Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Digital Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1640780

This article is part of the Research TopicGenerative AI Tools in Education and its Governance: Problems and SolutionsView all 13 articles

From Principles to Practice: A Novel Matrix for Evaluating AI-powered Learning Platforms Based on the UNESCO Ethical Impact Assessment Tool

Provisionally accepted
  • Cambridge Corporate University, Lucerne, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, yet practical tools for appraising the ethical and pedagogical readiness of AI platforms, especially in culturally specific contexts, remain scarce. This paper operationalizes UNESCO's Ethical Impact Assessment (EIA) Tool by introducing the Gulf-AI Education Tool Evaluation Matrix (G-AIETM), a five-domain, 18-indicator framework that integrates ethical governance, pedagogical effectiveness, technical transparency/safety, cultural-linguistic relevance, and implementation capacity. The matrix is grounded in constructivism, cognitive load theory, universal design for learning, teacher autonomy, inclusivity, and equity, justifying the pedagogical and explainability indicators. We articulate transparent scoring thresholds and apply the matrix to seven widely used AI-enabled learning platforms. Using publicly available documentation, hands-on exploration, and educator-facing affordances as evidence, we rate each platform and compile a cross-platform table that surfaces strengths, gaps, and context-specific risks. Without reporting detailed percentages, the analysis indicates one platform is suitable for near-term adoption with minor localization; most others require significant adaptation in Arabic language support, curriculum alignment, explainability for teacher oversight, data residency, and consent workflows. We provide a phased implementation pathway covering localization, professional learning, curriculum mapping, governance controls, and monitoring. To strengthen credibility, we outline a prospective validation plan (inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, factor structure, and sensitivity to alternative weightings) to be executed in pilot deployments. Our contribution is a replicable, policy-informed method that bridges global ethics principles and local educational priorities, enabling procurement teams, school leaders, and regulators in Qatar and comparable systems to make defensible, learner-centred decisions about AI adoption while minimizing risk and maximizing pedagogical value.

Keywords: AI, Adoption, Artificial intelligence in education, UNESCO Ethical Impact Assessment, Evaluation matrix, AI Tool Evaluation, Educational technology ethics

Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Isaifan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rima Isaifan, Cambridge Corporate University, Lucerne, Switzerland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.