ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Teacher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1601822
This article is part of the Research TopicFostering self-regulated learningView all 18 articles
Professionalizing schools on self-regulated learning: roles, responsibilities and challenges of process coaches
Provisionally accepted- Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The implementation of self-regulated learning (SRL) in primary and secondary schools is complex and requires a sustainable long-term development of the complete school. To support school leaders and their school team to implement SRL, a two-year school-wide professionalization trajectory was designed in collaboration with an in-service teacher professionalization organization. School leaders participated in a professional learning community (PLC) and were guided by process coaches from the in-service teacher professionalization organization. This study focuses on these coaches and more specific on (1) their roles and responsibilities and (2) the challenges they face in guiding SRLfocused professionalization programs. Bi-monthly focus group discussions with the process coaches were executed to gain more insight in their perspectives. In total, nine focus group discussions were organized, and thematic analysis was used to examine the qualitative data collected during these. Four roles for the process coaches could be identified throughout the two-year professionalization trajectory, namely the roles of a coach, an expert, a coordinator, and a learner. In these roles, the process coaches experienced various challenges and tensions. For example, they faced challenges in defining their role as either a content expert or a facilitator of group learning. Furthermore, the results indicate that challenges were also experienced at other levels, such as within the organization of the PLC, dealing with the diversity among participating school leaders, and involving the school team when implementing SRL school-wide.
Keywords: self-regulated learning, School-wide implementation, Professional learning communities, School leaders, process coaches
Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Backers and Van Keer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lies Backers, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.