Abstract
Introduction:
An increasing body of research has explored the predictive effect of personality traits and affective factors on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC). However, more is needed to know about how the sub-facets of individual personality traits influence WTC in the classroom context. Therefore, drawing on positive psychology, this study aims to bridge this gap by examining these roles in a mediation model of WTC incorporating FLE and conscientiousness.
Methods:
To this end, 244 Chinese EFL undergraduates from two distinct universities participated in an online survey, completing a composite questionnaire of the three constructs. The bootstrapping technique was employed to test the proposed relationships.
Results:
The findings indicated a positive correlation between both FLE and conscientiousness with WTC. Additionally, conscientiousness significantly mediated the relationship between FLE and WTC, supporting a partial mediation effect. Also, FLE had a direct influence on conscientiousness. These results may have some notable implications for EFL educators.
Discussion:
The adoption of a holistic approach that emphasizes affective factors alongside acknowledging individual differences among learners could enhance students’ willingness to communicate in English.
1 Introduction
Spoken English is a direct manifestation of language aptitude, and it is also a priority for many Chinese EFL students who face communicative difficulties in a non-English environment. Similarly, according to statistics, the speaking component in the IELTS test is one of the most challenging abilities for Chinese EFL learners to improve within a fixed period, often resulting in a specific negative emotion, namely speaking anxiety. Besides, L2 reticence of Chinese students in English learning has been widely observed in classroom settings (), and the reasons for their reticence varied across different communicative contexts (Zhong, 2013), highlighting the need for more support and attention for these language learners. These phenomena have prompted significant research into oral English communicative competence and spoken performance. Following this, the willingness to communicate (WTC) of L2 learners has become a topic in L2 academic research, defined as “a readiness to enter into discourse at a particular time with a specific person or persons, using an L2” by , p. 547), which is considered the last essential step before actual communicative behavior. Given the paramount role of WTC in the development of spoken ability, numerous studies have indicated the relationships between WTC and a variety of cognitive and non-cognitive factors (see the literature review). Empirical findings suggest that students with a higher level of WTC tend to achieve better performance in oral English and vice versa. Therefore, it is crucial to explore the antecedents of WTC, and the current study aligns with this focus by examining the predictive role of foreign language enjoyment (FLE) and Conscientiousness on WTC.
Drawing on positive psychology (PP) in recent decades, positive emotions have been found to have a profound and beneficial impact on the language learning process (Dewaele and Dewaele, 2018). Before this, researchers had focused more on negative affective factors, such as foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), stress, and burnout, among others. Consequently, FLE, the primary positive emotion in second language acquisition, has been defined as “a positive disposition toward the foreign language learning process, peers, and teachers” (, p. 282). Following the seminal work by , a growing body of research has confirmed that learners who find EFL more enjoyable are more likely to perform better in the learning process (see the literature review). Despite previous findings suggesting a positive relationship between WTC and FLE, based on the theoretical framework that FLE is one of the affective factors that may influence WTC (; see Figure 1), few studies have tested the indirect effect of FLE on WTC. In other words, the potential mediating role of Conscientiousness between FLE and WTC should be further explored.
Figure 1
Another variable, Conscientiousness, is worth investigating in the correlation between WTC and FLE due to a greater focus on individual differences among learners (Xu and Zheng, 2022), representing a research shift from teacher-orientation to student-orientation. As one of the five basic personality traits, Conscientiousness consists of a range of characteristic qualities, such as competence, order, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, and deliberation (
Although previous studies have revealed a variety of factors that may influence WTC, few have incorporated a specific personality trait, FLE, and WTC into a mediation model. This study aims to deepen the understanding of these factors that impact WTC in the context of the English classroom in China. For this purpose, the PROCESS macro, as a powerful analytic tool, has been used to test the role of these variables in predicting WTC.
