardized protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies. Mar. Micropaleontology94-95, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2012.06.001
134
SchooneesT.MancheñoA. G.ScheresB.BoumaT. J.SilvaR.SchlurmannT.et al. (2019). Hard structures for coastal protection, towards greener designs. Estuaries Coasts42, 1709–1729. doi: 10.1007/s12237-019-00551-z
135
SchröderH. K.KiehlK.StockM. (2002). Directional and non-directional vegetation changes in a temperate salt marsh in relation to biotic and abiotic factors. Appl. Vegetation Sci.5, 33–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2002.tb00533.x
136
SchuerchM.VafeidisA.SlawigT.TemmermanS. (2013). Modeling the influence of changing storm patterns on the ability of a salt marsh to keep pace with sea level rise. J. Geophysical Research: Earth Surface118, 84–96. doi: 10.1029/2012JF002471
137
ScottD. B.HermelinJ. O. R. (1993). A device for precision splitting of micropaleontological samples in liquid suspension. J. Paleontology67, 151–154. doi: 10.1017/S0022336000021302
138
ScottD. K.LeckieR. M. (1990). Foraminiferal zonation of Great Sippewissett salt marsh (Falmouth, Massachusetts). J. Foraminiferal Res.20, 248–266. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.20.3.248
139
ScottD. B.MedioliF. S. (1986). “Foraminifera as sea-level indicators,” in Sea-level research: a manual for the collection and evaluation of data. Ed. van de PlasscheO. (Norwich England: International Geological Correlation Project 64, Geo Books), 435–456.
140
Sen GuptaB. K. (1999). “Foraminifera in marginal marine environments,” in Modern foraminifera. Ed. Sen GuptaB. K. (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 141–159.
141
SiemesR. W. A.BorsjeB. W.DaggenvoordeR. J.HulscherS. J. M. H. (2020). Artificial structures steer morphological development of salt marshes: a model study. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.8, 326. doi: 10.3390/jmse8050326
142
StockM. (2003). Salzwiesenschutz im Schleswig-Holsteinischen Wattenmeer. Vogelkundlicher Bericht Niedersachsen35, 115–124.
143
StockM.GettnerS.HaggeM.HeinzelK.KohlusJ.StumpeH. (2005). Salzwiesen an der Westküste von Schleswig-Holstein 1988-2001. Schriftenreihe Des. Nationalparks Schleswig-Holsteinisches Wattenmeer (Tönning), Heft15, 239.
144
StockM.MaierM. (2016). Salzwiesenschutz im Nationalpark Wattenmeer: ein Überblick (Conservation of salt marshes within the National Park Wadden Sea – an overview). Vogelkundliche Berichte aus Niedersachsen44, 131–156.
145
StouffV.GeslinE.DebenayJ.-P.LesourdM. (1999). Origin of morphological abnormalities in Ammonia (foraminifera): studies in laboratory and natural environments. J. Foraminiferal Res.29, 152–170. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.29.2.152
146
StumpfR. P. (1983). The process of sedimentation on the surface of a salt marsh. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.17, 495–508. doi: 10.1016/0272-7714(83)90002-1
147
SuchrowS.PohlmannN.StockM.JensenK. (2012). Long-term surface elevation changes in German North Sea salt marshes. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.98, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.031
148
SvenssonC.JonesD. A. (2002). Dependence between extreme sea surge, river flow and precipitation in eastern Britain. Int. J. Climatology22, 1149–1168. doi: 10.1002/joc.794
149
TemmermanS.GoversG.MeireP.WartelS. (2003). Modelling long-term tidal marsh growth under changing tidal conditions and suspended sediment concentrations, Scheldt estuary, Belgium. Mar. Geology193, 151–169. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00642-4
150
TrenberthK. E.JonesP. D.AmbenjeP.BojariuR.EasterlingD.Klein TankA.et al. (2007). “Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change,” in Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Eds. SolomonS.QinD.ManningM.ChenZ.MarquisM.AverytK. B.TignorM.MillerH. L. (Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press), 1–102.
