SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Teacher Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1521473

Framing the Social Dimension of Reflection in Teacher Education Through Grounded Theory and Systematic Review Methodology

Provisionally accepted
Georgia  NatsiouGeorgia Natsiou*Melpomeni  TsitouridouMelpomeni Tsitouridou
  • School of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Although peer reflection activities are a frequent choice in teacher education, inconsistencies emerge in existing literature regarding the impact of peer interaction on reflection, the design of peer reflection activities, and the visibility of the social nature of reflection. Considering those inconsistencies, the present review seeks convergence in conceptualizing the social dimension of reflection. It aims to examine how reflection is presented in relation to social interaction in the introduction of research papers that study peer reflection activities in initial teacher education. Firstly, we employed a systematic review methodology through which ninety-eight (98) relevant research papers were selected. Then we applied the grounded theory literature review method to seek common themes emerging in the documents of the sample. Results indicate sociality as an inherent characteristic of the reflection process substantiated in reflection definitions and social learning theoretical frameworks, and at the same time, as an acquired characteristic -a methodological choice to enhance cognitive and emotional processes of reflection. Findings also indicate that the social dimension of reflection is a fluid characteristic, constantly evolving in alignment with the social turn in learning and technology.

Keywords: Teacher Education, Reflection, Reflective teacher, Peer reflection, social reflection, Collaborative reflection, Systematic review, grounded theory

Received: 01 Nov 2024; Accepted: 12 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Natsiou and Tsitouridou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Georgia Natsiou, School of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.