2 Literature review
2.1 Willingness to communicate
The concept of WTC was originally from an actual communicative predisposition behavior of first or native-language speakers labeled as unwillingness to communicate, mainly based on personality traits and affective variables (e.g.,
Given the important role of WTC in communication skills, many researchers have revealed the direct and indirect influences on WTC, including language learning emotions (
2.2 Foreign language enjoyment
Psychology has always significantly influenced second or foreign language learning process particularly concerning negative or aversive emotions, such as foreign language anxiety, boredom, distress, and burnout, among others (Xu et al., 2022). However, an increasing number of SLA researchers have started to concentrate on positive emotions, including joy, interest, contentment, and love, which may “broaden an individual’s momentary thought-action repertoire, the consequences of which in turn build that individual’s personal resources” (
Studies on FLE have received increasing attention in the field of L2 learning in the past two decades (
Copious studies have been conducted to examine the relationship between FLE and a range of factors, including motivation (
2.3 Conscientiousness
Conscientiousness is a personality trait based on the Five Factor Model (FFM), representing the characteristic qualities of competence, order, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, and deliberation, with both proactive and inhibitive aspects (
In light of the effect of Conscientiousness as a personality trait in educational settings, many scholars have investigated this variable to explore its role in facilitating learning, along with the affective variables. For instance,
2.4 Relationships between FLE, conscientiousness, and WTC
Given that students with greater enjoyment of learning are inclined to be more willing to communicate within the classroom context (
However, scant studies established the importance of Conscientiousness on L2 WTC, while some researchers examined the predictability of other personality traits on WTC. For instance, an earlier study conducted by Oz (2014) examined the relationship between Big Five personality traits and WTC, and the results showed that Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Openness to Experience significantly predicted the WTC. In line with it partially,
Regarding FLE and Conscientiousness, very few researchers have examined the relationship between these two variables. In the study conducted by (
Therefore, given the theoretical underpinnings of the constructs and the existing empirical findings previously reviewed, this study hypothesized a mediating model of WTC in the link between FLE and Conscientiousness in the classroom context. Along with the path directions, the proposed model was depicted in Figure 2. The subsequent hypotheses were suggested as follows based on the preceding rationale:
Hypothesis 1: FLE positively predicts WTC.
Hypothesis 2: Conscientiousness positively predicts WTC.
Hypothesis 3: FLE positively predicts Conscientiousness.
Hypothesis 4: FLE has a positive influence on WTC through the mediating role of Conscientiousness.
Figure 2

The hypothesized model of WTC.
3 Methodology
3.1 Participants
Employing a convenience sampling approach, this study enrolled 244 first-year to second-year Chinese EFL undergraduate students to explore their WTC, FLE, and Conscientiousness. Of these participants, 180 (74%) were female, and 64 (26%) were male; 176 (72%) were freshmen, and 68 (28%) were sophomores; 140 (57%) were from South China Agricultural University in Guangzhou, and 104 (43%) were from Guangdong Ocean University (Yangjiang Campus) in Yangjiang. Undergraduate students from two different stages were targeted to capture both WTC and affective feelings to varying degrees. Along with the fact that South China Agricultural University is recognized as a key university compared with Guangdong Ocean University (Yangjiang Campus), this study also aimed to ensure sample diversity and avoid the potential common method bias that could arise from distributing questionnaires to a specific university.
3.2 Instruments
The data were collected by a three-construct composite questionnaire, along with a demographic information section. Since the survey was conducted in a Chinese EFL context, the questionnaire, originally developed in English, was translated into Chinese. This translated version of the three-construct composite questionnaire underwent three rounds of review and revision by both authors and an associate professor with a Ph.D. in applied linguistics, focusing on enhancing the clarity and adaptability of the items for Chinese EFL undergraduate students. The three scales are as follows.
3.2.1 WTC in English scale
A 10-item scale from
3.2.2 Foreign language enjoyment scale
The students’ FLE in learning English was gauged by a 10-item scale (Jiang and Dewaele, 2019), originally from
3.2.3 Conscientiousness scale
Conscientiousness was tapped using six items from the sub-scales of IPIP-NEO-60 scale (Maples-Keller et al., 2017), which is a representation of 300-item IPIP-NEO (Goldberg et al., 2006) from the International Personality Item Pool, measuring five personality traits: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. The 6-item scale assesses facets of the participants’ Conscientiousness, including Orderliness, Achievement Striving, and Cautiousness. A higher score indicates that the respondent is more conscientious.
3.3 Procedure for data collection
Data collection was conducted in May 2024, and it took 21 days to gather all the data. The questionnaire was distributed online via Wenjuanxing1 an online survey platform with the assistance of two instructors from two universities. Before distribution, all students were informed that participation in the survey was voluntary and were asked to read a separate consent form to ensure that they were fully well-informed about the confidentiality and anonymity of their responses. All questionnaire items were set to the mandatory fill-in mode; thus, this research had no missing data.
