REVIEW article

Front. Educ.

Sec. STEM Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1575780

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the determinants of academic underachievement in children and adolescentsView all 3 articles

How Hard Did You Try? A Scoping Review of the Literature on Effort investment in math

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, College of Education, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Like most high-level human skills, such as reading or playing the piano, learning math requires thousands of hours of effort. Despite its importance, research on effort in math remains limited. This scoping review examines the literature on effort in math, focusing on individual variables (i.e., sex, age, skills, attitudes) and contextual factors (i.e., teacher involvement, parental support, SES, cultural differences) that influence effort investment in math. It explores how effort contributes to math achievement, predicts gains over time, and mediates the effects of affective factors, showing how positive attitudes enhance performance through increased effort and how lack of effort mediates the negative impact of math anxiety. The review highlights the foundational role of effort in fostering positive attitudes and emotions in math and offers strategies to motivate students to invest effort in math learning.

Keywords: math, effort, Achievement, performance, attitudes, Anxiety

Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nguyen and SUAREZ PELLICIONI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: MACARENA SUAREZ PELLICIONI, Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, College of Education, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.