ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Biogeography and Macroecology
This article is part of the Research TopicCoastal Adaptation Through Nature: Natural and Nature-Based Features (NNBF) ResearchView all 13 articles
The onset of coastal foredune formation at variable levels of ecological complexity
Provisionally accepted- 1Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, United States
- 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
- 3Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States
- 4Marine Academy of Technology and Environmental Science, Manahawkin, United States
- 5US Naval Research Laboratory Ocean Sciences Division, Stennis Space Center, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Gaps in our understanding of the interplay between biotic and abiotic forces shaping coastal dunes inhibit our ability to fully understand their evolution and predict topographic changes. The theoretical evolution of a dune system begins with nebkha formation. This formation begins around individual dune-building plants which grow over time around groups of plants. Individual nebkha mounds can meld into one another, growing in size and complexity based on the dune-building vegetation population. To better understand ecogeomorphological feedbacks driving these relationships, we tested how plant density impacts nebkha formation by Ammophila breviligulata in both a lab and field setting. Lab tests consisted of using a wind tunnel to control abiotic forces, focusing on the effects of plant density in nebkha formation. We tested three low densities commonly supporting backshore nebkha: an individual (one plant) and small groups (five and nine plants). In the field, we used both remote sensing and field techniques to quantify the relationship between stem density, nebkha shape, and size of backshore A. breviligulata nebkha. In the wind tunnel, stem density was not as strong a predictor of nebkha size or shape as number of leaves and aboveground biomass, both of which increased with growing stem and plant densities. Stem density was a strong predictor of nebkha size and shape with increasing variability at increasing densities in both the lab and field. In situ measurements of stem density are performed inconsistently amongst field experiments due to the effort required. Therefore, strong allometric scaling among A. breviligulata morphology metrics can help overcome limitations around what can be collected in the field or in a modeled environment containing limited plant metrics. In situ, vegetation stabilization frequently allowed nebkhas to grow steeper than would be expected based on grain size and angle of repose. These differences in field and lab nebkha highlight the importance of grounding lab work in field collections for the interpretation of their results in nature. Understanding the underlying ecogeomorphic feedbacks involved in nebkha formation, are critical to scaling up in modeling efforts to forecast coastal foredune evolution, recovery, and storm response in the face of climate change.
Keywords: Aeolian transport, Ammophila breviligulata (American beachgrass), Backshore, Ecogeomorphology, Nebkha, remote sensing, topographic evolution, wind tunnel
Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 03 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Charbonneau, Zinnert, Wnek, Williams, McGivney, Matthews, Sabo and Dohner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bianca Charbonneau
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