3.4 Data analysis
This study employed SPSS 29.0, along with the accompanying PROCESS macro version 4.1, to analyze the data. In the first phase, descriptive statistics for all latent constructs were calculated to present an overview of the dataset, including distribution, mean, and standard deviation. Then, the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with principal component factoring (PCF) analysis and varimax rotation, was conducted to assess the internal structure of each scale. Following this, the convergent and discriminant validity of the variables was verified using the indices of Composite Reliability (CR), Average Variance Extracted (AVE), and the square roots of AVE, which further ensured that all prerequisites for subsequent analyses were met (
4 Results
4.1 Descriptive analysis
The skewness (ranging from −0.395 to 0.275) and kurtosis (ranging from −0.603 to 0.657) of all 26 items were computed in the descriptive analysis. For all latent constructs, skewness values lower than ±2 and kurtosis values lower than ±7 suggested the normal distribution of the gathered data in this study (
4.2 Reliability and validity of the research instruments
At the beginning, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was performed to ensure that the data were appropriate to the EFA. Bartlett’s test of sphericity for all three constructs was significant (p < 0.001), and the KMO values ranged from 0.593 to 0.867, indicating the suitability of the data for conducting the EFA to assess the dimensional structure. Given the benchmark that items with eigenvalues greater than 1 and standardized factor loadings above 0.60 were retained (
Next, as can be seen from Table 1, two dimensions were extracted, and item 5 was eliminated due to its low factor loading. The nine remaining items, with no cross-loading greater than 0.40, explained 73.22% of the total variance, which aligned well with the initial dimensions of the WTC scale. The first factor represented students’ WTC in meaning-focused activities within the classroom context (Cronbach’s α = 0.86), while the second factor reflected the students’ WTC in English pertained to form-focused activities (Cronbach’s α = 0.94).
Table 1
| Items | Factors | |
|---|---|---|
| WMA | WFA | |
| I am willing to … | ||
| WTC2: give a short self-introduction without notes in English to the class | 0.838 | |
| WTC1: do a role-play standing in front of the class in English (e.g., ordering food in a restaurant) | 0.825 | |
| WTC4: translate a spoken utterance from Chinese into English in my group | 0.777 | |
| WTC3: give a short speech in English to the class about my hometown with notes | 0.729 | |
| WTC6: do a role-play in English at my desk, with my peer (e.g., ordering food in a restaurant) | 0.722 | |
| WTC8: ask my group mates in English the meaning of the word I do not know | 0.926 | |
| WTC9: ask my group mates in English how to pronounce a word in English | 0.922 | |
| WTC10: ask my peer sitting next to me in English how to say an English phrase to express the thoughts in my mind | 0.877 | |
| WTC7: ask my peer sitting next to me in English the meaning of an English word | 0.852 | |
| Cronbach’s alpha | 0.86 | 0.94 |
Dimensions in the WTC scale.
WTC, willingness to communicate; WMA, WTC in English in meaning-focused activities; WFA, WTC in English in form-focused activities.
After that, as shown in Table 2, the EFA yielded a two-dimensional structure for the scale of FLE, which accounted for 63.88% of the total variance. Item 4 and 7 were removed due to their cross-loadings exceeding 0.40, while item 6 was eliminated as a result of its low factor loading. The first factor reflected the students’ private enjoyment of English lessons (Cronbach’s α = 0.75), and the second factor represented their social enjoyment from interactions with classmates and the English teacher (Cronbach’s α = 0.77).
Table 2
| Items | Factors | |
|---|---|---|
| PE | SE | |
| FLE3: I performed well in this term’s English Listening and Speaking class | 0.826 | |
| FLE2: I enjoy this term’s English Listening and Speaking class | 0.791 | |
| FLE1: I do not get bored | 0.756 | |
| FLE9: There is a good atmosphere | 0.838 | |
| FLE10: We laugh a lot in class | 0.784 | |
| FLE5: It is a positive environment | 0.681 | |
| FLE8: My peers in the English Listening and Speaking class are nice | 0.656 | |
| Cronbach’s alpha | 0.75 | 0.77 |
Dimensions in the FLE scale.
FLE, foreign language enjoyment; SE, social enjoyment; PE, private enjoyment.
Then, Table 3 illustrates that a three-factor structure was produced by the EFA for the Conscientiousness scale, accounting for 77.63% of the total variance, which was consistently in line with the initial design of the scale’s dimensions. The three facets explained Conscientiousness from distant perspectives, including orderliness (Cronbach’s α = 0.62), achievement striving (Cronbach’s α = 0.61), and cautiousness (Cronbach’s α = 0.70).
Table 3
| Items | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | AS | CA | |
| C1: Like to tidy up | 0.868 | ||
| *C2: Leave a mess in my room | 0.793 | ||
| C3: Work hard | 0.847 | ||
| C4: Set high standards for myself and others | 0.829 | ||
| *C6: Act without thinking | 0.898 | ||
| *C5: Make rash decisions | 0.878 | ||
| Cronbach’s alpha | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
Dimensions in the conscientiousness scale.