151
TyszkaJ. (2006). Morphospace of foraminiferal shells: results from the moving reference model. Lethaia39, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00241160600575808
152
TyszkaJ.TopaP.SaczkaK. (2005). State-of-the-art in modelling of foraminiferal shells: searching for an emergent model. Studia Geologica Polonica124, 143–157.
153
Van der WalD.PyeK. (2004). Patterns, rates and possible causes of saltmarsh erosion in the Greater Thames area (UK). Geomorphology61, 373–391. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.02.005
154
Van de VenC. N.ReijersV. C.LammersC.van BelzenJ.ChungY.BoumaT. J.et al. (2023). Establishing cordgrass plants cluster their shoots to avoid ecosystem engineering. Funct. Ecol.37, 1339–1349. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14302
155
Van ProosdijD.Davidson-ArnottR. G. D.OllerheadJ. (2006). Controls on spatial patterns of sediment deposition across a macro-tidal salt marsh surface over single tidal cycles. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.69, 64–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.04.022
156
Van Vliet-LanoëB.PenaudA.HénaffA.DelacourtC.FernaneA.GoslinJ.et al. (2014). Middle- to late-Holocene storminess in Brittany (NW France): part II – the chronology of events and climate forcing. Holocene24, 434–453. doi: 10.1177/0959683613519688
157
Van WijnenH. J.BakkerJ. P.de VriesY. (1997). Twenty years of salt marsh succession on a Dutch coastal barrier island. J. Coast. Conserv.3, 9–18. doi: 10.1007/BF02908174
158
Von LiebermanN.SchwarzeH.ZimmermannC. (1998). Ausführung und Wirkungsweise von Lahnungen. Die Küste60, 191–225.
159
Von StorchH.GönnertG.MeineM. (2008). Storm surges – an option for Hamburg, Germany, to mitigate expected future aggravation of risk. Environ. Sci. Policy11, 735–742. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.08.003
160
WaltersD. C.CarrJ. A.HockadayA.JonesJ. A.McFarlandE.KovalenkoK. E.et al. (2021). Experimental tree mortality does not induce marsh transgression in a Chesapeake Bay low-lying coastal forest. Front. Mar. Sci.8. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.782643
161
WatsonE. B.OczkowskiA. J.WigandC.HansonA. R.DaveyE. W.CrosbyS. C.et al. (2014). Nutrient enrichment and precipitation changes do not enhance resiliency of salt marshes to sea level rise in the northeastern U.S. Climatic Change125, 501–509. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1189-x
162
WeisseR.von StorchH.NiemeyerH. D.KnaackH. (2012). Changing North Sea storm surge climate: an increasing hazard? Ocean Coast. Manage.68, 58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.005
163
WesselsT.-F. (2021). Addressing the challenges of climate change for coastal protection in Lower Saxony using the example of a coastal section near Neßmersiel (Aurich district) (Hannover (Germany: Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Environmental Planning).
164
WrightA. J.EdwardsR. J.van de PlasscheO. (2011). Reassessing transfer-function performance in sea-level reconstruction based on benthic salt-marsh foraminifera from the Atlantic coast of NE North America. Mar. Micropaleontology81, 43–62. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2011.07.003
165
YankoV.AhmadM.KaminskiM. (1998). Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to pollution by heavy metals: implications for pollution monitoring. J. Foraminiferal Res.28, 177–200.
Summary
Keywords
cultural landscapes, environmental stress, ecological indicators, foraminiferal test abnormalities, Entzia macrescens
Citation
Bunzel D, Milker Y, Francescangeli F and Schmiedl G (2023) Braving the extremes: foraminifera document changes in climate-induced and anthropogenic stress in Wadden Sea salt marshes. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11:1199281. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1199281
Received
03 April 2023
Accepted
08 September 2023
Published
28 September 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Ming Li, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Veronica Rossi, University of Bologna, Italy; Natascia Pannozzo, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Bunzel, Milker, Francescangeli and Schmiedl.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dorothea Bunzel, bunzel@lufi.uni-hannover.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.