ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.

Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1576407

This article is part of the Research TopicCoastal Adaptation Through Nature: Natural and Nature-Based Features (NNBF) ResearchView all 4 articles

A Changing of the Garden: Evaluating the performance and ecosystem functionality of alternative oyster garden structures in residential waterways

Provisionally accepted
Adrian  SakrAdrian Sakr1*Logan  D. MazorLogan D. Mazor1Eric  C. MilbrandtEric C. Milbrandt2Joseph  P. MortonJoseph P. Morton3Andrew  H. AltieriAndrew H. Altieri1
  • 1Engineering School for Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
  • 2Sanibel Captiva Conservation Foundation Marine Laboratory, Sanibel, Florida, United States
  • 3Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Oyster gardening, in which hanging oyster recruitment substrates are suspended from docks, has become an increasingly common and accessible technique for coastal communities to support local oyster populations for biodiversity enhancement, habitat restoration, and ecological functions including water filtration. However, little research has been done to evaluate materials and methods for oyster garden structures regarding cost, ease of assembly, durability, and ecosystem benefits, making it difficult to scale up efforts and maximize project success and sustainability. We conducted a field experiment in a residential canal system on Sanibel Island, Florida where we deployed a variety of oyster garden structure types to evaluate their performance in oyster recruitment, durability, water filtration rate, and biodiversity. Additionally, the occurrence of Hurricane Ian during the deployment provided an opportunity to evaluate how these structures resisted severe storm events. We tested a total of five structures: (1) a conventional design made of drilled oyster shell on steel wire (shell structures); and four alternatives, (2) GROW concrete discs (disc structures); (3) jute fiber coated with calcium sulfoaluminate cement (jute structures); (4) BESE biodegradable plastic matrix panels (BESE matrix panel structures); and (5) BESE biodegradable plastic mesh bags filled with oyster cultch (bag structures). All structures survived Hurricane Ian; however, both BESE structure types ultimately disintegrated without recruiting oysters. Disc, jute, and shell wire structures demonstrated similarly high levels of durability, oyster recruitment and growth, and biofiltration rates. Thus, we conclude that structure type selection is based on material and labor availability and whether cost and biodegradability are prioritized. We show that oyster gardening can provide ecosystem services, including filtration, in residential canal sites that have lost “natural” shoreline morphology. Investments in oyster gardening are low risk in the face of natural hazards, supporting use of the practice in storm-prone areas. However, residential canals are prone to adverse water quality, including low dissolved oxygen, which we show may undermine oyster survival and growth; location and season thus need to be considered for the deployment of substrate. Our results demonstrate material options for providing sustainability, durability, oyster recruitment, and biodiversity for oyster gardening projects while minimizing environmental impacts.

Keywords: alternative materials, Biodegradable plastic, Coastal restoration, Community science, Filtration, Oyster gardening, Biodiversity, Hurricane

Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 24 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sakr, Mazor, Milbrandt, Morton and Altieri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Adrian Sakr, Engineering School for Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.