C, conscientiousness; OR, orderliness; AS, achievement striving; CA, cautiousness; items with an asterisk (*) are reverse coded.
Based on the results from the EFA presented in Tables 1–3, the standardized factor loadings and the internal consistency of the items for the WTC, FLE, and Conscientiousness scales all met the acceptable or recommended criterion (
As reported in Table 4, the findings indicated solid convergent validity of all constructs, with composite reliability (CR) exceeding 0.70 and average variance extracted (AVE) exceeding 0.50. Additionally, the square roots of the AVE for each variable (see the numerals on the diagonals in Table 4) were greater than their corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients, thus fulfilling the criterion for discriminant validity (
Table 4
| Variable | Convergent validity | Discriminant validity | Descriptive statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | AVE | WTC | FLE | C | Mean | SD | N | |
| WTC | 0.953 | 0.694 | 0.833 | 3.24 | 0.686 | 240 | ||
| FLE | 0.907 | 0.584 | 0.521** | 0.764 | 3.34 | 0.539 | 240 | |
| C | 0.941 | 0.727 | 0.301** | 0.337** | 0.853 | 3.37 | 0.566 | 240 |
Convergent and discriminant validity of the constructs.
WTC, willingness to communicate; FLE, foreign language enjoyment; C, conscientiousness; SD, standard deviation; the numerals on the diagonals are square roots of the AVE; the off-diagonal elements are Pearson correlation coefficients of the constructs; **p < 0.01. Bold value mean the PROCESS macro version 4.1 with the Bootstrapping technique (
Furthermore, the correlations among the variables were computed (see Table 4), revealing that all the constructs were significantly inter-correlated. Specifically, the results indicated that students’ WTC was positively correlated with their FLE (r = 0.521, p < 0.01) and Conscientiousness (r = 0.301, p < 0.01). In the same vein, FLE was also positively correlated with Conscientiousness (r = 0.337, p < 0.01).
4.3 The results of the research hypotheses
After confirming that all prerequisites were fit for the following analyses, the PROCESS macro with the Bootstrapping technique was employed to test all the hypotheses put forward previously. First, as can be seen in Table 5, the results confirmed Hypothesis 3. The path leading from FLE to Conscientiousness was statistically significant (β = 0.354, p < 0.001). This result indicated that the variable FLE was positively correlated with Conscientiousness, thereby supporting Hypothesis 3.
Table 5
| Items | Parametric estimation | 95% Bootstrap | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t | p | LLCI | ULCI | |
| Y = C | ||||||
| Constant | 2.192 | 0.217 | 10.109 | 0.000 | 1.765 | 2.620 |
| X = FLE | 0.354 | 0.064 | 5.521 | 0.000 | 0.228 | 0.480 |
| R2 | 0.114*** | |||||
| Y = WTC | ||||||
| Constant | 0.649 | 0.282 | 2.301 | 0.022 | 0.093 | 1.205 |
| M = C | 0.171 | 0.071 | 2.431 | 0.016 | 0.033 | 0.310 |
| X = FLE | 0.603 | 0.074 | 8.142 | 0.000 | 0.457 | 0.749 |
| R2 | 0.289*** | |||||
| Direct effect of X on Y | ||||||
| FLE → WTC | 0.603 | 0.074 | 8.142 | 0.000 | 0.457 | 0.749 |
| Indirect effect of X on Y | Effect | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | ||
| FLE → C → WTC | 0.061 | 0.029 | 0.011 | 0.123 | ||
Results of mediation.
Model = 4; N = 240; Bootstrapping samples = 5,000; B = unstandardized regression coefficient; SE, standard error; LLCI, lower limit confidence intervals; ULCI, upper limit confidence interval; WTC, willingness to communicate; FLE, foreign language enjoyment; C, conscientiousness; ***p < 0.001.
Following this, the path from FLE to WTC (β = 0.603, p < 0.001) and the path from Conscientiousness to WTC (β = 0.171, p < 0.05) were also examined to be statistically significant, substantiating Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2. These findings verified the positive predictability of both FLE and Conscientiousness on WTC.
