Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Special Educational Needs

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1581257

This article is part of the Research TopicEducation To Enhance The Inclusion Of All LearnersView all 12 articles

Competency-based interprofessional education enhances collaboration skills in special education and speech-language pathology students

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Towson University, Towson, United States
  • 2Sigma Associates Incorporated, Minneapolis, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

There is growing emphasis on the importance of interprofessional education and practice when supporting autistic students and their families. However, implementation of hands-on interprofessional, collaborative training models are limited in research and practice. This study examined the impact of a hands-on, competency-based interprofessional, supplemental training course (part of a two-year interprofessional training program, 'Project LINC') for special education and speech-language pathology graduate students (n=21). To determine the effectiveness of intentionally designed interprofessional collaborative learning strategies used during the course, this study addressed three main objectives: (1) to evaluate how the course affected students' progress toward meeting the Project LINC competencies; (2) to examine how students implemented collaboration strategies learned during the program; and (3) to identify what students gained from the clinical experience and how it contributed to their ability to collaborate effectively. A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate the impact of a hands-on clinical interprofessional education (IPE) course on students' competencies and collaboration skills through quantitative self-ratings, paired ttests, and effect size calculations, as well as qualitative analysis of students' reflections using reflective thematic analysis. Student survey data, simulation ratings, and written reflections were analyzed by trained coders to identify themes and ensure reliability in understanding students' collaborative development. The study found that students reported significant perceived gains across all Project LINC competencies after completing a hands-on clinical IPE course, with statistically significant improvements on all self-rated items and large effect sizes. In simulated interprofessional meetings, students rated themselves as highly proficient collaborators. Qualitative analysis of student reflections revealed that the course strengthened their collaborative actions, problem-solving skills, use of communication tools, and professional dispositions such as flexibility, empathy, and trustkey traits that helped them overcome real-world barriers to collaboration like scheduling conflicts and build meaningful interprofessional partnerships.Conception of the study (KH, KW, GK, AR), data collection (KH, KW, GK, AR), data analysis and interpretation (KH, KW, GK, AR), drafting the article (KH, KW, GK, AR), critical revision of the article (KH, KW, GK, AR), final approval of the version to be submitted (KH, KW, GK, AR).

Keywords: Competency-based, interprofessional education, interprofessional practice, autism, speech language pathology, Special Education

Received: 21 Feb 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Holman, Wilson, Knollman and Russell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Katherine Cullinan Holman, Towson University, Towson, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.