CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND PEDAGOGY article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1596462

This article is part of the Research TopicAI for Assessment, Testing and Applied MeasurementView all articles

Balancing AI-assisted learning and traditional assessment: The FACT assessment in environmental data science education

Provisionally accepted
  • Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

As artificial intelligence (AI) tools evolve, a growing challenge faced by educators is how to leverage the invaluable AI-assisted learning, while maintaining rigorous assessment. AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Jupyter AI coding assistant, enable students to tackle advanced tasks and real-world applications but risk overreliance, which can diminish cognitive and skill development and complicate assessment design. To address these challenges, the Fundamental, Applied, Conceptual, critical Thinking (FACT) assessment was implemented in an Environmental Data Science course for upper-level undergraduate and graduate students from civil and environmental engineering, and Earth sciences. By balancing traditional and AI-assisted assessments, the FACT assessment includes: (1) Fundamental skills assessment (F) through assignments without AI assistance to build a strong coding foundation, (2) applied project assessment (A) through AIassisted assignments and term projects to engage students in authentic tasks, (3) conceptualunderstanding assessment (C) through a traditional paper-based exam to independently evaluate comprehension; and (4) critical-thinking assessment (T) through complex multi-step case study using AI, to assess critical problem-solving skills. Analysis of student performance shows that both AI tools and AI guidance improved student performance and allowed them to tackle complex tasks and real-world applications versus AI tools alone without guidance. Survey results show that many students found AI tools beneficial for problem solving, yet some students expressed concerns about overreliance. By integrating assessments with and without AI tools, FACT assessment promotes AIassisted learning while maintaining rigorous academic assessment to prepare students for their future careers in the AI era.The FACT assessment framework addresses the challenge of balancing AI-assisted learning with cognitive and skill development in higher education. By integrating foundational, applied, conceptual, and critical-thinking assessments, FACT mitigates over-reliance on AI while enhancing student engagement and performance. The paper offers educators a scalable approach to promote AI-assisted learning while ensuring that students develop critical and independent problem-solving skills. This framework provides a practical approach for integrating AI into education, to support the development of skills for workforce readiness in the AI era.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence in higher education, Environmental data science education, Holistic assessment, assessment design, human-AI co-creation, Critical Thinking, Traditional assessment, Generative AI in Education

Received: 20 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Elshall and Badir. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ahmed S. Elshall, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.