In addition, based on the rule that a mediation effect was considered significant if zero did not straddle between the lower and upper bounds (
Figure 3

The final model of WTC. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
5 Discussion
The current study shed light on the associations among FLE, Conscientiousness, and WTC in an EFL context in China. The Bootstrapping method was employed to verify the mediation effect within the three-variable model and to confirm the initial four hypotheses. Regarding Hypothesis 1, a significantly positive link was found between FLE and WTC. This is in line with the findings of a substantial body of research, including studies by
Then, Conscientiousness was revealed to be a direct and positive predictor of WTC, thus supporting Hypothesis 2. This suggests that L2 learners who possess a more conscientious personality trait are more likely to engage in communicative interactions with their peers and the English teacher. This result partially echoes the findings of the existing studies (e.g., Zhang et al., 2023), confirming the significantly positive relationship between Conscientiousness and WTC, but it contradicts the findings of Oz (2014). According to the multilayered pyramid model (
Concerning Hypothesis 3, FLE was indicated to positively predict Conscientiousness, indicating that students who have a higher level of enjoyment in learning a foreign language are more likely to show greater levels of Conscientiousness. While there are scant studies that have delved into this specific relationship, this present finding is partially in agreement with the main arguments of some studies pertaining to the connection between positive emotions and personality traits (e.g.,
In addition, FLE affected WTC indirectly through the mediating role of Conscientiousness (FLE → C → WTC), supporting Hypothesis 4. This is in line with the theoretical perspective that positive emotions play a role in shaping behavior and personal development (
6 Conclusion and implications
The present study examined the positive predictability of FLE and Conscientiousness on WTC in the mediation English language learning model. The findings indicated that Conscientiousness mediated the link between FLE and WTC, which could be elucidated from three perspectives. First, FLE has a significantly positive influence on Conscientious. Second, Conscientiousness was a positive predictor of WTC. Third, FLE also has a direct impact on WTC. Taken together, these results highlighted the critical role of the dynamic interplay of non-cognitive factors, including positive emotions and personality traits, in fostering the willingness to communicate among Chinese EFL learners. These findings not only enriched the existing literature on the relationship among these variables but also provided notable implications for EFL educators. To regard the key predictive effect of FLE in affecting WTC directly, L2 educators are suggestive of concentrating on fostering a playful and delightful classroom environment to stimulate students’ willingness to engage in English communication (
At the individual level, learners’ FLE and WTC are primarily related to the relevance of lesson topics. Therefore, curriculum developers can incorporate more practical and current topics into the English learning curriculum. This can be achieved by blending traditional textbooks with online learning resources (Yu et al., 2022) and enhanced through computer-assisted techniques, like QR code scanning for additional information. Following
Regarding the indirect impact of FLE on WTC in English through the mediator of Conscientiousness, teachers are recommended to leverage students’ conscientious traits by immersing them in a stress-free and low-anxiety English learning atmosphere to increase their WTC. Accordingly, English language curricula ought to be designed to aid learners in establishing explicit, attainable goals alongside the cultivation of a systematic, regular, and self-regulated learning schedule to improve their English-spoken proficiency. This recommendation aligns with the viewpoint that students whose level of conscientiousness is low may particularly need assistance from their teachers (
It is acknowledged that this study also suffers from some limitations. Firstly, the complexity and multifaceted nature of personality traits cannot be fully measured by a single self-report scale, thus potentially undermining the reliability of the gathered data. Consequently, subsequent studies employing a mixed method might be needed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of conscientious behavior and the underlying mechanisms related to personality traits, FEL, and WTC. Secondly, the current study was cross-sectional, failing to assess the long-term stability of the mediation effect. Longitudinal studies are therefore recommended to examine the influence of the relatively stable personality traits (
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the [patients/participants OR patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin] was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author contributions
JZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YF: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. ZL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
References
1
AlaviS. M.EsmaeilifardF.TommasiM. (2021). The effect of emotional scaffolding on language achievement and willingness to communicate by providing recast. Cogent Psychol.8:1911093. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2021.1911093
2
AlrabaiF. (2022). Modeling the relationship between classroom emotions, motivation, and learner willingness to communicate in EFL: applying a holistic approach of positive psychology in SLA research. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev.45, 2465–2483. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2022.2053138
3
BarabadiE.KhajavyG. H.BoothJ. R.Rahmani TabarM.Vahdani AsadiM. R. (2022). The links between perfectionistic cognitions, L2 achievement and willingness to communicate: examining L2 anxiety as a mediator. Curr. Psychol.42, 30878–30890. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04114-7
4
BotesE. L.DewaeleJ.-M.GreiffS. (2020). The power to improve: effects of multilingualism and perceived proficiency on enjoyment and anxiety in foreign language learning. Eur. J. Appl. Linguist.8, 279–306. doi: 10.1515/eujal-2020-0003
5
BotesE.DewaeleJ.-M.GreiffS. (2022). Taking stock: a meta-analysis of the effects of foreign language enjoyment. Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach.12, 205–232. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.3
6
BotesE.DewaeleJ.-M.GreiffS.GoetzT. (2023). Can personality predict foreign language classroom emotions? The devil’s in the detail. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis.46, 51–74. doi: 10.1017/s0272263123000153
7
BurgoonJ. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: development and validation. Commun. Monogr.43, 60–69. doi: 10.1080/03637757609375916
8
CaoY. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System39, 468–479. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016
9
CaoG. (2022). Toward the favorable consequences of academic motivation and L2 enjoyment for students’ willingness to communicate in the second language (L2WTC). Front. Psychol.13:997566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997566
10
CaspiA.RobertsB. W.ShinerR. L. (2005). Personality development: stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol.56, 453–484. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
11
ChengL.XuJ. (2022). Chinese English as a foreign language Learners’ individual differences and their willingness to communicate. Front. Psychol.13:883664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883664
12
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.DyeD. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personal. Individ. Differ.12, 887–898. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-d
13
CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikzentmihalyM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, vol. 1990. New York: Harper & Row, 1.
