Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.

Sec. Models in Ecology and Evolution

Cross-Comparison of Modeling Methods for Ancient Tree Age Prediction: A Case Study on Six Species in Huangshan City, China

Provisionally accepted
Ruijun  WangRuijun Wang1*Xukun  HanXukun Han1Peichu  LiuPeichu Liu1Xiaohan  ZhangXiaohan Zhang1Jinzi  ZhangJinzi Zhang1Qinghe  HouQinghe Hou2Lyu  XiaoqianLyu Xiaoqian1
  • 1Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China
  • 2China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Ancient trees represent vital natural and cultural assets for a nation or region, embodying values across ecological, historical, and landscape dimensions. Accurate determination of age is a cornerstone of effective ancient tree conservation and management. This study focuses on Huangshan City, China, investigating six regionally predominant species: T. grandis, T. mairei, C. sclerophylla, C. officinarum, L. formosana, and A. aspera. We established a cross-comparison framework encompassing these six species and four modeling methods (MLR, GWR, RF, GWRF) to conduct an in-depth analysis of model performance as influenced by method choice and predictor composition. The findings reveal: (1) GWR effectively addresses the spatial heterogeneity inherent in ancient tree distributions, while RF excels at capturing complex nonlinear relationships. The GWRF model, which integrates both approaches, achieved the highest prediction accuracy. (2) Model performance is closely linked to species-specific ecological strategies. Growth in long-lived species (e.g., T. grandis and T. mairei) is manifested more through the accumulation of morphological traits, whereas species with a younger population age structure (e.g., L. formosana and A. aspera) are more constrained by environmental factors; (3) DBH was consistently the key morphological factor across all species, while Altitude and MAP were the most common key environmental factors. The identification of these key factors and their interspecific differences can provide precise guidance for the census, conservation, and management of ancient trees. This study not only provides an optimized solution for predicting ancient tree age but also underscores a deeper principle: scientific conservation must begin with understanding their unique growth logic, thereby establishing a solid theoretical and practical framework for precision management.

Keywords: ecologicalstrategy, growth-environment relationship, Heritage tree, machine learning, Model Comparison, Spatial heterogeneity

Received: 09 Dec 2025; Accepted: 27 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Wang, Han, Liu, Zhang, Zhang, Hou and Xiaoqian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ruijun Wang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.