ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1602543
This article is part of the Research TopicConservation and Restoration in the OceansView all articles
Determining the diversity and relative abundance of coral taxa in wild spawning slicks for effective restoration
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
- 2Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia
- 3Australian Institute of Marine Science, Perth, Australia
- 4Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
- 5National Marine Science Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Coral reefs are increasingly threatened by climate change-induced stressors, including marine heatwaves, which can lead to coral mortality, reduced reproductive output, and compromised natural recovery. Successful coral reef recovery requires the settlement of coral larvae and recruitment in degraded areas, replenishing coral communities and promoting resilience. Some restoration strategies involve utilizing natural spawning slicks, composed of coral gametes and embryos, to produce larvae to reseed reefs. However, verifying the taxonomic composition of these slicks is challenging. Here, we tested the performance of two coral ITS primer sets, CoralITS2 and CoralITS2_acro, on mock communities to evaluate their ability to capture genera composition and relative abundances. Both primer sets demonstrated high accuracy (>97%) in detecting and quantifying coral taxa. Subsequently, these primers were applied to wild-collected spawning slicks from the Great Barrier Reef, revealing variation in scleractinian (reef-building) coral community composition among slicks. For the CoralITS2_acro assay, Acropora was consistently the most abundant resolved genus detected across wild slick sample sites, with the exception of samples from the Whitsundays region, where Platygyra was dominant. The CoralITS2 assay successfully differentiated reef-building (Scleractinian) corals from other cooccurring spawning taxa, such as soft corals, anemones, and sponges, and revealed that these other co-spawners dominated slicks at two sites. Our findings underscore the potential of eDNAbased monitoring as a scalable tool to confirm the presence and relative abundance of diverse coral assemblages in natural slicks, informing restoration efforts. By enabling the characterization and comparison of slick composition across large spatial and temporal scales, eDNA metabarcoding can support restoration practices that align with the ecological requirements of reef ecosystems, safeguarding biodiversity and promoting resilience against future disturbances.
Keywords: biodiversity1, EDNA2, ITS23, metabarcoding4, Great Barrier Reef5, Coral seeding6, Monitoring7
Received: 29 Mar 2025; Accepted: 04 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Marquardt, Elder, Yeoh, Randall, Heyward, Harrison, Logan and Howells. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bailey Marquardt, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.