14
DewaeleJ. M.DewaeleL. (2018). Learnerinternal and learner-external predictors of willingness to communicate in the FL classroom. J. Europ. Sec. Langu. Assoc.2, 24–37. doi: 10.22599/jesla.37
15
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach.4, 237–274. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
16
DewaeleJ. M.MacIntyreP. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: the right and left feet of the language learner. In: Positive psychology in SLA, 215, 9781783095360–9781783095010.
17
DewaeleJ. M.MacIntyreP. D. (2019). “The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety” in Evidence-based second language pedagogy. (Abingdon, UK: Routledge), 263–286.
18
DewaeleJ.-M.PavelescuL. M. (2019). The relationship between incommensurable emotions and willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: a multiple case study. Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach.15, 66–80. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2019.1675667
19
DewaeleJ.-M.SaitoK. (2024). Are enjoyment, anxiety and attitudes/motivation different in English foreign language classes compared to LOTE classes?Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach.14, 171–191. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.42376
20
DewaeleJ.-M.SaitoK.HalimiF. (2023). How foreign language enjoyment acts as a buoy for sagging motivation: a longitudinal investigation. Appl. Linguis.44, 22–45. doi: 10.1093/applin/amac033
21
EtikanI.MusaS. A.AlkassimR. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat.5, 1–4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
22
FathiJ.PawlakM.MehraeinS.HosseiniH. M.DerakhsheshA. (2023). Foreign language enjoyment, ideal L2 self, and intercultural communicative competence as predictors of willingness to communicate among EFL learners. System115:103067. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2023.103067
23
FatimaI.IsmailS. A. M. M.PathanZ. H.MemonU. (2020). The power of openness to experience, extraversion, L2 self-confidence, classroom environment in predicting L2 willingness to communicate. Int. J. Instr.13, 909–924. doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13360a
24
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). “Structural equation modeling” in Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. ed. SerlinR. C. (Charlotte, NC, the United States: Information Age Publishing), 269–315.
25
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am. Psychol.56, 218–226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
26
FredricksonB. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.359, 1367–1377. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
27
FriedrichT. S.SchützA. (2023). Predicting school grades: can conscientiousness compensate for intelligence?J. Intelligence11:146. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070146
28
GkonouC.DaubneyM.DewaeleJ. M. (2017). New insights into language anxiety: theory, research and educational implications, vol. 114. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
29
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J. Res. Person. 40, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
30
GuoY.WangY.Ortega-MartínJ. L. (2023). The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras40, 253–273. doi: 10.30827/portalin.vi40.27061
31
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. 8th Edn. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning EMEA.
32
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 3rd Edn: The Guilford Press.
33
JiangY.DewaeleJ. M. (2019). How unique is the foreign language classroom enjoyment and anxiety of Chinese EFL learners?Sys. 82, 13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.02.017
34
KangS. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System33, 277–292. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
35
KaradağŞ.KayaS. D. (2019). The effects of personality traits on willingness to communicate: a study on university students. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi8, 397–410. doi: 10.33206/mjss.519145
36
KatićM.ŠafranjJ. (2019). The relationship between big five personality traits and willingness to communicate. Педагошка стварност65, 69–81. doi: 10.19090/ps.2019.1.69-81
37
KhajavyG. H.MacIntyreP. D.BarabadiE. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis.40, 605–624. doi: 10.1017/s0272263117000304
38
KhanyR.NejadA. M. (2016). L2 willingness to communicate, openness to experience, extraversion, and L2 unwillingness to communicate: the Iranian EFL context. RELC J.48, 241–255. doi: 10.1177/0033688216645416
39
KingJ.HarumiS. (2020). “East Asian perspectives on silence in English language education” in Multilingual Matters, vol. 6.
