Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Digital Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1602151

This article is part of the Research TopicTeaching and Assessing with AI: Teaching Ideas, Research, and ReflectionsView all 14 articles

AI as a Creative Partner: A PRISMA Review of AI's Role in Supporting Creativity in Education

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
  • 2Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Creativity is considered an important competency for personal and professional development in the current society. With the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, there is increasing interest in understanding how AI can support the creative process and how its usage in various contexts might affect user agency. Nevertheless, the specific role of AI in the support to the creative process is not clearly identified in the literature. To address this gap, a comprehensive PRISMA review of the existing research explored the different contexts and use cases for AI in support of creativity, identifying 20 articles from the ScienceDirect database after a systematic review of 111 research papers. The 20 selected papers identified 5 primary use cases for AI in support of creativity in educational settings including academic achievement, chatbots, diagnostics and evaluation, and literature reviews and frameworks. Of these use cases, the most common applications of AI tend to occupy a more passive role where it supports brainstorming, creative writing, and adaptive learning systems. In these instances, user agency is considered high as the user is actively leading the process. In situations where AI functions as a co-collaborator, human agency is reduced as AI takes on a more substantial role in the creative process. Domain and context also play a role in how AI is currently supporting creativity in educational settings.Generic domains support divergent thinking while more specific domains may reduce creative possibilities, but provide more structured support in the creative process.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, Education, creativity, Creative Process, Chatbots, divergent thinking

Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Urmeneta and Romero. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Alex Urmeneta, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
Margarida Romero, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.