40
KrashenS. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
41
LalondeR. N.GardnerR. C. (1984). Investigating a causal model of second language acquisition: where does personality fit?Cana. J. Behav. Sci.16, 224–237. doi: 10.1037/h0080844
42
LanG.ZhaoX.GongM. (2023). Motivational intensity and willingness to communicate in L2 learning: A moderated mediation model of enjoyment, boredom, and shyness. System117:103116. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2023.103116
43
LeeJ. S. (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev.43, 452–468. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
44
LeeJ. S.LeeK. (2020). Role of L2 motivational self system on willingness to communicate of Korean EFL university and secondary students. J. Psycholinguist. Res.49, 147–161. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09675-6
45
LeeJ. S.XieQ.LeeK. (2021). Informal digital learning of English and L2 willingness to communicate: roles of emotions, gender, and educational stage. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev.45, 596–612. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2021.1918699
46
LiC.JiangG.DewaeleJ.-M. (2018). Understanding Chinese high school students’ foreign language enjoyment: validation of the Chinese version of the foreign language enjoyment scale. System76, 183–196. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.06.004
47
LiS.WuH.WangY. (2024). Positive emotions, self-regulatory capacity, and EFL performance in the Chinese senior high school context. Acta Psychol.243:104143. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104143
48
LittleT. D.CardN. A.BovairdJ. A.PreacherK. J.CrandallC. S. (2007). “Structural equation modeling of mediation and moderation with contextual factors” in Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies. eds. LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers), 207e230.
49
LiuG. Z.FathiJ.RahimiM. (2024). Using digital gamification to improve language achievement, foreign language enjoyment, and ideal L2 self: a case of English as a foreign language learners. J. Comput. Assist. Learn.40, 1347–1364. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12954
50
MacIntyreP. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach.10, 111–131. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6
51
MacIntyreP. D.CharosC. (2016). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol.15, 3–26. doi: 10.1177/0261927x960151001
52
MacIntyreP. D.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situated model of confidence and affiliation. Mod. Lang. J.82, 545–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
53
MacIntyreP.GregersenT. (2012). “Affect: the role of language anxiety and other emotions in language learning” in Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK), 103–118.
54
MacIntyreP. D.LegattoJ. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Appl. Linguis.32, 149–171. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq037
55
MacIntyreP. D.MercerS. (2014). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach.4, 153–172. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.2
56
MacIntyreP. D.WangL.KhajavyG. H. (2020). Thinking fast and slow about willingness to communicate: A two-systems view. Eur. J. Appl. Linguist.6, 443–458. doi: 10.32601/ejal.834681
57
Maples-KellerJ. L.WilliamsonR. L.SleepC. E.CarterN. T.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2017). Using Item Response Theory to Develop a 60-Item Representation of the NEO PI–R Using the International Personality Item Pool: Development of the IPIP–NEO–60. J. Person. Assessm.101, 4–15. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1381968
58
McAbeeS. T.OswaldF. L. (2013). The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: a Meta-analytic validity competition. Psychol. Assess.25, 532–544. doi: 10.1037/a0031748
59
McCroskeyJ. C.BaerJ. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: the construct and its measurement. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the speech communication association. Denver, CO: ERIC document reproduction service. No. ED265604.
60
MinnighT. L.SandersJ. M.WitherellS. M.CoyleT. R. (2024). Grit as a predictor of academic performance: not much more than conscientiousness. Personal. Individ. Differ.221:112542. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2024.112542
61
NematizadehS.WoodD. (2021). “Second language willingness to communicate as a complex dynamic system” in New perspectives on willingness to communicate in a second language (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 7–23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67634-6_2
62
OzH. (2014). Big five personality traits and willingness to communicate among foreign language learners in Turkey. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J.42, 1473–1482. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.9.1473
63
PavelescuL. M. (2023). Emotion, motivation and willingness to communicate in the language learning experience: a comparative case study of two adult ESOL learners. Lang. Teach. Res.136216882211468. doi: 10.1177/13621688221146884
64
PawlakM.Mystkowska-WiertelakA.BielakJ. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): a micro-perspective. Lang. Teach. Res.20, 654–671. doi: 10.1177/1362168815609615
65
PengJ. E. (2020). “Willing silence and silent willingness to communicate (WTC) in the Chinese EFL classroom: a dynamic systems perspective” in East Asian perspectives on silence in English language education, 143–165.
66
PengJ.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: a model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Lang. Learn.60, 834–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x
67
Piechurska-KucielE. (2018). Openness to experience as a predictor of L2 WTC. System72, 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.01.001
68
Proietti ErgünA. L.Ersöz DemirdağH. (2022). The relation between foreign language enjoyment, subjective well-being, and perceived stress in multilingual students. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev.45, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2022.2057504
69
PrzybyłJ.PawlakM. (2023). Personality as a factor affecting the use of language learning strategies: The case of university students. Cham, Zug, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
70
RobertsB. W.LejuezC.KruegerR. F.RichardsJ. M.HillP. L. (2014). What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed?Dev. Psychol.50, 1315–1330. doi: 10.1037/a0031109
71
RosiekJ.BeghettoR. A. (2009). “Emotional scaffolding: the emotional and imaginative dimensions of teaching and learning” in Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives. eds. SchutzP. A.ZembylasM. (Boston, MA, the United States: Springer), 175–194.
72
SangY.HiverP. (2021). Using a language socialization framework to explore Chinese Students’ L2 Reticence in English language learning. Linguist. Educ.61:100904. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2021.100904
73
ShaoQ.GaoX. (2016). Reticence and willingness to communicate (WTC) of east Asian language learners. System63, 115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.10.001
74
SpielmannJ.YoonH. J. R.AyoubM.ChenY.EcklandN. S.TrautweinU.et al. (2022). An in-depth review of conscientiousness and educational issues. Educ. Psychol. Rev.34, 2745–2781. doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09693-2
75
StewartR. D.MottusR.SeebothA.SotoC. J.JohnsonW. (2022). The finer details? The predictability of life outcomes from big five domains, facets, and nuances. J. Pers.90, 167–182. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12660
76
TsangA.DewaeleJ. M. (2023). The relationships between young FL learners’ classroom emotions (anxiety, boredom, and enjoyment), engagement, and FL proficiency. Appl. Linguist. Rev.15, 2015–2034. doi: 10.1515/applirev-2022-0077
77
WangY.XuW.GuanK.ZhaoJ.WuP. (2024). English teachers’ post-pandemic motivation in Macau’s higher education system. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud.14, 1990–2001. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1407.05
78
WeaverC. (2005). Using the Rasch model to develop a measure of second language learners’ willingness to communicate within a language classroom. J. Appl. Measur.6, 396–415.
79
XuW.ZhangH.SukjairungwattanaP.WangT. (2022). The roles of motivation, anxiety and learning strategies in online Chinese learning among Thai learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Front. Psychol.13:962492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962492
80
XuW.ZhengS. (2022). Personality traits and cyberbullying perpetration among Chinese university students: the moderating role of internet self-efficacy and gender. Front. Psychol.13:779139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779139
81
YuX.MaJ. (2024). Modeling the predictive effect of enjoyment on willingness to communicate in a foreign language: the chain mediating role of growth mindset and grit. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev., 1–18. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2023.2300351
82
YuZ.XuW.SukjairungwattanaP. (2022). A meta-analysis of eight factors influencing MOOC-based learning outcomes across the world. Interact. Learn. Environ.32, 707–726. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2096641
83
ZhangJ.BeckmannN.BeckmannJ. F. (2023). More than meets the ear: individual differences in trait and state willingness to communicate as predictors of language learning performance in a Chinese EFL context. Lang. Teach. Res.27, 593–620. doi: 10.1177/1362168820951931
84
ZhangZ.LiuT.LeeC. B. (2021). Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System98:102478. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102478
85
ZhangQ.SongY.ZhaoC. (2024). Foreign language enjoyment and willingness to communicate: the mediating roles of communication confidence and motivation. System125:103346. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103346
86
ZhongQ. (2013). Understanding Chinese learners’ willingness to communicate in a New Zealand ESL classroom: a multiple case study drawing on the theory of planned behavior. System41, 740–751. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.001
Summary
Keywords
willingness to communicate, foreign language enjoyment, conscientiousness, personality traits, English as a foreign language
Citation
Zhao J, Guan K, Feng Y and Liu Z (2024) The effect of foreign language enjoyment on willingness to communicate among Chinese EFL students: conscientiousness as a mediator. Front. Educ. 9:1473649. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1473649
Received
31 July 2024
Accepted
25 October 2024
Published
13 November 2024
Volume
9 - 2024
Edited by
Priscilla Roberts, University of Saint Joseph, Macao SAR, China
Reviewed by
Musa Nushi, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran
Zhang Lei, Yantai University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Zhao, Guan, Feng and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kaining Guan, kainingg@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.